Conlang Mailing List – March 2011, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• 400 Basic Concepts/Words...? (8 messages)
• Cases and states in Semitic languages
• CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (10 messages)
• Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (40 messages)
• Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (3 messages)
• Correlatives in your conlang (12 messages)
• Correlatives in your conlang (longish...)
• Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (3 messages)
• Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases)) (5 messages)
• Does anyone speak Inukitut? (9 messages)
• Etymological tangent (4 messages)
• Growing a Language
• How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases) (3 messages)
• Instrumental Pronouns (16 messages)
• Naming Cases (22 messages)
• Phonology: Initial glottal stop + stop (2 messages)
• Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography
• Startling (But Pleasant!) Discovery (4 messages)
• Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (26 messages)
• Types of etymological relationships (8 messages)

1. 400 Basic Concepts/Words...?
   • Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...? (55 lines)
     From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:47:30 -0400
   • Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...? (83 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:12:49 -0500
   • Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...? (51 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:01:29 -0400
   • Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...? (30 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:03:43 -0400
   • Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...? (84 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:21:41 -0400
   • Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...? (64 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:02:28 -0400
   • Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...? (42 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:33:04 -0500
   • Re: 400 Basic Concepts/Words...? (68 lines)
     From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:19:58 +0100

2. Cases and states in Semitic languages
   • Cases and states in Semitic languages (100 lines)
     From: Renato Montes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:01:32 -0700

3. CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
   • Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (58 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:42:59 -0700
   • Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (53 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:30:33 -0700
   • Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (119 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:52:22 -0700
   • Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (68 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:01:50 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (44 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:27:08 -0700
   • Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (106 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:38:38 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (73 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:39:49 -0700
   • Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (64 lines)
     From: Jeff Daniel Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:11:10 +0100
   • Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (48 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:45:36 -0700
   • CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (59 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:22:05 -0400

4. Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (43 lines)
     From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:58:14 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (136 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:52:44 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (124 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:24:32 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (113 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:00:35 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (41 lines)
     From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:58:04 +0200
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (125 lines)
     From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:07:56 +0200
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (70 lines)
     From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:37:54 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (70 lines)
     From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:34:54 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (57 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 01:18:17 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (95 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:03:11 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (143 lines)
     From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:51:57 +0200
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (64 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:39:57 +0200
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (155 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:00:09 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (64 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:55:37 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (48 lines)
     From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:26:44 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (33 lines)
     From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:09:05 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (138 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:31:14 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (36 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:37:31 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (49 lines)
     From: Dale McCreery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:13:40 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (41 lines)
     From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:55:15 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (40 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:49:44 -0400
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (73 lines)
     From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:18:17 +0000
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (110 lines)
     From: David Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:56:41 +0800
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (100 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:25:41 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (87 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:09:01 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (50 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:44:44 -0500
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (48 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0400
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (51 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:58:31 -0500
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (144 lines)
     From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:37:53 +0000
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (64 lines)
     From: Jan Strasser <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:48:08 -0400
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (84 lines)
     From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:24:38 +0200
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (109 lines)
     From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:46:59 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (109 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 03:04:45 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (86 lines)
     From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:42:51 +0100
   • Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (75 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:04:06 -0700
   • Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (41 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:03:09 -0700
   • Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (44 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:00:50 -0700
   • Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (35 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:00:57 -0700
   • Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (44 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:01:24 -0700
   • Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (47 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:58:17 -0700

5. Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error?
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (44 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:54:27 -0600
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (51 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:58:52 -0400
   • Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (98 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:18:45 -0400

6. Correlatives in your conlang
   • Re: Correlatives in your conlang (57 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:33:11 -0400
   • Re: Correlatives in your conlang (83 lines)
     From: <deinx nxtxr> <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:15:32 -0400
   • Re: Correlatives in your conlang (52 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:48:46 -0400
   • Re: Correlatives in your conlang (48 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:48:00 -0000
   • Re: Correlatives in your conlang (54 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:42:56 +0100
   • Re: Correlatives in your conlang (74 lines)
     From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:54:26 -0500
   • Re: Correlatives in your conlang (47 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:45:23 +0100
   • Re: Correlatives in your conlang (46 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 08:55:38 -0400
   • Re: Correlatives in your conlang (56 lines)
     From: Zach Wellstood <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:32:42 -0400
   • Re: Correlatives in your conlang (62 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:07:48 +0000
   • Re: Correlatives in your conlang (49 lines)
     From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:01:29 +0000
   • Correlatives in your conlang (32 lines)
     From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 15:14:44 +1100

7. Correlatives in your conlang (longish...)
   • Re: Correlatives in your conlang (longish...) (74 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:05:22 -0700

8. Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary?
   • Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (63 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:52:42 -0700
   • Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (84 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:33:25 +0100
   • Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (73 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:12:52 +0200

9. Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases))
   • Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases)) (111 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:08:49 -0400
   • Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases)) (81 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:10:13 -0500
   • Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases)) (62 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:49:40 +0200
   • Re: Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases)) (91 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:58:02 -0400
   • Dictionary Frameworks (was Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases)) (64 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:28:37 -0700

10. Does anyone speak Inukitut?
    • Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut? (43 lines)
      From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:25:15 -0500
    • Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut? (52 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:54:32 -0400
    • Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut? (50 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:33:21 -0500
    • Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut? (37 lines)
      From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:34:13 -0500
    • Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut? (44 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:48:43 +0100
    • Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut? (52 lines)
      From: Dale McCreery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:44:07 -0700
    • Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut? (37 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:15:07 -0400
    • Re: Does anyone speak Inukitut? (33 lines)
      From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:02:50 -0500
    • Does anyone speak Inukitut? (42 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:45:05 +0000

11. Etymological tangent
    • Re: Etymological tangent (111 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:29:06 -0400
    • Re: Etymological tangent (90 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:18:55 -0400
    • Re: Etymological tangent (58 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:37:10 -0700
    • Etymological tangent (35 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:57:28 -0500

12. Growing a Language
    • Growing a Language (27 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:47:11 -0600

13. How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases)
    • Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases) (171 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:55:29 -0400
    • Re: How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases) (50 lines)
      From: Renato Montes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:08:06 -0700
    • How useful is Wiktionary? (was: Naming Cases) (150 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:52:29 +0100

14. Instrumental Pronouns
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (57 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:02:57 +0100
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (28 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 04:52:17 -0400
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (120 lines)
      From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:39:09 +1100
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (118 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 12:30:28 -0400
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (51 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 05:40:57 -0400
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (91 lines)
      From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:30:50 +1100
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (49 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:42:53 -0400
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (103 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:48:32 -0700
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (58 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:10:26 -0000
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (49 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:40:22 -0500
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (37 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:05:46 +0100
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (80 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:57:11 +0100
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (45 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 05:49:26 -0400
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (42 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 05:19:31 -0400
    • Re: Instrumental Pronouns (107 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 04:19:40 -0400
    • Instrumental Pronouns (37 lines)
      From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:49:04 +1100

15. Naming Cases
    • Re: Naming Cases (152 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:20:02 -0400
    • Re: Naming Cases (54 lines)
      From: Renato Montes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:00:53 -0700
    • Re: Naming Cases (68 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 08:59:54 +0000
    • Re: Naming Cases (93 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:23:04 -0400
    • Re: Naming Cases (119 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 05:41:44 -0400
    • Re: Naming Cases (89 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:49:04 -0500
    • Re: Naming Cases (85 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:59:52 +0000
    • Re: Naming Cases (104 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:42:19 -0400
    • Re: Naming Cases (82 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:28:05 -0400
    • Re: Naming Cases (59 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:06:18 -0000
    • Re: Naming Cases (167 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:57:51 -0400
    • Re: Naming Cases (71 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:41:25 +0100
    • Re: Naming Cases (97 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:01:11 -0400
    • Re: Naming Cases (61 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:39:37 +0100
    • Re: Naming Cases (52 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:19:43 +0000
    • Re: Naming Cases (54 lines)
      From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:13:24 +0000
    • Re: Naming Cases (115 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:40:33 -0400
    • Re: Naming Cases (85 lines)
      From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:59:47 +0000
    • Re: Naming Cases (48 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 01:48:37 -0500
    • Re: Naming Cases (125 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:43:06 -0400
    • Re: Naming Cases (68 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:18:18 -0700
    • Naming Cases (47 lines)
      From: Toms Deimonds Barvidis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:28:09 +0200

16. Phonology: Initial glottal stop + stop
    • Re: Phonology: Initial glottal stop + stop (50 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:05:01 +0000
    • Re: Phonology: Initial glottal stop + stop (49 lines)
      From: Alex Bicksler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:15:37 -0700

17. Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography
    • Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography (80 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:48:57 +0100

18. Startling (But Pleasant!) Discovery
    • Re: Startling (But Pleasant!) Discovery (25 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:04:40 -0500
    • Re: Startling (But Pleasant!) Discovery (54 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:02:13 -0700
    • Re: Startling (But Pleasant!) Discovery (44 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:30:30 -0500
    • Startling (But Pleasant!) Discovery (40 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:54:15 -0700

19. Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (99 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:09:49 -0500
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (64 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:49:46 -0400
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (63 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:39:02 -0700
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (93 lines)
      From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:10:17 +0100
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (43 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:23:49 -0500
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (118 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:04:43 -0400
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (106 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:00:14 +0100
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (102 lines)
      From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:23:50 +0100
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (65 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 09:55:33 +0000
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (48 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:47:04 -0500
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (70 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:10:21 -0500
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (68 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:21:22 -0700
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (130 lines)
      From: Richard Littauer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 00:43:00 +0000
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (102 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:59:15 -0500
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (49 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:50:27 -0700
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (30 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:42:49 -0600
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (107 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:49:14 -0700
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (55 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:27:06 +0000
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (53 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:10:07 -0700
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (124 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:50:20 -0400
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (58 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:28:21 -0500
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (40 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:19:36 +0000
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (75 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:12:44 +0100
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (74 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:12:07 +0000
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (61 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:53:21 -0500
    • Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (44 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:28:58 -0700

20. Types of etymological relationships
    • Re: Types of etymological relationships (45 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:44:13 -0500
    • Re: Types of etymological relationships (34 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:27:16 -0700
    • Re: Types of etymological relationships (83 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:52:02 -0500
    • Re: Types of etymological relationships (46 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:07:07 -0500
    • Re: Types of etymological relationships (86 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:57:21 -0700
    • Re: Types of etymological relationships (89 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:42:40 -0500
    • Re: Types of etymological relationships (69 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:27:08 -0500
    • Types of etymological relationships (58 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:05:02 -0500