Conlang Mailing List – November 2011, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• Alice Chapter Five (5 messages)
• Alice Chapter Four (3 messages)
• Alice Chapter Six
• Babel Text in Old Albic (2 messages)
• Codex Seraphinianus Free Online
• Conlang Confusion [was: Inspirational Natlangs] (2 messages)
• Conlang Names (5 messages)
• Design Perameters for Romanization (12 messages)
• FairyLang Update: Concept and Phonetics (5 messages)
• Fwd: Re: Vilani (2 messages)
• Gifts of importance... (25 messages)
• Inspirational Natlangs (4 messages)
• It's the End of the World As We Know It (18 messages)
• Klingon Meeting at Saarbrücken
• Korean tongue (20 messages)
• Looking for feedback, comments, etc. (10 messages)
• On case (2 messages)
• on case
• On case (2 messages)
• OT Baby (8 messages)
• OT Returning (13 messages)
• Questionable Case? (2 messages)
• the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (6 messages)
• Vilani
• Vilani (third try)

1. Alice Chapter Five
   • Re: Alice Chapter Five (281 lines)
     From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:31:13 -0500
   • Re: Alice Chapter Five (512 lines)
     From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:26:25 -0500
   • Re: Alice Chapter Five (371 lines)
     From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:20:41 -0500
   • Re: Alice Chapter Five (247 lines)
     From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:28:34 -0500
   • Alice Chapter Five (128 lines)
     From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 22:17:46 -0500

2. Alice Chapter Four
   • Re: Alice Chapter Four (51 lines)
     From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:42:46 -0500
   • Re: Alice Chapter Four (35 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:38:35 -0600
   • Re: Alice Chapter Four (278 lines)
     From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 21:46:03 -0500

3. Alice Chapter Six
   • Alice Chapter Six (229 lines)
     From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:26:55 -0500

4. Babel Text in Old Albic
   • Re: Babel Text in Old Albic (104 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:23:12 -0800
   • Babel Text in Old Albic (94 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 22:33:14 +0100

5. Codex Seraphinianus Free Online
   • Re: Codex Seraphinianus Free Online (42 lines)
     From: Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 11:12:23 -0600

6. Conlang Confusion [was: Inspirational Natlangs]
   • Re: Conlang Confusion [was: Inspirational Natlangs] (69 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:00:38 +0100
   • Conlang Confusion [was: Inspirational Natlangs] (29 lines)
     From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:38:40 -0600

7. Conlang Names
   • Re: Conlang Names (50 lines)
     From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:30:39 +1300
   • Re: Conlang Names (50 lines)
     From: George Corley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:38:09 -0500
   • Re: Conlang Names (38 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 18:14:28 -0500
   • Re: Conlang Names (32 lines)
     From: Max Dominik Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:40:42 +0000
   • Re: Conlang Names (34 lines)
     From: Max Dominik Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:37:57 +0000

8. Design Perameters for Romanization
   • Re: Design Perameters for Romanization (66 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:39:40 -0500
   • Re: Design Perameters for Romanization (78 lines)
     From: Charlie Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:18:35 -0500
   • Re: Design Perameters for Romanization (68 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:16:29 -0600
   • Re: Design Perameters for Romanization (47 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:54:15 -0500
   • Re: Design Perameters for Romanization (52 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:23:47 -0600
   • Re: Design Perameters for Romanization (69 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:53:38 -0500
   • Re: Design Perameters for Romanization (40 lines)
     From: Brian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:53:04 +0000
   • Re: Design Perameters for Romanization (50 lines)
     From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:47:38 -0500
   • Re: Design Perameters for Romanization (62 lines)
     From: Iuhan Culmærija <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:28:45 +0200
   • Re: Design Perameters for Romanization (63 lines)
     From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:28:26 +0100
   • Re: Design Perameters for Romanization (45 lines)
     From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:04:39 -0600
   • Design Perameters for Romanization (24 lines)
     From: George Corley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 02:04:11 -0500

9. FairyLang Update: Concept and Phonetics
   • Re: FairyLang Update: Concept and Phonetics (49 lines)
     From: Fausto Chikko <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:44:15 -0600
   • Re: FairyLang Update: Concept and Phonetics (46 lines)
     From: Brian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:37:38 +0000
   • Re: FairyLang Update: Concept and Phonetics (32 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:28:12 -0600
   • Re: FairyLang Update: Concept and Phonetics (35 lines)
     From: John Erickson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:27:11 -0500
   • FairyLang Update: Concept and Phonetics (54 lines)
     From: John Erickson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:24:06 -0800

10. Fwd: Re: Vilani
    • Re: Fwd: Re: Vilani (38 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:02:40 -0500
    • Fwd: Re: Vilani (109 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:46:53 +0100

11. Gifts of importance...
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (47 lines)
      From: Charlie Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:31:04 -0500
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (45 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:48:51 -0500
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (63 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:33:09 +0100
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (56 lines)
      From: Charles W Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:47:53 -0500
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (46 lines)
      From: Charles W Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:43:26 -0500
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (99 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:16:08 +1300
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (75 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:45:08 -0500
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (34 lines)
      From: George Corley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:27:06 -0500
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (52 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 05:43:49 +0100
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (77 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:48:50 +1100
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (64 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:56:41 -0800
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (84 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:55:22 -0800
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (45 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:53:14 -0800
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (44 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:42:34 -0800
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (83 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:36:19 -0800
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (43 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:05:42 -0800
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (100 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:43:25 -0600
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (72 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:21:55 +0000
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (58 lines)
      From: Patrick Dunn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 10:15:15 -0600
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (79 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:57:07 +0100
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (56 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:37:43 -0600
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (60 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:11:11 -0600
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (42 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:56:48 -0500
    • Re: Gifts of importance... (72 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:30:44 +1100
    • Gifts of importance... (48 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:13:05 +0100

12. Inspirational Natlangs
    • Re: Inspirational Natlangs (38 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:34:09 -0600
    • Re: Inspirational Natlangs (49 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:31:30 -0500
    • Re: Inspirational Natlangs (58 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:48:21 +0100
    • Inspirational Natlangs (40 lines)
      From: Wm Annis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:06:25 -0600

13. It's the End of the World As We Know It
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (90 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:55:28 +1300
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (75 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:20:35 +0100
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (27 lines)
      From: Cosman246 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:07:40 -0800
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (44 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:59:56 -0500
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (31 lines)
      From: Cosman246 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:44:33 -0800
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (45 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:37:39 -0500
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (46 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:26:15 -0600
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (44 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:13:56 -0500
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (45 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:06:40 -0500
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (72 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:04:38 -0800
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (83 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:52:06 +0000
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (80 lines)
      From: Brian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:51:03 +0000
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (72 lines)
      From: Robert Brockway <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:24:53 +1000
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (45 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:14:57 -0500
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (70 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:12:11 -0500
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (52 lines)
      From: Robert Brockway <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:55:03 +1000
    • Re: It's the End of the World As We Know It (66 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:45:45 +0000
    • It's the End of the World As We Know It (31 lines)
      From: Brian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:23:47 +0000

14. Klingon Meeting at Saarbrücken
    • Klingon Meeting at Saarbrücken (27 lines)
      From: Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:45:31 -0500

15. Korean tongue
    • Re: Korean tongue (46 lines)
      From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:03:55 -0600
    • Re: Korean tongue (45 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 01:05:06 -0600
    • Re: Korean tongue (91 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:04:11 -0800
    • Re: Korean tongue (56 lines)
      From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 15:39:25 +0100
    • Re: Korean tongue (62 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 05:11:46 -0800
    • Re: Korean tongue (59 lines)
      From: Charles W Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 20:02:40 -0500
    • Re: Korean tongue (46 lines)
      From: Daniel Burgener <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:17:26 -0500
    • Re: Korean tongue (40 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:05:56 +0000
    • Re: Korean tongue (87 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:01:17 -0500
    • Re: Korean tongue (137 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:57:36 -0800
    • Re: Korean tongue (66 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:41:30 +1100
    • Re: Korean tongue (88 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:39:49 +1100
    • Re: Korean tongue (76 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 16:34:55 -0500
    • Re: Korean tongue (78 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 16:50:35 +0000
    • Re: Korean tongue (78 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 07:13:24 -0800
    • Re: Korean tongue (67 lines)
      From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 16:06:38 +0100
    • Re: Korean tongue (57 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:28:08 -0500
    • Re: Korean tongue (61 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:15:24 -0500
    • Re: Korean tongue (38 lines)
      From: Ben Scerri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 00:20:08 +1100
    • Korean tongue (27 lines)
      From: Charlie Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:04:59 -0500

16. Looking for feedback, comments, etc.
    • Re: Looking for feedback, comments, etc. (31 lines)
      From: J. Snow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:44:51 -0500
    • Re: Looking for feedback, comments, etc. (39 lines)
      From: J. Snow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:36:26 -0500
    • Re: Looking for feedback, comments, etc. (46 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:46:40 -0500
    • Re: Looking for feedback, comments, etc. (55 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:56:49 +0000
    • Re: Looking for feedback, comments, etc. (57 lines)
      From: J. Snow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:51:01 -0500
    • Re: Looking for feedback, comments, etc. (46 lines)
      From: Krista Casada <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:43:26 -0600
    • Re: Looking for feedback, comments, etc. (27 lines)
      From: J. Snow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:34:49 -0500
    • Re: Looking for feedback, comments, etc. (127 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:32:40 +0000
    • Re: Looking for feedback, comments, etc. (108 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:28:56 -0500
    • Looking for feedback, comments, etc. (81 lines)
      From: J. Snow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:16:31 -0500

17. On case
    • Re: On case (53 lines)
      From: Charlie Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:06:27 -0500
    • Re: On case (45 lines)
      From: Charlie Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:23:33 -0500

18. on case
    • Re: on case (59 lines)
      From: Brian Weekes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 01:06:17 -0800

19. On case
    • Re: On case (72 lines)
      From: Brian Weekes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:17:22 -0800
    • Re: On case (58 lines)
      From: Brian Weekes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:14:18 -0800

20. OT Baby
    • Re: OT Baby (47 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:32:34 +0000
    • Re: OT Baby (38 lines)
      From: Brian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 03:48:08 +0000
    • Re: OT Baby (50 lines)
      From: Brian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 03:46:22 +0000
    • Re: OT Baby (20 lines)
      From: John Erickson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:29:31 -0500
    • Re: OT Baby (27 lines)
      From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:46:02 -0500
    • Re: OT Baby (41 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:08:56 -0800
    • Re: OT Baby (39 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:34:06 +0100
    • OT Baby (29 lines)
      From: Brian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:31:49 +0000

21. OT Returning
    • Re: OT Returning (156 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:39:50 +0100
    • Re: OT Returning (109 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:39:33 -0800
    • Re: OT Returning (62 lines)
      From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:58:14 +0100
    • Re: OT Returning (84 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:15:25 +0100
    • Re: OT Returning (73 lines)
      From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:10:14 +0100
    • Re: OT Returning (46 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:57:42 +0100
    • Re: OT Returning (23 lines)
      From: George Corley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:26:12 -0500
    • Re: OT Returning (76 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 16:50:11 +0100
    • Re: OT Returning (61 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:35:22 -0600
    • Re: OT Returning (49 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:45:27 +0100
    • Re: OT Returning (75 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 05:16:07 -0800
    • Re: OT Returning (43 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 07:14:40 -0600
    • OT Returning (37 lines)
      From: Koppa Dasao <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 11:06:51 +0100

22. Questionable Case?
    • Re: Questionable Case? (58 lines)
      From: Brian <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 16:13:32 +0000
    • Re: Questionable Case? (37 lines)
      From: Roman Rausch <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 05:56:16 -0500

23. the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms
    • Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (73 lines)
      From: Brian Weekes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:31:20 -0800
    • Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (66 lines)
      From: Brian Weekes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:17:58 -0800
    • Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (45 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:31:48 -0500
    • Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (125 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:18:23 +0000
    • Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (117 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 03:53:04 -0800
    • Re: the importance of English spelling reform (was: Re: [CONLANG] Spelling reforms, schmelling reforms (137 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:09:27 +0000

24. Vilani
    • Re: Vilani (70 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:21:40 +0100

25. Vilani (third try)
    • Re: Vilani (third try) (72 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:48:38 +0100