Conlang Mailing List – October 2010, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Best" way to write a complete description of a language (8 messages)
• /S/ and /s`/ - language universals (2 messages)
• A Preliminary Syllabary (4 messages)
• An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (12 messages)
• Back ON TOPIC: A Syllabary for your consideration
• Case Inflection Development (39 messages)
• Conlanging talk @ Edinburgh
• Conlangs based on Endangered/Dead Languages (6 messages)
• Could you take quick look at this? (10 messages)
• Date and time on Cindu
• Doggy translation [was: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review] (5 messages)
• Euia Twas phonology and orthography
• Fight Linguistic Extinction
• Fonts with correct diacritic placement? (3 messages)
• for those who collect grammars: Chemehuevi (3 messages)
• Help CONLANG movie get distribution!
• List of Germanic loanwords in Balto-Finnic?
• OT : endos vs entos (6 messages)
• OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails... (11 messages)
• TAKE revision - latest (2 messages)
• TECH Font Embedding (was Re: Could you take quick look at this?) (2 messages)
• TECH: HTML entities in Emails (was: Re: TAKE revision - latest)
• The Trouble with Wizards (2 messages)
• Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review (8 messages)
• Usona Esperantiso and Dothraki (9 messages)
• XSAMPA question (42 messages)
• ZBB has moved (4 messages)

1. "Best" way to write a complete description of a language
   • "Best" way to write a complete description of a language (38 lines)
     From: Miles Forster <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Best" way to write a complete description of a language (62 lines)
     From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Best" way to write a complete description of a language (46 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Best" way to write a complete description of a language (42 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Best" way to write a complete description of a language (54 lines)
     From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Best" way to write a complete description of a language (55 lines)
     From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Best" way to write a complete description of a language (36 lines)
     From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Best" way to write a complete description of a language (58 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

2. /S/ and /s`/ - language universals
   • /S/ and /s`/ - language universals (35 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /S/ and /s`/ - language universals (41 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

3. A Preliminary Syllabary
   • A Preliminary Syllabary (49 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Preliminary Syllabary (42 lines)
     From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Preliminary Syllabary (75 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Preliminary Syllabary (61 lines)
     From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>

4. An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness
   • Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (42 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (130 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (36 lines)
     From: kechpaja <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (40 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (81 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (110 lines)
     From: maikxlx <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (70 lines)
     From: maikxlx <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (106 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (131 lines)
     From: maikxlx <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (83 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (77 lines)
     From: John Q <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: An engelang to minimize or contain abstractness (63 lines)
     From: John Q <[log in to unmask]>

5. Back ON TOPIC: A Syllabary for your consideration
   • Back ON TOPIC: A Syllabary for your consideration (39 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

6. Case Inflection Development
   • Case Inflection Development (25 lines)
     From: Sasha Boyd <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (37 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (39 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (44 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (38 lines)
     From: Alexander Boyd <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (46 lines)
     From: Sasha Boyd <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (54 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (88 lines)
     From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (65 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (51 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (73 lines)
     From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (45 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (71 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (62 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (93 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (45 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (63 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (65 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (52 lines)
     From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (96 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (81 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (70 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (76 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (83 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (74 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (41 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (52 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (61 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (30 lines)
     From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (90 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (41 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (70 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (69 lines)
     From: Maxime Papillon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (75 lines)
     From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (30 lines)
     From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (67 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (34 lines)
     From: Sasha Boyd <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (58 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case Inflection Development (65 lines)
     From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>

7. Conlanging talk @ Edinburgh
   • Re: Conlanging talk @ Edinburgh (119 lines)
     From: Richard Littauer <[log in to unmask]>

8. Conlangs based on Endangered/Dead Languages
   • Conlangs based on Endangered/Dead Languages (39 lines)
     From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs based on Endangered/Dead Languages (59 lines)
     From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs based on Endangered/Dead Languages (43 lines)
     From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs based on Endangered/Dead Languages (59 lines)
     From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs based on Endangered/Dead Languages (57 lines)
     From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs based on Endangered/Dead Languages (54 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

9. Could you take quick look at this?
   • Could you take quick look at this? (33 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Could you take quick look at this? (46 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Could you take quick look at this? (61 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Could you take quick look at this? (32 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Could you take quick look at this? (51 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Could you take quick look at this? (41 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Could you take quick look at this? (45 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Could you take quick look at this? (51 lines)
     From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Could you take quick look at this? (42 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Could you take quick look at this? (63 lines)
     From: M.S. Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>

10. Date and time on Cindu
    • Date and time on Cindu (38 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

11. Doggy translation [was: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review]
    • Doggy translation [was: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review] (34 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Doggy translation [was: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review] (45 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Doggy translation [was: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review] (52 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Doggy translation [was: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review] (42 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Doggy translation [was: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review] (53 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>

12. Euia Twas phonology and orthography
    • Euia Twas phonology and orthography (270 lines)
      From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>

13. Fight Linguistic Extinction
    • Re: Fight Linguistic Extinction (51 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>

14. Fonts with correct diacritic placement?
    • Fonts with correct diacritic placement? (36 lines)
      From: Josh Roth <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fonts with correct diacritic placement? (69 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fonts with correct diacritic placement? (69 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>

15. for those who collect grammars: Chemehuevi
    • for those who collect grammars: Chemehuevi (33 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: for those who collect grammars: Chemehuevi (55 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: for those who collect grammars: Chemehuevi (52 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

16. Help CONLANG movie get distribution!
    • Help CONLANG movie get distribution! (50 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>

17. List of Germanic loanwords in Balto-Finnic?
    • List of Germanic loanwords in Balto-Finnic? (37 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

18. OT : endos vs entos
    • OT : endos vs entos (26 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT : endos vs entos (64 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT : endos vs entos (103 lines)
      From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT : endos vs entos (36 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT : endos vs entos (27 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT : endos vs entos (122 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

19. OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails...
    • OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails... (72 lines)
      From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails... (70 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails... (75 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails... (87 lines)
      From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails... (28 lines)
      From: Nathan Schulzke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails... (43 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails... (46 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails... (105 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails... (113 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails... (52 lines)
      From: Tristan Plumb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: On the subject of dodgy looking emails... (65 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>

20. TAKE revision - latest
    • TAKE revision - latest (68 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TAKE revision - latest (43 lines)
      From: Henrik <[log in to unmask]>

21. TECH Font Embedding (was Re: Could you take quick look at this?)
    • TECH Font Embedding (was Re: Could you take quick look at this?) (64 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH Font Embedding (was Re: Could you take quick look at this?) (43 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>

22. TECH: HTML entities in Emails (was: Re: TAKE revision - latest)
    • TECH: HTML entities in Emails (was: Re: TAKE revision - latest) (53 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

23. The Trouble with Wizards
    • Re: The Trouble with Wizards (55 lines)
      From: Simon Clarkstone <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Trouble with Wizards (24 lines)
      From: Leila Kalomi <[log in to unmask]>

24. Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review
    • Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review (35 lines)
      From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review (83 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review (62 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review (47 lines)
      From: masukomi <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review (60 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review (40 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review (54 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review (51 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>

25. Usona Esperantiso and Dothraki
    • Usona Esperantiso and Dothraki (34 lines)
      From: Richard Littauer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Usona Esperantiso and Dothraki (41 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Usona Esperantiso and Dothraki (51 lines)
      From: Richard Littauer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Usona Esperantiso and Dothraki (33 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Usona Esperantiso and Dothraki (54 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Usona Esperantiso and Dothraki (67 lines)
      From: Richard Littauer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Usona Esperantiso and Dothraki (40 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Usona Esperantiso and Dothraki (32 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Usona Esperantiso and Dothraki (38 lines)
      From: Vincent Pistelli <[log in to unmask]>

26. XSAMPA question
    • XSAMPA question (44 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (45 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (49 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (48 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (59 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (56 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (43 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (57 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (53 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (44 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (67 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (59 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: XSAMPA question (35 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (49 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (86 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (99 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (57 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (69 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (69 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (62 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (87 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (74 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (73 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (63 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (49 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (53 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (58 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (83 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (69 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (53 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (118 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (42 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (53 lines)
      From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (60 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (39 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (82 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (75 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (58 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (86 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (58 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (64 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: XSAMPA question (63 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>

27. ZBB has moved
    • Re: ZBB has moved (52 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ZBB has moved (43 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ZBB has moved (53 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ZBB has moved (38 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>