Conlang
Mailing List – May 2010, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Arabic loanwords in European languages
(5 messages)
Call for Papers: Fiat Lingua, the Journal of the Language Creation Society
Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(16 messages)
CONLANG: Help
Latin -que clitic
(9 messages)
LCS is now on Twitter
Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(22 messages)
OT: Rock Band type vocal app for PC/OSX
(2 messages)
OT: translator fun
(5 messages)
OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!!
physical exercise
(3 messages)
Quickfire conlanging
(14 messages)
Revision of TAKE pronouns
(12 messages)
Semantomissiliar discs (was: Semi-OT: Dream)
(2 messages)
Semi-OT: Dream
(4 messages)
TECH: Re: Ukelele again
(6 messages)
TECH: Web Hosting
(18 messages)
Terminology question
(22 messages)
Ukelele again
Universal-bending engelangs
(9 messages)
Voynich-like manuscript
(4 messages)
Arabic loanwords in European languages
Arabic loanwords in European languages
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic loanwords in European languages
(89 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic loanwords in European languages
(55 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic loanwords in European languages
(44 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic loanwords in European languages
(42 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Call for Papers: Fiat Lingua, the Journal of the Language Creation Society
Call for Papers: Fiat Lingua, the Journal of the Language Creation Society
(112 lines)
From:
Language Creation Society <
[log in to unmask]
>
Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(90 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(57 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(35 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(84 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(71 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(170 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(211 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(60 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(118 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(66 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(71 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(33 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(45 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(42 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(104 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
(143 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG: Help
CONLANG: Help
(22 lines)
From:
Lensman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Latin -que clitic
Re: Latin -que clitic
(46 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(65 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(36 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(85 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(62 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(91 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(63 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(116 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latin -que clitic
(91 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
LCS is now on Twitter
LCS is now on Twitter
(30 lines)
From:
Language Creation Society <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(35 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(122 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(35 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(77 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(52 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(67 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(41 lines)
From:
Louie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(58 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(86 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(125 lines)
From:
Louie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(50 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(54 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(67 lines)
From:
Louie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(67 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(79 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(79 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(52 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(73 lines)
From:
David Edwards <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(54 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
(55 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Rock Band type vocal app for PC/OSX
OT: Rock Band type vocal app for PC/OSX
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Rock Band type vocal app for PC/OSX
(66 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: translator fun
Re: OT: translator fun
(62 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: translator fun
(65 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: translator fun
(90 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: translator fun
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: translator fun
(50 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!!
Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!!
(79 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
physical exercise
physical exercise
(59 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: physical exercise
(67 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: physical exercise
(45 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Quickfire conlanging
Quickfire conlanging
(37 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(50 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(52 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(53 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(50 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(32 lines)
From:
Dan Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(70 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(50 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(61 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(44 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(44 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(68 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(100 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quickfire conlanging
(70 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Revision of TAKE pronouns
Revision of TAKE pronouns
(59 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revision of TAKE pronouns
(61 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revision of TAKE pronouns
(83 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revision of TAKE pronouns
(67 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revision of TAKE pronouns
(70 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revision of TAKE pronouns
(56 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revision of TAKE pronouns
(68 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revision of TAKE pronouns
(63 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revision of TAKE pronouns
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revision of TAKE pronouns
(61 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revision of TAKE pronouns
(88 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Revision of TAKE pronouns
(130 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Semantomissiliar discs (was: Semi-OT: Dream)
Semantomissiliar discs (was: Semi-OT: Dream)
(44 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semantomissiliar discs (was: Semi-OT: Dream)
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Semi-OT: Dream
Semi-OT: Dream
(59 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semi-OT: Dream
(96 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semi-OT: Dream
(61 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semi-OT: Dream
(64 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Re: Ukelele again
TECH: Re: Ukelele again
(42 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Re: Ukelele again
(58 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Re: Ukelele again
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Re: Ukelele again
(79 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Re: Ukelele again
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Re: Ukelele again
(46 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Web Hosting
TECH: Web Hosting
(37 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(48 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(27 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(35 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(61 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(36 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(26 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(47 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(28 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(46 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(39 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(39 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(37 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(46 lines)
From:
David Edwards <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web Hosting
(37 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Terminology question
Terminology question
(47 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(93 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(52 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(65 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(51 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(54 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(126 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(82 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(53 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(118 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(219 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(447 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(52 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(74 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(83 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(46 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(41 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(50 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(48 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(51 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology question
(50 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ukelele again
Ukelele again
(32 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Universal-bending engelangs
Universal-bending engelangs
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Universal-bending engelangs
(33 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Universal-bending engelangs
(50 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Universal-bending engelangs
(43 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Universal-bending engelangs
(55 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Universal-bending engelangs
(75 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Universal-bending engelangs
(77 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Universal-bending engelangs
(50 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Universal-bending engelangs
(52 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Voynich-like manuscript
Re: Voynich-like manuscript
(48 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Voynich-like manuscript
(65 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Voynich-like manuscript
(41 lines)
From:
Daniel Demski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Voynich-like manuscript
(44 lines)
From:
Sal Armoniac <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – May 2010, week 3
Conlang Mailing List – May 2010, week 3
