Conlang Mailing List – August 2011, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Hire us" in various conlangs with interesting orthographies
• an ablaut sketch (6 messages)
• Bye for a while
• Chinese to Thai (10 messages)
• Difficulties of Communication (4 messages)
• Documentary Looking for Subjects (4 messages)
• Evolving towards Semitoid, erat: ablaut diachronics (5 messages)
• google books ngram viewer (2 messages)
• In need of a term
• irrealis imperatives (2 messages)
• La Caccigga Babel Text (4 messages)
• Latin Motto Question. (4 messages)
• lexical management on portable devices (5 messages)
• New a priori conlang parts of speech (15 messages)
• Orthography of apical/laminal silibants (8 messages)
• OT webpage/html question (9 messages)
• The Origin of a Conlang: An Idea (9 messages)
• the Shwa script
• What to call these grammatical categories?

1. "Hire us" in various conlangs with interesting orthographies
   • "Hire us" in various conlangs with interesting orthographies (38 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:55:48 -0400

2. an ablaut sketch
   • Re: an ablaut sketch (65 lines)
     From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:39:18 -0400
   • Re: an ablaut sketch (47 lines)
     From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:10:13 -0400
   • Re: an ablaut sketch (39 lines)
     From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 08:21:11 -0400
   • Re: an ablaut sketch (171 lines)
     From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:04:13 -0400
   • Re: an ablaut sketch (130 lines)
     From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:56:06 -0400
   • an ablaut sketch (84 lines)
     From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:34:27 -0400

3. Bye for a while
   • Bye for a while (52 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 07:44:17 +0100

4. Chinese to Thai
   • Re: Chinese to Thai (45 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 15:54:40 -0500
   • Re: Chinese to Thai (70 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 15:50:09 -0500
   • Re: Chinese to Thai (76 lines)
     From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 11:14:45 +0200
   • Re: Chinese to Thai (94 lines)
     From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:47:46 -0700
   • Re: Chinese to Thai (75 lines)
     From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:49:17 -0400
   • Re: Chinese to Thai (71 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:38:51 -0400
   • Re: Chinese to Thai (59 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:32:42 -0500
   • Re: Chinese to Thai (51 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:21:48 -0400
   • Re: Chinese to Thai (40 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 21:11:20 -0500
   • Chinese to Thai (30 lines)
     From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:36:05 -0700

5. Difficulties of Communication
   • Re: Difficulties of Communication (45 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 09:27:32 -0400
   • Re: Difficulties of Communication (96 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:17:14 -0500
   • Re: Difficulties of Communication (81 lines)
     From: Ralph DeCarli <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:12:14 -0400
   • Difficulties of Communication (38 lines)
     From: Virginia Keys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:50:13 -0400

6. Documentary Looking for Subjects
   • Re: Documentary Looking for Subjects (45 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:32:03 -0500
   • Re: Documentary Looking for Subjects (74 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 12:14:43 -0700
   • Re: Documentary Looking for Subjects (64 lines)
     From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 19:42:42 +0100
   • Documentary Looking for Subjects (56 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 00:45:50 -0700

7. Evolving towards Semitoid, erat: ablaut diachronics
   • Re: Evolving towards Semitoid, erat: ablaut diachronics (358 lines)
     From: Basilius <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 21:47:38 -0400
   • Re: Evolving towards Semitoid, erat: ablaut diachronics (45 lines)
     From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:57:07 +0200
   • Re: Evolving towards Semitoid, erat: ablaut diachronics (192 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:39:18 +0200
   • Re: Evolving towards Semitoid, erat: ablaut diachronics (91 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 21:54:50 -0400
   • Re: Evolving towards Semitoid, erat: ablaut diachronics (367 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 12:21:30 +0200

8. google books ngram viewer
   • Re: google books ngram viewer (34 lines)
     From: Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:06:23 -0500
   • google books ngram viewer (25 lines)
     From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:37:01 -0500

9. In need of a term
   • In need of a term (48 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:03:17 +0200

10. irrealis imperatives
    • Re: irrealis imperatives (71 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:34:04 -0500
    • Re: irrealis imperatives (72 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:20:58 -0700

11. La Caccigga Babel Text
    • Re: La Caccigga Babel Text (66 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:59:21 -0700
    • Re: La Caccigga Babel Text (65 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:59:25 -0700
    • Re: La Caccigga Babel Text (35 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:23:56 +0200
    • La Caccigga Babel Text (37 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 22:18:17 +0100

12. Latin Motto Question.
    • Re: Latin Motto Question. (36 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:27:43 -0500
    • Re: Latin Motto Question. (64 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 20:42:08 +0100
    • Re: Latin Motto Question. (52 lines)
      From: Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:44:15 -0500
    • Re: Latin Motto Question. (65 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 07:36:49 +0100

13. lexical management on portable devices
    • Re: lexical management on portable devices (93 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 19:50:06 -0400
    • Re: lexical management on portable devices (84 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 18:16:25 -0500
    • Re: lexical management on portable devices (64 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:27:53 -0400
    • Re: lexical management on portable devices (54 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 21:29:08 +0100
    • lexical management on portable devices (39 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:27:53 -0600

14. New a priori conlang parts of speech
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (90 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 18:36:59 -0700
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (106 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 04:00:22 -0400
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (104 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 21:19:39 -0700
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (55 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:02:31 -0500
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (104 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 12:32:22 -0400
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (102 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 05:14:47 -0700
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (112 lines)
      From: Scott Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:26:14 -0600
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (56 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:45:52 -0400
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (73 lines)
      From: Scott Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:16:06 -0600
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (58 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:15:59 -0700
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (74 lines)
      From: Scott Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:26:09 -0600
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (58 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:24:37 -0700
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (319 lines)
      From: Scott Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:59:25 -0600
    • Re: New a priori conlang parts of speech (301 lines)
      From: Scott Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:45:05 -0600
    • New a priori conlang parts of speech (308 lines)
      From: Scott Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:34:09 -0600

15. Orthography of apical/laminal silibants
    • Re: Orthography of apical/laminal silibants (129 lines)
      From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:37:20 +0200
    • Re: Orthography of apical/laminal silibants (84 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:05:46 +0200
    • Re: Orthography of apical/laminal silibants (75 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:20:58 -0500
    • Re: Orthography of apical/laminal silibants (74 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:01:37 +0200
    • Re: Orthography of apical/laminal silibants (36 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:01:46 +0200
    • Re: Orthography of apical/laminal silibants (50 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:36:28 +0100
    • Re: Orthography of apical/laminal silibants (79 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:51:49 +0200
    • Orthography of apical/laminal silibants (61 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:13:19 -0500

16. OT webpage/html question
    • Re: OT webpage/html question (54 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:19:31 -0500
    • Re: OT webpage/html question (51 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 01:12:17 -0400
    • Re: OT webpage/html question (57 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:50:12 -0700
    • Re: OT webpage/html question (33 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:48:00 -0400
    • Re: OT webpage/html question (43 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:46:10 -0400
    • Re: OT webpage/html question (53 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:38:53 -0600
    • Re: OT webpage/html question (76 lines)
      From: Cosman246 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:26:31 -0700
    • Re: OT webpage/html question (52 lines)
      From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:25:10 -0700
    • OT webpage/html question (41 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:23:17 -0500

17. The Origin of a Conlang: An Idea
    • Re: The Origin of a Conlang: An Idea (57 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:21:56 -0500
    • Re: The Origin of a Conlang: An Idea (43 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:54:19 -0700
    • Re: The Origin of a Conlang: An Idea (66 lines)
      From: Njenfalgar <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:24:24 +0200
    • Re: The Origin of a Conlang: An Idea (45 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:44:02 -0700
    • Re: The Origin of a Conlang: An Idea (35 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:26:07 +0200
    • Re: The Origin of a Conlang: An Idea (86 lines)
      From: Cosman246 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 17:33:44 -0700
    • Re: The Origin of a Conlang: An Idea (73 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:59:22 -0500
    • Re: The Origin of a Conlang: An Idea (52 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:48:00 -0500
    • The Origin of a Conlang: An Idea (50 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:55:39 -0700

18. the Shwa script
    • Re: the Shwa script (81 lines)
      From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:29:31 -0700

19. What to call these grammatical categories?
    • Re: What to call these grammatical categories? (137 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 14:53:04 -0400