Conlang Mailing List – July 2010, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (15 messages)
• Bible-era language decoded by computer (6 messages)
• CHAT: translations for artwork (3 messages)
• Etruscan (5 messages)
• Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (29 messages)
• Genitive case > Topic marker? (2 messages)
• I Have Returned from Kalmykia
• Isolates (was: Etruscan)
• Methodology in historical linguistics (was: Etruscan (was: ...)) (2 messages)
• Murray Gell-Mann (2 messages)
• OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer
• OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (14 messages)
• OT: Words are an endless source of fascination (10 messages)
• Proto/Modern Language Documentation (12 messages)
• Semi-Taxonomic Lexicon Building (8 messages)
• Stephen Fry on language (5 messages)
• The Results are In!
• Translation exercise. (2 messages)
• Twtpoll: Inspirations
• would like to have the PIE Lexicon (2 messages)

1. An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology
   • An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (112 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (100 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (103 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (130 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (30 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (74 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (39 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (79 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (73 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (90 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (99 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (115 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (134 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (72 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An Optimal Self-Segregating Morphology (137 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>

2. Bible-era language decoded by computer
   • Re: Bible-era language decoded by computer (89 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bible-era language decoded by computer (46 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bible-era language decoded by computer (47 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bible-era language decoded by computer (61 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bible-era language decoded by computer (40 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bible-era language decoded by computer (69 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

3. CHAT: translations for artwork
   • Re: CHAT: translations for artwork (52 lines)
     From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: translations for artwork (85 lines)
     From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: translations for artwork (59 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

4. Etruscan
   • Re: Etruscan (51 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (75 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (158 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (123 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (41 lines)
     From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>

5. Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer)
   • Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (54 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (72 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (98 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (60 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (64 lines)
     From: Patrick Michael Niedzielski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (74 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (186 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (217 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (154 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (66 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (67 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (117 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (74 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (116 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (52 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (112 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (70 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (117 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (44 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (45 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (46 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (132 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (58 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (133 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (171 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (100 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (35 lines)
     From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (97 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etruscan (was: Bible-era language decoded by computer) (133 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

6. Genitive case > Topic marker?
   • Re: Genitive case > Topic marker? (121 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Genitive case > Topic marker? (76 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

7. I Have Returned from Kalmykia
   • Re: I Have Returned from Kalmykia (177 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

8. Isolates (was: Etruscan)
   • Isolates (was: Etruscan) (124 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

9. Methodology in historical linguistics (was: Etruscan (was: ...))
   • Methodology in historical linguistics (was: Etruscan (was: ...)) (107 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Methodology in historical linguistics (was: Etruscan (was: ...)) (53 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>

10. Murray Gell-Mann
    • Murray Gell-Mann (37 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Murray Gell-Mann (41 lines)
      From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>

11. OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer
    • Re: OT: a stupidly addictive English style-analyzer (37 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

12. OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (113 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (49 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (59 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (249 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (294 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (48 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (51 lines)
      From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (51 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (40 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (44 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (59 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (35 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: It's a conlang, it's a relex, it's a secret code (50 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>

13. OT: Words are an endless source of fascination
    • OT: Words are an endless source of fascination (324 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Words are an endless source of fascination (353 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Words are an endless source of fascination (48 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Words are an endless source of fascination (60 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Words are an endless source of fascination (65 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Words are an endless source of fascination (85 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Words are an endless source of fascination (99 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Words are an endless source of fascination (58 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Words are an endless source of fascination (35 lines)
      From: Ryan Dobie-Watt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Words are an endless source of fascination (59 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

14. Proto/Modern Language Documentation
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (149 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (78 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (42 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (58 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (46 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (76 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (86 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (44 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (66 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (57 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (46 lines)
      From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proto/Modern Language Documentation (68 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>

15. Semi-Taxonomic Lexicon Building
    • Semi-Taxonomic Lexicon Building (84 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semi-Taxonomic Lexicon Building (112 lines)
      From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semi-Taxonomic Lexicon Building (93 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semi-Taxonomic Lexicon Building (53 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semi-Taxonomic Lexicon Building (43 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semi-Taxonomic Lexicon Building (80 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semi-Taxonomic Lexicon Building (102 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semi-Taxonomic Lexicon Building (46 lines)
      From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>

16. Stephen Fry on language
    • Re: Stephen Fry on language (56 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stephen Fry on language (46 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stephen Fry on language (49 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stephen Fry on language (33 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stephen Fry on language (42 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>

17. The Results are In!
    • The Results are In! (40 lines)
      From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>

18. Translation exercise.
    • Translation exercise. (34 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Translation exercise. (61 lines)
      From: Toms Deimonds Barvidis <[log in to unmask]>

19. Twtpoll: Inspirations
    • Twtpoll: Inspirations (47 lines)
      From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>

20. would like to have the PIE Lexicon
    • would like to have the PIE Lexicon (46 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (57 lines)
      From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>