Conlang Mailing List – July 2010, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• Are right-branching languages easier to parse? (9 messages)
• Interrogative Cases (13 messages)
• Language Phrase Books (4 messages)
• would like to have the PIE Lexicon (22 messages)

1. Are right-branching languages easier to parse?
   • Are right-branching languages easier to parse? (28 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Are right-branching languages easier to parse? (55 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Are right-branching languages easier to parse? (67 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Are right-branching languages easier to parse? (58 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Are right-branching languages easier to parse? (85 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Are right-branching languages easier to parse? (116 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Are right-branching languages easier to parse? (154 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Are right-branching languages easier to parse? (58 lines)
     From: Micah Johnston <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Are right-branching languages easier to parse? (44 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

2. Interrogative Cases
   • Interrogative Cases (60 lines)
     From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (47 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (56 lines)
     From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (59 lines)
     From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (70 lines)
     From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (91 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (73 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (48 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (134 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (67 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (54 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (154 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (43 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>

3. Language Phrase Books
   • Language Phrase Books (69 lines)
     From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Language Phrase Books (64 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Language Phrase Books (73 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Language Phrase Books (132 lines)
     From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>

4. would like to have the PIE Lexicon
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (30 lines)
     From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (42 lines)
     From: Kelvin Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (30 lines)
     From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (80 lines)
     From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (90 lines)
     From: John Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (104 lines)
     From: Shair A <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (118 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (133 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (46 lines)
     From: Patrick Michael Niedzielski <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (36 lines)
     From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (34 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (49 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (59 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (33 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (135 lines)
     From: Toms Deimonds Barvidis <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (68 lines)
     From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (49 lines)
     From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (56 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (40 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (81 lines)
     From: Jan Strasser <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (51 lines)
     From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: would like to have the PIE Lexicon (69 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>