Conlang Mailing List – May 2010, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• <No subject> (6 messages)
• A modest spelling reform (20 messages)
• An article on alien languages (5 messages)
• Ciao for now!
• Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
• ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy> (11 messages)
• Date and time on Cindu (7 messages)
• Etymology of "Herzog" (8 messages)
• FrathWiki relay 17 pages for Alurhsa and Tariatta
• Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech) (8 messages)
• LoCoWriMo 2010 (13 messages)
• LoCoWriMo brainstorming (7 messages)
• META: Conlang-L FAQ
• New Moro Data
• nternally headed relative clauses (6 messages)
• OT : mte a word? (9 messages)
• OT: translator fun (5 messages)
• Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (16 messages)
• Quickfire conlanging (2 messages)
• Semantic field maps: kinship systems (9 messages)
• Sound symbolism (7 messages)
• Spam translation (was: no subject)
• Tatoeba Project
• Voynich-like manuscript (6 messages)

1. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (56 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 20:45:48 -0400
   • <No subject> (50 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 20:46:10 +0100
   • <No subject> (40 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 20:57:01 +0200
   • <No subject> (36 lines)
     From: Parker Glynn-Adey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 22:21:12 +0400
   • <No subject> (35 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 19:01:41 +0200
   • <No subject> (23 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 00:59:05 +0800

2. A modest spelling reform
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (74 lines)
     From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 17:19:49 +0000
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (49 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 08:10:48 +0100
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (56 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 08:03:42 +0100
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (35 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 22:00:19 -0400
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (46 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 20:08:32 -0400
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (86 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 18:08:08 +0100
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (46 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:06:29 +0100
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (89 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:39:16 +0200
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (49 lines)
     From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 08:31:35 -0700
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (35 lines)
     From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 10:15:05 -0500
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (44 lines)
     From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 02:54:08 -0500
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (54 lines)
     From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 03:02:10 -0500
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (29 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 01:46:12 -0400
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (114 lines)
     From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 21:18:33 -0700
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (110 lines)
     From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 21:06:07 -0700
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (90 lines)
     From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 18:22:58 -0500
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (89 lines)
     From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:14:07 -0500
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (68 lines)
     From: Lensman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 16:53:08 -0500
   • Re: A modest spelling reform (57 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 14:39:23 -0700
   • A modest spelling reform (199 lines)
     From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 13:22:13 -0700

3. An article on alien languages
   • Re: An article on alien languages (50 lines)
     From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:49:54 -0700
   • Re: An article on alien languages (53 lines)
     From: Jeffrey S. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 01:14:43 -0400
   • Re: An article on alien languages (51 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 20:43:27 -0400
   • Re: An article on alien languages (40 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:24:05 +0200
   • An article on alien languages (28 lines)
     From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:23:54 -0700

4. Ciao for now!
   • Ciao for now! (40 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 07:27:09 +0100

5. Coexistence of participles and relative clauses
   • Re: Coexistence of participles and relative clauses (72 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 02:29:33 +0200

6. ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy>
   • Re: ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy> (35 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:26:35 -0400
   • Re: ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy> (60 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 13:23:15 -0700
   • Re: ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy> (48 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:18:17 -0400
   • Re: ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy> (65 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:21:09 -0700
   • Re: ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy> (42 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:37:20 -0400
   • Re: ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy> (154 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 03:31:38 -0400
   • Re: ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy> (224 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 01:53:24 -0400
   • Re: ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy> (99 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 21:17:55 -0700
   • Re: ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy> (81 lines)
     From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 20:57:58 -0700
   • Re: ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy> (298 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 22:37:55 -0400
   • ConLang Software <somewhat lengthy> (231 lines)
     From: Dave Babb <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:16:02 -0600

7. Date and time on Cindu
   • Re: Date and time on Cindu (104 lines)
     From: Louie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 18:57:24 -0400
   • Re: Date and time on Cindu (95 lines)
     From: Louie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 18:53:52 -0400
   • Re: Date and time on Cindu (83 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 22:45:13 +0100
   • Re: Date and time on Cindu (71 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 12:55:37 -0700
   • Re: Date and time on Cindu (42 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 19:08:53 +0200
   • Re: Date and time on Cindu (47 lines)
     From: Louie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 12:01:15 -0400
   • Date and time on Cindu (40 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 08:57:54 -0700

8. Etymology of "Herzog"
   • Re: Etymology of "Herzog" (119 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 19:18:02 -0400
   • Re: Etymology of "Herzog" (37 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:09:39 -0500
   • Re: Etymology of "Herzog" (125 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:43:07 +0100
   • Re: Etymology of "Herzog" (60 lines)
     From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 16:54:25 -0400
   • Re: Etymology of "Herzog" (53 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:29:59 +0200
   • Re: Etymology of "Herzog" (64 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:24:39 +0200
   • Re: Etymology of "Herzog" (56 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 13:20:09 -0700
   • Etymology of "Herzog" (29 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 20:52:12 +0100

9. FrathWiki relay 17 pages for Alurhsa and Tariatta
   • FrathWiki relay 17 pages for Alurhsa and Tariatta (35 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 22:27:23 -0400

10. Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech)
    • Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech) (103 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 12:56:18 +0200
    • Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech) (49 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 16:37:46 -0400
    • Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech) (55 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 13:35:42 -0700
    • Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech) (32 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 16:32:13 -0400
    • Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech) (37 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 10:24:26 -0500
    • Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech) (70 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 21:58:19 -0700
    • Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech) (57 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 15:07:48 -0400
    • Re: Lexical categories (aka, parts of speech) (64 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 11:33:52 -0000

11. LoCoWriMo 2010
    • Re: LoCoWriMo 2010 (94 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 04:42:45 +0200
    • Re: LoCoWriMo 2010 (45 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 12:23:14 -0400
    • Re: LoCoWriMo 2010 (34 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 12:19:09 -0400
    • Re: LoCoWriMo 2010 (59 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 09:17:07 -0700
    • Re: LoCoWriMo 2010 (44 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:14:43 -0500
    • Re: LoCoWriMo 2010 (40 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 12:04:36 -0400
    • Re: LoCoWriMo 2010 (43 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:36:39 +0200
    • Re: LoCoWriMo 2010 (50 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 06:12:00 -0700
    • Re: LoCoWriMo 2010 (41 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:47:51 +0200
    • Re: LoCoWriMo 2010 (72 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 21:26:23 -0400
    • Re: LoCoWriMo 2010 (61 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 18:22:36 -0700
    • Re: LoCoWriMo 2010 (47 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 19:08:57 -0500
    • LoCoWriMo 2010 (37 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 16:41:05 -0700

12. LoCoWriMo brainstorming
    • Re: LoCoWriMo brainstorming (46 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 09:41:15 -0700
    • Re: LoCoWriMo brainstorming (144 lines)
      From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:11:35 -0500
    • Re: LoCoWriMo brainstorming (122 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 08:24:05 -0700
    • Re: LoCoWriMo brainstorming (76 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 14:04:39 +0100
    • Re: LoCoWriMo brainstorming (60 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 06:39:04 -0400
    • Re: LoCoWriMo brainstorming (48 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 19:06:10 +1000
    • LoCoWriMo brainstorming (45 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 09:50:13 +0100

13. META: Conlang-L FAQ
    • META: Conlang-L FAQ (290 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 18:33:05 -0700

14. New Moro Data
    • New Moro Data (114 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 15:58:19 -0700

15. nternally headed relative clauses
    • Re: nternally headed relative clauses (34 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:03:17 -0500
    • Re: nternally headed relative clauses (61 lines)
      From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 08:02:09 -0400
    • Re: nternally headed relative clauses (39 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 00:22:08 -0400
    • Re: nternally headed relative clauses (39 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 20:40:24 -0500
    • Re: nternally headed relative clauses (46 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 21:34:19 -0400
    • nternally headed relative clauses (109 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 20:11:06 -0500

16. OT : mte a word?
    • Re: OT : mte a word? (55 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 08:14:57 -0600
    • Re: OT : mte a word? (44 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 01:54:36 -0700
    • Re: OT : mte a word? (85 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 07:23:57 +0100
    • Re: OT : mte a word? (100 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 22:39:01 -0600
    • Re: OT : mte a word? (80 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:18:43 -0500
    • Re: OT : mte a word? (71 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:23:25 -0600
    • Re: OT : mte a word? (44 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:37:12 -0500
    • Re: OT : mte a word? (37 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:26:23 -0600
    • OT : mte a word? (29 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:49:43 -0500

17. OT: translator fun
    • Re: OT: translator fun (41 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:40:04 -0400
    • Re: OT: translator fun (171 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:49:25 +0100
    • Re: OT: translator fun (172 lines)
      From: Louie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:44:51 -0400
    • Re: OT: translator fun (325 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:44:25 -0400
    • Re: OT: translator fun (132 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:39:49 -0400

18. Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript]
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (69 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 23:19:06 -0700
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (59 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 22:54:01 +1200
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (89 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 23:25:21 -0400
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (87 lines)
      From: Jen Runds <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:38:50 +1000
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (80 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:10:44 -0700
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (41 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:06:07 -0700
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (55 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:13:28 -0700
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (41 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:20:35 -0400
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (73 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:43:10 -0700
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (43 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:52:46 -0400
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (62 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 08:38:34 -0700
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (46 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 01:37:51 -0400
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (75 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 23:40:15 -0400
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (64 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:54:05 -0700
    • Re: Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (77 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 19:16:45 -0400
    • Putting the CON back in Conlang [WAS: Re: Voynich-like manuscript] (66 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 15:26:16 -0700

19. Quickfire conlanging
    • Re: Quickfire conlanging (88 lines)
      From: Louie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:56:55 -0400
    • Re: Quickfire conlanging (79 lines)
      From: John Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 20:32:40 -0300

20. Semantic field maps: kinship systems
    • Semantic field maps: kinship systems (94 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 22:08:10 -0400
    • Re: Semantic field maps: kinship systems (83 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:50:12 -0600
    • Re: Semantic field maps: kinship systems (68 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 14:37:01 -0500
    • Re: Semantic field maps: kinship systems (58 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 21:47:56 +0200
    • Re: Semantic field maps: kinship systems (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 08:30:52 +0200
    • Re: Semantic field maps: kinship systems (36 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 17:36:32 -0400
    • Re: Semantic field maps: kinship systems (123 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 16:02:51 -0500
    • Re: Semantic field maps: kinship systems (105 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 13:54:38 -0400
    • Semantic field maps: kinship systems (100 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:11:39 -0400

21. Sound symbolism
    • Re: Sound symbolism (60 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 18:45:32 +0000
    • Re: Sound symbolism (53 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:12:48 +0100
    • Re: Sound symbolism (45 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:39:42 -0500
    • Re: Sound symbolism (86 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 16:14:30 +0100
    • Re: Sound symbolism (80 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:56:39 +0100
    • Re: Sound symbolism (64 lines)
      From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 04:36:32 -0500
    • Sound symbolism (50 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:35:01 +0100

22. Spam translation (was: no subject)
    • Re: Spam translation (was: no subject) (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 14:42:32 -0700

23. Tatoeba Project
    • Tatoeba Project (44 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 08:23:02 -0700

24. Voynich-like manuscript
    • Re: Voynich-like manuscript (80 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 19:34:56 -0700
    • Re: Voynich-like manuscript (67 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 18:46:11 -0500
    • Re: Voynich-like manuscript (61 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 18:41:02 +0000
    • Re: Voynich-like manuscript (53 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 19:51:48 +0200
    • Re: Voynich-like manuscript (59 lines)
      From: Sal Armoniac <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:03:12 -0500
    • Re: Voynich-like manuscript (52 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:05:36 +0100