Conlang Mailing List – October 2011, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• a prefix for one job
• Alice in Conlang Land
• Aspect (11 messages)
• basic problems (29 messages)
• conlang movie querry (3 messages)
• Delang and stress (10 messages)
• Dictionary and History book
• Favourite consonant clusters?
• Further info on tense marking for nouns (14 messages)
• Help creating subordinate clauses with neither pronouns nor conjunctions (4 messages)
• How to decide when language documentation is done? (51 messages)
• LCC4 video editor needed (17 messages)
• LoCo-/NaNoWriMo (4 messages)
• Na'vi Speaker's survey
• OT: Conlang Web Design
• Passive and Antipassive (17 messages)
• reconstructing proto-Romance (was: basic problems)
• Reconstruction challenges (was: basic problems)
• Review in 'Fiat Lingua' of Sarah Higley's book on Hildegard of Bingen
• SAE (was: Aspect)
• The essence of diachronic conlanging (was: basic problems) (4 messages)
• Translating Alice (2 messages)
• Translating Alice (was: How to decide when language documentation is done?) (6 messages)

1. a prefix for one job
   • Re: a prefix for one job (135 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>

2. Alice in Conlang Land
   • Alice in Conlang Land (136 lines)
     From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>

3. Aspect
   • Re: Aspect (26 lines)
     From: Anthony Miles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (22 lines)
     From: Anthony Miles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (97 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (36 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (76 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (92 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (101 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (101 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (50 lines)
     From: Anthony Miles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (84 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect (71 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

4. basic problems
   • Re: basic problems (22 lines)
     From: Anthony Miles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (62 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (87 lines)
     From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (96 lines)
     From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (92 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (41 lines)
     From: Anthony Miles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (98 lines)
     From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (62 lines)
     From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (141 lines)
     From: Hugo Cesar de Castro Carneiro <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (70 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (155 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (41 lines)
     From: Daniel Burgener <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (44 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (56 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (39 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (34 lines)
     From: Daniel Burgener <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (54 lines)
     From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (42 lines)
     From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (48 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (110 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (59 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (51 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (65 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (50 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (42 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (55 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (44 lines)
     From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (71 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: basic problems (153 lines)
     From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>

5. conlang movie querry
   • conlang movie querry (26 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: conlang movie querry (37 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: conlang movie querry (44 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

6. Delang and stress
   • Re: Delang and stress (43 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Delang and stress (54 lines)
     From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Delang and stress (50 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Delang and stress (66 lines)
     From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Delang and stress (56 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Delang and stress (75 lines)
     From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Delang and stress (99 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Delang and stress (113 lines)
     From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Delang and stress (60 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Delang and stress (78 lines)
     From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>

7. Dictionary and History book
   • Re: Dictionary and History book (51 lines)
     From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>

8. Favourite consonant clusters?
   • Re: Favourite consonant clusters? (53 lines)
     From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>

9. Further info on tense marking for nouns
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (27 lines)
     From: Anthony Miles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (50 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (41 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (52 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (67 lines)
     From: Charles W Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (74 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (103 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (134 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (75 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (125 lines)
     From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (92 lines)
     From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (45 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (171 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Further info on tense marking for nouns (63 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

10. Help creating subordinate clauses with neither pronouns nor conjunctions
    • Help creating subordinate clauses with neither pronouns nor conjunctions (78 lines)
      From: Hugo Cesar de Castro Carneiro <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Help creating subordinate clauses with neither pronouns nor conjunctions (98 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Help creating subordinate clauses with neither pronouns nor conjunctions (109 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Help creating subordinate clauses with neither pronouns nor conjunctions (121 lines)
      From: Hugo Cesar de Castro Carneiro <[log in to unmask]>

11. How to decide when language documentation is done?
    • How to decide when language documentation is done? (46 lines)
      From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (98 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (67 lines)
      From: Brian <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (71 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (84 lines)
      From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (115 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (133 lines)
      From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (37 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (153 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (104 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (107 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (131 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (69 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (60 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (52 lines)
      From: Matthew Martin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (37 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (115 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (52 lines)
      From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (74 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (63 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (119 lines)
      From: Iuhan Culmærija <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (40 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (73 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (59 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (100 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (70 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (73 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (48 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (52 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (49 lines)
      From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (128 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (38 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (58 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (59 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (62 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (53 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (51 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (99 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (154 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (58 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (74 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (55 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (64 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (87 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (114 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (50 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (64 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (72 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (45 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (84 lines)
      From: Tony Harris <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How to decide when language documentation is done? (33 lines)
      From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>

12. LCC4 video editor needed
    • LCC4 video editor needed (60 lines)
      From: Language Creation Society <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (68 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (73 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (81 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (89 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (103 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (112 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (26 lines)
      From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (46 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (125 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (138 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (65 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (72 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (64 lines)
      From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (47 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: LCC4 video editor needed (48 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

13. LoCo-/NaNoWriMo
    • LoCo-/NaNoWriMo (43 lines)
      From: Lee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LoCo-/NaNoWriMo (32 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LoCo-/NaNoWriMo (48 lines)
      From: Mechthild Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: LoCo-/NaNoWriMo (37 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>

14. Na'vi Speaker's survey
    • Na'vi Speaker's survey (35 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>

15. OT: Conlang Web Design
    • Re: OT: Conlang Web Design (44 lines)
      From: A. Mendes <[log in to unmask]>

16. Passive and Antipassive
    • Passive and Antipassive (22 lines)
      From: Brian A. Woodward <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (45 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (37 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (70 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (90 lines)
      From: Brian <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (48 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (93 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (65 lines)
      From: Brian <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (56 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (77 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (50 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (65 lines)
      From: Brian <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (48 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (61 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (52 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (56 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Passive and Antipassive (56 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>

17. reconstructing proto-Romance (was: basic problems)
    • Re: reconstructing proto-Romance (was: basic problems) (85 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

18. Reconstruction challenges (was: basic problems)
    • Reconstruction challenges (was: basic problems) (74 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

19. Review in 'Fiat Lingua' of Sarah Higley's book on Hildegard of Bingen
    • Review in 'Fiat Lingua' of Sarah Higley's book on Hildegard of Bingen (63 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>

20. SAE (was: Aspect)
    • SAE (was: Aspect) (72 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

21. The essence of diachronic conlanging (was: basic problems)
    • The essence of diachronic conlanging (was: basic problems) (125 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The essence of diachronic conlanging (was: basic problems) (52 lines)
      From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The essence of diachronic conlanging (was: basic problems) (112 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The essence of diachronic conlanging (was: basic problems) (192 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

22. Translating Alice
    • Re: Translating Alice (73 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Translating Alice (84 lines)
      From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>

23. Translating Alice (was: How to decide when language documentation is done?)
    • Translating Alice (was: How to decide when language documentation is done?) (117 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Translating Alice (was: How to decide when language documentation is done?) (163 lines)
      From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Translating Alice (was: How to decide when language documentation is done?) (38 lines)
      From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Translating Alice (was: How to decide when language documentation is done?) (62 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Translating Alice (was: How to decide when language documentation is done?) (41 lines)
      From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Translating Alice (was: How to decide when language documentation is done?) (269 lines)
      From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>