Conlang
Mailing List – October 2010, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Best" way to write a complete description of a language
(2 messages)
<No subject>
A method of generating "flavored" words
(6 messages)
A Preliminary Syllabary
(2 messages)
Conlang Graffiti?
(15 messages)
Conlangs based on Endangered/Dead Languages
Could you take quick look at this?
(3 messages)
Doggy translation [was: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review]
Fonts with correct diacritic placement?
(6 messages)
Help wanted with experiment
Kunu Syllabary - Second Draft
Kunu syllabary web page
(5 messages)
LLL idea
(25 messages)
Logographic Script for your Conlang
(5 messages)
Mixing pre- and post- positioned adjectives
(6 messages)
Morphological Downstep (Tone)
New Zhyler Orthography Page
(7 messages)
OffTopic/THEORY Re: LLL idea
(2 messages)
OT (and TECH): Annoyances
(4 messages)
phonemicity
(3 messages)
TAKE revision - latest
(2 messages)
TECH Font Embedding (was Re: Could you take quick look at this?)
(3 messages)
Third Draft Syllabary
Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review
(7 messages)
Troilgulm phrasebook
(2 messages)
XSAMPA question
(12 messages)
YAEUT : journal vs diary
(31 messages)
{X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(25 messages)
"Best" way to write a complete description of a language
Re: "Best" way to write a complete description of a language
(61 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Best" way to write a complete description of a language
(32 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
<No subject>
(86 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
A method of generating "flavored" words
Re: A method of generating "flavored" words
(80 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A method of generating "flavored" words
(108 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A method of generating "flavored" words
(61 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A method of generating "flavored" words
(72 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A method of generating "flavored" words
(55 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A method of generating "flavored" words
(98 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Preliminary Syllabary
Re: A Preliminary Syllabary
(43 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Preliminary Syllabary
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Graffiti?
Conlang Graffiti?
(36 lines)
From:
masukomi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(45 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(42 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(54 lines)
From:
masukomi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(72 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(46 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(51 lines)
From:
masukomi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(39 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(41 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(63 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(73 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(59 lines)
From:
masukomi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(70 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(55 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Graffiti?
(55 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlangs based on Endangered/Dead Languages
Re: Conlangs based on Endangered/Dead Languages
(45 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Could you take quick look at this?
Re: Could you take quick look at this?
(35 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Could you take quick look at this?
(60 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Could you take quick look at this?
(67 lines)
From:
Shair A <
[log in to unmask]
>
Doggy translation [was: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review]
Re: Doggy translation [was: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review]
(42 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fonts with correct diacritic placement?
Re: Fonts with correct diacritic placement?
(77 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fonts with correct diacritic placement?
(37 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fonts with correct diacritic placement?
(67 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fonts with correct diacritic placement?
(78 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fonts with correct diacritic placement?
(42 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fonts with correct diacritic placement?
(60 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Help wanted with experiment
Help wanted with experiment
(35 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kunu Syllabary - Second Draft
Kunu Syllabary - Second Draft
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kunu syllabary web page
Kunu syllabary web page
(37 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kunu syllabary web page
(62 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kunu syllabary web page
(77 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kunu syllabary web page
(59 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kunu syllabary web page
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
LLL idea
LLL idea
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(43 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(35 lines)
From:
vii iiix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(41 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(40 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(47 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(43 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(48 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(59 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(38 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(44 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(49 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(39 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(45 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(86 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(63 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(35 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(61 lines)
From:
Maxime Papillon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(77 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(43 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(103 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(97 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(62 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LLL idea
(93 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Logographic Script for your Conlang
Logographic Script for your Conlang
(54 lines)
From:
Patrick Michael Niedzielski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Logographic Script for your Conlang
(50 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Logographic Script for your Conlang
(59 lines)
From:
Patrick Michael Niedzielski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Logographic Script for your Conlang
(70 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Logographic Script for your Conlang
(46 lines)
From:
Patrick Michael Niedzielski <
[log in to unmask]
>
Mixing pre- and post- positioned adjectives
Mixing pre- and post- positioned adjectives
(50 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixing pre- and post- positioned adjectives
(38 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixing pre- and post- positioned adjectives
(99 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixing pre- and post- positioned adjectives
(83 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixing pre- and post- positioned adjectives
(92 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Mixing pre- and post- positioned adjectives
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Morphological Downstep (Tone)
Morphological Downstep (Tone)
(102 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Zhyler Orthography Page
New Zhyler Orthography Page
(55 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page
(64 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page
(71 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page
(49 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page
(75 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page
(82 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page
(54 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
OffTopic/THEORY Re: LLL idea
OffTopic/THEORY Re: LLL idea
(64 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
OffTopic/THEORY Re: LLL idea
(57 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT (and TECH): Annoyances
OT (and TECH): Annoyances
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT (and TECH): Annoyances
(76 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT (and TECH): Annoyances
(48 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT (and TECH): Annoyances
(98 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
phonemicity
phonemicity
(66 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemicity
(45 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonemicity
(62 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
TAKE revision - latest
Re: TAKE revision - latest
(33 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TAKE revision - latest
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH Font Embedding (was Re: Could you take quick look at this?)
Re: TECH Font Embedding (was Re: Could you take quick look at this?)
(50 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH Font Embedding (was Re: Could you take quick look at this?)
(74 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH Font Embedding (was Re: Could you take quick look at this?)
(34 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Third Draft Syllabary
Third Draft Syllabary
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review
Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review
(49 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review
(103 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review
(113 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review
(61 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review
(66 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review
(90 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Through the Language Glass - A Conlanger's Review
(85 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Troilgulm phrasebook
Troilgulm phrasebook
(129 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Troilgulm phrasebook
(27 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
XSAMPA question
Re: XSAMPA question
(49 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA question
(75 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA question
(71 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA question
(62 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA question
(49 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA question
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA question
(47 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA question
(71 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA question
(65 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA question
(76 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA question
(94 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: XSAMPA question
(63 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEUT : journal vs diary
YAEUT : journal vs diary
(27 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(38 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(37 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(63 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(35 lines)
From:
Max Dominik Weber <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(54 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(42 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(52 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(95 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(41 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(58 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(71 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(56 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(40 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(50 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(39 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(48 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(59 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(49 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(46 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(47 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(59 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(47 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(38 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(29 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(50 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT : journal vs diary
(61 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
{X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
{X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(78 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(41 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
{X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(55 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(53 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(71 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(78 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(43 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(48 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(55 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(49 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(65 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(32 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
{X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(43 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(47 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(108 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(75 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(45 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(65 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(105 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(112 lines)
From:
Shair A <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(128 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(44 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: {X} in Your Conscript (was Re: New Zhyler Orthography Page)
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – October 2010, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – October 2010, week 4
