Conlang Mailing List – March 2011, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• Anyone use NLTK?
• Book Recommendations for Field Ling/Descript. ling? (2 messages)
• CHAT James (8 messages)
• CHAT James (was: Etymological tangent) (9 messages)
• CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (2 messages)
• Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (2 messages)
• Etymological tangent (10 messages)
• FBI Decryption problem (6 messages)
• FBI seeks help cracking coded notes... (2 messages)
• Hard to learn (9 messages)
• Hi all, just joined! (4 messages)
• Isolating morphology and case markings: a boundary pickle (6 messages)
• Local and Abstract noun markings (3 messages)
• Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography (10 messages)
• site
• TECH: Survey of conlang database programs (2 messages)
• Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
• Types of etymological relationships

1. Anyone use NLTK?
   • Anyone use NLTK? (37 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

2. Book Recommendations for Field Ling/Descript. ling?
   • Book Recommendations for Field Ling/Descript. ling? (35 lines)
     From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Book Recommendations for Field Ling/Descript. ling? (54 lines)
     From: Richard Littauer <[log in to unmask]>

3. CHAT James
   • Re: CHAT James (62 lines)
     From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (62 lines)
     From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (115 lines)
     From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (93 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (103 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (80 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (47 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (83 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

4. CHAT James (was: Etymological tangent)
   • CHAT James (was: Etymological tangent) (154 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (was: Etymological tangent) (39 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (was: Etymological tangent) (67 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (was: Etymological tangent) (56 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (was: Etymological tangent) (57 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (was: Etymological tangent) (90 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (was: Etymological tangent) (132 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (was: Etymological tangent) (59 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT James (was: Etymological tangent) (58 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>

5. CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible?
   • Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (79 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Vulgar Latin Bible? (107 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

6. Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2!
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (50 lines)
     From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Romanization Help Needed: Take 2! (42 lines)
     From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>

7. Etymological tangent
   • Re: Etymological tangent (128 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etymological tangent (45 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etymological tangent (70 lines)
     From: Renato Montes <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etymological tangent (84 lines)
     From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etymological tangent (51 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etymological tangent (70 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etymological tangent (45 lines)
     From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etymological tangent (58 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etymological tangent (51 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Etymological tangent (37 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

8. FBI Decryption problem
   • FBI Decryption problem (33 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FBI Decryption problem (42 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FBI Decryption problem (64 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FBI Decryption problem (103 lines)
     From: Dale McCreery <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FBI Decryption problem (78 lines)
     From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FBI Decryption problem (102 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

9. FBI seeks help cracking coded notes...
   • FBI seeks help cracking coded notes... (40 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FBI seeks help cracking coded notes... (48 lines)
     From: Ralph DeCarli <[log in to unmask]>

10. Hard to learn
    • Hard to learn (35 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hard to learn (44 lines)
      From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hard to learn (77 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hard to learn (52 lines)
      From: Dale McCreery <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hard to learn (46 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hard to learn (54 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hard to learn (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hard to learn (84 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hard to learn (62 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>

11. Hi all, just joined!
    • Hi all, just joined! (53 lines)
      From: Andrew Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hi all, just joined! (68 lines)
      From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hi all, just joined! (79 lines)
      From: Andrew Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hi all, just joined! (76 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>

12. Isolating morphology and case markings: a boundary pickle
    • Isolating morphology and case markings: a boundary pickle (93 lines)
      From: Andrew Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Isolating morphology and case markings: a boundary pickle (97 lines)
      From: Andrew Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Isolating morphology and case markings: a boundary pickle (162 lines)
      From: Andrew Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Isolating morphology and case markings: a boundary pickle (50 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Isolating morphology and case markings: a boundary pickle (47 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Isolating morphology and case markings: a boundary pickle (58 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

13. Local and Abstract noun markings
    • Local and Abstract noun markings (42 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Local and Abstract noun markings (55 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Local and Abstract noun markings (61 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

14. Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography
    • Re: Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography (35 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography (42 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography (67 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography (84 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography (43 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography (141 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography (58 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography (44 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography (52 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Redeeming an amateur conlang phonology and orthography (80 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>

15. site
    • site (35 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>

16. TECH: Survey of conlang database programs
    • TECH: Survey of conlang database programs (47 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Survey of conlang database programs (73 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

17. Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs!
    • Re: Tokana, Skerre and Watakassi Become Natlangs! (25 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

18. Types of etymological relationships
    • Re: Types of etymological relationships (60 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>