Conlang Mailing List – May 2011, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

1. Ambiguous Alignment
   • Re: Ambiguous Alignment (47 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

2. Bootstraping Phrases
   • Bootstraping Phrases (41 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstraping Phrases (53 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstraping Phrases (82 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstraping Phrases (91 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstraping Phrases (50 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstraping Phrases (107 lines)
     From: David Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstraping Phrases (57 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bootstraping Phrases (63 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>

3. Conlangery podcast up
   • Conlangery podcast up (32 lines)
     From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangery podcast up (47 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlangery podcast up (69 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

4. Creating Vocabulary for an A Priori Language
   • Re: Creating Vocabulary for an A Priori Language (134 lines)
     From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Vocabulary for an A Priori Language (37 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Vocabulary for an A Priori Language (69 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Vocabulary for an A Priori Language (75 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Vocabulary for an A Priori Language (77 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Vocabulary for an A Priori Language (87 lines)
     From: Mia "Waffle" Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Vocabulary for an A Priori Language (43 lines)
     From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Vocabulary for an A Priori Language (43 lines)
     From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating Vocabulary for an A Priori Language (64 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

5. Etymology of Numbers
   • Re: Etymology of Numbers (35 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

6. Glossopoeia (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon)
   • Re: Glossopoeia (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (86 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Glossopoeia (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (40 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Glossopoeia (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (60 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Glossopoeia (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (112 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Glossopoeia (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (80 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Glossopoeia (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (73 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Glossopoeia (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (97 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>

7. Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction
   • Re: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction (55 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction (46 lines)
     From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction (90 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction (126 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction (104 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction (53 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction (109 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

8. Hello, and a question
   • Re: Hello, and a question (52 lines)
     From: Daniel Burgener <[log in to unmask]>

9. more on histories of terms: 'glossopoeia', 'artlang', 'Gnoli triangle'
   • more on histories of terms: 'glossopoeia', 'artlang', 'Gnoli triangle' (57 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: more on histories of terms: 'glossopoeia', 'artlang', 'Gnoli triangle' (151 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: more on histories of terms: 'glossopoeia', 'artlang', 'Gnoli triangle' (74 lines)
     From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: more on histories of terms: 'glossopoeia', 'artlang', 'Gnoli triangle' (152 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: more on histories of terms: 'glossopoeia', 'artlang', 'Gnoli triangle' (38 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: more on histories of terms: 'glossopoeia', 'artlang', 'Gnoli triangle' (75 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

10. Natlang loglangs? (was: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction)
    • Natlang loglangs? (was: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction) (81 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang loglangs? (was: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction) (42 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang loglangs? (was: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction) (48 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang loglangs? (was: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction) (52 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang loglangs? (was: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction) (55 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang loglangs? (was: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction) (53 lines)
      From: Maxime Papillon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang loglangs? (was: Glossopoeia vs. reconstruction) (88 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

11. Some updates
    • Some updates (87 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

12. Stack Exchange conlangs site
    • Re: Stack Exchange conlangs site (40 lines)
      From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stack Exchange conlangs site (84 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>