Conlang
Mailing List – November 2011, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Alice Chapter Four
(4 messages)
Alice Chapter Three
Beware the Jabberwock Resource
(5 messages)
Codex Seraphinianus Free Online
(8 messages)
Conlang by Pictures
(2 messages)
Conlang Names
(23 messages)
Diacritics (was: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms)
English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(26 messages)
English fn-
(10 messages)
English lexical sets in Teascript
(7 messages)
English rewritten
English rewritten (was: the Shwa script)
(6 messages)
Fw: Conlang Names
Fw: Re: Conlang Names
META: Conlang-L FAQ
New info on Alleliawullian
Noun case-gender vs. Word order
(3 messages)
On case
(7 messages)
on case
On case
(10 messages)
Origin of the Drow Dictionary?
(6 messages)
OT: IPA help
phonix 0.8 released
(10 messages)
Quelle couleur! (was Qulele couleur! (was:: the Shwa script))
(9 messages)
Questionable Case?
(5 messages)
Signwriting
(2 messages)
Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(13 messages)
Teascript page (test)
(3 messages)
The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
(11 messages)
the importance of English spelling reform
the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(51 messages)
the Shwa script
(27 messages)
Vilani
(3 messages)
Alice Chapter Four
Alice Chapter Four
(174 lines)
From:
Puey McCleary <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alice Chapter Four
(592 lines)
From:
Puey McCleary <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alice Chapter Four
(255 lines)
From:
Puey McCleary <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alice Chapter Four
(304 lines)
From:
Puey McCleary <
[log in to unmask]
>
Alice Chapter Three
Re: Alice Chapter Three
(363 lines)
From:
Puey McCleary <
[log in to unmask]
>
Beware the Jabberwock Resource
Re: Beware the Jabberwock Resource
(76 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beware the Jabberwock Resource
(29 lines)
From:
Puey McCleary <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beware the Jabberwock Resource
(90 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beware the Jabberwock Resource
(44 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beware the Jabberwock Resource
(98 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Codex Seraphinianus Free Online
Codex Seraphinianus Free Online
(38 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Codex Seraphinianus Free Online
(34 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Codex Seraphinianus Free Online
(43 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Codex Seraphinianus Free Online
(47 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Codex Seraphinianus Free Online
(43 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Codex Seraphinianus Free Online
(52 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Codex Seraphinianus Free Online
(69 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Codex Seraphinianus Free Online
(46 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang by Pictures
Conlang by Pictures
(32 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang by Pictures
(52 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Names
Conlang Names
(29 lines)
From:
Brian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(47 lines)
From:
Daniel Burgener <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(68 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(53 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(100 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(64 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(80 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(117 lines)
From:
Scott Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(94 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(54 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(33 lines)
From:
yuri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(60 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(29 lines)
From:
John Erickson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(65 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(41 lines)
From:
Koppa Dasao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(46 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(26 lines)
From:
J. Snow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(68 lines)
From:
Billy JB <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(45 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(67 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(33 lines)
From:
yuri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(43 lines)
From:
Ben Scerri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Names
(50 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Diacritics (was: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms)
Diacritics (was: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms)
(64 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(45 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(55 lines)
From:
Brian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(42 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(45 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(60 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(96 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(83 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(151 lines)
From:
Hugo Cesar de Castro Carneiro <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(73 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(41 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(42 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(48 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(45 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(57 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(58 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(69 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(33 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(65 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(87 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(49 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(47 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(48 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(89 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English EVERYTHING Reform (was: Shwa, Spelling, etc.)
(52 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
English fn-
English fn-
(42 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English fn-
(85 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English fn-
(48 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English fn-
(91 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English fn-
(49 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English fn-
(62 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English fn-
(47 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English fn-
(73 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English fn-
(83 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English fn-
(143 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
English lexical sets in Teascript
English lexical sets in Teascript
(80 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English lexical sets in Teascript
(95 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English lexical sets in Teascript
(86 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English lexical sets in Teascript
(56 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English lexical sets in Teascript
(71 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English lexical sets in Teascript
(80 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English lexical sets in Teascript
(56 lines)
From:
Charles W Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
English rewritten
Re: English rewritten
(136 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
English rewritten (was: the Shwa script)
English rewritten (was: the Shwa script)
(100 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English rewritten (was: the Shwa script)
(130 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English rewritten (was: the Shwa script)
(82 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English rewritten (was: the Shwa script)
(48 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English rewritten (was: the Shwa script)
(49 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: English rewritten (was: the Shwa script)
(48 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: Conlang Names
Fw: Conlang Names
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: Re: Conlang Names
Fw: Re: Conlang Names
(69 lines)
From:
Brian Weekes <
[log in to unmask]
>
META: Conlang-L FAQ
META: Conlang-L FAQ
(341 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
New info on Alleliawullian
New info on Alleliawullian
(65 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Noun case-gender vs. Word order
Noun case-gender vs. Word order
(34 lines)
From:
J. Snow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun case-gender vs. Word order
(55 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Noun case-gender vs. Word order
(67 lines)
From:
J. Snow <
[log in to unmask]
>
On case
On case
(53 lines)
From:
Brian Weekes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(83 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(146 lines)
From:
Brian Weekes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(149 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(34 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(48 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
on case
on case
(31 lines)
From:
Jerry Muelver <
[log in to unmask]
>
On case
Re: On case
(54 lines)
From:
Charles W Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(57 lines)
From:
Charles W Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(51 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(60 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(62 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(87 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(46 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(148 lines)
From:
Brian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(53 lines)
From:
Ralph DeCarli <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On case
(56 lines)
From:
Charles W Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Origin of the Drow Dictionary?
Origin of the Drow Dictionary?
(52 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of the Drow Dictionary?
(60 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of the Drow Dictionary?
(66 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of the Drow Dictionary?
(47 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of the Drow Dictionary?
(52 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Origin of the Drow Dictionary?
(62 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: IPA help
OT: IPA help
(44 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
phonix 0.8 released
phonix 0.8 released
(43 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonix 0.8 released
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonix 0.8 released
(66 lines)
From:
Billy JB <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonix 0.8 released
(38 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonix 0.8 released
(28 lines)
From:
Cosman246 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonix 0.8 released
(51 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonix 0.8 released
(53 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonix 0.8 released
(30 lines)
From:
Cosman246 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonix 0.8 released
(71 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonix 0.8 released
(47 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Quelle couleur! (was Qulele couleur! (was:: the Shwa script))
Quelle couleur! (was Qulele couleur! (was:: the Shwa script))
(117 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quelle couleur! (was Qulele couleur! (was:: the Shwa script))
(73 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quelle couleur! (was Qulele couleur! (was:: the Shwa script))
(25 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quelle couleur! (was Qulele couleur! (was:: the Shwa script))
(40 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quelle couleur! (was Qulele couleur! (was:: the Shwa script))
(39 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quelle couleur! (was Qulele couleur! (was:: the Shwa script))
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quelle couleur! (was Qulele couleur! (was:: the Shwa script))
(63 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quelle couleur! (was Qulele couleur! (was:: the Shwa script))
(51 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quelle couleur! (was Qulele couleur! (was:: the Shwa script))
(52 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Questionable Case?
Questionable Case?
(33 lines)
From:
Brian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questionable Case?
(30 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questionable Case?
(58 lines)
From:
Scott Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questionable Case?
(54 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Questionable Case?
(57 lines)
From:
Brian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Signwriting
Signwriting
(49 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Signwriting
(40 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(86 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(91 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(61 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(99 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(81 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(64 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(58 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(73 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(41 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(49 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(35 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(49 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (was: Quelle couleur!)
(48 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Teascript page (test)
Teascript page (test)
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Teascript page (test)
(38 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Teascript page (test)
(51 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
(119 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
(128 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
(38 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
(46 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
(45 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
(46 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
(51 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
(60 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
(79 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Greek alphabet (was: the Shwa script)
(42 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
the importance of English spelling reform
Re: the importance of English spelling reform
(255 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(86 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(54 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(59 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(70 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(62 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(78 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(240 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(45 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(94 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(37 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(78 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(65 lines)
From:
Charles W Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(48 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(69 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(67 lines)
From:
Charles W Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(54 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(52 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(69 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(67 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(31 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(115 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(84 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(46 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(55 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(56 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(71 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(78 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(45 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(77 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(92 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(46 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(120 lines)
From:
Brian Weekes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(109 lines)
From:
Brian Weekes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(71 lines)
From:
Brian Weekes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(30 lines)
From:
Cosman246 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(46 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(100 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(66 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(43 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(33 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(75 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(37 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(45 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(65 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(62 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(42 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(81 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(46 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(49 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
(56 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
the Shwa script
Re: the Shwa script
(113 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
the Shwa script
(123 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(132 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(188 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(196 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(72 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(129 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(55 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(54 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(53 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(54 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(50 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(100 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(77 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(100 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(78 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(56 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(68 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(53 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(45 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(56 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(63 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(84 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(147 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(73 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(78 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: the Shwa script
(54 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vilani
Vilani
(46 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vilani
(49 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vilani
(58 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – November 2011, week 1
Conlang Mailing List – November 2011, week 1
