Conlang
Mailing List November 2011, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
A two-hour conlang
(4 messages)
a very short text (Nov23)
Alleliawullian/Alelliawuilan
(2 messages)
Annotum
ASCII syllabary
(4 messages)
Brx approximants
(2 messages)
Car names and languages...
(11 messages)
Complex sentences involving conditionals
(3 messages)
Conscript idea: WAS: Syllabaries & abugidas
(6 messages)
Design Perameters for Romanization
(4 messages)
Do artlangers dislike auxlangers?
Do artlangers dislike auxlangers? (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(10 messages)
For Saidifoca, re: Conlang Card Exchange
Gait?
(11 messages)
Gaits, modes and Shwa
(9 messages)
Gaits, modes and Shwa (was: Gait?)
(6 messages)
laid off
(2 messages)
Languages without Glottal Stop
(21 messages)
NATLANG: Languages don't "compensate"
(3 messages)
OT: Answer my question, now!
(14 messages)
OT: sasxsek.org (FYI)
Roman letter syllabary problems (was: Design Perameters for Romanization)
Roman-letter syllabaries
(12 messages)
Roman-letter syllabaries (and featural abugidas)
(2 messages)
Sarcasm
(5 messages)
Syllabaries & abugidas
(6 messages)
Syllabaries & abugidas (was: Roman-letter syllabaries)
(5 messages)
The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
(11 messages)
Topicality
(2 messages)
Topicality (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(2 messages)
Writing system for ciShanjo
(3 messages)
A two-hour conlang
Re: A two-hour conlang
(66 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A two-hour conlang
(40 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A two-hour conlang
(53 lines)
From:
Matthew Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A two-hour conlang
(74 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
a very short text (Nov23)
a very short text (Nov23)
(59 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Alleliawullian/Alelliawuilan
Re: Alleliawullian/Alelliawuilan
(91 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Alleliawullian/Alelliawuilan
(124 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Annotum
Annotum
(43 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
ASCII syllabary
ASCII syllabary
(65 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCII syllabary
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCII syllabary
(46 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ASCII syllabary
(94 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Brx approximants
Re: Brx approximants
(47 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Brx approximants
(92 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Car names and languages...
Re: Car names and languages...
(28 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Car names and languages...
(40 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Car names and languages...
(43 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Car names and languages...
(31 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Car names and languages...
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Car names and languages...
(48 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Car names and languages...
(63 lines)
From:
Koppa Dasao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Car names and languages...
(31 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Car names and languages...
(60 lines)
From:
Brian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Car names and languages...
(47 lines)
From:
Koppa Dasao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Car names and languages...
(26 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Complex sentences involving conditionals
Re: Complex sentences involving conditionals
(66 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Complex sentences involving conditionals
(87 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Complex sentences involving conditionals
(20 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conscript idea: WAS: Syllabaries & abugidas
Conscript idea: WAS: Syllabaries & abugidas
(30 lines)
From:
G. van der Vegt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscript idea: WAS: Syllabaries & abugidas
(55 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscript idea: WAS: Syllabaries & abugidas
(27 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscript idea: WAS: Syllabaries & abugidas
(41 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscript idea: WAS: Syllabaries & abugidas
(67 lines)
From:
Hugo Cesar de Castro Carneiro <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conscript idea: WAS: Syllabaries & abugidas
(45 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Design Perameters for Romanization
Re: Design Perameters for Romanization
(67 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Design Perameters for Romanization
(62 lines)
From:
Charles W Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Design Perameters for Romanization
(47 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Design Perameters for Romanization
(49 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Do artlangers dislike auxlangers?
Re: Do artlangers dislike auxlangers?
(61 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Do artlangers dislike auxlangers? (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
Do artlangers dislike auxlangers? (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(100 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Do artlangers dislike auxlangers? (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(109 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Do artlangers dislike auxlangers? (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(39 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Do artlangers dislike auxlangers? (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(51 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Do artlangers dislike auxlangers? (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(57 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Do artlangers dislike auxlangers? (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(77 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Do artlangers dislike auxlangers? (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(68 lines)
From:
Daniel Burgener <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Do artlangers dislike auxlangers? (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(114 lines)
From:
Mechthild Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Do artlangers dislike auxlangers? (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(318 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Do artlangers dislike auxlangers? (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(76 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
For Saidifoca, re: Conlang Card Exchange
For Saidifoca, re: Conlang Card Exchange
(36 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gait?
Gait?
(29 lines)
From:
Brian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gait?
(47 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gait?
(50 lines)
From:
Brian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gait?
(44 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gait?
(57 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gait?
(76 lines)
From:
Brian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gait?
(54 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gait?
(73 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gait?
(67 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gait?
(86 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gait?
(48 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gaits, modes and Shwa
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa
(120 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa
(127 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa
(63 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa
(172 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa
(199 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa
(213 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa
(220 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa
(33 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa
(36 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gaits, modes and Shwa (was: Gait?)
Gaits, modes and Shwa (was: Gait?)
(118 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa (was: Gait?)
(132 lines)
From:
Brian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa (was: Gait?)
(138 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa (was: Gait?)
(145 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa (was: Gait?)
(32 lines)
From:
G. van der Vegt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaits, modes and Shwa (was: Gait?)
(149 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
laid off
laid off
(48 lines)
From:
Scott Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: laid off
(52 lines)
From:
Sapthan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Languages without Glottal Stop
Languages without Glottal Stop
(44 lines)
From:
Miles Forster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(53 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(68 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(71 lines)
From:
DK Dragonbound <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(42 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(52 lines)
From:
Alex Bicksler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(135 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(58 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(80 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(81 lines)
From:
DK Dragonbound <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(71 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(74 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(59 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(78 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(67 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(119 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(54 lines)
From:
Miles Forster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(42 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(45 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(54 lines)
From:
Miles Forster <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Languages without Glottal Stop
(55 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: Languages don't "compensate"
NATLANG: Languages don't "compensate"
(107 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Languages don't "compensate"
(95 lines)
From:
Dale McCreery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Languages don't "compensate"
(119 lines)
From:
Jesse Bangs <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Answer my question, now!
OT: Answer my question, now!
(38 lines)
From:
Koppa Dasao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(67 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(68 lines)
From:
Koppa Dasao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(90 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(95 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(182 lines)
From:
Koppa Dasao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(66 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(34 lines)
From:
Charlie Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(49 lines)
From:
Koppa Dasao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(49 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Answer my question, now!
(61 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: sasxsek.org (FYI)
OT: sasxsek.org (FYI)
(32 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Roman letter syllabary problems (was: Design Perameters for Romanization)
Re: Roman letter syllabary problems (was: Design Perameters for Romanization)
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Roman-letter syllabaries
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries
(118 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries
(162 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries
(41 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries
(131 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries
(139 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries
(57 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries
(138 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries
(177 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries
(207 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries
(196 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries
(55 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries
(236 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Roman-letter syllabaries (and featural abugidas)
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries (and featural abugidas)
(273 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Roman-letter syllabaries (and featural abugidas)
(92 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sarcasm
Sarcasm
(31 lines)
From:
Brian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sarcasm
(42 lines)
From:
Daniel Myers <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sarcasm
(50 lines)
From:
Brian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sarcasm
(50 lines)
From:
Koppa Dasao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sarcasm
(64 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Syllabaries & abugidas
Re: Syllabaries & abugidas
(168 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabaries & abugidas
(247 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabaries & abugidas
(41 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabaries & abugidas
(258 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabaries & abugidas
(224 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabaries & abugidas
(267 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Syllabaries & abugidas (was: Roman-letter syllabaries)
Syllabaries & abugidas (was: Roman-letter syllabaries)
(157 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabaries & abugidas (was: Roman-letter syllabaries)
(197 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabaries & abugidas (was: Roman-letter syllabaries)
(44 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabaries & abugidas (was: Roman-letter syllabaries)
(196 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllabaries & abugidas (was: Roman-letter syllabaries)
(105 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
(44 lines)
From:
Lee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
(43 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
(37 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
(40 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
(40 lines)
From:
Tony Harris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
(36 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
(51 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
(71 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
(67 lines)
From:
Koppa Dasao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
(103 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Dictionary of Made-up Languages
(101 lines)
From:
Koppa Dasao <
[log in to unmask]
>
Topicality
Re: Topicality
(57 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Topicality
(89 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Topicality (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
Topicality (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(119 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Topicality (was: Gaits, modes and Shwa)
(112 lines)
From:
neo gu <
[log in to unmask]
>
Writing system for ciShanjo
Writing system for ciShanjo
(36 lines)
From:
Roberto Suárez Soto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Writing system for ciShanjo
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Writing system for ciShanjo
(48 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU