Conlang Mailing List – February 2011, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (6 messages)
• Exquisite Corpse
• Infinitives? (was: The verb "to want") (8 messages)
• Lexical Borrowing (8 messages)
• Lexical Borrowing IRL (Was: Lexical Borrowing) (2 messages)
• META: Conlang-L FAQ (2 messages)
• My colang Yuelami
• My conlang Yuelami
• My conlang: Olesi
• New conlang: yuelami (2 messages)
• Non-subject relativization strategies (32 messages)
• OT: Re: Raig
• Please help me slim down my Conlanging 101 talk to 16 minutes (3 messages)
• Please send me a sentence in your conlang for use in my TEDx talk (2 messages)
• Raig (was Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages)
• Register for the Fourth Language Creation Conference
• The verb "to want" (15 messages)
• Translation exercise? (24 messages)
• Word generation: Na'gifi Fasu'xa step-by-step (7 messages)
• YAEUT: Husband and Wife (6 messages)

1. DomLang = Domain Specific Languages
   • DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (96 lines)
     From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:36:09 -0600
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (48 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 12:14:35 +0000
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (57 lines)
     From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:58:34 -0600
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (58 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:16:48 +0000
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (77 lines)
     From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:27:25 -0800
   • Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages (97 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 02:18:48 -0500

2. Exquisite Corpse
   • Re: Exquisite Corpse (29 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:35:18 -0700

3. Infinitives? (was: The verb "to want")
   • Infinitives? (was: The verb "to want") (50 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:07:09 -0500
   • Re: Infinitives? (was: The verb "to want") (195 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:18:40 +0000
   • Re: Infinitives? (was: The verb "to want") (53 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:34:24 +0000
   • Re: Infinitives? (was: The verb "to want") (60 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:45:20 -0500
   • Re: Infinitives? (was: The verb "to want") (50 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:02:50 -0500
   • Re: Infinitives? (was: The verb "to want") (113 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 08:06:50 +0000
   • Re: Infinitives? (was: The verb "to want") (47 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:18:33 +0000
   • Re: Infinitives? (was: The verb "to want") (116 lines)
     From: Marlon Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:30:05 -0500

4. Lexical Borrowing
   • Lexical Borrowing (61 lines)
     From: Richard Littauer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:21:31 +0000
   • Re: Lexical Borrowing (54 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:42:00 +0000
   • Re: Lexical Borrowing (43 lines)
     From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:24:03 -0500
   • Re: Lexical Borrowing (29 lines)
     From: Anthony Miles <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:30:17 -0500
   • Re: Lexical Borrowing (39 lines)
     From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:42:25 -0500
   • Re: Lexical Borrowing (63 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:23:52 -0800
   • Re: Lexical Borrowing (124 lines)
     From: Marlon Couto Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 03:27:53 -0200
   • Re: Lexical Borrowing (97 lines)
     From: Marlon Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:23:15 -0500

5. Lexical Borrowing IRL (Was: Lexical Borrowing)
   • Lexical Borrowing IRL (Was: Lexical Borrowing) (76 lines)
     From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:51:32 -0500
   • Re: Lexical Borrowing IRL (Was: Lexical Borrowing) (46 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:23:31 -0800

6. META: Conlang-L FAQ
   • META: Conlang-L FAQ (279 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:51:00 -0500
   • META: Conlang-L FAQ (366 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:19:44 +0100

7. My colang Yuelami
   • My colang Yuelami (203 lines)
     From: Marlon Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:07:31 -0500

8. My conlang Yuelami
   • My conlang Yuelami (35 lines)
     From: Marlon Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:24:39 -0500

9. My conlang: Olesi
   • Re: My conlang: Olesi (23 lines)
     From: Anthony Miles <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 02:24:33 -0500

10. New conlang: yuelami
    • New conlang: yuelami (192 lines)
      From: Marlon Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:50:17 -0500
    • Re: New conlang: yuelami (57 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:55:17 -0600

11. Non-subject relativization strategies
    • Non-subject relativization strategies (53 lines)
      From: 1 2 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 08:54:36 -0500
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (86 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:21:27 +0100
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (45 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 09:01:49 -0700
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (40 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:24:53 +0000
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (112 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:55:10 -0500
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (156 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 19:33:25 +0000
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (60 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:07:49 +0000
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (51 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:39:35 -0500
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (67 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:47:33 -0800
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (36 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:19:32 -0600
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (88 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:45:23 -0700
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (187 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 23:10:08 +0000
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (63 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:34:17 -0700
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (94 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:46:02 -0800
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (102 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 04:35:17 +0000
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (90 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:09:59 +0100
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (101 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:16:42 +0100
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (50 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 17:07:43 +0000
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (66 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:38:26 +0100
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (74 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 09:57:00 -0800
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (89 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:28:23 +0000
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (68 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:41:42 -0600
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (68 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 19:50:26 +0000
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (116 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 13:14:50 -0800
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (61 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 16:37:59 -0500
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (44 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 16:47:39 -0500
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (43 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:41:32 -0800
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (83 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:54:28 -0500
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (173 lines)
      From: Marlon Couto Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 03:07:18 -0200
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (130 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:38:14 -0500
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (171 lines)
      From: Marlon Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:25:05 -0500
    • Re: Non-subject relativization strategies (43 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:09:20 -0500

12. OT: Re: Raig
    • OT: Re: Raig (39 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:09:18 +0100

13. Please help me slim down my Conlanging 101 talk to 16 minutes
    • Please help me slim down my Conlanging 101 talk to 16 minutes (49 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 23:02:23 -0600
    • Re: Please help me slim down my Conlanging 101 talk to 16 minutes (91 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 17:15:05 -0600
    • Re: Please help me slim down my Conlanging 101 talk to 16 minutes (54 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 03:02:06 -0500

14. Please send me a sentence in your conlang for use in my TEDx talk
    • Please send me a sentence in your conlang for use in my TEDx talk (82 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 01:50:47 -0600
    • Re: Please send me a sentence in your conlang for use in my TEDx talk (34 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 01:53:29 -0600

15. Raig (was Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages)
    • Raig (was Re: DomLang = Domain Specific Languages) (111 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:09:43 -0600

16. Register for the Fourth Language Creation Conference
    • Register for the Fourth Language Creation Conference (152 lines)
      From: Language Creation Society <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 22:16:14 -0800

17. The verb "to want"
    • Re: The verb "to want" (63 lines)
      From: 1 2 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:54:03 -0200
    • Re: The verb "to want" (50 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 13:39:24 -0600
    • Re: The verb "to want" (62 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 21:21:32 +0000
    • Re: The verb "to want" (71 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 22:59:58 +0000
    • Re: The verb "to want" (60 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 18:33:20 -0600
    • Re: The verb "to want" (78 lines)
      From: 1 2 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:09:17 -0200
    • Re: The verb "to want" (68 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:00:23 -0800
    • Re: The verb "to want" (63 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:19:17 -0800
    • Re: The verb "to want" (66 lines)
      From: John Lategan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:39:28 +0200
    • Re: The verb "to want" (74 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:52:35 +0100
    • Re: The verb "to want" (95 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:48:31 +0000
    • Re: The verb "to want" (56 lines)
      From: 1 2 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:41:39 -0200
    • Re: The verb "to want" (41 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:49:56 -0500
    • Re: The verb "to want" (63 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:58:57 -0600
    • Re: The verb "to want" (75 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:33:19 -0800

18. Translation exercise?
    • Translation exercise? (44 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:52:41 -0800
    • Re: Translation exercise? (58 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:15:01 -0600
    • Re: Translation exercise? (56 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:22:38 -0500
    • Re: Translation exercise? (65 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:31:15 +0100
    • Re: Translation exercise? (44 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:41:49 +0000
    • Re: Translation exercise? (30 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:45:55 -0600
    • Re: Translation exercise? (57 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:48:11 -0500
    • Re: Translation exercise? (30 lines)
      From: Karen Badham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:57:43 -0500
    • Re: Translation exercise? (53 lines)
      From: Дмитрий <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 03:09:01 +0300
    • Re: Translation exercise? (46 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:22:33 -0000
    • Re: Translation exercise? (46 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:44:04 +0000
    • Re: Translation exercise? (53 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:16:06 -0500
    • Re: Translation exercise? (57 lines)
      From: Marlon Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:25:24 -0500
    • Re: Translation exercise? (69 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:30:32 -0800
    • Re: Translation exercise? (46 lines)
      From: Anthony Miles <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:33:39 -0500
    • Re: Translation exercise? (62 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:35:09 -0800
    • Re: Translation exercise? (64 lines)
      From: Jan Strasser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 10:35:27 +0100
    • Re: Translation exercise? (44 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:32:50 +0100
    • Re: Translation exercise? (47 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:27:53 -0600
    • Re: Translation exercise? (41 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:38:11 +0000
    • Re: Translation exercise? (74 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 02:07:28 +0000
    • Re: Translation exercise? (27 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 23:09:07 -0500
    • Re: Translation exercise? (31 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 23:13:21 -0500
    • Re: Translation exercise? (37 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 09:31:23 -0600

19. Word generation: Na'gifi Fasu'xa step-by-step
    • Word generation: Na'gifi Fasu'xa step-by-step (55 lines)
      From: Anthony Miles <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 02:12:13 -0500
    • Re: Word generation: Na'gifi Fasu'xa step-by-step (95 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:05:34 -0500
    • Re: Word generation: Na'gifi Fasu'xa step-by-step (41 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 21:52:20 -0500
    • Re: Word generation: Na'gifi Fasu'xa step-by-step (57 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:55:47 -0500
    • Re: Word generation: Na'gifi Fasu'xa step-by-step (42 lines)
      From: Anthony Miles <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:35:20 -0500
    • Re: Word generation: Na'gifi Fasu'xa step-by-step (41 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:45:24 -0500
    • Re: Word generation: Na'gifi Fasu'xa step-by-step (55 lines)
      From: Anthony Miles <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:18:39 -0500

20. YAEUT: Husband and Wife
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (43 lines)
      From: maikxlx <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 23:35:30 -0500
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (64 lines)
      From: Sapthan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:06:46 -0800
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (32 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 13:36:30 -0600
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (35 lines)
      From: Jeff Sheets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 14:43:15 -0600
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (72 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 02:31:41 +0000
    • Re: YAEUT: Husband and Wife (86 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 03:17:43 -0500