Conlang Mailing List – July 2011, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• Ŝercbildoj
• </lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts (5 messages)
• A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (12 messages)
• ablaut diachronics (8 messages)
• Another Pronoun Question (5 messages)
• Ceqli updated
• Conscript - Gait Gone Wild (WAS: Schwa...) (2 messages)
• Conveyance of Intended Status
• Derivation of Austronesian-Type Alignment (2 messages)
• Do you se [sic]? (was: RE: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?")
• fate of topic markers (3 messages)
• Gnoli triangle with color (3 messages)
• Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (5 messages)
• IPA typing help
• Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology) (5 messages)
• Natlang loglangs? (2 messages)
• Norway (5 messages)
• phoneme (2 messages)
• phoneme (was: the Shwa script) (9 messages)
• revisiting the artlang/engelang distinction (was: Re: van Steenbergen Hexagon (4 messages)
• Shaw Karen
• the Shwa script (50 messages)
• the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (6 messages)
• Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing (6 messages)
• Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?" (9 messages)
• Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (17 messages)

1. &#348;ercbildoj
   • &#348;ercbildoj (22 lines)
     Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:35:44 -0400

2. </lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts
   • </lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts (49 lines)
     Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:58:17 -0400
   • Re: </lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts (54 lines)
     Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:27:54 -0600
   • Re: </lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts (109 lines)
     Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:33:51 -0700
   • Re: </lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts (46 lines)
     Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:27:55 +0100
   • Re: </lurk>Ergativity and Active-Stative Contrasts (47 lines)
     Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:04:02 +0200

3. A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
   • A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (32 lines)
     Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 23:40:19 -0700
   • Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (43 lines)
     Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:37:51 -0400
   • Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (64 lines)
     Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:59:46 -0700
   • Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (48 lines)
     Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:19:07 -0700
   • Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (52 lines)
     Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:26:17 +0200
   • Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (42 lines)
     Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:09:40 -0500
   • Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (49 lines)
     Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:19:05 +0200
   • Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (58 lines)
     Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:06:46 -0500
   • Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (81 lines)
     Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:46:40 +0200
   • Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (106 lines)
     Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:59:07 -0500
   • Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (118 lines)
     Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:49:30 +0200
   • Re: A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (45 lines)
     Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:01:37 -0500

4. ablaut diachronics
   • ablaut diachronics (24 lines)
     Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:58:22 -0400
   • Re: ablaut diachronics (48 lines)
     Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:39:38 -0400
   • Re: ablaut diachronics (86 lines)
     Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:20:21 +0200
   • Re: ablaut diachronics (125 lines)
     Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:03:53 +0200
   • Re: ablaut diachronics (33 lines)
     Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:43:36 -0400
   • Re: ablaut diachronics (66 lines)
     Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:27:49 -0400
   • Re: ablaut diachronics (127 lines)
     Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:35:22 +0200
   • Re: ablaut diachronics (75 lines)
     Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:38:19 +0200

5. Another Pronoun Question
   • Re: Another Pronoun Question (34 lines)
     Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 22:55:33 -0600
   • Re: Another Pronoun Question (46 lines)
     Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:17:19 +0200
   • Re: Another Pronoun Question (47 lines)
     Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 23:24:06 -0600
   • Re: Another Pronoun Question (38 lines)
     Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:32:01 -0400
   • Re: Another Pronoun Question (44 lines)
     Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:17:23 -0500

6. Ceqli updated
   • Ceqli updated (21 lines)
     Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:14:47 -0400

7. Conscript - Gait Gone Wild (WAS: Schwa...)
   • Conscript - Gait Gone Wild (WAS: Schwa...) (83 lines)
     Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:28:27 -0700
   • Re: Conscript - Gait Gone Wild (WAS: Schwa...) (92 lines)
     Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:50:58 -0600

8. Conveyance of Intended Status
   • Re: Conveyance of Intended Status (56 lines)
     Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 22:42:23 -0600

9. Derivation of Austronesian-Type Alignment
   • Derivation of Austronesian-Type Alignment (36 lines)
     Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:58:27 -0400
   • Re: Derivation of Austronesian-Type Alignment (56 lines)
     Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:17:50 -0700

10. Do you se [sic]? (was: RE: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?")
    • Do you se [sic]? (was: RE: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?") (48 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:43:11 -0400

11. fate of topic markers
    • fate of topic markers (40 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:11:06 +0200
    • Re: fate of topic markers (49 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:31:31 +0100
    • Re: fate of topic markers (62 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:38:22 +0200

12. Gnoli triangle with color
    • Re: Gnoli triangle with color (49 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:44:35 +0200
    • Re: Gnoli triangle with color (72 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:46:24 +0100
    • Re: Gnoli triangle with color (69 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:34:46 +0200

13. Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon)
    • Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (55 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:30:52 +0100
    • Re: Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (103 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:50:20 -0400
    • Re: Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (34 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:03:00 -0500
    • Re: Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (46 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:14:34 +0100
    • Re: Gnoli triangle with color (was: van Steenbergen Hexagon) (42 lines)
      Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:56:33 +0200

14. IPA typing help
    • IPA typing help (39 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:15:29 +0200

15. Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology)
    • Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology) (107 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:20:06 +0200
    • Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology) (79 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:47:41 +0200
    • Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology) (81 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:35:37 +0100
    • Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology) (102 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:40:07 +0200
    • Re: Language adaptation to the environment (Was: Noise resistant phonology) (155 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:36:13 +0200

16. Natlang loglangs?
    • Re: Natlang loglangs? (105 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:55:51 +0100
    • Re: Natlang loglangs? (50 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:25:53 -0400

17. Norway
    • Norway (28 lines)
      Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:48:49 -0500
    • Re: Norway (49 lines)
      Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:19:07 +0200
    • Re: Norway (43 lines)
      Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 08:56:17 -0500
    • Re: Norway (38 lines)
      Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 22:31:41 +0200
    • Re: Norway (48 lines)
      Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 22:53:07 +0200

18. phoneme
    • Re: phoneme (72 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:16:55 +0100
    • Re: phoneme (66 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:36:23 +0100

19. phoneme (was: the Shwa script)
    • phoneme (was: the Shwa script) (91 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:53:41 +0100
    • Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script) (44 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:37:08 +0200
    • Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script) (41 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:48:13 -0700
    • Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script) (62 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:04:27 +0200
    • Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script) (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:35:53 +0200
    • Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script) (43 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:27:23 +0100
    • Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script) (85 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:18:27 +0200
    • Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script) (57 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:42:21 +0200
    • Re: phoneme (was: the Shwa script) (46 lines)
      Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:57:06 +0100

20. revisiting the artlang/engelang distinction (was: Re: van Steenbergen Hexagon
    • revisiting the artlang/engelang distinction (was: Re: van Steenbergen Hexagon (66 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:17:45 +0100
    • Re: revisiting the artlang/engelang distinction (was: Re: van Steenbergen Hexagon (191 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:21:22 +0200
    • Re: revisiting the artlang/engelang distinction (was: Re: van Steenbergen Hexagon (50 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:14:41 -0700
    • Re: revisiting the artlang/engelang distinction (was: Re: van Steenbergen Hexagon (97 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:17:56 -0400

21. Shaw Karen
    • Shaw Karen (42 lines)
      Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:34:34 -0500

22. the Shwa script
    • Re: the Shwa script (45 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:56:50 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (67 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:52:44 +0200
    • Re: the Shwa script (156 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:30:07 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (77 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:44:24 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (114 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:11:42 -0600
    • Re: the Shwa script (267 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 12:32:26 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (46 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:16:09 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (93 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:35:42 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (57 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:42:34 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (78 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:30:14 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (89 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:56:33 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (97 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:23:12 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (66 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:52:40 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (74 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:59:57 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (70 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:00:28 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (76 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:28:01 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (62 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:55:47 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (73 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:58:57 -0500
    • Re: the Shwa script (130 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:16:50 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (144 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:17:41 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (84 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:55:25 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (119 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:02:02 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (120 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:31:26 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (165 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:36:15 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (49 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:56:44 -0500
    • Re: the Shwa script (58 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:00:46 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (63 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:05:28 -0500
    • Re: the Shwa script (73 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:08:51 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (57 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:16:12 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (66 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:20:10 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (38 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:19:10 -0400
    • Re: the Shwa script (143 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:14:14 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (53 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:21:41 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (186 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 05:35:44 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (76 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:22:12 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (131 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:26:58 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (35 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:43:05 -0400
    • Re: the Shwa script (60 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:45:10 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (52 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:56:01 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (152 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:59:30 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (58 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:00:59 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (186 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:01:39 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (59 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:30:22 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (84 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:06:27 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (116 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 07:46:19 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (158 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 01:21:48 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script (62 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:22:49 +0200
    • Re: the Shwa script (50 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:24:35 +0200
    • Re: the Shwa script (76 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:17:30 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script (50 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:29:02 +0100

23. the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet
    • Re: the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (56 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:27:13 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (57 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:36:36 +0100
    • Re: the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (69 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:11:53 -0500
    • Re: the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (56 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:33:00 +0200
    • Re: the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (66 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:10:09 -0700
    • Re: the Shwa script and A Non-Phonemic Alphabet (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:06:43 -0700

24. Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing
    • Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing (62 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:27:18 -0700
    • Re: Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing (62 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:06:17 -0700
    • Re: Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing (88 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 01:19:49 +0100
    • Re: Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing (37 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:45:24 -0400
    • Re: Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing (58 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:32:57 -0700
    • Re: Translation Challenge: Reading and Writing (54 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:34:25 -0700

25. Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?"
    • Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?" (40 lines)
      Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:06:54 -0400
    • Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?" (40 lines)
      Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:18:43 -0400
    • Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?" (24 lines)
      Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 13:48:08 -0400
    • Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?" (79 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:19:22 -0700
    • Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?" (88 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:58:46 -0400
    • Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?" (36 lines)
      Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:24:54 +1200
    • Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?" (170 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:24:43 -0700
    • Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?" (40 lines)
      Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:56:41 -0500
    • Re: Translations please: "Are you a conlanger?" (35 lines)
      Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 01:31:00 -0500

26. Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"?
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (97 lines)
      Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 06:48:18 +0100
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (70 lines)
      Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:43:49 -0700
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (132 lines)
      Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:29:05 +0200
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (145 lines)
      Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:31:04 +0200
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (114 lines)
      Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:38:13 +0100
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (79 lines)
      Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:35:43 -0700
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (96 lines)
      Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:16:17 -0700
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (55 lines)
      Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:30:28 +0100
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (136 lines)
      Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:20:56 +0200
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (221 lines)
      Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 07:36:59 +0100
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (53 lines)
      Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:03:24 +0200
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (282 lines)
      Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 14:31:55 +0200
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (74 lines)
      Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 16:36:24 +0100
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (44 lines)
      Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 11:00:23 -0700
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (40 lines)
      Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:19:27 +0100
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (41 lines)
      Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:00:36 -0700
    • Re: Which came first, the word for "chicken" or the word for "egg"? (132 lines)
      Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:05:32 -0700