Conlang
Mailing List – March 2011, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
400 Basic Concepts/Words...?
(8 messages)
Cases and states in Semitic languages
CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
(10 messages)
Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(40 messages)
Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error?
(3 messages)
Correlatives in your conlang
(12 messages)
Correlatives in your conlang (longish...)
Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary?
(3 messages)
Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases))
(5 messages)
Does anyone speak Inukitut?
(9 messages)
Etymological tangent
(4 messages)
Growing a Language
How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases)
(3 messages)
Instrumental Pronouns
(16 messages)
Naming Cases
(22 messages)
Phonology: Initial glottal stop + stop
(2 messages)
Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography
Startling (But Pleasant!) Discovery
(4 messages)
Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(26 messages)
Types of etymological relationships
(8 messages)
400 Basic Concepts/Words...?
Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...?
(68 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...?
(42 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...?
(64 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...?
(84 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...?
(30 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...?
(51 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...?
(83 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...?
(55 lines)
From:
Matthew Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cases and states in Semitic languages
Cases and states in Semitic languages
(100 lines)
From:
Renato Montes <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
(59 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
(48 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
(64 lines)
From:
Jeff Daniel Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
(73 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
(106 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
(44 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
(68 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
(119 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
(53 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
(58 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(47 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(44 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(35 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(44 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(41 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(75 lines)
From:
J. Burke <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(86 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(109 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(109 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(84 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(64 lines)
From:
Jan Strasser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(144 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(51 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(48 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(50 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(87 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(100 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(110 lines)
From:
David Edwards <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(73 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(40 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(41 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(49 lines)
From:
Dale McCreery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(36 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(138 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(33 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(48 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(64 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(155 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(64 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(143 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(95 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(57 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(70 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(70 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(125 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(41 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(113 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(124 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(136 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
(43 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error?
Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error?
(98 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error?
(51 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error?
(44 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Correlatives in your conlang
Correlatives in your conlang
(32 lines)
From:
vii iiix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Correlatives in your conlang
(49 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Correlatives in your conlang
(62 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Correlatives in your conlang
(56 lines)
From:
Zach Wellstood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Correlatives in your conlang
(46 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Correlatives in your conlang
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Correlatives in your conlang
(74 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Correlatives in your conlang
(54 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Correlatives in your conlang
(48 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Correlatives in your conlang
(52 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Correlatives in your conlang
(83 lines)
From:
<deinx nxtxr> <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Correlatives in your conlang
(57 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Correlatives in your conlang (longish...)
Re: Correlatives in your conlang (longish...)
(74 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary?
Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary?
(73 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary?
(84 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary?
(63 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases))
Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases))
(64 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases))
(91 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases))
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases))
(81 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases))
(111 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Does anyone speak Inukitut?
Does anyone speak Inukitut?
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut?
(33 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut?
(37 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut?
(52 lines)
From:
Dale McCreery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut?
(44 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut?
(37 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut?
(50 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut?
(52 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut?
(43 lines)
From:
Daniel Nielsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Etymological tangent
Etymological tangent
(35 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etymological tangent
(58 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etymological tangent
(90 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Etymological tangent
(111 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Growing a Language
Growing a Language
(27 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases)
How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases)
(150 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases)
(50 lines)
From:
Renato Montes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases)
(171 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Instrumental Pronouns
Instrumental Pronouns
(37 lines)
From:
vii iiix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(107 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(42 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(45 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(80 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(37 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(49 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(58 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(103 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(49 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(91 lines)
From:
vii iiix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(51 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(118 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(120 lines)
From:
vii iiix <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(28 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Instrumental Pronouns
(57 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Naming Cases
Naming Cases
(47 lines)
From:
Toms Deimonds Barvidis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(68 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(125 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(48 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(85 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(115 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(54 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(52 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(61 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(97 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(71 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(167 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(59 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(82 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(104 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(85 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(89 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(119 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(93 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(68 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(54 lines)
From:
Renato Montes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naming Cases
(152 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonology: Initial glottal stop + stop
Re: Phonology: Initial glottal stop + stop
(49 lines)
From:
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology: Initial glottal stop + stop
(50 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography
Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography
(80 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Startling (But Pleasant!) Discovery
Startling (But Pleasant!) Discovery
(40 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Startling (But Pleasant!) Discovery
(44 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Startling (But Pleasant!) Discovery
(54 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Startling (But Pleasant!) Discovery
(25 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(44 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(61 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(74 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(75 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(40 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(58 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(124 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(53 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(55 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(107 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(30 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(49 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(102 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(130 lines)
From:
Richard Littauer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(68 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(70 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(48 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(65 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(102 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(106 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(118 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(43 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(93 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(63 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(64 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
(99 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Types of etymological relationships
Types of etymological relationships
(58 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Types of etymological relationships
(69 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Types of etymological relationships
(89 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Types of etymological relationships
(86 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Types of etymological relationships
(46 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Types of etymological relationships
(83 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Types of etymological relationships
(34 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Types of etymological relationships
(45 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – March 2011, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – March 2011, week 4
