Conlang Mailing List -- May 2010, week 1

Conlang Mailing List – May 2010, week 1

Sort by

Author | Date | Topic
Chronologically | Most recent first

Options

Show author | Hide author
Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation

Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives

"Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages"
- "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (27 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (73 lines)
  From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (38 lines)
  From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (58 lines)
  From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (71 lines)
  From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (66 lines)
  From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (100 lines)
  From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (35 lines)
  From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (57 lines)
  From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (72 lines)
  From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (49 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (48 lines)
  From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (76 lines)
  From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (81 lines)
  From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages" (31 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
A bit of nostalgia...
- A bit of nostalgia... (61 lines)
  From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (42 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (43 lines)
  From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (55 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (40 lines)
  From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (65 lines)
  From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (47 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (87 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (93 lines)
  From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (48 lines)
  From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (60 lines)
  From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (75 lines)
  From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (43 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (61 lines)
  From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (32 lines)
  From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (40 lines)
  From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: A bit of nostalgia... (61 lines)
  From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?
- Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (178 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (68 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (93 lines)
  From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (66 lines)
  From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (69 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (64 lines)
  From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (132 lines)
  From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really? (408 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Choose your own career in linguistics!
- Choose your own career in linguistics! (23 lines)
  From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Choose your own career in linguistics! (38 lines)
  From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
Concivil planning
- Re: Concivil planning (25 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
Conlang list archive
- Conlang list archive (31 lines)
  From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conlang list archive (37 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
diachronic honorifics
- diachronic honorifics (39 lines)
  From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: diachronic honorifics (60 lines)
  From: Andrew Quïnn <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: diachronic honorifics (84 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: diachronic honorifics (85 lines)
  From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: diachronic honorifics (84 lines)
  From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: diachronic honorifics (57 lines)
  From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: diachronic honorifics (51 lines)
  From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: diachronic honorifics (50 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: diachronic honorifics (48 lines)
  From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: diachronic honorifics (42 lines)
  From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: diachronic honorifics (29 lines)
  From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages
- Re: Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages (42 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages (42 lines)
  From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
Ergative-marked agreement markers?
- Re: Ergative-marked agreement markers? (77 lines)
  From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Ergative-marked agreement markers? (46 lines)
  From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Ergative-marked agreement markers? (124 lines)
  From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
gjâ-zym-byn site update and captioned pictures
- gjâ-zym-byn site update and captioned pictures (43 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
Golden line in conlangs
- Golden line in conlangs (31 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Grammar Nazis
- Grammar Nazis (23 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Grammar Nazis (30 lines)
  From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Grammar Nazis (38 lines)
  From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Grammar Nazis (34 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Grammar Nazis (34 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
I'm back!
- Re: I'm back! (42 lines)
  From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>
Linguistic Obituary
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (40 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (39 lines)
  From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (45 lines)
  From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (59 lines)
  From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (32 lines)
  From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (43 lines)
  From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (51 lines)
  From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (54 lines)
  From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (51 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (62 lines)
  From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (38 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (60 lines)
  From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (55 lines)
  From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (42 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Linguistic Obituary (41 lines)
  From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
Ludmila
- Ludmila (23 lines)
  From: Charlie Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Ludmila (42 lines)
  From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Ludmila (70 lines)
  From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Ludmila (52 lines)
  From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
Morphosyntactic allignment oddity
- Re: Morphosyntactic allignment oddity (120 lines)
  From: Maxime Papillon <[log in to unmask]>
Most recognised contemporary conlangs
- Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (42 lines)
  From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs (39 lines)
  From: John Q <[log in to unmask]>
Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology
- Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (152 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (231 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (74 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (89 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (252 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology (62 lines)
  From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
OT & YAEPT : Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!!
- OT & YAEPT : Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (50 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!!
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (59 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (42 lines)
  From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (75 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (59 lines)
  From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (57 lines)
  From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (50 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (52 lines)
  From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (53 lines)
  From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (60 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (97 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (43 lines)
  From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (56 lines)
  From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (49 lines)
  From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!! (61 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Relaxing noun classes
- Relaxing noun classes (46 lines)
  From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (101 lines)
  From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (39 lines)
  From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (46 lines)
  From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (53 lines)
  From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (54 lines)
  From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (68 lines)
  From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (46 lines)
  From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (59 lines)
  From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (67 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (54 lines)
  From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (46 lines)
  From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (24 lines)
  From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (56 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Relaxing noun classes (49 lines)
  From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
Rick Harrison book giveaway
- Rick Harrison book giveaway (23 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
Round Robins
- Round Robins (38 lines)
  From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Round Robins (39 lines)
  From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Round Robins (69 lines)
  From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Round Robins (44 lines)
  From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
susan day
- Re: susan day (49 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
The golden line in conlangs
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (55 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (250 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (45 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (93 lines)
  From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (106 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (78 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (30 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (180 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (56 lines)
  From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (76 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (84 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (99 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (59 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (104 lines)
  From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (52 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (78 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (86 lines)
  From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (78 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (92 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (135 lines)
  From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (106 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (50 lines)
  From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (153 lines)
  From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (106 lines)
  From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (75 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (92 lines)
  From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (37 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (48 lines)
  From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? )
- The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (93 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (92 lines)
  From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (83 lines)
  From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (56 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (102 lines)
  From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (61 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (64 lines)
  From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (59 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (68 lines)
  From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (56 lines)
  From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? ) (67 lines)
  From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>

Back to the main CONLANG page

LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU