Conlang
Mailing List June 2011, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
A puzzle
(25 messages)
A verbless language
(10 messages)
ALT-1066 English were Re: [CONLANG] Sorting ash
Android dictionary management software?
(2 messages)
Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
(10 messages)
Catlang the Phonotactics Exercise Part 2
Chicago area folk? (WAS: 20th anniversary coming up)
(2 messages)
Conlang in the womb!
Gestures
(3 messages)
Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(19 messages)
Get out?
(2 messages)
Hello, and a question
(15 messages)
mass nouns & plural count nouns
mass nouns & plural count nouns (was: A puzzle)
(4 messages)
Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax
(7 messages)
My Newest Conlang, Çideaux
(2 messages)
need to archive Ithkuil & Ilaksh
(2 messages)
No personal pronouns?
(33 messages)
Non-human Features
(10 messages)
Perfects and passives
(9 messages)
Preventing a crash a la langmaker
(2 messages)
Pronouns, pronouns, everywhere. It's driving me to drink...
(3 messages)
Puzzling sketch unearthed
(7 messages)
query about list processing algorithms
(4 messages)
semantics = syntax? (was: Hello, and a question)
(2 messages)
Senjecas Oblique Cases (was: A verbless language)
Sentence order
(9 messages)
TAKE (- date expression)
TAKE diacritics
(2 messages)
To be or not to be, that is suppletion
(6 messages)
A puzzle
Re: A puzzle
(31 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(49 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(68 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(37 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(89 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(49 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(96 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(41 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(45 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(54 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(39 lines)
From:
Daniel Burgener <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(70 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(66 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(33 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(64 lines)
From:
Dale McCreery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(50 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(36 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(40 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(44 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(67 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(61 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(92 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(75 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A puzzle
(88 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
A verbless language
A verbless language
(171 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A verbless language
(181 lines)
From:
Miles Forster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A verbless language
(240 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A verbless language
(379 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A verbless language
(278 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A verbless language
(40 lines)
From:
Miles Forster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A verbless language
(94 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A verbless language
(259 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A verbless language
(211 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A verbless language
(254 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
ALT-1066 English were Re: [CONLANG] Sorting ash
Re: ALT-1066 English were Re: [CONLANG] Sorting ash
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Android dictionary management software?
Re: Android dictionary management software?
(81 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Android dictionary management software?
(44 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
(50 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
(55 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
(59 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
(57 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
(48 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
(62 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
(87 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
(64 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
(39 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
(67 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Catlang the Phonotactics Exercise Part 2
Catlang the Phonotactics Exercise Part 2
(49 lines)
From:
Matthew Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chicago area folk? (WAS: 20th anniversary coming up)
Chicago area folk? (WAS: 20th anniversary coming up)
(38 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chicago area folk? (WAS: 20th anniversary coming up)
(54 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang in the womb!
Conlang in the womb!
(56 lines)
From:
Miles Forster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gestures
Re: Gestures
(67 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures
(71 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures
(107 lines)
From:
Nika Mirovak <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(85 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(49 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(62 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(62 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(54 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(40 lines)
From:
Marta Teresa Perlińska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(58 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(51 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(56 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(60 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(67 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(56 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(65 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(68 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(45 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(45 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(77 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(77 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
(98 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Get out?
Get out?
(27 lines)
From:
Even Eclectic Tolo Dybevik <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Get out?
(29 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hello, and a question
Re: Hello, and a question
(190 lines)
From:
Jason Stokes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(66 lines)
From:
Jason Stokes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(103 lines)
From:
Jason Stokes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(67 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(245 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(81 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(59 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(79 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(39 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(104 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(81 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(80 lines)
From:
Jason Stokes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(94 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(64 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hello, and a question
(113 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
mass nouns & plural count nouns
Re: mass nouns & plural count nouns
(40 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
mass nouns & plural count nouns (was: A puzzle)
mass nouns & plural count nouns (was: A puzzle)
(98 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mass nouns & plural count nouns (was: A puzzle)
(98 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mass nouns & plural count nouns (was: A puzzle)
(85 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: mass nouns & plural count nouns (was: A puzzle)
(133 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax
Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax
(44 lines)
From:
Matthew Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax
(68 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax
(86 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax
(49 lines)
From:
Matthew Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax
(46 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax
(39 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax
(43 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
My Newest Conlang, Çideaux
My Newest Conlang, Çideaux
(69 lines)
From:
Cullen Kain <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: My Newest Conlang, Çideaux
(28 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
need to archive Ithkuil & Ilaksh
Re: need to archive Ithkuil & Ilaksh
(41 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: need to archive Ithkuil & Ilaksh
(51 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
No personal pronouns?
No personal pronouns?
(46 lines)
From:
Miles Forster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(52 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(62 lines)
From:
Miles Forster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(39 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(36 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(51 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(72 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(42 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(43 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(58 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(67 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(41 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(55 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(67 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(84 lines)
From:
Miles Forster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(175 lines)
From:
Zach Wellstood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(33 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(51 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(29 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(35 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(51 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(62 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(93 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(82 lines)
From:
Iuhan Culmærija <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(87 lines)
From:
Mia "Waffle" Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(43 lines)
From:
Miles Forster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(39 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(39 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(53 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(59 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(62 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No personal pronouns?
(85 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-human Features
Re: Non-human Features
(61 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-human Features
(31 lines)
From:
Marta Teresa Perlińska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-human Features
(72 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-human Features
(52 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-human Features
(55 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-human Features
(72 lines)
From:
Matthew Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-human Features
(58 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-human Features
(65 lines)
From:
Matthew Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-human Features
(60 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-human Features
(73 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Perfects and passives
Perfects and passives
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perfects and passives
(47 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perfects and passives
(84 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perfects and passives
(46 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perfects and passives
(68 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perfects and passives
(31 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perfects and passives
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perfects and passives
(68 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Perfects and passives
(84 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Preventing a crash a la langmaker
Preventing a crash a la langmaker
(40 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Preventing a crash a la langmaker
(69 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pronouns, pronouns, everywhere. It's driving me to drink...
Re: Pronouns, pronouns, everywhere. It's driving me to drink...
(93 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns, pronouns, everywhere. It's driving me to drink...
(70 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pronouns, pronouns, everywhere. It's driving me to drink...
(100 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Puzzling sketch unearthed
Puzzling sketch unearthed
(80 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Puzzling sketch unearthed
(101 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Puzzling sketch unearthed
(107 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Puzzling sketch unearthed
(140 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Puzzling sketch unearthed
(46 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Puzzling sketch unearthed
(58 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Puzzling sketch unearthed
(55 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
query about list processing algorithms
query about list processing algorithms
(35 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: query about list processing algorithms
(59 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: query about list processing algorithms
(101 lines)
From:
Cíat Ó Gáibhtheacháin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: query about list processing algorithms
(49 lines)
From:
Ralph DeCarli <
[log in to unmask]
>
semantics = syntax? (was: Hello, and a question)
semantics = syntax? (was: Hello, and a question)
(44 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: semantics = syntax? (was: Hello, and a question)
(60 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Senjecas Oblique Cases (was: A verbless language)
Senjecas Oblique Cases (was: A verbless language)
(35 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sentence order
Sentence order
(25 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sentence order
(49 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sentence order
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sentence order
(46 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sentence order
(75 lines)
From:
Samuel Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sentence order
(33 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sentence order
(47 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sentence order
(64 lines)
From:
Alglenne Glennaroe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sentence order
(31 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
TAKE (- date expression)
Re: TAKE (- date expression)
(64 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
TAKE diacritics
Re: TAKE diacritics
(219 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TAKE diacritics
(45 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
To be or not to be, that is suppletion
To be or not to be, that is suppletion
(56 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To be or not to be, that is suppletion
(59 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To be or not to be, that is suppletion
(45 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To be or not to be, that is suppletion
(92 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To be or not to be, that is suppletion
(66 lines)
From:
Andrew Jarrette <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To be or not to be, that is suppletion
(141 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU