Conlang Mailing List – February 2011, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• Can anyone recommend a speech recognition library? (2 messages)
• CONLANG Digest - 16 Feb 2011 to 17 Feb 2011 (#2011-49)
• DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (12 messages)
• Going nomail
• Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features? (6 messages)
• I seem to have acquired a Native American name (5 messages)
• Lemurs (4 messages)
• Lexical Borrowing
• Lexical Borrowing IRL (Was: Lexical Borrowing)
• Logical analysis attempt
• Non-subject relativization strategies (14 messages)
• not able to prononunce glottal stop? (6 messages)
• OT: International Mother Language Day (8 messages)
• phrases at the "wrong" level (6 messages)
• TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (17 messages)
• TEDx: Your favorite card from the Exchange
• the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (26 messages)
• Time travelling (5 messages)
• Tones and their associations (was: TEDx etc.) (3 messages)
• Wardwesan? (2 messages)
• Where Angels Fear to Tread (was: Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages) (3 messages)
• YAEUT: Husband and Wife
• YAEUT: kinges vs kynges (10 messages)

1. Can anyone recommend a speech recognition library?
   • Can anyone recommend a speech recognition library? (39 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:50:45 +0000
   • Re: Can anyone recommend a speech recognition library? (46 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:16:32 +0100

2. CONLANG Digest - 16 Feb 2011 to 17 Feb 2011 (#2011-49)
   • Re: CONLANG Digest - 16 Feb 2011 to 17 Feb 2011 (#2011-49) (45 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 05:43:45 -0600

3. DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (48 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:24:40 -0500
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (94 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:27:58 +0100
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (62 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:21:04 -0800
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (44 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:19:59 -0600
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (31 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:45:41 -0500
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (49 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:06:57 -0700
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (60 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:32:43 +0100
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (72 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:59:05 -0700
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (50 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:55:17 +0000
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (53 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:40:33 -0800
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (65 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 01:58:53 -0500
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (21 lines)
     Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:30:56 -0500

4. Going nomail
   • Going nomail (37 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:28:37 -0000

5. Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features?
   • Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features? (51 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:09:50 -0800
   • Re: Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features? (67 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:23:01 -0500
   • Re: Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features? (120 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:05:03 -0800
   • Re: Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features? (44 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:44:27 -0500
   • Re: Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features? (36 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:26:09 +0000
   • Re: Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features? (91 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:01:46 -0800

6. I seem to have acquired a Native American name
   • I seem to have acquired a Native American name (34 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:46:22 +0000
   • Re: I seem to have acquired a Native American name (43 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:53:58 +0000
   • Re: I seem to have acquired a Native American name (71 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:51:10 -0800
   • Re: I seem to have acquired a Native American name (51 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:55:56 +0000
   • Re: I seem to have acquired a Native American name (73 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:52:19 -0800

7. Lemurs
   • Lemurs (32 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:16:13 +0000
   • Re: Lemurs (35 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:24:32 +0100
   • Re: Lemurs (40 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:25:55 +0100
   • Re: Lemurs (50 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:32:57 +0000

8. Lexical Borrowing
   • Re: Lexical Borrowing (146 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:36:59 +0000

9. Lexical Borrowing IRL (Was: Lexical Borrowing)
   • Re: Lexical Borrowing IRL (Was: Lexical Borrowing) (27 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 05:09:52 -0500

10. Logical analysis attempt
    • Logical analysis attempt (200 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:01:12 -0600

11. Non-subject relativization strategies
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (39 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:14:25 -0500
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 07:41:47 -0700
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (49 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:26:09 -0800
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (44 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:36:55 -0600
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (67 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:48:12 -0500
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (66 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:53:29 +0000
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (80 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:13:04 +0100
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (54 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:13:29 -0600
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (74 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:47:45 -0600
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (79 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:09:04 -0800
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (119 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:18:35 +0000
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (45 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:13:28 -0500
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (83 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:25:01 +0200
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (76 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:28:30 -0000

12. not able to prononunce glottal stop?
    • not able to prononunce glottal stop? (39 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:09:30 +0100
    • Re: not able to prononunce glottal stop? (50 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:32:31 +0000
    • Re: not able to prononunce glottal stop? (62 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:29:20 -0600
    • Re: not able to prononunce glottal stop? (72 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:09:47 +0100
    • Re: not able to prononunce glottal stop? (105 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:33:26 +0000
    • Re: not able to prononunce glottal stop? (41 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:32:41 +0000

13. OT: International Mother Language Day
    • OT: International Mother Language Day (38 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:17:15 -0500
    • Re: OT: International Mother Language Day (47 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:59:56 -0600
    • Re: OT: International Mother Language Day (59 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:45:49 -0000
    • Re: OT: International Mother Language Day (74 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:35:54 -0500
    • Re: OT: International Mother Language Day (101 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:34:57 +0000
    • Re: OT: International Mother Language Day (68 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:48:09 -0500
    • Re: OT: International Mother Language Day (47 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:46:32 -0000
    • Re: OT: International Mother Language Day (90 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:16:08 -0800

14. phrases at the "wrong" level
    • phrases at the "wrong" level (39 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:08:31 +0100
    • Re: phrases at the "wrong" level (58 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:26:29 -0500
    • Re: phrases at the "wrong" level (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:31:25 -0700
    • Re: phrases at the "wrong" level (52 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:37:01 +0000
    • Re: phrases at the "wrong" level (46 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:02:39 -0600
    • Re: phrases at the "wrong" level (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:08:04 -0500

15. TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
    • TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (30 lines)
      Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:49:29 -0600
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (35 lines)
      Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:52:40 -0600
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (44 lines)
      Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:47:09 -0800
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (46 lines)
      Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:10:56 -0600
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (50 lines)
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 01:20:08 +0000
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (33 lines)
      Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:16:06 -0500
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (52 lines)
      Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:37:52 -0800
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (73 lines)
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 03:53:15 +0000
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (40 lines)
      Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:35:57 -0600
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (43 lines)
      Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:19:56 -0800
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (56 lines)
      Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:25:59 -0800
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (61 lines)
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:57:11 +0000
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (78 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:48:53 +0000
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (81 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:53:02 -0600
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (90 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:32:03 +0000
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (91 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:04:43 -0500
    • Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo (61 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:56:10 +0000

16. TEDx: Your favorite card from the Exchange
    • TEDx: Your favorite card from the Exchange (32 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:31:51 -0600

17. the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
    • the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (42 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:40:51 -0500
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (59 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:48:56 -0800
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (57 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:49:23 -0600
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (80 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:49:44 -0500
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (32 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:52:23 -0700
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (44 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:57:24 -0600
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (78 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 07:51:59 -0500
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 07:14:05 -0600
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (42 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:37:00 -0500
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (65 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:33:17 -0500
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (59 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 19:20:36 +0000
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (42 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:48:02 -0800
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (33 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:10:22 -0600
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (79 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:13:39 -0600
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (40 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:51:58 -0000
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (49 lines)
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 01:14:27 -0500
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (67 lines)
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:57:02 -0500
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (88 lines)
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:54:53 +0100
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (105 lines)
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:21:36 -0500
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (37 lines)
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:33:13 +0100
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (106 lines)
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:13:54 -0800
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (43 lines)
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:18:28 -0500
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (51 lines)
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:29:23 -0500
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (65 lines)
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:51:15 -0500
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (82 lines)
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:18:28 -0500
    • Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects (34 lines)
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:47:52 -0500

18. Time travelling
    • Time travelling (49 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 08:11:22 -0000
    • Re: Time travelling (70 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 01:08:45 -0800
    • Re: Time travelling (43 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 08:48:45 -0700
    • Re: Time travelling (52 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:27:48 +0000
    • Re: Time travelling (38 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:04:06 -0500

19. Tones and their associations (was: TEDx etc.)
    • Tones and their associations (was: TEDx etc.) (59 lines)
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 08:23:45 +0000
    • Re: Tones and their associations (was: TEDx etc.) (40 lines)
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:14:09 -0600
    • Re: Tones and their associations (was: TEDx etc.) (32 lines)
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:43:10 -0800

20. Wardwesan?
    • Wardwesan? (64 lines)
      Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:36:24 +0000
    • Re: Wardwesan? (63 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:00:40 -0500

21. Where Angels Fear to Tread (was: Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages)
    • Where Angels Fear to Tread (was: Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages) (76 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:00:52 +0000
    • Re: Where Angels Fear to Tread (was: Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages) (27 lines)
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:27:52 -0500
    • Re: Where Angels Fear to Tread (was: Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages) (46 lines)
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 06:49:00 +0000

22. YAEUT: Husband and Wife
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (51 lines)
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:04:04 -0600

23. YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
    • YAEUT: kinges vs kynges (46 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:50:58 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges (34 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:14:59 -0600
    • Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges (48 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:15:04 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges (27 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:18:44 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges (36 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:35:55 -0600
    • Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges (43 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:37:11 -0600
    • Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges (47 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:46:17 +0100
    • Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges (67 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:13:26 +0100
    • Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges (41 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:08:01 -0800
    • Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges (47 lines)
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:38:03 +0000