Conlang
Mailing List October 2010, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(3 messages)
An interesting noun marking system
(8 messages)
As the Actress Said to the Bishop
(2 messages)
Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(8 messages)
Celtic & other myths (was: Celticity?)
Celticity?
(2 messages)
Conlang program project
(3 messages)
Conlanging in The Onion
(2 messages)
Consonant system morphing
(4 messages)
Joseph Peanou RIP
Koro - Undocumented language found in India
(6 messages)
Latest SpecGram: The Morphome Issue
(4 messages)
META: Conlang-L FAQ
Multimodality
(2 messages)
N+ADJ V or N ADV+V
(6 messages)
Natlangs in CALS now have sounds from UPSID
New book
norsk (was Re: As the Actress Said to the Bishop)
(2 messages)
OT (Very OT) Naval Terminology
(4 messages)
OT: conhistorical conjecture
(11 messages)
OT: Hello to UCSCian Alex Bicksler (was Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2)
OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(40 messages)
Reliable Reference for definitions...
(15 messages)
Saltani Noun Cases
TECH: Optimality Theory Tableaux Manipulator?
(2 messages)
TECH: Yahoo
(2 messages)
Tone death
(2 messages)
Tonogenesis
(3 messages)
Toponymic Etymological Mythopoesis
(4 messages)
verbing as a poetic instrument
(2 messages)
What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(12 messages)
Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(34 messages)
Writing system for a new project
(4 messages)
XKCD Lobjan
(17 messages)
Young conlanger/cellist on NPR's From The Top
(4 messages)
An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(139 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(161 lines)
From:
John Herold <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(45 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
An interesting noun marking system
An interesting noun marking system
(61 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An interesting noun marking system
(81 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An interesting noun marking system
(58 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An interesting noun marking system
(67 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An interesting noun marking system
(45 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An interesting noun marking system
(64 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An interesting noun marking system
(89 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An interesting noun marking system
(55 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
As the Actress Said to the Bishop
Re: As the Actress Said to the Bishop
(58 lines)
From:
Francois Remond <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: As the Actress Said to the Bishop
(59 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(61 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(81 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(45 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(54 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(87 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(63 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(31 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Celtic & other myths (was: Celticity?)
Re: Celtic & other myths (was: Celticity?)
(82 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Celticity?
Re: Celticity?
(169 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Celticity?
(118 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang program project
Conlang program project
(79 lines)
From:
Ellen Million Graphics <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang program project
(26 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang program project
(29 lines)
From:
Ellen Million <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlanging in The Onion
Conlanging in The Onion
(32 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlanging in The Onion
(45 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Consonant system morphing
Consonant system morphing
(43 lines)
From:
Nathan Unanymous <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonant system morphing
(41 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonant system morphing
(76 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consonant system morphing
(93 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Joseph Peanou RIP
Re: Joseph Peanou RIP
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Koro - Undocumented language found in India
Koro - Undocumented language found in India
(40 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Koro - Undocumented language found in India
(36 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Koro - Undocumented language found in India
(43 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Koro - Undocumented language found in India
(27 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Koro - Undocumented language found in India
(41 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Koro - Undocumented language found in India
(21 lines)
From:
Mario Bonassin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Latest SpecGram: The Morphome Issue
Latest SpecGram: The Morphome Issue
(50 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latest SpecGram: The Morphome Issue
(50 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latest SpecGram: The Morphome Issue
(60 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Latest SpecGram: The Morphome Issue
(55 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: Conlang-L FAQ
META: Conlang-L FAQ
(274 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Multimodality
Multimodality
(37 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multimodality
(26 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
N+ADJ V or N ADV+V
N+ADJ V or N ADV+V
(48 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: N+ADJ V or N ADV+V
(49 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: N+ADJ V or N ADV+V
(66 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: N+ADJ V or N ADV+V
(48 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: N+ADJ V or N ADV+V
(90 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: N+ADJ V or N ADV+V
(41 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Natlangs in CALS now have sounds from UPSID
Natlangs in CALS now have sounds from UPSID
(43 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
New book
Re: New book
(56 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
norsk (was Re: As the Actress Said to the Bishop)
Re: norsk (was Re: As the Actress Said to the Bishop)
(72 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: norsk (was Re: As the Actress Said to the Bishop)
(118 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT (Very OT) Naval Terminology
OT (Very OT) Naval Terminology
(46 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT (Very OT) Naval Terminology
(63 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT (Very OT) Naval Terminology
(53 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT (Very OT) Naval Terminology
(60 lines)
From:
John Herold <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: conhistorical conjecture
OT: conhistorical conjecture
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: conhistorical conjecture
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: conhistorical conjecture
(135 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: conhistorical conjecture
(66 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: conhistorical conjecture
(43 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: conhistorical conjecture
(141 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: conhistorical conjecture
(74 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: conhistorical conjecture
(63 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: conhistorical conjecture
(49 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: conhistorical conjecture
(229 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: conhistorical conjecture
(94 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Hello to UCSCian Alex Bicksler (was Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2)
Re: OT: Hello to UCSCian Alex Bicksler (was Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2)
(29 lines)
From:
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Why these exceptions in English?
OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(31 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(49 lines)
From:
vii iiix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(61 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(32 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(50 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(67 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(46 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(45 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(34 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(37 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(55 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(88 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(40 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(65 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(74 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(49 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(78 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(38 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(54 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(44 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(65 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(92 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(55 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(53 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(60 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(50 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(37 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(44 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(68 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(79 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(49 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(53 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(44 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(49 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(39 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(40 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reliable Reference for definitions...
Reliable Reference for definitions...
(36 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(77 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(45 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(75 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(70 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(58 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(46 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(44 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(32 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(41 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(54 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(53 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(40 lines)
From:
Israel Noletto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reliable Reference for definitions...
(33 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Saltani Noun Cases
Saltani Noun Cases
(70 lines)
From:
Leila Kalomi <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Optimality Theory Tableaux Manipulator?
TECH: Optimality Theory Tableaux Manipulator?
(65 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Optimality Theory Tableaux Manipulator?
(133 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Yahoo
TECH: Yahoo
(31 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Yahoo
(46 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tone death
Re: Tone death
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tone death
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tonogenesis
Re: Tonogenesis
(22 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tonogenesis
(46 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tonogenesis
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Toponymic Etymological Mythopoesis
Toponymic Etymological Mythopoesis
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Toponymic Etymological Mythopoesis
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Toponymic Etymological Mythopoesis
(88 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Toponymic Etymological Mythopoesis
(73 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
verbing as a poetic instrument
verbing as a poetic instrument
(63 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: verbing as a poetic instrument
(80 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(32 lines)
From:
Matthew Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(85 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(69 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(111 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(127 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(93 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(67 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(142 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(72 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(53 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(132 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(109 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(68 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(45 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(61 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(51 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(65 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(32 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(51 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(62 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(70 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(100 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(50 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(30 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(40 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(54 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(61 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(119 lines)
From:
Noelle Morris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(71 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(62 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(45 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(70 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(53 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(60 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(38 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(59 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(70 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(39 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(53 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(61 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(56 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Writing system for a new project
Writing system for a new project
(77 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Writing system for a new project
(102 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Writing system for a new project
(81 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Writing system for a new project
(121 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
XKCD Lobjan
XKCD Lobjan
(39 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
XKCD Lobjan
(33 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(36 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(41 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(47 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(35 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(34 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(46 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(35 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(38 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(56 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(60 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(38 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XKCD Lobjan
(43 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Young conlanger/cellist on NPR's From The Top
Young conlanger/cellist on NPR's From The Top
(56 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Young conlanger/cellist on NPR's From The Top
(30 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Young conlanger/cellist on NPR's From The Top
(36 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Young conlanger/cellist on NPR's From The Top
(44 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU