Conlang Mailing List – February 2011, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Glimpse" journal on written language
• Conlang Card Exchange 2010 registration available
• Conlangy webcomic (2 messages)
• evolution of infixes (11 messages)
• Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes) (11 messages)
• F0 action types (2 messages)
• FrathWiki appears to be down (5 messages)
• IPA Question: Proper representation of the korean ssang-gyeok and ssang-seot (3 messages)
• Metafont tutorial beyond lesson 2
• My conlang: Olesi
• OT: The OEDILF (2 messages)
• prosody
• question on analysis of tone
• SI units in TAKE (2 messages)
• SI units in TAKE (was: What does _joule_ rhyme with?) (3 messages)
• Splitting of a word or morpheme into several (9 messages)
• The verb "to want" (6 messages)
• Use in the real world (11 messages)
• What does _joule_ rhyme with?
• What's the difference betweeen a King and and Emperor? (5 messages)
• YAEUT: Husband and Wife (35 messages)

1. "Glimpse" journal on written language
   • "Glimpse" journal on written language (27 lines)
     Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 03:40:23 -0600

2. Conlang Card Exchange 2010 registration available
   • Re: Conlang Card Exchange 2010 registration available (39 lines)
     Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 12:30:42 -0600

3. Conlangy webcomic
   • Conlangy webcomic (29 lines)
     Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 13:06:49 -0500
   • Re: Conlangy webcomic (39 lines)
     Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 19:43:37 +0000

4. evolution of infixes
   • evolution of infixes (29 lines)
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:27:37 -0600
   • Re: evolution of infixes (46 lines)
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:37:44 -0600
   • Re: evolution of infixes (35 lines)
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:38:34 -0700
   • Re: evolution of infixes (28 lines)
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:01:59 -0500
   • Re: evolution of infixes (37 lines)
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:04:25 -0500
   • Re: evolution of infixes (69 lines)
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:21:50 -0600
   • Re: evolution of infixes (55 lines)
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:40:30 -0800
   • Re: evolution of infixes (46 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 00:11:47 -0600
   • Re: evolution of infixes (60 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 01:38:13 -0600
   • Re: evolution of infixes (50 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:04:38 +0000
   • Re: evolution of infixes (54 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:12:36 +0000

5. Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes)
   • Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes) (58 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 00:09:54 -0600
   • Re: Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes) (37 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:13:14 -0600
   • Re: Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes) (56 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:26:44 -0600
   • Re: Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes) (36 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:38:09 -0800
   • Re: Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes) (37 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:44:57 -0500
   • Re: Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes) (69 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:11:21 -0800
   • Re: Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes) (52 lines)
     Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 01:20:12 -0600
   • Re: Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes) (48 lines)
     Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:38:58 +0100
   • Re: Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes) (56 lines)
     Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 10:12:55 -0500
   • Re: Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes) (42 lines)
     Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:03:53 +0000
   • Re: Evolution of reduplication (was Re: evolution of infixes) (37 lines)
     Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:04:32 -0500

6. F0 action types
   • F0 action types (44 lines)
     Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:19:41 -0500
   • Re: F0 action types (50 lines)
     Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:24:21 -0500

7. FrathWiki appears to be down
   • FrathWiki appears to be down (21 lines)
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:58:30 -0500
   • Re: FrathWiki appears to be down (44 lines)
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:05:11 +0100
   • Re: FrathWiki appears to be down (54 lines)
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:10:04 -0800
   • Re: FrathWiki appears to be down (27 lines)
     Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:20:21 -0500
   • Re: FrathWiki appears to be down (19 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:26:55 -0500

8. IPA Question: Proper representation of the korean ssang-gyeok and ssang-seot
   • IPA Question: Proper representation of the korean ssang-gyeok and ssang-seot (38 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 21:07:10 -0500
   • Re: IPA Question: Proper representation of the korean ssang-gyeok and ssang-seot (49 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 21:28:54 -0500
   • Re: IPA Question: Proper representation of the korean ssang-gyeok and ssang-seot (402 lines)
     Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 21:52:51 -0500

9. Metafont tutorial beyond lesson 2
   • Metafont tutorial beyond lesson 2 (41 lines)
     Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 19:02:11 +0100

10. My conlang: Olesi
    • Re: My conlang: Olesi (60 lines)
      Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:38:37 +0200

11. OT: The OEDILF
    • OT: The OEDILF (53 lines)
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:01:44 -0500
    • Re: OT: The OEDILF (42 lines)
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 02:17:31 -0500

12. prosody
    • prosody (56 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:06:03 -0800

13. question on analysis of tone
    • question on analysis of tone (30 lines)
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 22:18:04 +0000

14. SI units in TAKE
    • Re: SI units in TAKE (71 lines)
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:17:25 +0000
    • Re: SI units in TAKE (95 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:06:20 +0000

15. SI units in TAKE (was: What does _joule_ rhyme with?)
    • SI units in TAKE (was: What does _joule_ rhyme with?) (105 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:20:44 +0000
    • Re: SI units in TAKE (was: What does _joule_ rhyme with?) (81 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 21:09:39 +0100
    • Re: SI units in TAKE (was: What does _joule_ rhyme with?) (69 lines)
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 03:11:18 +0000

16. Splitting of a word or morpheme into several
    • Splitting of a word or morpheme into several (62 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 00:44:15 -0600
    • Re: Splitting of a word or morpheme into several (44 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 00:28:58 -0800
    • Re: Splitting of a word or morpheme into several (95 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:55:37 -0500
    • Re: Splitting of a word or morpheme into several (35 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:25:04 -0700
    • Re: Splitting of a word or morpheme into several (55 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:36:49 -0500
    • Re: Splitting of a word or morpheme into several (139 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:38:18 -0500
    • Re: Splitting of a word or morpheme into several (26 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:49:26 -0500
    • Re: Splitting of a word or morpheme into several (57 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:22:56 +0000
    • Re: Splitting of a word or morpheme into several (124 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:24:39 -0600

17. The verb "to want"
    • The verb "to want" (67 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:27:43 -0200
    • Re: The verb "to want" (56 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:02:02 -0500
    • Re: The verb "to want" (94 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 12:20:27 -0500
    • Re: The verb "to want" (90 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 20:16:59 +0100
    • Re: The verb "to want" (136 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 21:53:38 +0100
    • Re: The verb "to want" (38 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:05:05 -0800

18. Use in the real world
    • Use in the real world (54 lines)
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 16:17:52 -0000
    • Re: Use in the real world (62 lines)
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:24:44 -0500
    • Re: Use in the real world (35 lines)
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 17:32:30 +0100
    • Re: Use in the real world (42 lines)
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:40:57 -0500
    • Re: Use in the real world (72 lines)
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 22:42:22 +0000
    • Re: Use in the real world (73 lines)
      Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 18:16:03 -0600
    • Re: Use in the real world (32 lines)
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 01:51:47 -0500
    • Re: Use in the real world (59 lines)
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:07:04 +0000
    • Re: Use in the real world (83 lines)
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 09:04:26 -0000
    • Re: Use in the real world (62 lines)
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:15:41 +0100
    • Re: Use in the real world (73 lines)
      Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 16:36:30 +0000

19. What does _joule_ rhyme with?
    • Re: What does _joule_ rhyme with? (55 lines)
      Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:41:35 +0100

20. What's the difference betweeen a King and and Emperor?
    • What's the difference betweeen a King and and Emperor? (42 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 11:02:25 +0000
    • Re: What's the difference betweeen a King and and Emperor? (108 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 14:25:45 +0000
    • Re: What's the difference betweeen a King and and Emperor? (87 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 18:44:15 +0100
    • Re: What's the difference betweeen a King and and Emperor? (53 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 13:36:34 -0500
    • Re: What's the difference betweeen a King and and Emperor? (115 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:10:48 +0000

21. YAEUT: Husband and Wife
    • YAEUT: Husband and Wife (30 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:00:52 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (46 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:22:25 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (46 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:48:37 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (74 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 14:59:54 -0800
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (28 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 18:00:47 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (27 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:58:11 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (61 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 23:12:34 +0000
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (63 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 15:15:22 -0800
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (92 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:15:39 -0600
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (59 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 16:25:28 -0700
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (77 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:18:01 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (52 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:35:16 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (40 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:58:30 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (47 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 20:03:57 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (48 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 17:43:19 -0800
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (64 lines)
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 01:57:59 +0000
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (44 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 21:43:30 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (45 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 21:49:45 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (35 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 21:53:07 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (78 lines)
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 04:49:12 +0100
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (47 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 22:49:50 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (49 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 21:02:30 -0700
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (59 lines)
      Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 21:02:58 -0800
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (112 lines)
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 10:46:19 +0000
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (68 lines)
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 12:15:43 +0000
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (64 lines)
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 15:54:54 +0000
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (49 lines)
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 20:19:57 +0100
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (94 lines)
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 17:07:22 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (107 lines)
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (52 lines)
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 14:23:53 -0800
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (88 lines)
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 23:28:20 +0000
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (88 lines)
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:04:02 -0800
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (40 lines)
      Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 18:29:38 -0600
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (51 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:10:53 +0000
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (33 lines)
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:33:56 -0500