Conlang
Mailing List – October 2010, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
A vignette ...
(9 messages)
An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(14 messages)
Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(3 messages)
Cāvacodes to Kërvor
Conlang Talk in Edinburgh
(2 messages)
Conlanging in The Onion
Conlanging talk @ Edinburgh
(5 messages)
Conlangs in Harry Potter?
Conlangs in Harry Potter? (was: Teresa Edgerton conlangs)
(8 messages)
Higher-density data graphics for corpus and lexicon analysis data?
(2 messages)
Hitman scam
(6 messages)
language created from names.
(12 messages)
Loglan questions
(4 messages)
marking for affectedness
(3 messages)
N+ADJ V or N ADV+V
non-lexical tones
(14 messages)
OT: Why these exceptions in English?
Q: sound changes
(7 messages)
Saltani Noun Cases
(3 messages)
Semantic Components of Motion Verbs
(7 messages)
SETI-type thing
(6 messages)
TECH: Optimality Theory Tableaux Manipulator?
(5 messages)
Teresa Edgerton conlangs
(2 messages)
The Trouble with Wizards
(2 messages)
World without end (was: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness)
(5 messages)
Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(10 messages)
ZBB has moved
(6 messages)
A vignette ...
A vignette ...
(46 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A vignette ...
(50 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A vignette ...
(48 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A vignette ...
(60 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A vignette ...
(53 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A vignette ...
(65 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A vignette ...
(100 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A vignette ...
(53 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A vignette ...
(48 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(36 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(82 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(32 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(58 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(57 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(39 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(52 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(41 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(47 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(59 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(57 lines)
From:
Henrik <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(67 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
(114 lines)
From:
maikxlx <
[log in to unmask]
>
Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
Re: Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(82 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(78 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Broad or narrow usage of "phonology? -- was Re: What is the state of the art for easy apriori conlangs?
(68 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cāvacodes to Kërvor
Cāvacodes to Kërvor
(44 lines)
From:
Nathan Unanymous <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Talk in Edinburgh
Re: Conlang Talk in Edinburgh
(39 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Talk in Edinburgh
(54 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlanging in The Onion
Re: Conlanging in The Onion
(53 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlanging talk @ Edinburgh
Conlanging talk @ Edinburgh
(22 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlanging talk @ Edinburgh
(42 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlanging talk @ Edinburgh
(68 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlanging talk @ Edinburgh
(82 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlanging talk @ Edinburgh
(102 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlangs in Harry Potter?
Re: Conlangs in Harry Potter?
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlangs in Harry Potter? (was: Teresa Edgerton conlangs)
Conlangs in Harry Potter? (was: Teresa Edgerton conlangs)
(64 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in Harry Potter? (was: Teresa Edgerton conlangs)
(41 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in Harry Potter? (was: Teresa Edgerton conlangs)
(79 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in Harry Potter? (was: Teresa Edgerton conlangs)
(57 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in Harry Potter? (was: Teresa Edgerton conlangs)
(46 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in Harry Potter? (was: Teresa Edgerton conlangs)
(35 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in Harry Potter? (was: Teresa Edgerton conlangs)
(31 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs in Harry Potter? (was: Teresa Edgerton conlangs)
(38 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Higher-density data graphics for corpus and lexicon analysis data?
Higher-density data graphics for corpus and lexicon analysis data?
(63 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Higher-density data graphics for corpus and lexicon analysis data?
(52 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hitman scam
Hitman scam
(82 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hitman scam
(51 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hitman scam
(49 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hitman scam
(82 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hitman scam
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hitman scam
(46 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
language created from names.
language created from names.
(52 lines)
From:
Mario Bonassin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: language created from names.
(96 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: language created from names.
(63 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: language created from names.
(31 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: language created from names.
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: language created from names.
(44 lines)
From:
Roberto Suarez Soto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: language created from names.
(83 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: language created from names.
(36 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: language created from names.
(86 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: language created from names.
(34 lines)
From:
Mario Bonassin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: language created from names.
(34 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: language created from names.
(51 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Loglan questions
Loglan questions
(33 lines)
From:
maikxlx <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Loglan questions
(45 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Loglan questions
(60 lines)
From:
maikxlx <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Loglan questions
(47 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
marking for affectedness
marking for affectedness
(77 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: marking for affectedness
(43 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: marking for affectedness
(25 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
N+ADJ V or N ADV+V
Re: N+ADJ V or N ADV+V
(42 lines)
From:
David Johnson <
[log in to unmask]
>
non-lexical tones
non-lexical tones
(43 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(56 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(56 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(40 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(57 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(44 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(52 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(67 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(46 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(68 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(62 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(91 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: non-lexical tones
(32 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Why these exceptions in English?
Re: OT: Why these exceptions in English?
(47 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Q: sound changes
Q: sound changes
(64 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q: sound changes
(86 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q: sound changes
(91 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q: sound changes
(56 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q: sound changes
(76 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q: sound changes
(46 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Q: sound changes
(55 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Saltani Noun Cases
Re: Saltani Noun Cases
(73 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saltani Noun Cases
(69 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Saltani Noun Cases
(66 lines)
From:
Leila Kalomi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Semantic Components of Motion Verbs
Semantic Components of Motion Verbs
(51 lines)
From:
vii iiix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semantic Components of Motion Verbs
(61 lines)
From:
Jen Runds <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semantic Components of Motion Verbs
(50 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semantic Components of Motion Verbs
(68 lines)
From:
vii iiix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semantic Components of Motion Verbs
(88 lines)
From:
Jen Runds <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semantic Components of Motion Verbs
(107 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semantic Components of Motion Verbs
(59 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
SETI-type thing
SETI-type thing
(38 lines)
From:
Leila Kalomi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SETI-type thing
(69 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SETI-type thing
(35 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SETI-type thing
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SETI-type thing
(35 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SETI-type thing
(40 lines)
From:
Leila Kalomi <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Optimality Theory Tableaux Manipulator?
Re: TECH: Optimality Theory Tableaux Manipulator?
(68 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Optimality Theory Tableaux Manipulator?
(78 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Optimality Theory Tableaux Manipulator?
(33 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Optimality Theory Tableaux Manipulator?
(41 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Optimality Theory Tableaux Manipulator?
(104 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Teresa Edgerton conlangs
Re: Teresa Edgerton conlangs
(34 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Teresa Edgerton conlangs
(40 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Trouble with Wizards
The Trouble with Wizards
(61 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Trouble with Wizards
(56 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
World without end (was: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness)
Re: World without end (was: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness)
(68 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: World without end (was: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness)
(45 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: World without end (was: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness)
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: World without end (was: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness)
(51 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: World without end (was: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness)
(61 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(36 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(46 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(33 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(51 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(54 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(42 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(29 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(50 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(34 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Worldwide conlanger locations map, v2
(34 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
ZBB has moved
ZBB has moved
(42 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ZBB has moved
(27 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ZBB has moved
(44 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ZBB has moved
(35 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ZBB has moved
(49 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ZBB has moved
(42 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – October 2010, week 2
Conlang Mailing List – October 2010, week 2
