Conlang
Mailing List – July 2011, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Ceqli Through Pictures"
(17 messages)
a convoluted sentence
(3 messages)
Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(24 messages)
Another Pronoun Question
Base-6 Number System (Count to 35 on 2 hands!)
Ceqli being slowly revised.
Conlang Machine Translation - sort of
(3 messages)
Conlang/-culture personal naming practices
Conveyance of Intended Status
(3 messages)
If you strike at the king
(12 messages)
IPA, Unicode help please.
(3 messages)
Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
(5 messages)
Noise resistant phonology
(19 messages)
Nounlessness (was Re: A verbless language)
(8 messages)
Oh No! Not again! (Self-Segregating Morphology)
(2 messages)
OT: My full legal name is now Sai. W00t!
quotes on Frath (was: A verbless language)
TAKE - Pater Noster & updates.
The Conlanger's GoogleMaps map
(10 messages)
the Shwa script
(25 messages)
Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(34 messages)
Underwater Language (Was: Language adaptation to the environment)
(4 messages)
using sounds as interpunction
(7 messages)
Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(25 messages)
Why I conlang, was Re: OT: My full legal name is now Sai. W00t!
"Ceqli Through Pictures"
"Ceqli Through Pictures"
(21 lines)
From:
Rex May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(40 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(49 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(65 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(82 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(35 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(52 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(36 lines)
From:
Rex May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(48 lines)
From:
Rex May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(36 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(34 lines)
From:
Rex May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(47 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(34 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(49 lines)
From:
Rex May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(24 lines)
From:
Rex May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(36 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Ceqli Through Pictures"
(39 lines)
From:
Rex May <
[log in to unmask]
>
a convoluted sentence
a convoluted sentence
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a convoluted sentence
(45 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a convoluted sentence
(39 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(94 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(59 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(58 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(85 lines)
From:
Daniel Burgener <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(78 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(43 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(31 lines)
From:
Daniel Burgener <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(58 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(37 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(61 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(32 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(43 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(51 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(40 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(77 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(60 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(71 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(93 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(77 lines)
From:
Iuhan Culmærija <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(105 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(63 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(80 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ancient Kalau - A Proto-Conlang
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another Pronoun Question
Re: Another Pronoun Question
(116 lines)
From:
Basilius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Base-6 Number System (Count to 35 on 2 hands!)
Re: Base-6 Number System (Count to 35 on 2 hands!)
(93 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ceqli being slowly revised.
Ceqli being slowly revised.
(22 lines)
From:
Rex May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Machine Translation - sort of
Conlang Machine Translation - sort of
(73 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Machine Translation - sort of
(83 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Machine Translation - sort of
(52 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang/-culture personal naming practices
Re: Conlang/-culture personal naming practices
(38 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conveyance of Intended Status
Conveyance of Intended Status
(54 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conveyance of Intended Status
(68 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conveyance of Intended Status
(41 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
If you strike at the king
Re: If you strike at the king
(59 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you strike at the king
(39 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you strike at the king
(55 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you strike at the king
(67 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you strike at the king
(59 lines)
From:
Charlie <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you strike at the king
(72 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you strike at the king
(80 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you strike at the king
(49 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you strike at the king
(44 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you strike at the king
(66 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you strike at the king
(45 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you strike at the king
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
IPA, Unicode help please.
IPA, Unicode help please.
(24 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA, Unicode help please.
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: IPA, Unicode help please.
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
(61 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
(107 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
(148 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
(77 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
(101 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Noise resistant phonology
Noise resistant phonology
(41 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(50 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(69 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(75 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(40 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(30 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(109 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(62 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(43 lines)
From:
yuri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(44 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(69 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(44 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(61 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(49 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(57 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(33 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(37 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noise resistant phonology
(37 lines)
From:
yuri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nounlessness (was Re: A verbless language)
Re: Nounlessness (was Re: A verbless language)
(73 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nounlessness (was Re: A verbless language)
(94 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nounlessness (was Re: A verbless language)
(57 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nounlessness (was Re: A verbless language)
(57 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nounlessness (was Re: A verbless language)
(69 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nounlessness (was Re: A verbless language)
(127 lines)
From:
David Edwards <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nounlessness (was Re: A verbless language)
(41 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nounlessness (was Re: A verbless language)
(103 lines)
From:
David Edwards <
[log in to unmask]
>
Oh No! Not again! (Self-Segregating Morphology)
Oh No! Not again! (Self-Segregating Morphology)
(64 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Oh No! Not again! (Self-Segregating Morphology)
(48 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: My full legal name is now Sai. W00t!
Re: OT: My full legal name is now Sai. W00t!
(88 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
quotes on Frath (was: A verbless language)
Re: quotes on Frath (was: A verbless language)
(70 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
TAKE - Pater Noster & updates.
TAKE - Pater Noster & updates.
(165 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Conlanger's GoogleMaps map
The Conlanger's GoogleMaps map
(30 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlanger's GoogleMaps map
(39 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlanger's GoogleMaps map
(54 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlanger's GoogleMaps map
(66 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlanger's GoogleMaps map
(38 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlanger's GoogleMaps map
(36 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlanger's GoogleMaps map
(30 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlanger's GoogleMaps map
(40 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlanger's GoogleMaps map
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Conlanger's GoogleMaps map
(52 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
the Shwa script
the Shwa script
(33 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(29 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(26 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(52 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(59 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(41 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(64 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(86 lines)
From:
masukomi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(38 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(119 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(191 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(53 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(43 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(50 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(57 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(69 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(68 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(44 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(75 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(102 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(128 lines)
From:
Cosman246 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(53 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(55 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(47 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(30 lines)
From:
Karen Badham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(21 lines)
From:
Matthew Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(60 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(75 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(81 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(74 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(26 lines)
From:
Rex May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(42 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(63 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(55 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(94 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(112 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(72 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(40 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(54 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(88 lines)
From:
Jan Strasser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(50 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(63 lines)
From:
Mia S. Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(48 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(67 lines)
From:
Vojtěch Merunka <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(46 lines)
From:
kechpaja <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(42 lines)
From:
Miles Forster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(88 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(42 lines)
From:
yuri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(38 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(156 lines)
From:
masukomi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(35 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(64 lines)
From:
David Edwards <
[log in to unmask]
>
Underwater Language (Was: Language adaptation to the environment)
Underwater Language (Was: Language adaptation to the environment)
(49 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Underwater Language (Was: Language adaptation to the environment)
(77 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Underwater Language (Was: Language adaptation to the environment)
(29 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Underwater Language (Was: Language adaptation to the environment)
(92 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
using sounds as interpunction
using sounds as interpunction
(54 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: using sounds as interpunction
(38 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: using sounds as interpunction
(98 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: using sounds as interpunction
(47 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: using sounds as interpunction
(85 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: using sounds as interpunction
(51 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: using sounds as interpunction
(80 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(59 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(90 lines)
From:
Sam Weston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(102 lines)
From:
Sam Weston <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(39 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(57 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(46 lines)
From:
Brett Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(51 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(67 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(67 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(137 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(77 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(118 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(87 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(145 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(134 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(176 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(185 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(47 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(132 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(88 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(43 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(108 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(64 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(60 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(67 lines)
From:
Piermaria Maraziti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why I conlang, was Re: OT: My full legal name is now Sai. W00t!
Re: Why I conlang, was Re: OT: My full legal name is now Sai. W00t!
(64 lines)
From:
yuri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – July 2011, week 3
Conlang Mailing List – July 2011, week 3
