|
|
|
|
Size
|
<head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Robert Whalen <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:57:08 -0500 |
209 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Brett Barney <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:17:36 -0600 |
192 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Paul F. Schaffner <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:31:03 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Robert Whalen <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:45:02 -0500 |
387 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Robert Whalen <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:52:09 -0500 |
384 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Brett Barney <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:03:34 -0600 |
128 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:04:10 -0800 |
118 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:42:59 +0000 |
125 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Robert Whalen <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:49:53 -0500 |
499 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:04:09 -0800 |
177 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Robert Whalen <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:22:44 -0500 |
689 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:37:12 +0000 |
491 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:59:44 -0800 |
232 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Brett Barney <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:54:19 +0000 |
673 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Robert Whalen <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:09:52 -0500 |
909 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Robert Whalen <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:19:34 -0500 |
837 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Paul F. Schaffner <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:39:25 -0500 |
341 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 04:56:16 -0800 |
363 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Rob Whalen <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:54:30 -0500 |
367 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
McAulay, Elizabeth <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:56:53 -0800 |
366 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:45:01 +0000 |
443 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Robert Whalen <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:50:11 -0500 |
1550 lines |
Re: <head/> inside <epigraph/>
|
Robert Whalen <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:55:23 -0500 |
1545 lines |
@cRef: a survey on usage
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 05:55:59 -0800 |
39 lines |
additional place to get current TEI release, for oxygen users
|
Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:49:58 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: additional place to get current TEI release, for oxygen users
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 08:54:36 -0800 |
55 lines |
Announcing Scholarly Editing: The Annual of the Association for Documentary Editing
|
Amanda Gailey <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:45:12 -0600 |
219 lines |
Another XSLT training opportunity
|
Bridger Dyson-Smith <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:47:14 -0500 |
54 lines |
apparatus: "omitted"
|
Gabriel Bodard <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:13:04 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: apparatus: "omitted"
|
Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:43:21 +0000 |
84 lines |
Re: apparatus: "omitted"
|
Marjorie Burghart <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:23:42 +0100 |
157 lines |
Re: apparatus: "omitted"
|
Marion LAMÉ <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:16:35 +0100 |
229 lines |
Re: apparatus: "omitted"
|
Gabriel Bodard <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:11:04 +0000 |
143 lines |
Re: apparatus: "omitted"
|
Marion LAMÉ <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:05:38 +0100 |
439 lines |
Associate Director Position
|
Mandell, Laura <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:25:21 +0000 |
40 lines |
bibliographic series encoding question
|
Tom Elliott <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:23:25 -0600 |
82 lines |
Re: bibliographic series encoding question
|
Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:13:41 +0000 |
89 lines |
Re: bibliographic series encoding question
|
Gabriel Bodard <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:25:39 +0000 |
122 lines |
Re: bibliographic series encoding question
|
Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:35:57 -0500 |
107 lines |
Re: bibliographic series encoding question
|
Tom Elliott <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:32:52 -0600 |
127 lines |
Call for Papers, "Digital Revolutions: Interpreting and Historicizing American Culture"
|
Sara Sikes <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:15:42 +0000 |
40 lines |
call for participation: Taking TEI Further
|
Julia Flanders <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:54:36 -0500 |
65 lines |
Call for TAPAS test contributors and beta-testers
|
Julia Flanders <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:41:39 -0500 |
67 lines |
Call to improve the TEI Wikipedia Article
|
Sebastian Hellmann <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 5 Feb 2012 23:38:11 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: Call to improve the TEI Wikipedia Article
|
stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 6 Feb 2012 15:25:56 +1300 |
56 lines |
Re: Call to improve the TEI Wikipedia Article
|
Sebastian Hellmann <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:12:04 +0100 |
232 lines |
CfP (2nd notice): DC-2012 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications
|
DCMI Announce <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 7 Feb 2012 10:58:27 -0800 |
362 lines |
Code4Lib Journal: Call for Papers Issue 17
|
Lepczyk, Timothy <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 8 Feb 2012 21:29:09 +0000 |
135 lines |
Encoding bilingual edition
|
Tamás Kende <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:10:06 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Encoding bilingual edition
|
Laurent Romary <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:57:05 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Encoding bilingual edition
|
James Cummings <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:33:21 +0000 |
83 lines |
Re: Encoding bilingual edition
|
Tamás Kende <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:06:43 +0100 |
204 lines |
Re: Encoding bilingual edition
|
Tamás Kende <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:09:26 +0100 |
227 lines |
Re: Encoding bilingual edition
|
Laurent Romary <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:05:52 +0100 |
253 lines |
Re: Encoding bilingual edition
|
stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 08:03:08 +1300 |
33 lines |
Encoding epithets in a personography
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:58:58 -0800 |
70 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:37:56 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
James Cummings <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:15:35 +0000 |
85 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:30:49 +0000 |
87 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
Gabriel Bodard <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:45:18 +0000 |
117 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:14:54 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:30:46 -0800 |
121 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:31:21 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
Laurent Romary <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:40:19 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
James Cummings <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:35:10 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:09:34 -0800 |
74 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:18:18 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
James Cummings <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:51:16 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Encoding epithets in a personography
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:37:22 -0800 |
52 lines |
FW: San Jose State University looking for XML/XSLT instructor
|
Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:56:22 -0500 |
14 lines |
how to represent optical structure?
|
Steffen Wolfrum <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:41:56 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: how to represent optical structure?
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:10:11 -0800 |
42 lines |
Re: how to represent optical structure?
|
Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 8 Feb 2012 22:19:06 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: how to represent optical structure?
|
Paul F. Schaffner <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:30:18 -0500 |
64 lines |
How to specify a closed list of attribute values?
|
Tomaz Erjavec <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:39:13 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: How to specify a closed list of attribute values?
|
Syd Bauman <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:04:20 -0500 |
62 lines |
Issue 2 of the Journal of the TEI is now available
|
Susan Schreibman <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 4 Feb 2012 08:12:12 +0000 |
36 lines |
new tranche of ECCO texts in Oxford Text Archive
|
Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:33:35 +0000 |
29 lines |
NISO/DCMI Joint Webinar -- Karen Coyle: "Taking Library Data From Here to There"
|
DCMI Announce <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:29:10 -0800 |
76 lines |
Re: Question about index of persons and PND
|
Georg Vogeler <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:53:35 +0100 |
237 lines |
Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Laurent Romary <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:14:24 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Fabian Körner <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:32:08 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Laurent Romary <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:37:55 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Paul F. Schaffner <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:43:23 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Fabian Körner <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:57:34 +0100 |
80 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:11:19 -0800 |
50 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Lou Burnard <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:23:28 +0000 |
122 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
James Cummings <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:59:10 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
James Cummings <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:03:28 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
McAulay, Elizabeth <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:37:50 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:07:16 +0000 |
71 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Paul F. Schaffner <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:47:17 -0500 |
90 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
John T Young <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:34:28 +0000 |
65 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Franz Fischer <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:24:02 +0100 |
94 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
John T Young <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:42:27 +0000 |
86 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Franz Fischer <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:21:18 +0100 |
118 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Malte Rehbein <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:25:22 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:55:44 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
stuart yeates <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:57:16 +1300 |
39 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
James Cummings <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:05:27 +0000 |
72 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Ute Recker-Hamm <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:10:58 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:49:17 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
James Cummings <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:24:29 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Martin de la Iglesia <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:34:11 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Martin Mueller <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:03:19 +0000 |
95 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Dr. Herbert Wender <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:13:52 -0500 |
122 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Martin de la Iglesia <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:03:49 +0100 |
185 lines |
Re: Representing "Geminationsstriche"
|
Dr. Herbert Wender <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:41:06 -0500 |
74 lines |
some <castList> questions
|
Daniel Schopper <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:52:30 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: some <castList> questions
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:30:30 -0800 |
97 lines |
submission deadline extended for special issue of Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative
|
Kevin Hawkins <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:38:49 -0500 |
39 lines |
TEI by Example: unfair presentation of LaTeX
|
Janusz S. Bień <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 19:46:08 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: TEI by Example: unfair presentation of LaTeX
|
Daniel O'Donnell <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 12:49:53 -0700 |
60 lines |
Re: TEI by Example: unfair presentation of LaTeX
|
Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:01:36 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: TEI by Example: unfair presentation of LaTeX
|
Martin Sievers <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:04:08 +0100 |
95 lines |
Re: TEI by Example: unfair presentation of LaTeX
|
ron.vandenbranden@home <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:29:37 +0100 |
105 lines |
TEI interoperability with text processing systems
|
Stuart A. Yeates <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:29:47 +1300 |
62 lines |
Re: TEI interoperability with text processing systems
|
Mandy Neumann <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:59:49 +0100 |
89 lines |
TEI P5 2.0.2 has been released.
|
James Cummings <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:32:47 +0000 |
51 lines |
TEIDisplay: Displaying TEI documents in Omeka
|
Tanya Clement <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:12:48 -0600 |
128 lines |
Transpose element in Roma?
|
Peter Boot <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:34:47 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: Transpose element in Roma?
|
James Cummings <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:14:32 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Transpose element in Roma?
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:18:56 -0800 |
46 lines |
Re: Transpose element in Roma?
|
Martin Holmes <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:21:21 -0800 |
50 lines |
Re: Transpose element in Roma?
|
James Cummings <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:32:19 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Transpose element in Roma?
|
Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:34:18 +0000 |
20 lines |
What is Good XML? How Can We Tell?
|
Tommie Usdin <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:01:30 -0500 |
40 lines |
Working with Text in a Digital Age - Reminder
|
Monica Berti <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:51:49 -0500 |
85 lines |
[ANN] BaseX 7.1: The XMLPrague 2012 Edition
|
Christian Grün <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:48:30 +0100 |
100 lines |
