Conlang
Mailing List August 2010, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
A Diachronic Riddle - Help?
(10 messages)
Aspirated Nasals
(10 messages)
CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang.
(9 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 16 Aug 2010 to 17 Aug 2010 (#2010-123)
conlang.org down temporarily
(4 messages)
Does anyone use the "-" symbol in his/her conlang?
(6 messages)
False friends
(108 messages)
Finally Online!
(5 messages)
Future English Languages
(9 messages)
Future Englishes
Killing inflections
(3 messages)
making an oral conlang
(18 messages)
my new romlang
(2 messages)
my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip)
(3 messages)
online etym dicts (was: Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip))
(9 messages)
OT Facebook
(8 messages)
OT Facebook False Friends
(3 messages)
Path vs. Manner Languages
(16 messages)
possible impossibles
(6 messages)
Question about Bracketification
(2 messages)
Romance language forum (google-groups)
(4 messages)
The English r.
(4 messages)
Typing in the IPA
(2 messages)
we like to verb things
(5 messages)
A Diachronic Riddle - Help?
A Diachronic Riddle - Help?
(86 lines)
From:
David Edwards <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Diachronic Riddle - Help?
(92 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Diachronic Riddle - Help?
(36 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Diachronic Riddle - Help?
(78 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Diachronic Riddle - Help?
(124 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Diachronic Riddle - Help?
(41 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Diachronic Riddle - Help?
(57 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Diachronic Riddle - Help?
(40 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Diachronic Riddle - Help?
(48 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Diachronic Riddle - Help?
(58 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Aspirated Nasals
Aspirated Nasals
(47 lines)
From:
Toms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aspirated Nasals
(62 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aspirated Nasals
(100 lines)
From:
Toms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aspirated Nasals
(36 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aspirated Nasals
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aspirated Nasals
(40 lines)
From:
Henrik <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aspirated Nasals
(60 lines)
From:
Toms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aspirated Nasals
(66 lines)
From:
Toms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aspirated Nasals
(61 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aspirated Nasals
(77 lines)
From:
Toms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang.
Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang.
(80 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang.
(67 lines)
From:
Joseph Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang.
(73 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang.
(123 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang.
(71 lines)
From:
David Johnson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang.
(71 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang.
(60 lines)
From:
Joseph Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang.
(71 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Reasons for using/writing a conlang.
(35 lines)
From:
Joseph Allen <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 16 Aug 2010 to 17 Aug 2010 (#2010-123)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 16 Aug 2010 to 17 Aug 2010 (#2010-123)
(62 lines)
From:
Ben Carnehl <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlang.org down temporarily
conlang.org down temporarily
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org down temporarily
(44 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org down temporarily
(69 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org down temporarily
(87 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Does anyone use the "-" symbol in his/her conlang?
Re: Does anyone use the "-" symbol in his/her conlang?
(173 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone use the "-" symbol in his/her conlang?
(52 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone use the "-" symbol in his/her conlang?
(63 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone use the "-" symbol in his/her conlang?
(39 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone use the "-" symbol in his/her conlang?
(192 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone use the "-" symbol in his/her conlang?
(101 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
False friends
False friends
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(38 lines)
From:
vii iiix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(51 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(39 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(36 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(50 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(39 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(46 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(31 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(43 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(49 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(51 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(42 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(63 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(74 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(91 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(71 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(50 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(36 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(81 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(31 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(37 lines)
From:
Andrew Jarrette <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(75 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(117 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(42 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(47 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(37 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(38 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(49 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(49 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(58 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(72 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(42 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(48 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(76 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(60 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(75 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(53 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(69 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(104 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(57 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(63 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(65 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(37 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(40 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(48 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(59 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(99 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(113 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(64 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(84 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(111 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(53 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(60 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(39 lines)
From:
G. van der Vegt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(48 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(47 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(39 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(32 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(59 lines)
From:
Noelle Morris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(41 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(54 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(70 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(63 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(108 lines)
From:
Julia Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(51 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(58 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(121 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(45 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(47 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(65 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(71 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(72 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(43 lines)
From:
lingwadeplaneta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(50 lines)
From:
lingwadeplaneta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(33 lines)
From:
lingwadeplaneta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(29 lines)
From:
lingwadeplaneta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(43 lines)
From:
lingwadeplaneta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(51 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: False friends
(30 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(66 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(50 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(61 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(144 lines)
From:
Julia Simon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(50 lines)
From:
Henrik <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(78 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(87 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(110 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(88 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(49 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(66 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(49 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(53 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(60 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(49 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(36 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(66 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: False friends
(77 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Finally Online!
Finally Online!
(32 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Finally Online!
(28 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Finally Online!
(25 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Finally Online!
(39 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Finally Online!
(45 lines)
From:
Roberto Suarez Soto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Future English Languages
Future English Languages
(29 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future English Languages
(49 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future English Languages
(88 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future English Languages
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future English Languages
(31 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future English Languages
(36 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future English Languages
(31 lines)
From:
Aidan Aannestad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future English Languages
(38 lines)
From:
Nathan Unanymous <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future English Languages
(69 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Future Englishes
Future Englishes
(35 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Killing inflections
Killing inflections
(59 lines)
From:
Nathan Unanymous <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Killing inflections
(92 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Killing inflections
(124 lines)
From:
Nathan Unanymous <
[log in to unmask]
>
making an oral conlang
making an oral conlang
(40 lines)
From:
Dale McCreery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(55 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(61 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(44 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(51 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(36 lines)
From:
Vincent Pistelli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(38 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(34 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(63 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(80 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(38 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(78 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(84 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(41 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(64 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(73 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: making an oral conlang
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
my new romlang
Re: my new romlang
(48 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my new romlang
(24 lines)
From:
Henrik <
[log in to unmask]
>
my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip)
Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip)
(33 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip)
(61 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip)
(43 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
online etym dicts (was: Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip))
online etym dicts (was: Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip))
(33 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: online etym dicts (was: Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip))
(48 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: online etym dicts (was: Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip))
(68 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: online etym dicts (was: Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip))
(42 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: online etym dicts (was: Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip))
(42 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: online etym dicts (was: Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip))
(36 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: online etym dicts (was: Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip))
(44 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: online etym dicts (was: Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip))
(62 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: online etym dicts (was: Re: my new romlang (was: OT (mostly): my road trip))
(40 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Facebook
OT Facebook
(30 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Facebook
(49 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Facebook
(46 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Facebook
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Facebook
(48 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Facebook
(54 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Facebook
(43 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Facebook
(50 lines)
From:
Jen Runds <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Facebook False Friends
Re: OT Facebook False Friends
(64 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Facebook False Friends
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Facebook False Friends
(56 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Path vs. Manner Languages
Path vs. Manner Languages
(51 lines)
From:
vii iiix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(65 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(55 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(71 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(40 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(58 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(64 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(38 lines)
From:
Piermaria Maraziti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(36 lines)
From:
vii iiix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(64 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(27 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(48 lines)
From:
John Q <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(54 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(57 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Path vs. Manner Languages
(69 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
possible impossibles
possible impossibles
(37 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: possible impossibles
(49 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: possible impossibles
(50 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: possible impossibles
(48 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: possible impossibles
(77 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: possible impossibles
(55 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Question about Bracketification
Re: Question about Bracketification
(81 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question about Bracketification
(49 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Romance language forum (google-groups)
Romance language forum (google-groups)
(45 lines)
From:
Daniel Hollande <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romance language forum (google-groups)
(50 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romance language forum (google-groups)
(49 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Romance language forum (google-groups)
(47 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
The English r.
The English r.
(39 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The English r.
(50 lines)
From:
vii iiix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The English r.
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The English r.
(56 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Typing in the IPA
Re: Typing in the IPA
(58 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Typing in the IPA
(63 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
we like to verb things
we like to verb things
(31 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we like to verb things
(24 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we like to verb things
(41 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we like to verb things
(54 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we like to verb things
(53 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU