Conlang
Mailing List – July 2011, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Ŝercbildoj
</lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts
(5 messages)
A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(12 messages)
ablaut diachronics
(8 messages)
Another Pronoun Question
(5 messages)
Ceqli updated
Conscript - Gait Gone Wild (WAS: Schwa...)
(2 messages)
Conveyance of Intended Status
Derivation of Austronesian-Type Alignment
(2 messages)
Do you se [sic]? (was: RE: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?")
fate of topic markers
(3 messages)
Gnoli triangle with color
(3 messages)
Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon)
(5 messages)
IPA typing help
Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
(5 messages)
Natlang loglangs?
(2 messages)
Norway
(5 messages)
phoneme
(2 messages)
phoneme (was: the Shwa script)
(9 messages)
revisiting the artlang/engelang distinction (was: Re: van Steenbergen Hexagon
(4 messages)
Shaw Karen
the Shwa script
(50 messages)
the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(6 messages)
Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing
(6 messages)
Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(9 messages)
Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(17 messages)
Ŝercbildoj
Ŝercbildoj
(22 lines)
From:
Rex May <
[log in to unmask]
>
</lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts
</lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts
(49 lines)
From:
Cullen Kain <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: </lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts
(54 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: </lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts
(109 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: </lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts
(46 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: </lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts
(47 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(32 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(43 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(64 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(48 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(42 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(58 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(81 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(106 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(118 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(45 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
ablaut diachronics
ablaut diachronics
(24 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ablaut diachronics
(48 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ablaut diachronics
(86 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ablaut diachronics
(125 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ablaut diachronics
(33 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ablaut diachronics
(66 lines)
From:
Basilius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ablaut diachronics
(127 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ablaut diachronics
(75 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another Pronoun Question
Re: Another Pronoun Question
(34 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another Pronoun Question
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another Pronoun Question
(47 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another Pronoun Question
(38 lines)
From:
Basilius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another Pronoun Question
(44 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ceqli updated
Ceqli updated
(21 lines)
From:
Rex May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conscript - Gait Gone Wild (WAS: Schwa...)
Conscript - Gait Gone Wild (WAS: Schwa...)
(83 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscript - Gait Gone Wild (WAS: Schwa...)
(92 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conveyance of Intended Status
Re: Conveyance of Intended Status
(56 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Derivation of Austronesian-Type Alignment
Derivation of Austronesian-Type Alignment
(36 lines)
From:
Galen Buttitta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derivation of Austronesian-Type Alignment
(56 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Do you se [sic]? (was: RE: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?")
Do you se [sic]? (was: RE: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?")
(48 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
fate of topic markers
fate of topic markers
(40 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: fate of topic markers
(49 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: fate of topic markers
(62 lines)
From:
Njenfalgar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gnoli triangle with color
Re: Gnoli triangle with color
(49 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gnoli triangle with color
(72 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gnoli triangle with color
(69 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon)
Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon)
(55 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon)
(103 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon)
(34 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon)
(46 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon)
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
IPA typing help
IPA typing help
(39 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
(107 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
(79 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
(81 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
(102 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
(155 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Natlang loglangs?
Re: Natlang loglangs?
(105 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Natlang loglangs?
(50 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Norway
Norway
(28 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norway
(49 lines)
From:
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norway
(43 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norway
(38 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norway
(48 lines)
From:
Even Eclectic Tolo Dybevik <
[log in to unmask]
>
phoneme
Re: phoneme
(72 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phoneme
(66 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
phoneme (was: the Shwa script)
phoneme (was: the Shwa script)
(91 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script)
(44 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script)
(41 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script)
(62 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script)
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script)
(43 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script)
(85 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script)
(57 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script)
(46 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
revisiting the artlang/engelang distinction (was: Re: van Steenbergen Hexagon
revisiting the artlang/engelang distinction (was: Re: van Steenbergen Hexagon
(66 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: revisiting the artlang/engelang distinction (was: Re: van Steenbergen Hexagon
(191 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: revisiting the artlang/engelang distinction (was: Re: van Steenbergen Hexagon
(50 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: revisiting the artlang/engelang distinction (was: Re: van Steenbergen Hexagon
(97 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Shaw Karen
Shaw Karen
(42 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
the Shwa script
Re: the Shwa script
(45 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(67 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(156 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(77 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(114 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(267 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(46 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(93 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(57 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(78 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(89 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(97 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(66 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(74 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(70 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(76 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(62 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(73 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(130 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(144 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(84 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(119 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(120 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(165 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(49 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(58 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(63 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(73 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(57 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(66 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(38 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(143 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(53 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(186 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(76 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(131 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(35 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(60 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(52 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(152 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(58 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(186 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(59 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(84 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(116 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(158 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(62 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(50 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(76 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(50 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
Re: the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(56 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(57 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(69 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(56 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(66 lines)
From:
Cosman246 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing
Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing
(62 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing
(88 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing
(37 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing
(58 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing
(54 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(40 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(40 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(24 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(79 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(88 lines)
From:
Virginia Keys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(36 lines)
From:
yuri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(170 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(40 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
(35 lines)
From:
Sai <
[log in to unmask]
>
Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(97 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(70 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(132 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(145 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(114 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(79 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(96 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(55 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(136 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(221 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(53 lines)
From:
Piermaria Maraziti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(282 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(74 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(40 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
(132 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – July 2011, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – July 2011, week 4
