Conlang Mailing List – July 2010, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show contributor list | Hide contributor list

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

List of contributors:

• <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
• Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Andrew Quïnn <[log in to unmask]>
• Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
• Bruno Barcelos <[log in to unmask]>
• caol_kailash <[log in to unmask]>
• Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
• Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
• Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Dale McCreery <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
• David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
• David Peterson <[log in to unmask]> (7 messages)
• Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
• Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
• Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]> (9 messages)
• Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
• J. Burke <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
• Jeffrey S. Jones <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]> (10 messages)
• John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
• John Q <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Joseph Jarrell <[log in to unmask]>
• Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]> (9 messages)
• Lee <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Maxime Papillon <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]> (12 messages)
• Nathan Schulzke <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Nika Mirovak <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Patrick Michael Niedzielski <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
• Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• R A Brown <[log in to unmask]> (8 messages)
• Rebecca Bettencourt <[log in to unmask]>
• Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Ronald Craig <[log in to unmask]>
• Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
• Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
• Veoler <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)

1. <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: introducing a new conlang (45 lines)
     Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:25:30 -0400
   • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (41 lines)
     Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:27:19 -0400

2. Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (38 lines)
     Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:05:18 -0500
   • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (103 lines)
     Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:48:33 -0500
   • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (53 lines)
     Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 10:02:11 -0500

3. Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Last chance for LCC1/2 programs & handouts (28 lines)
     Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:39:33 -0400

4. Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (63 lines)
     Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:06:28 +0200
   • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (36 lines)
     Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:07:26 +0200
   • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (67 lines)
     Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:13:32 +0200

5. Andrew Quïnn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (52 lines)
     Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 00:17:47 -0400

6. Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Stephen Fry on language (35 lines)
     Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:15:41 +1000

7. Bruno Barcelos <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: NO SUBJECT (25 lines)
     Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:05:16 -0300

8. caol_kailash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: THEORY: Some evidence to Sapir-Whorf? Does language influence bias? (77 lines)
     Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:23:31 -0000

9. Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Deictic Thingumies (52 lines)
     Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:49:43 -0000

10. Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
    • Bible-era language decoded by computer (33 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:50:48 -0500

11. Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: E1 Writing System (63 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:35:45 +0200
    • Re: E1 Writing System (79 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:33:01 +0200
    • Re: Stephen Fry on language (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:01:41 +0200
    • Re: Stephen Fry on language (48 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:19:16 +0200
    • Re: Verbs and time, etc. (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:43:55 +0200

12. Dale McCreery <[log in to unmask]>
    • introducing a new conlang (132 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:06:35 -0700
    • Re: introducing a new conlang (67 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:36:39 -0400

13. Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (64 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:35:53 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (111 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:23:25 -0400

14. Daniel Demski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deictic Thingumies (59 lines)
      Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:52:13 -0400
    • Re: Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (62 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:32:09 -0400

15. Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (94 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:50:15 +0200

16. David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (54 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:50:32 +0100

17. David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I Have Returned from Kalmykia (61 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:06:07 -0700
    • Re: introducing a new conlang (67 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:13:30 -0700
    • Re: Last chance for LCC1/2 programs & handouts (50 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:44:55 -0700
    • Re: Last chance for LCC1/2 programs & handouts (48 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:45:23 -0700
    • Proto/Modern Language Documentation (48 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:35:03 -0700
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (78 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:34:03 -0700
    • Re: Stephen Fry on language (54 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:40:23 -0700

18. Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: translations for artwork (52 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:56:08 +0000
    • Re: CHAT: translations for artwork (61 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:58:11 +0000
    • Re: Deictic Thingumies (57 lines)
      Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:58:34 +0000

19. Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Last chance for LCC1/2 programs & handouts (45 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:30:45 -0500

20. Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (44 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:11:00 +0100

21. Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bible-era language decoded by computer (68 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:58:54 -0700
    • Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (32 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 10:57:10 -0700
    • Re: Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (62 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:13:37 -0700
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (57 lines)
      Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:33:44 -0700
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (47 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:26:07 -0700
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (27 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:20:20 -0700
    • OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (32 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:06:45 -0700
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (57 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:00:24 -0700
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (86 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:46:36 -0700

22. Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: E1 Writing System (55 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:15:21 +0200
    • OT: "jihad against Microsoft" (was: E1 Writing System) (66 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:17:59 +0200
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (41 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:40:35 +0200
    • Re: THEORY: Some evidence to Sapir-Whorf? Does language influence bias? (68 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:04:49 +0200

23. J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (40 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 16:23:35 -0400

24. J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: introducing a new conlang (203 lines)
      Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:03:17 -0700
    • Re: introducing a new conlang (39 lines)
      Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:05:50 -0700
    • Re: introducing a new conlang (83 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:36:09 -0700

25. Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (42 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:49:24 -0500

26. Jeffrey S. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (41 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 05:39:55 -0400
    • E1 Writing System (30 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:34:59 -0400
    • Re: E1 Writing System (54 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:42:36 -0400
    • Re: E1 Writing System (70 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:08:11 -0400
    • NO SUBJECT (26 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:32:20 -0400

27. Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deictic Thingumies (56 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:03:42 -0400
    • OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (51 lines)
      Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:59:16 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (86 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:52:22 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (36 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:31:04 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (45 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:53:35 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (46 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 10:22:45 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (39 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:23:34 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (48 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:02:38 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (46 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:10:04 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Some evidence to Sapir-Whorf? Does language influence bias? (67 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:32:21 -0400

28. John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
    • CHAT: translations for artwork (68 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:06:05 +0200

29. John Q <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: I Have Returned from Kalmykia (24 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:51:44 -0400
    • Re: I Have Returned from Kalmykia (190 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:05:36 -0400

30. Joseph Jarrell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (28 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:53:33 -0500

31. Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: (Im)perfective and Progressive aspects (55 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:17:00 +0200
    • Re: CHAT: translations for artwork (42 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:11:07 +0200
    • Re: I Have Returned from Kalmykia (98 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:58:47 +0200
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (61 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:06:37 +0200
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (43 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 16:41:41 +0200
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (58 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:44:00 +0200
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (54 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:59:29 +0200
    • The Urianian verb. (47 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:52:03 +0200
    • Re: The Urianian verb. (71 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:37:45 +0200

32. Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: E1 Writing System (46 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 07:25:43 -0700
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (69 lines)
      Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 20:32:02 -0700
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (33 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:02:55 -0700
    • Re: Stephen Fry on language (64 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 07:37:27 -0700
    • Re: Stephen Fry on language (67 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:30:29 -0700
    • Verbs and time, etc. (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:00:42 -0700

33. Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: introducing a new conlang (32 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:45:38 -0500
    • Re: introducing a new conlang (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:31:33 -0500
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (34 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:45:04 -0500
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (122 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:58:08 -0500

34. Maxime Papillon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (81 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:23:14 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Some evidence to Sapir-Whorf? Does language influence bias? (145 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:21:25 -0400

35. MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deictic Thingumies (49 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:01:43 -0400
    • Re: Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (47 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:05:08 -0400
    • Re: Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (56 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:07:21 -0400
    • Re: Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (66 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:12:51 -0400
    • Re: Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (53 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:14:04 -0400
    • Re: Last chance for LCC1/2 programs & handouts (61 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:41:09 -0400
    • Re: Last chance for LCC1/2 programs & handouts (92 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:11:06 -0400
    • Re: Last chance for LCC1/2 programs & handouts (131 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:37:29 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (57 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:16:12 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (130 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:15:07 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (169 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:27:53 -0400
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (67 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:55:04 -0400

36. Nathan Schulzke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (75 lines)
      Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:15:57 -0600
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (63 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:08:51 -0600

37. Nika Mirovak <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (153 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:30:06 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (159 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:32:51 -0400

38. Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (60 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:06:36 -0500
    • Re: NO SUBJECT (49 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:37:48 -0500

39. Patrick Michael Niedzielski <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bible-era language decoded by computer (59 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:58:22 +0000
    • Re: Bible-era language decoded by computer (53 lines)
      Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:05:33 +0000
    • Re: The Urianian verb. (64 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:13:23 +0000
    • Re: The Urianian verb. (68 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:17:57 +0000

40. Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Stephen Fry on language (34 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:30:07 +0100

41. Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: translations for artwork (47 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:37:01 +0200
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (44 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:42:18 +0200

42. R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: translations for artwork (78 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:08:40 +0100
    • Re: Deictic Thingumies (98 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:49:35 +0100
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (66 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 16:13:08 +0100
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (97 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 11:22:29 +0100
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (91 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:48:37 +0100
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (131 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:04:03 +0100
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (128 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:38:20 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Some evidence to Sapir-Whorf? Does language influence bias? (103 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:09:07 +0100

43. Rebecca Bettencourt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (51 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 01:40:40 -0700

44. Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Original or not? (38 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:06:12 -0700
    • Re: Original or not? (30 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:08:51 -0700
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (37 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:42:44 -0700
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (39 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:50:34 -0700
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (37 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:41:18 -0700
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (40 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:58:02 -0700

45. Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: translations for artwork (24 lines)
      Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:02:04 -0400
    • Re: Deictic Thingumies (35 lines)
      Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:03:32 -0400
    • Re: Deictic Thingumies (35 lines)
      Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 05:05:24 -0400
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (29 lines)
      Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:31:36 -0400

46. Ronald Craig <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NO SUBJECT (37 lines)
      Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:55:35 +0900

47. Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stephen Fry on language (29 lines)
      Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:54:48 -0700

48. Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: A series on linguistics for authors (49 lines)
      Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 07:45:42 -0700

49. Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Does anybody know the origin of this writing system? (37 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:19:37 +0200
    • Re: Last chance for LCC1/2 programs & handouts (108 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:07:54 +0200
    • Re: Last chance for LCC1/2 programs & handouts (39 lines)
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 13:16:30 +0200

50. Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Interlinear Javascript? (40 lines)
      Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:37:43 -0500
    • Re: introducing a new conlang (42 lines)
      Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:18:33 -0500