Conlang
Mailing List – February 2011, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Can anyone recommend a speech recognition library?
(2 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 16 Feb 2011 to 17 Feb 2011 (#2011-49)
DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(12 messages)
Going nomail
Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features?
(6 messages)
I seem to have acquired a Native American name
(5 messages)
Lemurs
(4 messages)
Lexical Borrowing
Lexical Borrowing IRL (Was: Lexical Borrowing)
Logical analysis attempt
Non-subject relativization strategies
(14 messages)
not able to prononunce glottal stop?
(6 messages)
OT: International Mother Language Day
(8 messages)
phrases at the "wrong" level
(6 messages)
TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(17 messages)
TEDx: Your favorite card from the Exchange
the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(26 messages)
Time travelling
(5 messages)
Tones and their associations (was: TEDx etc.)
(3 messages)
Wardwesan?
(2 messages)
Where Angels Fear to Tread (was: Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages)
(3 messages)
YAEUT: Husband and Wife
YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
(10 messages)
Can anyone recommend a speech recognition library?
Can anyone recommend a speech recognition library?
(39 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Can anyone recommend a speech recognition library?
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 16 Feb 2011 to 17 Feb 2011 (#2011-49)
Re: CONLANG Digest - 16 Feb 2011 to 17 Feb 2011 (#2011-49)
(45 lines)
From:
Jerry Muelver <
[log in to unmask]
>
DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(48 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(94 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(44 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(31 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(49 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(60 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(72 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(50 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(53 lines)
From:
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(65 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
(21 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going nomail
Going nomail
(37 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features?
Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features?
(51 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features?
(67 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features?
(120 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features?
(44 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features?
(36 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Contact Features?
(91 lines)
From:
Eamon Graham <
[log in to unmask]
>
I seem to have acquired a Native American name
I seem to have acquired a Native American name
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I seem to have acquired a Native American name
(43 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I seem to have acquired a Native American name
(71 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I seem to have acquired a Native American name
(51 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: I seem to have acquired a Native American name
(73 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lemurs
Lemurs
(32 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lemurs
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lemurs
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lemurs
(50 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lexical Borrowing
Re: Lexical Borrowing
(146 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lexical Borrowing IRL (Was: Lexical Borrowing)
Re: Lexical Borrowing IRL (Was: Lexical Borrowing)
(27 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Logical analysis attempt
Logical analysis attempt
(200 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-subject relativization strategies
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(39 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(46 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(49 lines)
From:
Adnan Majid <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(44 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(67 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(66 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(80 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(54 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(74 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(79 lines)
From:
Leila Kalomi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(119 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(45 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(83 lines)
From:
John Lategan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-subject relativization strategies
(76 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
not able to prononunce glottal stop?
not able to prononunce glottal stop?
(39 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not able to prononunce glottal stop?
(50 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not able to prononunce glottal stop?
(62 lines)
From:
Sam Weston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not able to prononunce glottal stop?
(72 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not able to prononunce glottal stop?
(105 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not able to prononunce glottal stop?
(41 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: International Mother Language Day
OT: International Mother Language Day
(38 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: International Mother Language Day
(47 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: International Mother Language Day
(59 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: International Mother Language Day
(74 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: International Mother Language Day
(101 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: International Mother Language Day
(68 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: International Mother Language Day
(47 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: International Mother Language Day
(90 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
phrases at the "wrong" level
phrases at the "wrong" level
(39 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phrases at the "wrong" level
(58 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phrases at the "wrong" level
(45 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phrases at the "wrong" level
(52 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phrases at the "wrong" level
(46 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phrases at the "wrong" level
(43 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(30 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(35 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(46 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(50 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(33 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(52 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(73 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(40 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(43 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(56 lines)
From:
David Edwards <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(61 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(78 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(81 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(90 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(91 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TEDx: Good tonal conlang for demo
(61 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
TEDx: Your favorite card from the Exchange
TEDx: Your favorite card from the Exchange
(32 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(42 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(59 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(57 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(80 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(32 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(44 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(78 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(51 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(42 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(65 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(59 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(42 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(33 lines)
From:
Jeff Sheets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(79 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(40 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(49 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(67 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(88 lines)
From:
Vojtěch Merunka <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(105 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(106 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(43 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(51 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(65 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(82 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the hobby of conlanging affecting one's job or school prospects
(34 lines)
From:
David Johnson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Time travelling
Time travelling
(49 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time travelling
(70 lines)
From:
Matthew Nichols <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time travelling
(43 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time travelling
(52 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Time travelling
(38 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tones and their associations (was: TEDx etc.)
Tones and their associations (was: TEDx etc.)
(59 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tones and their associations (was: TEDx etc.)
(40 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tones and their associations (was: TEDx etc.)
(32 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Wardwesan?
Wardwesan?
(64 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wardwesan?
(63 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Where Angels Fear to Tread (was: Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages)
Where Angels Fear to Tread (was: Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages)
(76 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Where Angels Fear to Tread (was: Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages)
(27 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Where Angels Fear to Tread (was: Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages)
(46 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEUT: Husband and Wife
Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife
(51 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
(46 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
(34 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
(48 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
(27 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
(36 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
(43 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
(47 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
(67 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEUT: kinges vs kynges
(47 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – February 2011, week 3
Conlang Mailing List – February 2011, week 3
