Conlang
Mailing List – February 2012, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
A Random Thought: Anglo-Romance Conlang
(2 messages)
a tale of two vowels
Another nice word list
(2 messages)
Case Creation
(3 messages)
CHAT: About the List
(4 messages)
CHAT: About the List (RESOLVED?)
Coining New Words in Language Families
from Roger
(11 messages)
gjâ-zym-byn site update, including example sentence s for lexicon entries
Information-question words in subordinate clauses, indirect speech etc.
(7 messages)
Linguistic literature on conlangs
(34 messages)
Name That Glyph | Round Eight « Pseudoglyphs
NATLANG: Con-scripting a Hamer writing system
(5 messages)
NATLANG: Hamer language anadewisms
(3 messages)
NATLANG: Middle English pronunciation of digraph/diphthong OU/OW
(5 messages)
Newspeak was Re: [CONLANG] quick vocab/sociology survey
Nominals in Verb-heavy Languages
(5 messages)
Nonhuman features: birdspeak
(3 messages)
Number Creation
(2 messages)
opossum - opossa
(33 messages)
Orthographic and other constraints (was Re: opossum - opossa)
(3 messages)
Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(17 messages)
Phonology Imitation
(9 messages)
quick vocab/sociology survey
Reverse genative?
(36 messages)
Roger
(2 messages)
Shortcuts on phonology?
(17 messages)
Siye Babel Text
(10 messages)
Siye: Some Example Sentences
Stranded w
(5 messages)
Unexpected ANADEW: Conjugation for Location
A Random Thought: Anglo-Romance Conlang
A Random Thought: Anglo-Romance Conlang
(74 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Random Thought: Anglo-Romance Conlang
(91 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
a tale of two vowels
Re: a tale of two vowels
(23 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another nice word list
Another nice word list
(41 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another nice word list
(51 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Case Creation
Re: Case Creation
(23 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case Creation
(41 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case Creation
(47 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: About the List
CHAT: About the List
(43 lines)
From:
J. M. DeSantis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: About the List
(64 lines)
From:
Scott Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: About the List
(38 lines)
From:
yuri <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: About the List
(50 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: About the List (RESOLVED?)
Re: CHAT: About the List (RESOLVED?)
(38 lines)
From:
J. M. DeSantis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Coining New Words in Language Families
Re: Coining New Words in Language Families
(55 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
from Roger
from Roger
(44 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: from Roger
(50 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: from Roger
(65 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: from Roger
(73 lines)
From:
Scott Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: from Roger
(43 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: from Roger
(50 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Daniel Rollin-Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: from Roger
(65 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: from Roger
(22 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: from Roger
(36 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: from Roger
(41 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: from Roger
(31 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
gjâ-zym-byn site update, including example sentence s for lexicon entries
gjâ-zym-byn site update, including example sentence s for lexicon entries
(54 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Information-question words in subordinate clauses, indirect speech etc.
Information-question words in subordinate clauses, indirect speech etc.
(62 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Information-question words in subordinate clauses, indirect speech etc.
(61 lines)
From:
Charlie Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Information-question words in subordinate clauses, indirect speech etc.
(89 lines)
From:
Charles W Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Information-question words in subordinate clauses, indirect speech etc.
(79 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Information-question words in subordinate clauses, indirect speech etc.
(126 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Information-question words in subordinate clauses, indirect speech etc.
(130 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Information-question words in subordinate clauses, indirect speech etc.
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Linguistic literature on conlangs
Linguistic literature on conlangs
(91 lines)
From:
Armin Buch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(111 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(41 lines)
From:
Wm Annis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(56 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(104 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(116 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(54 lines)
From:
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(133 lines)
From:
J. M. DeSantis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(55 lines)
From:
Jen Runds <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(156 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(176 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(47 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(190 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(214 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(48 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(34 lines)
From:
Armin Buch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(63 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(42 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(52 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(181 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(57 lines)
From:
Armin Buch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(39 lines)
From:
Roman Rausch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(144 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(90 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(45 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(241 lines)
From:
Daniela Amsler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(339 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(252 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(50 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(74 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(56 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(45 lines)
From:
Michael Everson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(49 lines)
From:
Daniela Amsler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic literature on conlangs
(61 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Name That Glyph | Round Eight « Pseudoglyphs
Name That Glyph | Round Eight « Pseudoglyphs
(42 lines)
From:
Andrew Mendes <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: Con-scripting a Hamer writing system
NATLANG: Con-scripting a Hamer writing system
(130 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Con-scripting a Hamer writing system
(156 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Con-scripting a Hamer writing system
(91 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Con-scripting a Hamer writing system
(64 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Con-scripting a Hamer writing system
(84 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: Hamer language anadewisms
NATLANG: Hamer language anadewisms
(149 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Hamer language anadewisms
(154 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Hamer language anadewisms
(66 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: Middle English pronunciation of digraph/diphthong OU/OW
NATLANG: Middle English pronunciation of digraph/diphthong OU/OW
(74 lines)
From:
Hugo Cesar de Castro Carneiro <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Middle English pronunciation of digraph/diphthong OU/OW
(140 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Middle English pronunciation of digraph/diphthong OU/OW
(75 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Middle English pronunciation of digraph/diphthong OU/OW
(63 lines)
From:
Hugo Cesar de Castro Carneiro <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Middle English pronunciation of digraph/diphthong OU/OW
(306 lines)
From:
Hugo Cesar de Castro Carneiro <
[log in to unmask]
>
Newspeak was Re: [CONLANG] quick vocab/sociology survey
Re: Newspeak was Re: [CONLANG] quick vocab/sociology survey
(157 lines)
From:
Brian Woodward <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nominals in Verb-heavy Languages
Nominals in Verb-heavy Languages
(59 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nominals in Verb-heavy Languages
(73 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nominals in Verb-heavy Languages
(139 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Daniel Rollin-Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nominals in Verb-heavy Languages
(159 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nominals in Verb-heavy Languages
(149 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nonhuman features: birdspeak
Nonhuman features: birdspeak
(55 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nonhuman features: birdspeak
(70 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nonhuman features: birdspeak
(51 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Number Creation
Re: Number Creation
(50 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Number Creation
(23 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
opossum - opossa
opossum - opossa
(37 lines)
From:
A. da Mek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(45 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(51 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(48 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(61 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(71 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(84 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(50 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: opossum - opossa
(86 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(98 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Daniel Rollin-Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(90 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(45 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(56 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(49 lines)
From:
Leland Kusmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(61 lines)
From:
Armin Buch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(84 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(58 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(59 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(64 lines)
From:
J. Jocordy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(55 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(48 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(45 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(60 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(91 lines)
From:
Ian Spolarich <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(34 lines)
From:
A. da Mek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(113 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(134 lines)
From:
Peter Cyrus <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(64 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(94 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(49 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(47 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(66 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: opossum - opossa
(52 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Orthographic and other constraints (was Re: opossum - opossa)
Orthographic and other constraints (was Re: opossum - opossa)
(97 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic and other constraints (was Re: opossum - opossa)
(105 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic and other constraints (was Re: opossum - opossa)
(117 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phone*ic notation: Geminates
Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(56 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(60 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(84 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(83 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(110 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(80 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(47 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(58 lines)
From:
Daniela Amsler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(57 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(94 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(93 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(114 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(113 lines)
From:
Daniela Amsler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(40 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(78 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(43 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phone*ic notation: Geminates
(51 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonology Imitation
Phonology Imitation
(52 lines)
From:
Ian Spolarich <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology Imitation
(118 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology Imitation
(131 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology Imitation
(159 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology Imitation
(156 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology Imitation
(214 lines)
From:
Cosman246 <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology Imitation
(213 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology Imitation
(140 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology Imitation
(57 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
quick vocab/sociology survey
Re: quick vocab/sociology survey
(39 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reverse genative?
Reverse genative?
(52 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(58 lines)
From:
Arnt Richard Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(63 lines)
From:
Nikolay Ivankov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(42 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(65 lines)
From:
Armin Buch <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(63 lines)
From:
Leland Kusmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(98 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(89 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(91 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(79 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(75 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(45 lines)
From:
Leland Kusmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(73 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(56 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(65 lines)
From:
MorphemeAddict <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(63 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(100 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(126 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(160 lines)
From:
Matthew Boutilier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(180 lines)
From:
Leland Kusmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(58 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(78 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(71 lines)
From:
Leland Kusmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(82 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(67 lines)
From:
BPJ <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(78 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(109 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(76 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(90 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(43 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(54 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(72 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(52 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(59 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reverse genative?
(58 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Daniel Rollin-Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Roger
Roger
(39 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Roger
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Shortcuts on phonology?
Shortcuts on phonology?
(45 lines)
From:
Daniel Burgener <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(92 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(74 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(66 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(35 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(68 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(135 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(75 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(50 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(175 lines)
From:
Sam Stutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(93 lines)
From:
George Corley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(103 lines)
From:
David Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(84 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(70 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(43 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(72 lines)
From:
Daniel Bowman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shortcuts on phonology?
(62 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Siye Babel Text
Re: Siye Babel Text
(186 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Siye Babel Text
(35 lines)
From:
Garth Wallace <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Siye Babel Text
(58 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Siye Babel Text
(53 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Siye Babel Text
(31 lines)
From:
Charlie Brickner <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Siye Babel Text
(59 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Siye Babel Text
(41 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Siye Babel Text
(54 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Siye Babel Text
(36 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Siye Babel Text
(38 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Siye: Some Example Sentences
Siye: Some Example Sentences
(87 lines)
From:
Anthony Miles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stranded w
Stranded w
(51 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stranded w
(66 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stranded w
(60 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stranded w
(108 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stranded w
(102 lines)
From:
Sasha Fleischman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unexpected ANADEW: Conjugation for Location
Unexpected ANADEW: Conjugation for Location
(60 lines)
From:
Logan Kearsley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – February 2012, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – February 2012, week 4
