Conlang Mailing List – April 2011, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Game of Thrones" (2 messages)
• "Green Eggs and Ham" in gjâ-zym-byn (3 messages)
• Also, what's this called? (2 messages)
• awesome sounds
• Case System (8 messages)
• Conlang _langue_ and _parole_ (was: The Platonic fallacy (was: ...))
• Conlangs and Wonderland (4 messages)
• Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (23 messages)
• Counting system (10 messages)
• Degree of nouns (or other parts of speech) (2 messages)
• Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (18 messages)
• Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain)--repost/second try
• Grammaticization of fault/credit (13 messages)
• Hanoa?tsi Romanization Update
• introduce.PRES.PROG.PART-1SG.REFL (4 messages)
• Learning colors (10 messages)
• Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (32 messages)
• Loucarian grammar at Frath
• Multipart verbs (6 messages)
• Noun marking for the credit blame language
• number classes (11 messages)
• Origin of Triggers + Active Alignment (2 messages)
• Possible New Grammatical Mood (15 messages)
• Potentially amusing experiment (7 messages)
• Recognition Contest (5 messages)
• The antiperfect aspect (3 messages)
• Topic Possession (3 messages)
• Topic: preverbal/postverbal goodness (10 messages)
• Translating non-base-10 numbers into English (WAS: Counting system)
• welcome.PRES.PFV-2SG.OBJ-1PL.INCL.SBJ (was: welcome.PRES.PROG.PART-2SG.OBJ-1SG.SBJ) (2 messages)
• welcome.PRES.PROG.PART-2SG.OBJ-1SG.SBJ (was Re: introduce.PRES.PROG.PART-1SG.REFL)
• What's it called? (10 messages)

1. "Game of Thrones"
   • "Game of Thrones" (29 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Game of Thrones" (30 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>

2. "Green Eggs and Ham" in gjâ-zym-byn
   • "Green Eggs and Ham" in gjâ-zym-byn (59 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Green Eggs and Ham" in gjâ-zym-byn (44 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Green Eggs and Ham" in gjâ-zym-byn (86 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

3. Also, what's this called?
   • Also, what's this called? (54 lines)
     From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Also, what's this called? (74 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>

4. awesome sounds
   • awesome sounds (38 lines)
     From: Dale McCreery <[log in to unmask]>

5. Case System
   • Case System (41 lines)
     From: Eamon Graham <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case System (53 lines)
     From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case System (44 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case System (62 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case System (47 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case System (47 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case System (45 lines)
     From: Eamon Graham <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case System (66 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

6. Conlang _langue_ and _parole_ (was: The Platonic fallacy (was: ...))
   • Re: Conlang _langue_ and _parole_ (was: The Platonic fallacy (was: ...)) (37 lines)
     From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>

7. Conlangs and Wonderland
   • Re: Conlangs and Wonderland (57 lines)
     From: James Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs and Wonderland (51 lines)
     From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs and Wonderland (59 lines)
     From: James Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs and Wonderland (52 lines)
     From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>

8. Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error?
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (67 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (29 lines)
     From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (97 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (55 lines)
     From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (51 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (74 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (76 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (64 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (65 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (53 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (92 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (226 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (39 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (77 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (59 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (28 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (56 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (54 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (48 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (64 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (108 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (102 lines)
     From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangs as Academic Evidence in Linguistic Studies: How Serious was Gong et al's error? (70 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>

9. Counting system
   • Counting system (53 lines)
     From: Marlon Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Counting system (78 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Counting system (46 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Counting system (76 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Counting system (32 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Counting system (35 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Counting system (50 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Counting system (38 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Counting system (41 lines)
     From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Counting system (71 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>

10. Degree of nouns (or other parts of speech)
    • Degree of nouns (or other parts of speech) (81 lines)
      From: Marlon Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Degree of nouns (or other parts of speech) (67 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

11. Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain)
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (176 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (327 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (123 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (170 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (44 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (172 lines)
      From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (54 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (183 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (47 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (46 lines)
      From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (324 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (66 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (179 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (241 lines)
      From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (118 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (66 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain) (200 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>

12. Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain)--repost/second try
    • Re: Gender Origin and Evolution (Hanoa?tsi/Central Mountain)--repost/second try (418 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>

13. Grammaticization of fault/credit
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (112 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (30 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (43 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (33 lines)
      From: David Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (55 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (67 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (76 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (51 lines)
      From: David Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (121 lines)
      From: Marlon Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (198 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (88 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (151 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammaticization of fault/credit (72 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

14. Hanoa?tsi Romanization Update
    • Hanoa?tsi Romanization Update (107 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>

15. introduce.PRES.PROG.PART-1SG.REFL
    • introduce.PRES.PROG.PART-1SG.REFL (57 lines)
      From: Chris Curtis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: introduce.PRES.PROG.PART-1SG.REFL (71 lines)
      From: Justin Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: introduce.PRES.PROG.PART-1SG.REFL (75 lines)
      From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: introduce.PRES.PROG.PART-1SG.REFL (91 lines)
      From: Justin Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>

16. Learning colors
    • Learning colors (48 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Learning colors (47 lines)
      From: Justin Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Learning colors (57 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Learning colors (63 lines)
      From: Justin Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Learning colors (97 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Learning colors (73 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Learning colors (62 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Learning colors (102 lines)
      From: Justin Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Learning colors (62 lines)
      From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Learning colors (31 lines)
      From: Daniel Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>

17. Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time?
    • Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (44 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (53 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (48 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (43 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (60 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (50 lines)
      From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (72 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (112 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (43 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (36 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (44 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (35 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (38 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (55 lines)
      From: J. Burke <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (83 lines)
      From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (49 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (70 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (84 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (51 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (55 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (93 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (80 lines)
      From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (54 lines)
      From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (95 lines)
      From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (37 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (35 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (61 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (40 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (65 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (49 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Loss of phoneme inventory diversity over time? (62 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

18. Loucarian grammar at Frath
    • Loucarian grammar at Frath (40 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

19. Multipart verbs
    • Multipart verbs (53 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Multipart verbs (24 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Multipart verbs (73 lines)
      From: A. Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Multipart verbs (79 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Multipart verbs (102 lines)
      From: A. Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Multipart verbs (65 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>

20. Noun marking for the credit blame language
    • Noun marking for the credit blame language (73 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

21. number classes
    • number classes (43 lines)
      From: Dale McCreery <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: number classes (59 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: number classes (92 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: number classes (32 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: number classes (48 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: number classes (70 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: number classes (62 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: number classes (103 lines)
      From: David Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: number classes (50 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: number classes (82 lines)
      From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: number classes (37 lines)
      From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>

22. Origin of Triggers + Active Alignment
    • Origin of Triggers + Active Alignment (64 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Origin of Triggers + Active Alignment (61 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

23. Possible New Grammatical Mood
    • Possible New Grammatical Mood (42 lines)
      From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (64 lines)
      From: Zach Wellstood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (51 lines)
      From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (99 lines)
      From: Zach Wellstood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (41 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (42 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (57 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (57 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (46 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (54 lines)
      From: Justin Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (85 lines)
      From: Zach Wellstood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (88 lines)
      From: Justin Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (75 lines)
      From: vii iiix <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (50 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Possible New Grammatical Mood (95 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

24. Potentially amusing experiment
    • Potentially amusing experiment (23 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Potentially amusing experiment (32 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Potentially amusing experiment (55 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Potentially amusing experiment (61 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Potentially amusing experiment (60 lines)
      From: Justin Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Potentially amusing experiment (47 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Potentially amusing experiment (78 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>

25. Recognition Contest
    • Recognition Contest (40 lines)
      From: Justin Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recognition Contest (57 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recognition Contest (58 lines)
      From: Justin Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recognition Contest (49 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Recognition Contest (50 lines)
      From: Justin Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>

26. The antiperfect aspect
    • The antiperfect aspect (77 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The antiperfect aspect (92 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The antiperfect aspect (40 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

27. Topic Possession
    • Topic Possession (111 lines)
      From: A. Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Topic Possession (159 lines)
      From: A. Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Topic Possession (158 lines)
      From: Vasiliy Chernov <[log in to unmask]>

28. Topic: preverbal/postverbal goodness
    • Topic: preverbal/postverbal goodness (96 lines)
      From: A. Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Topic: preverbal/postverbal goodness (112 lines)
      From: A. Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Topic: preverbal/postverbal goodness (52 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Topic: preverbal/postverbal goodness (53 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Topic: preverbal/postverbal goodness (32 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Topic: preverbal/postverbal goodness (53 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Topic: preverbal/postverbal goodness (39 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Topic: preverbal/postverbal goodness (68 lines)
      From: A. Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Topic: preverbal/postverbal goodness (56 lines)
      From: A. Mendes <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Topic: preverbal/postverbal goodness (42 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>

29. Translating non-base-10 numbers into English (WAS: Counting system)
    • Translating non-base-10 numbers into English (WAS: Counting system) (38 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>

30. welcome.PRES.PFV-2SG.OBJ-1PL.INCL.SBJ (was: welcome.PRES.PROG.PART-2SG.OBJ-1SG.SBJ)
    • Re: welcome.PRES.PFV-2SG.OBJ-1PL.INCL.SBJ (was: welcome.PRES.PROG.PART-2SG.OBJ-1SG.SBJ) (20 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: welcome.PRES.PFV-2SG.OBJ-1PL.INCL.SBJ (was: welcome.PRES.PROG.PART-2SG.OBJ-1SG.SBJ) (36 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>

31. welcome.PRES.PROG.PART-2SG.OBJ-1SG.SBJ (was Re: introduce.PRES.PROG.PART-1SG.REFL)
    • welcome.PRES.PROG.PART-2SG.OBJ-1SG.SBJ (was Re: introduce.PRES.PROG.PART-1SG.REFL) (73 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

32. What's it called?
    • What's it called? (40 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What's it called? (50 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What's it called? (64 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What's it called? (59 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What's it called? (67 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What's it called? (60 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What's it called? (59 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What's it called? (69 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What's it called? (42 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What's it called? (49 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>