Conlang Mailing List – April 2012, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• Іљте Ьлеј: First article available (Fwd: Re: [Delang] Зе�� (2 messages)
• Іљте Ьлеј: First article available (Fwd: Re: [Delang] Зе� (4 messages)
• Aeu phonology (6 messages)
• another conlang promoted to natlanghood: Denden (3 messages)
• Anyone there? (5 messages)
• Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (12 messages)
• Course on conlangs: course material to be available online (2 messages)
• Destroying the noun/verb distinction (8 messages)
• Fith Texts (2 messages)
• Fith texts
• Fith Texts
• Fith texts
• Fith Texts (20 messages)
• Indexed Predicates Sketch (13 messages)
• LCS Jobs Board
• Monster sentences, was: Re: [CONLANG] Fith Texts (10 messages)
• OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (15 messages)
• OT: replying to a message
• Project:Ideal Conlang (12 messages)
• Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (21 messages)
• Sutton SignWriting (Was: Written Form of American Sign Language (ASL)) (3 messages)
• TECH: Test, please ignore.
• [LCS Members] Project:Ideal Conlang

1. Іљте Ьлеј: First article available (Fwd: Re: [Delang] Зе��
   • Re: Іљте Ьлеј: First article available (Fwd: Re: [Delang] Зе�� (96 lines)
     From: Тоłе МаьіЛеƒіљ МаьіПані <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Іљте Ьлеј: First article available (Fwd: Re: [Delang] Зе�� (62 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>

2. Іљте Ьлеј: First article available (Fwd: Re: [Delang] Зе�
   • Re: Іљте Ьлеј: First article available (Fwd: Re: [Delang] Зе� (56 lines)
     From: Тоłе МаьіЛеƒіљ МаьіПані <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Іљте Ьлеј: First article available (Fwd: Re: [Delang] Зе� (43 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Іљте Ьлеј: First article available (Fwd: Re: [Delang] Зе� (90 lines)
     From: Тоłе МаьіЛеƒіљ МаьіПані <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Іљте Ьлеј: First article available (Fwd: Re: [Delang] Зе� (58 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>

3. Aeu phonology
   • Aeu phonology (82 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aeu phonology (102 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aeu phonology (48 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aeu phonology (86 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aeu phonology (95 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aeu phonology (140 lines)
     From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>

4. another conlang promoted to natlanghood: Denden
   • Re: another conlang promoted to natlanghood: Denden (36 lines)
     From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another conlang promoted to natlanghood: Denden (49 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: another conlang promoted to natlanghood: Denden (56 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

5. Anyone there?
   • Anyone there? (33 lines)
     From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone there? (50 lines)
     From: Тоłе МаьіЛеƒіљ МаьіПані <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone there? (36 lines)
     From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone there? (40 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Anyone there? (80 lines)
     From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>

6. Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers
   • Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (60 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (79 lines)
     From: Ian Spolarich <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (37 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (100 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (46 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (39 lines)
     From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (78 lines)
     From: Daniel Bowman <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (92 lines)
     From: Matthew Turnbull <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (129 lines)
     From: Zach Wellstood <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (118 lines)
     From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (19 lines)
     From: Virginia Keys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Flash Fiction: Friday Fictioneers (36 lines)
     From: Ian Spolarich <[log in to unmask]>

7. Course on conlangs: course material to be available online
   • Re: Course on conlangs: course material to be available online (44 lines)
     From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Course on conlangs: course material to be available online (59 lines)
     From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>

8. Destroying the noun/verb distinction
   • Re: Destroying the noun/verb distinction (165 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Destroying the noun/verb distinction (167 lines)
     From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Destroying the noun/verb distinction (153 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Destroying the noun/verb distinction (166 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Destroying the noun/verb distinction (94 lines)
     From: Brian Rice <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Destroying the noun/verb distinction (44 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Destroying the noun/verb distinction (119 lines)
     From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Destroying the noun/verb distinction (103 lines)
     From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>

9. Fith Texts
   • Re: Fith Texts (130 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fith Texts (75 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

10. Fith texts
    • Re: Fith texts (59 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

11. Fith Texts
    • Re: Fith Texts (156 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

12. Fith texts
    • Re: Fith texts (60 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

13. Fith Texts
    • Re: Fith Texts (188 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (185 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (180 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (58 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (474 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (54 lines)
      From: Miles Forster <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (541 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (107 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (62 lines)
      From: Miles Forster <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (110 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (69 lines)
      From: Miles Forster <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (207 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (251 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (76 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (54 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (251 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (121 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (59 lines)
      From: Garth Wallace <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (134 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fith Texts (83 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

14. Indexed Predicates Sketch
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (94 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (54 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (58 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (93 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (82 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (100 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (42 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (71 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (58 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (43 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (29 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (71 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Indexed Predicates Sketch (89 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>

15. LCS Jobs Board
    • LCS Jobs Board (81 lines)
      From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>

16. Monster sentences, was: Re: [CONLANG] Fith Texts
    • Monster sentences, was: Re: [CONLANG] Fith Texts (74 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Monster sentences, was: Re: [CONLANG] Fith Texts (53 lines)
      From: neo gu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Monster sentences, was: Re: [CONLANG] Fith Texts (79 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Monster sentences, was: Re: [CONLANG] Fith Texts (86 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Monster sentences, was: Re: [CONLANG] Fith Texts (54 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Monster sentences, was: Re: [CONLANG] Fith Texts (56 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Monster sentences, was: Re: [CONLANG] Fith Texts (60 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Monster sentences, was: Re: [CONLANG] Fith Texts (51 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Monster sentences, was: Re: [CONLANG] Fith Texts (36 lines)
      From: Puey McCleary <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Monster sentences, was: Re: [CONLANG] Fith Texts (91 lines)
      From: Matthew A. Gurevitch <[log in to unmask]>

17. OT: Any romantic arabists out there?
    • OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (56 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (61 lines)
      From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (72 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (84 lines)
      From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (84 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (93 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (55 lines)
      From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (108 lines)
      From: BPJ <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (118 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (81 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (52 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (66 lines)
      From: Peter Cyrus <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (128 lines)
      From: Matthew Boutilier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (70 lines)
      From: Iuhan Culmærija <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Any romantic arabists out there? (94 lines)
      From: Jesse Bangs <[log in to unmask]>

18. OT: replying to a message
    • OT: replying to a message (40 lines)
      From: Charles W Brickner <[log in to unmask]>

19. Project:Ideal Conlang
    • Project:Ideal Conlang (29 lines)
      From: mert köseoğlu <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Project:Ideal Conlang (92 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Project:Ideal Conlang (91 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Project:Ideal Conlang (128 lines)
      From: Sam Stutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Project:Ideal Conlang (92 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Project:Ideal Conlang (34 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Project:Ideal Conlang (62 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Project:Ideal Conlang (57 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Project:Ideal Conlang (49 lines)
      From: Michael Everson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Project:Ideal Conlang (85 lines)
      From: Nikolay Ivankov <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Project:Ideal Conlang (101 lines)
      From: drdileo <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Project:Ideal Conlang (104 lines)
      From: Sai <[log in to unmask]>

20. Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax
    • Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (90 lines)
      From: George Marques <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (110 lines)
      From: Casey Borders <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (152 lines)
      From: Zach Wellstood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (177 lines)
      From: Matthew A. Gurevitch <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (107 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (185 lines)
      From: George Marques <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (151 lines)
      From: George Marques <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (198 lines)
      From: Zach Wellstood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (49 lines)
      From: George Marques <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (36 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (212 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (107 lines)
      From: Logan Kearsley <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (74 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (117 lines)
      From: George Marques <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (129 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (67 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (79 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (65 lines)
      From: George Marques <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (64 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (97 lines)
      From: Charles W Brickner <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Subordinate clauses in SOV syntax (90 lines)
      From: Charles W Brickner <[log in to unmask]>

21. Sutton SignWriting (Was: Written Form of American Sign Language (ASL))
    • Re: Sutton SignWriting (Was: Written Form of American Sign Language (ASL)) (129 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sutton SignWriting (Was: Written Form of American Sign Language (ASL)) (67 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sutton SignWriting (Was: Written Form of American Sign Language (ASL)) (78 lines)
      From: MorphemeAddict <[log in to unmask]>

22. TECH: Test, please ignore.
    • TECH: Test, please ignore. (39 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

23. [LCS Members] Project:Ideal Conlang
    • Re: [LCS Members] Project:Ideal Conlang (143 lines)
      From: mert köseoğlu <[log in to unmask]>