Conlang
Mailing List June 2010, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
¡glaði midjar festë!
(3 messages)
'Yemls Vocabulary
CHAT: CALS stats
Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(16 messages)
ETYM: wyraz
ETYM: wyrdaz
(4 messages)
Just for fun: A syllabary font
Lexical gaps (was: Re: USAGE: poad)
(6 messages)
META: The NCNC 'rule'
OT : atheism
OT: English Language and Usage invites for StackExchange 2.0
P2 first sentence
(2 messages)
Pseudo-Italian gibberish
Quasi-Polynesian
(4 messages)
Typical noun class systems?
(12 messages)
USAGE: poad
(6 messages)
Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(70 messages)
¡glaði midjar festë!
¡glaði midjar festë!
(33 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ¡glaði midjar festë!
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ¡glaði midjar festë!
(42 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
'Yemls Vocabulary
'Yemls Vocabulary
(32 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: CALS stats
CHAT: CALS stats
(24 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(57 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(43 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(51 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(66 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(92 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(38 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(73 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(55 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(65 lines)
From:
Louie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(62 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(73 lines)
From:
Louie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(86 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(59 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-culture/religion etc.--longish (was OT : atheism)
(50 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
ETYM: wyraz
Re: ETYM: wyraz
(54 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
ETYM: wyrdaz
ETYM: wyrdaz
(39 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ETYM: wyrdaz
(30 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ETYM: wyrdaz
(40 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ETYM: wyrdaz
(51 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Just for fun: A syllabary font
Re: Just for fun: A syllabary font
(59 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lexical gaps (was: Re: USAGE: poad)
Lexical gaps (was: Re: USAGE: poad)
(67 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical gaps (was: Re: USAGE: poad)
(31 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical gaps (was: Re: USAGE: poad)
(57 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical gaps (was: Re: USAGE: poad)
(37 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical gaps (was: Re: USAGE: poad)
(83 lines)
From:
Toms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lexical gaps (was: Re: USAGE: poad)
(54 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: The NCNC 'rule'
Re: META: The NCNC 'rule'
(36 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT : atheism
Re: OT : atheism
(55 lines)
From:
Kelvin Jackson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: English Language and Usage invites for StackExchange 2.0
OT: English Language and Usage invites for StackExchange 2.0
(56 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
P2 first sentence
P2 first sentence
(36 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: P2 first sentence
(55 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pseudo-Italian gibberish
Re: Pseudo-Italian gibberish
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Quasi-Polynesian
Quasi-Polynesian
(49 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quasi-Polynesian
(56 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quasi-Polynesian
(34 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quasi-Polynesian
(33 lines)
From:
Jen Runds <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typical noun class systems?
Re: Typical noun class systems?
(47 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typical noun class systems?
(62 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typical noun class systems?
(54 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typical noun class systems?
(41 lines)
From:
Parker Glynn-Adey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typical noun class systems?
(63 lines)
From:
Louie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typical noun class systems?
(39 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typical noun class systems?
(31 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typical noun class systems?
(80 lines)
From:
David Edwards <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typical noun class systems?
(106 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typical noun class systems?
(157 lines)
From:
David Edwards <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typical noun class systems?
(44 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typical noun class systems?
(53 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: poad
USAGE: poad
(22 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: poad
(31 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: poad
(34 lines)
From:
Jeffrey S. Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: poad
(50 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: poad
(71 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: poad
(75 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(31 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(41 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(32 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(51 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(47 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(113 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(122 lines)
From:
Patrick Michael Niedzielski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(129 lines)
From:
Jen Runds <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(135 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(70 lines)
From:
Patrick Michael Niedzielski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(84 lines)
From:
Jen Runds <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(104 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(95 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(58 lines)
From:
Patrick Michael Niedzielski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(72 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(84 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(107 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(102 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(180 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(55 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(46 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(54 lines)
From:
Patrick Michael Niedzielski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(95 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(145 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(57 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(107 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(70 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(117 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(50 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(49 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(76 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(112 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(87 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(126 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(30 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(68 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(67 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(38 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(29 lines)
From:
John Q <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(71 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(40 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(68 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(53 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(25 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(82 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(89 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(96 lines)
From:
Louie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(52 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(50 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(68 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(41 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(76 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(85 lines)
From:
Jen Runds <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(63 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(141 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(54 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(67 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(34 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(49 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(50 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(55 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(86 lines)
From:
Patrick Michael Niedzielski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(73 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(23 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(54 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(41 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(48 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why do so many crackpots go for "crypto"?
(28 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU