Conlang Mailing List – June 2011, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A puzzle (25 messages)
• A verbless language (10 messages)
• ALT-1066 English were Re: [CONLANG] Sorting ash
• Android dictionary management software? (2 messages)
• Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives) (10 messages)
• Catlang the Phonotactics Exercise Part 2
• Chicago area folk? (WAS: 20th anniversary coming up) (2 messages)
• Conlang in the womb!
• Gestures (3 messages)
• Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (19 messages)
• Get out? (2 messages)
• Hello, and a question (15 messages)
• mass nouns & plural count nouns
• mass nouns & plural count nouns (was: A puzzle) (4 messages)
• Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax (7 messages)
• My Newest Conlang, Çideaux (2 messages)
• need to archive Ithkuil & Ilaksh (2 messages)
• No personal pronouns? (33 messages)
• Non-human Features (10 messages)
• Perfects and passives (9 messages)
• Preventing a crash a la langmaker (2 messages)
• Pronouns, pronouns, everywhere. It's driving me to drink... (3 messages)
• Puzzling sketch unearthed (7 messages)
• query about list processing algorithms (4 messages)
• semantics = syntax? (was: Hello, and a question) (2 messages)
• Senjecas Oblique Cases (was: A verbless language)
• Sentence order (9 messages)
• TAKE (- date expression)
• TAKE diacritics (2 messages)
• To be or not to be, that is suppletion (6 messages)

1. A puzzle
   • Re: A puzzle (31 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 03:51:35 -0400
   • Re: A puzzle (49 lines)
     From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:40:08 +0200
   • Re: A puzzle (68 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:26:24 +0100
   • Re: A puzzle (37 lines)
     From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:32:15 +0100
   • Re: A puzzle (89 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:23:56 -0700
   • Re: A puzzle (49 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:27:46 +0100
   • Re: A puzzle (48 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:37:04 +0100
   • Re: A puzzle (96 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:43:23 -0700
   • Re: A puzzle (41 lines)
     From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:49:34 +0200
   • Re: A puzzle (45 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:06:05 -0500
   • Re: A puzzle (54 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:07:19 -0500
   • Re: A puzzle (39 lines)
     From: Daniel Burgener <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:15:39 -0400
   • Re: A puzzle (70 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:06:23 -0700
   • Re: A puzzle (66 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:06:25 -0700
   • Re: A puzzle (33 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:20:40 -0400
   • Re: A puzzle (64 lines)
     From: Dale McCreery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:28:16 -0700
   • Re: A puzzle (50 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:01:33 +0100
   • Re: A puzzle (36 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:21:04 -0400
   • Re: A puzzle (40 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:10:12 -0000
   • Re: A puzzle (44 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:32:12 +0100
   • Re: A puzzle (67 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:07:28 +0100
   • Re: A puzzle (61 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:32:59 +0100
   • Re: A puzzle (92 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:30:26 +0100
   • Re: A puzzle (75 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:47:29 -0700
   • Re: A puzzle (88 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:08:57 -0700

2. A verbless language
   • A verbless language (171 lines)
     From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 00:27:01 +0200
   • Re: A verbless language (181 lines)
     From: Miles Forster <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 00:41:00 +0200
   • Re: A verbless language (240 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:57:16 -0500
   • Re: A verbless language (379 lines)
     From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:24:33 +0200
   • Re: A verbless language (278 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:23:45 +0100
   • Re: A verbless language (40 lines)
     From: Miles Forster <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:51:55 +0200
   • Re: A verbless language (94 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:16:18 +0200
   • Re: A verbless language (259 lines)
     From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:44:43 +0200
   • Re: A verbless language (211 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 08:47:08 +0100
   • Re: A verbless language (254 lines)
     From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:23:30 +0200

3. ALT-1066 English were Re: [CONLANG] Sorting ash
   • Re: ALT-1066 English were Re: [CONLANG] Sorting ash (54 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:13:07 -0700

4. Android dictionary management software?
   • Re: Android dictionary management software? (81 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:38:14 -0400
   • Re: Android dictionary management software? (44 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:43:34 -0400

5. Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives)
   • Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives) (50 lines)
     From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:18:57 -0400
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives) (55 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:52:14 +0100
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives) (59 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 05:02:31 -0400
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives) (57 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:13:00 +0200
   • Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives) (48 lines)
     From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:05:55 -0000
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives) (62 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:45:19 +0100
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives) (87 lines)
     From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:23:37 +0200
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives) (64 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:28:52 +0200
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives) (39 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:01:43 -0400
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (was: Re: Perfects and passives) (67 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:50:16 +0100

6. Catlang the Phonotactics Exercise Part 2
   • Catlang the Phonotactics Exercise Part 2 (49 lines)
     From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:08:19 -0400

7. Chicago area folk? (WAS: 20th anniversary coming up)
   • Chicago area folk? (WAS: 20th anniversary coming up) (38 lines)
     From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:18:04 -0500
   • Re: Chicago area folk? (WAS: 20th anniversary coming up) (54 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:03:00 -0500

8. Conlang in the womb!
   • Conlang in the womb! (56 lines)
     From: Miles Forster <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:41:14 +0200

9. Gestures
   • Re: Gestures (67 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:14:25 +0100
   • Re: Gestures (71 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:52:01 +0100
   • Re: Gestures (107 lines)
     From: Nika Mirovak <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:03:30 -0400

10. Gestures (was: Non-human Features)
    • Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (85 lines)
      From: Fredrik Ekman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:19:28 +0200
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (49 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:28:03 +0100
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (62 lines)
      From: Fredrik Ekman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:48:15 +0200
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (62 lines)
      From: Fredrik Ekman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:06:26 +0200
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (54 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:55:33 -0500
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (40 lines)
      From: Marta Teresa Perlińska <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:06:52 +0200
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (58 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:19:53 -0500
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (51 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:24:40 -0600
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (56 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:35:29 -0500
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (60 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:39:20 -0500
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (67 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:45:21 -0400
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (56 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:58:21 -0700
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (65 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:38:54 -0600
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (68 lines)
      From: Brett Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:42:43 -0400
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (45 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:42:06 +0100
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (45 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:52:52 -0400
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (77 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:33:26 -0700
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (77 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:37:04 +0100
    • Re: Gestures (was: Non-human Features) (98 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:10:18 -0700

11. Get out?
    • Get out? (27 lines)
      From: Even Eclectic Tolo Dybevik <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:24:43 +0200
    • Re: Get out? (29 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 07:05:14 -0400

12. Hello, and a question
    • Re: Hello, and a question (190 lines)
      From: Jason Stokes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:29:38 -0700
    • Re: Hello, and a question (66 lines)
      From: Jason Stokes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:40:59 -0700
    • Re: Hello, and a question (103 lines)
      From: Jason Stokes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:21:50 -0700
    • Re: Hello, and a question (67 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:56:31 +0100
    • Re: Hello, and a question (245 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:11:06 +1200
    • Re: Hello, and a question (81 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:25:16 -0700
    • Re: Hello, and a question (59 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:46:16 -0400
    • Re: Hello, and a question (79 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:03:42 -0500
    • Re: Hello, and a question (39 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:15:31 -0400
    • Re: Hello, and a question (104 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:05:06 +0100
    • Re: Hello, and a question (81 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:48:57 -0400
    • Re: Hello, and a question (80 lines)
      From: Jason Stokes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 17:32:27 -0700
    • Re: Hello, and a question (94 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:27:53 -0400
    • Re: Hello, and a question (64 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:04:21 +0100
    • Re: Hello, and a question (113 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:55:05 -0700

13. mass nouns & plural count nouns
    • Re: mass nouns & plural count nouns (40 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:17:39 +0100

14. mass nouns & plural count nouns (was: A puzzle)
    • mass nouns & plural count nouns (was: A puzzle) (98 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:17:51 +0100
    • Re: mass nouns & plural count nouns (was: A puzzle) (98 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:20:51 -0700
    • Re: mass nouns & plural count nouns (was: A puzzle) (85 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 06:46:01 +0100
    • Re: mass nouns & plural count nouns (was: A puzzle) (133 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:57:19 -0700

15. Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax
    • Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax (44 lines)
      From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:36:25 -0400
    • Re: Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax (68 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:06:00 -0500
    • Re: Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax (86 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:35:03 -0400
    • Re: Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax (49 lines)
      From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:02:05 -0400
    • Re: Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax (46 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:49:56 -0400
    • Re: Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax (39 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:58:13 -0400
    • Re: Metalanguage for phonotactics and syntax (43 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 13:49:41 +0100

16. My Newest Conlang, Çideaux
    • My Newest Conlang, Çideaux (69 lines)
      From: Cullen Kain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:04:47 -0400
    • Re: My Newest Conlang, Çideaux (28 lines)
      From: Virginia Keys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:59:56 -0400

17. need to archive Ithkuil & Ilaksh
    • Re: need to archive Ithkuil & Ilaksh (41 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:17:16 -0500
    • Re: need to archive Ithkuil & Ilaksh (51 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:18:24 +0100

18. No personal pronouns?
    • No personal pronouns? (46 lines)
      From: Miles Forster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:22:03 +0200
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (52 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:18:46 +0200
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (62 lines)
      From: Miles Forster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:35:32 +0200
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (39 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:35:39 -0000
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (36 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:38:16 -0000
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (51 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:49:36 -0400
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (72 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:00:12 -0500
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (42 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:09:47 -0400
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (43 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:09:51 +0200
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (58 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:15:12 +0200
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (67 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:21:52 -0400
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (41 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:25:00 -0500
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (55 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:35:39 +0100
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (67 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:40:21 +0100
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (84 lines)
      From: Miles Forster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:25:01 +0200
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (175 lines)
      From: Zach Wellstood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:44:07 -0400
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (33 lines)
      From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:34:26 -0400
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (51 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:03:30 +0100
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (29 lines)
      From: Virginia Keys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:38:12 -0400
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (35 lines)
      From: Virginia Keys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:48:32 -0400
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (51 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:24:50 +0200
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (62 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:44:51 -0400
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (93 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:03:12 +0200
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (82 lines)
      From: Iuhan Culmærija <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:42:03 +0200
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (87 lines)
      From: Mia "Waffle" Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:52:56 -0400
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (43 lines)
      From: Miles Forster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:21:05 +0200
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (39 lines)
      From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:38:53 -0400
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (39 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:15:54 -0500
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (53 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:40:19 -0400
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (59 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:32:58 -0700
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (47 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:38:04 -0700
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (62 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:20:31 +0100
    • Re: No personal pronouns? (85 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:41:49 -0700

19. Non-human Features
    • Re: Non-human Features (61 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:26:48 -0400
    • Re: Non-human Features (31 lines)
      From: Marta Teresa Perlińska <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:36:30 +0200
    • Re: Non-human Features (72 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:13:20 -0400
    • Re: Non-human Features (52 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:12:02 -0400
    • Re: Non-human Features (55 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:44:18 -0400
    • Re: Non-human Features (72 lines)
      From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:12:46 -0400
    • Re: Non-human Features (58 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:20:00 -0400
    • Re: Non-human Features (65 lines)
      From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:54:05 -0400
    • Re: Non-human Features (60 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:13:40 -0400
    • Re: Non-human Features (73 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:27:12 -0400

20. Perfects and passives
    • Perfects and passives (45 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:32:01 +0100
    • Re: Perfects and passives (47 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:53:13 -0400
    • Re: Perfects and passives (84 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:46:26 -0700
    • Re: Perfects and passives (46 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:39:29 +0100
    • Re: Perfects and passives (68 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:10:37 +0200
    • Re: Perfects and passives (31 lines)
      From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:56:37 -0400
    • Re: Perfects and passives (49 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:59:41 +0200
    • Re: Perfects and passives (68 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:22:05 -0500
    • Re: Perfects and passives (84 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:34:08 +0200

21. Preventing a crash a la langmaker
    • Preventing a crash a la langmaker (40 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:55:38 +0200
    • Re: Preventing a crash a la langmaker (69 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:00:44 -0700

22. Pronouns, pronouns, everywhere. It's driving me to drink...
    • Re: Pronouns, pronouns, everywhere. It's driving me to drink... (93 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 05:57:22 -0400
    • Re: Pronouns, pronouns, everywhere. It's driving me to drink... (70 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:08:00 -0400
    • Re: Pronouns, pronouns, everywhere. It's driving me to drink... (100 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:06:11 -0400

23. Puzzling sketch unearthed
    • Puzzling sketch unearthed (80 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:59:33 -0400
    • Re: Puzzling sketch unearthed (101 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 11:07:50 +0100
    • Re: Puzzling sketch unearthed (107 lines)
      From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 11:34:59 +0100
    • Re: Puzzling sketch unearthed (140 lines)
      From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 11:58:02 +0100
    • Re: Puzzling sketch unearthed (46 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:24:01 +0200
    • Re: Puzzling sketch unearthed (58 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:55:20 -0700
    • Re: Puzzling sketch unearthed (55 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:24:05 -0400

24. query about list processing algorithms
    • query about list processing algorithms (35 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 01:40:30 +0100
    • Re: query about list processing algorithms (59 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:40:59 -0700
    • Re: query about list processing algorithms (101 lines)
      From: Cíat Ó Gáibhtheacháin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:20:27 +0100
    • Re: query about list processing algorithms (49 lines)
      From: Ralph DeCarli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:24:40 -0400

25. semantics = syntax? (was: Hello, and a question)
    • semantics = syntax? (was: Hello, and a question) (44 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:32:48 -0400
    • Re: semantics = syntax? (was: Hello, and a question) (60 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:01:41 +0100

26. Senjecas Oblique Cases (was: A verbless language)
    • Senjecas Oblique Cases (was: A verbless language) (35 lines)
      From: Charlie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:37:26 -0000

27. Sentence order
    • Sentence order (25 lines)
      From: Virginia Keys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:20:23 -0400
    • Re: Sentence order (49 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:31:55 -0500
    • Re: Sentence order (46 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:45:13 +0100
    • Re: Sentence order (46 lines)
      From: Virginia Keys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:58:49 -0400
    • Re: Sentence order (75 lines)
      From: Samuel Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:58:55 +0100
    • Re: Sentence order (33 lines)
      From: Virginia Keys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:42:50 -0400
    • Re: Sentence order (47 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:22:47 +0200
    • Re: Sentence order (64 lines)
      From: Alglenne Glennaroe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:33:49 +0100
    • Re: Sentence order (31 lines)
      From: Virginia Keys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:18:39 -0400

28. TAKE (- date expression)
    • Re: TAKE (- date expression) (64 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 07:00:05 +0100

29. TAKE diacritics
    • Re: TAKE diacritics (219 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:58:07 +0100
    • Re: TAKE diacritics (45 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:03:39 +0200

30. To be or not to be, that is suppletion
    • To be or not to be, that is suppletion (56 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:42:09 +0100
    • Re: To be or not to be, that is suppletion (59 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:52:03 +0200
    • Re: To be or not to be, that is suppletion (45 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:39:43 +0100
    • Re: To be or not to be, that is suppletion (92 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 09:26:42 -0700
    • Re: To be or not to be, that is suppletion (66 lines)
      From: Andrew Jarrette <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:51:48 -0400
    • Re: To be or not to be, that is suppletion (141 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:24:16 -0400