Conlang Mailing List – August 2010, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• away time
• CHAT: One Month, One Conlang project (2 messages)
• CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (18 messages)
• Conlang Job (9 messages)
• Derivational productivity (longish) (was: Translation excercise: Unabsteigbarkeit)
• Does anyone use the "-" symbol in his/her conlang? (2 messages)
• Elision (was: [CONLANG] Translation excercise: Unabsteigbarkeit)
• Initial /r/ in Indo-European (was: Musings) (3 messages)
• Interrogative Cases
• loss of glottalization and diphthongization (3 messages)
• Musings (4 messages)
• Musings (was: Re: Romanization for the flap/tap) (3 messages)
• My Second Language (24 messages)
• nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (17 messages)
• OT (mostly): my road trip (2 messages)
• OT: Grave accent as opening quote (was Re: Elision (7 messages)
• OT: Grave accent as opening quote (was Re: Elision (was: [CONLANG] Translation excercise: Unabsteigbarkeit))
• Question about Bracketification (4 messages)
• Romanization for the flap/tap (13 messages)
• TECH: Converting MediaWiki markup to HTML (4 messages)
• Typing in the IPA (4 messages)
• writing system

1. away time
   • away time (29 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 20:28:42 -0700

2. CHAT: One Month, One Conlang project
   • Re: CHAT: One Month, One Conlang project (70 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 20:59:03 -0700
   • CHAT: One Month, One Conlang project (49 lines)
     From: Richard Littauer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 23:33:39 -0400

3. CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang.
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (38 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:19:52 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (43 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:51:21 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (32 lines)
     From: David Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:21:18 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (52 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:20:01 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (70 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 00:25:04 +0200
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (33 lines)
     From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:21:45 -0500
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (51 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:55:32 +0200
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (89 lines)
     From: Jerry Muelver <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:09:37 -0500
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (77 lines)
     From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:42:19 -0500
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (53 lines)
     From: Jerry Muelver <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:09:24 -0500
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (61 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:10:57 -0700
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (74 lines)
     From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:06:44 -0500
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (54 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:50:21 +0200
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (47 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:46:12 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (79 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:33:29 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (55 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:23:37 +0200
   • Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (48 lines)
     From: Roberto Suarez Soto <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:02:15 +0200
   • CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang. (26 lines)
     From: Joseph Allen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:54:13 -0400

4. Conlang Job
   • Re: Conlang Job (30 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:34:15 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Job (78 lines)
     From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:05:15 +1030
   • Re: Conlang Job (64 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 06:29:11 +0200
   • Conlang Job (39 lines)
     From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:30:11 +1030
   • Re: Conlang Job (61 lines)
     From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:53:09 +1030
   • Re: Conlang Job (31 lines)
     From: Alex Bicksler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:14:38 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Job (64 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 02:09:49 +0200
   • Re: Conlang Job (44 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 18:21:12 -0500
   • Conlang Job (40 lines)
     From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:32:34 +1030

5. Derivational productivity (longish) (was: Translation excercise: Unabsteigbarkeit)
   • Re: Derivational productivity (longish) (was: Translation excercise: Unabsteigbarkeit) (80 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 13:50:53 +0200

6. Does anyone use the "-" symbol in his/her conlang?
   • Re: Does anyone use the "-" symbol in his/her conlang? (130 lines)
     From: kechpaja <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:14:37 -0400
   • Re: Does anyone use the "-" symbol in his/her conlang? (121 lines)
     From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:05:12 -0400

7. Elision (was: [CONLANG] Translation excercise: Unabsteigbarkeit)
   • Re: Elision (was: [CONLANG] Translation excercise: Unabsteigbarkeit) (49 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 13:31:07 +0200

8. Initial /r/ in Indo-European (was: Musings)
   • Re: Initial /r/ in Indo-European (was: Musings) (65 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 23:39:13 +0200
   • Re: Initial /r/ in Indo-European (was: Musings) (53 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:50:18 +0200
   • Initial /r/ in Indo-European (was: Musings) (50 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:48:10 +0200

9. Interrogative Cases
   • Re: Interrogative Cases (42 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:33:25 -0400

10. loss of glottalization and diphthongization
    • Re: loss of glottalization and diphthongization (82 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:55:59 +0200
    • Re: loss of glottalization and diphthongization (60 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:48:27 +0200
    • loss of glottalization and diphthongization (39 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:23:28 +0200

11. Musings
    • Re: Musings (147 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:42:59 +0100
    • Re: Musings (53 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:00:25 +0200
    • Re: Musings (65 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:48:39 +0200
    • Re: Musings (89 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:11:55 +0100

12. Musings (was: Re: Romanization for the flap/tap)
    • Re: Musings (was: Re: Romanization for the flap/tap) (38 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:22:16 +0200
    • Re: Musings (was: Re: Romanization for the flap/tap) (68 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:29:27 +0200
    • Musings (was: Re: Romanization for the flap/tap) (129 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 21:40:40 +0000

13. My Second Language
    • Re: My Second Language (91 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:20:09 -0600
    • Re: My Second Language (58 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:32:06 +0200
    • Re: My Second Language (44 lines)
      From: Joseph Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:05:11 -0400
    • Re: My Second Language (56 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:59:57 -0700
    • Re: My Second Language (38 lines)
      From: Joseph Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:35:29 -0400
    • Re: My Second Language (63 lines)
      From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:24:53 +1030
    • Re: My Second Language (52 lines)
      From: Joseph Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:29:28 -0400
    • Re: My Second Language (44 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:15:32 -0600
    • Re: My Second Language (70 lines)
      From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:28:21 +1030
    • Re: My Second Language (35 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:56:03 -0600
    • Re: My Second Language (45 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:38:05 -0700
    • Re: My Second Language (105 lines)
      From: Joseph Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:20:09 -0500
    • Re: My Second Language (77 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:20:48 +0200
    • Re: My Second Language (70 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:19:35 -0500
    • Re: My Second Language (41 lines)
      From: Joseph Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:56:22 -0500
    • Re: My Second Language (72 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:28:53 -0500
    • Re: My Second Language (36 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:09:30 -0700
    • Re: My Second Language (31 lines)
      From: Joseph Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:35:13 -0500
    • Re: My Second Language (51 lines)
      From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:53:26 +0100
    • Re: My Second Language (52 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:54:35 +0200
    • Re: My Second Language (58 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:20:28 +0200
    • Re: My Second Language (76 lines)
      From: Joseph Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:34:58 -0500
    • Re: My Second Language (86 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:06:22 -0500
    • My Second Language (47 lines)
      From: Joseph Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:56:05 -0500

14. nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (43 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:13:03 +0200
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (54 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:36:01 -0700
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (80 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:01:02 -0700
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (51 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:55:32 -0700
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (59 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:16:51 -0400
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (85 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:58:26 -0400
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (61 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:08:13 -0400
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (55 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:03:20 -0400
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (67 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:45:59 -0500
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (33 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:24:53 -0600
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (58 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:09:07 -0400
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (48 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:52:38 -0400
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (94 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:30:23 -0400
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (112 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:07:56 -0600
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (64 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 20:37:24 -0400
    • Re: nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (39 lines)
      From: Alex Bicksler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:22:55 -0700
    • nouns inflecting for anticipated pronouns (60 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:17:38 -0400

15. OT (mostly): my road trip
    • Re: OT (mostly): my road trip (26 lines)
      From: Bruno Barcelos <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:25:16 -0300
    • OT (mostly): my road trip (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 08:38:57 -0700

16. OT: Grave accent as opening quote (was Re: Elision
    • Re: OT: Grave accent as opening quote (was Re: Elision (75 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:06:15 -0400
    • Re: OT: Grave accent as opening quote (was Re: Elision (65 lines)
      From: Calculator Ftvb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:55:47 -0400
    • Re: OT: Grave accent as opening quote (was Re: Elision (41 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 08:50:40 -0500
    • Re: OT: Grave accent as opening quote (was Re: Elision (35 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 01:02:59 -0500
    • Re: OT: Grave accent as opening quote (was Re: Elision (79 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 14:09:23 +0200
    • Re: OT: Grave accent as opening quote (was Re: Elision (62 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 23:19:12 -0700
    • Re: OT: Grave accent as opening quote (was Re: Elision (51 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 08:07:13 +0200

17. OT: Grave accent as opening quote (was Re: Elision (was: [CONLANG] Translation excercise: Unabsteigbarkeit))
    • Re: OT: Grave accent as opening quote (was Re: Elision (was: [CONLANG] Translation excercise: Unabsteigbarkeit)) (57 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 23:48:35 -0500

18. Question about Bracketification
    • Re: Question about Bracketification (40 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:17:01 +0200
    • Re: Question about Bracketification (51 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:40:18 +0200
    • Re: Question about Bracketification (73 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:09:53 +0100
    • Question about Bracketification (53 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:42:46 +0200

19. Romanization for the flap/tap
    • Re: Romanization for the flap/tap (27 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:46:01 -0400
    • Re: Romanization for the flap/tap (72 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:52:49 -0400
    • Re: Romanization for the flap/tap (60 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 20:41:24 +0200
    • Re: Romanization for the flap/tap (28 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 00:58:23 -0500
    • Re: Romanization for the flap/tap (48 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 18:48:52 -0400
    • Re: Romanization for the flap/tap (41 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 16:31:23 +0100
    • Re: Romanization for the flap/tap (105 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 16:59:11 +0200
    • Re: Romanization for the flap/tap (38 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 10:42:56 -0400
    • Re: Romanization for the flap/tap (35 lines)
      From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 10:40:48 -0400
    • Re: Romanization for the flap/tap (98 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 14:00:34 +0100
    • Re: Romanization for the flap/tap (50 lines)
      From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 18:29:57 +1030
    • Re: Romanization for the flap/tap (69 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 00:33:53 -0700
    • Romanization for the flap/tap (33 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 03:20:24 -0400

20. TECH: Converting MediaWiki markup to HTML
    • Re: TECH: Converting MediaWiki markup to HTML (51 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 07:22:07 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Converting MediaWiki markup to HTML (49 lines)
      From: Roberto Suarez Soto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:41:10 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Converting MediaWiki markup to HTML (54 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 01:12:31 -0700
    • Re: TECH: Converting MediaWiki markup to HTML (44 lines)
      From: Roberto Suarez Soto <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:22:16 +0200

21. Typing in the IPA
    • Re: Typing in the IPA (40 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:22:31 -0400
    • Re: Typing in the IPA (32 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:13:15 -0700
    • Re: Typing in the IPA (53 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:41:41 -0400
    • Typing in the IPA (22 lines)
      From: Nathan Unanymous <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:32:23 -0400

22. writing system
    • Re: writing system (60 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 06:00:56 +0200