Conlang
Mailing List October 1998, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"nonasemy" ( was: Re: your conlang, please? (Rich Aunt gets hold
(3 messages)
<No subject>
A Conlang by de group: genders
(2 messages)
A Conlang by the group: genders
(3 messages)
A Conlang by the group: parts of speech
(3 messages)
A Conlang by the group: phonetics
A Conlang by the group: phonology
A Conlang, created by the group?
(78 messages)
Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group:
(6 messages)
Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group: genders]
(4 messages)
Aroven, and survey responses
Babel Text - Live!
Back at last...
bizarre (was: Re: CONLANG Digest...)
bye for now...
CHAT Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers?
Chat: My sig (was: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer?)
(2 messages)
CHAT: Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs.
(5 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(13 messages)
Conlang Overdose?
(3 messages)
Conlangers homepage and Sally et al Surveys
(5 messages)
Conlangs of the World
Fess Up Now.
FINAL QUESTION
FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the
FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the survey...
(9 messages)
FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of thesurvey...
Font layouts
(13 messages)
Font layouts)
Font-making software (Re: Font layouts)
(3 messages)
Fourth Person
(2 messages)
GOUPLANG: prefix created
Group Conlang
(12 messages)
Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by
(4 messages)
Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(9 messages)
Group Conlang : all 10 cases needed for all-noun predicate
Group Conlang : Vote on First Tags
(2 messages)
Group Conlang : Vote on First Tags (was: Re: a Conlang, created by
(4 messages)
Group Conlang: affix morphology
(16 messages)
Group Conlang: phonology
(4 messages)
GRUOPLANG: Phonetics
Hello all: I'm new...a quick question about v
Hello all: I'm new...a quick question about vocabularies
Hungarian
IIs conlang a generator of conlanging
inhapxualox, first composition
Input wanted.
Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a su
(7 messages)
Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer?
Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: O...
Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(25 messages)
Is conlang a generator of conlangers? Tolkien's Influence...
Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(35 messages)
Measurements revisited
Modularity and Self-expression
Myers-Briggs (was: Lunatic Survey)
(4 messages)
New Ideas... group project?
(6 messages)
NGL: Request for vote on word order/number; proposed ballot
numeral stuff
Omnilingual
(3 messages)
Our lost first conlang
Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen
(3 messages)
Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen...)
(9 messages)
Perfect tenses (was Re Inhapxuom)
Programs for conlang?
(2 messages)
Re Inhapxuom
Reformed, Teutonic English
(3 messages)
Sally et al Surveys
(2 messages)
Schwa vowel, which letter?
(10 messages)
Selenites (was Re: equinox)
(2 messages)
Speedtalk attempts)
Tangential frivolity
TEST:Delete this
Translation
(5 messages)
Unusual language
USAGE: French nasal vowels
(2 messages)
Vector tense #10
What're "agglutinating" and "isolating"? (was
What're "agglutinating" and "isolating"? (was Re: Speedtalk attempts)
(5 messages)
What? Yet another newbie?
(4 messages)
your conlang
Zero-entropy (was Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs...)
(2 messages)
[Fwd: [occidental] Theory and Reality]
(3 messages)
[Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(4 messages)
"nonasemy" ( was: Re: your conlang, please? (Rich Aunt gets hold
"nonasemy" ( was: Re: your conlang, please? (Rich Aunt gets hold
(32 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "nonasemy" ( was: Re: your conlang, please? (Rich Aunt gets hold
(54 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "nonasemy" ( was: Re: your conlang, please? (Rich Aunt gets hold
(35 lines)
From:
R. Skrintha <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
<No subject>
(21 lines)
From:
That Keenan crowd <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Conlang by de group: genders
A Conlang by de group: genders
(50 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang by de group: genders
(77 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Conlang by the group: genders
A Conlang by the group: genders
(28 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang by the group: genders
(80 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang by the group: genders
(21 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Conlang by the group: parts of speech
A Conlang by the group: parts of speech
(88 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang by the group: parts of speech
(98 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang by the group: parts of speech
(38 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Conlang by the group: phonetics
A Conlang by the group: phonetics
(61 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Conlang by the group: phonology
A Conlang by the group: phonology
(51 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Conlang, created by the group?
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(59 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(60 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(112 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(27 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(86 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(93 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(45 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(159 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(168 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(27 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(131 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(211 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(14 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(32 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(102 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(40 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(27 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(149 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(45 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(31 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(36 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(23 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(30 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(61 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(46 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(106 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(30 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(106 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(86 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(152 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(29 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(32 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(103 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(37 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(105 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(73 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(107 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(36 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(39 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(26 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(184 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(255 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(32 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(155 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(41 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(29 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(25 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(28 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(207 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(71 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(109 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(53 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(88 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(99 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(243 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(102 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(20 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(108 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(30 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(31 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(18 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(29 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(60 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(51 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(80 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(44 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(50 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(239 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(248 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(96 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(275 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(105 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(93 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(103 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(55 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(101 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group:
Re: Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group:
(71 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group:
(32 lines)
From:
/Joe Mondello <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group:
(67 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group:
(41 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group:
(39 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group:
(60 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group: genders]
Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group: genders]
(22 lines)
From:
/Joe Mondello <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group: genders]
(40 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group: genders]
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut/Gender[was Re: A Conlang by de group: genders]
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Aroven, and survey responses
Aroven, and survey responses
(563 lines)
From:
Joshua Shinavier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Babel Text - Live!
Babel Text - Live!
(18 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back at last...
Back at last...
(23 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
bizarre (was: Re: CONLANG Digest...)
bizarre (was: Re: CONLANG Digest...)
(28 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
bye for now...
bye for now...
(24 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers?
CHAT Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers?
(16 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chat: My sig (was: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer?)
Chat: My sig (was: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer?)
(30 lines)
From:
Pharamond Curtis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chat: My sig (was: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer?)
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs.
CHAT: Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs.
(29 lines)
From:
Laurie Gerholz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs.
(33 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs.
(39 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs.
(43 lines)
From:
Laurie Gerholz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs.
(57 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(31 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(29 lines)
From:
Sheets, Jeff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(63 lines)
From:
Sheets, Jeff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(25 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(67 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(37 lines)
From:
Sheets, Jeff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(43 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(22 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(64 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(43 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(19 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CONLANG Digest - 4 Oct 1998 to 5 Oct 1998
(72 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Overdose?
Re: Conlang Overdose?
(37 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Overdose?
(31 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Overdose?
(37 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlangers homepage and Sally et al Surveys
Conlangers homepage and Sally et al Surveys
(18 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangers homepage and Sally et al Surveys
(13 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangers homepage and Sally et al Surveys
(40 lines)
From:
Gustavo Eulalio <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangers homepage and Sally et al Surveys
(52 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlangers homepage and Sally et al Surveys
(36 lines)
From:
Jay Bowks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlangs of the World
Conlangs of the World
(125 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fess Up Now.
Fess Up Now.
(71 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
FINAL QUESTION
Re: FINAL QUESTION
(40 lines)
From:
R. Skrintha <
[log in to unmask]
>
FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the
Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the
(38 lines)
From:
HS Brandsma <
[log in to unmask]
>
FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the survey...
Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the survey...
(35 lines)
From:
Baba <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the survey...
(49 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the survey...
(53 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the survey...
(18 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the survey...
(35 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the survey...
(71 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the survey...
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the survey...
(37 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of the survey...
(23 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of thesurvey...
Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs. Sorry this is the last of thesurvey...
(100 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Font layouts
Font layouts
(41 lines)
From:
Terrence Donnelly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font layouts
(66 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font layouts
(38 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font layouts
(32 lines)
From:
Terrence Donnelly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font layouts
(31 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font layouts
(51 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font layouts
(29 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font layouts
(40 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font layouts
(65 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font layouts
(61 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font layouts
(12 lines)
From:
Dale Morris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font layouts
(66 lines)
From:
Terrence Donnelly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font layouts
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Font layouts)
Re: Font layouts)
(37 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Font-making software (Re: Font layouts)
Font-making software (Re: Font layouts)
(26 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font-making software (Re: Font layouts)
(25 lines)
From:
Terrence Donnelly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Font-making software (Re: Font layouts)
(47 lines)
From:
Sheets, Jeff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fourth Person
Re: Fourth Person
(61 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fourth Person
(34 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
GOUPLANG: prefix created
GOUPLANG: prefix created
(33 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Group Conlang
Re: Group Conlang
(399 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang
(58 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang
(402 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang
(35 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang
(190 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang
(52 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang
(29 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang
(236 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang
(245 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang
(277 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang
(21 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang
(44 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by
(151 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by
(183 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by
(309 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by
(43 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(97 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(33 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(95 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(52 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(175 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(65 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(69 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(150 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Group Conlang : all 10 cases needed for all-noun predicate
Group Conlang : all 10 cases needed for all-noun predicate
(79 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Group Conlang : Vote on First Tags
Re: Group Conlang : Vote on First Tags
(204 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang : Vote on First Tags
(201 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Group Conlang : Vote on First Tags (was: Re: a Conlang, created by
Group Conlang : Vote on First Tags (was: Re: a Conlang, created by
(159 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang : Vote on First Tags (was: Re: a Conlang, created by
(83 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang : Vote on First Tags (was: Re: a Conlang, created by
(196 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang : Vote on First Tags (was: Re: a Conlang, created by
(91 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Group Conlang: affix morphology
Group Conlang: affix morphology
(59 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(53 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(76 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(84 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(86 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(65 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(67 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(92 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(80 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(72 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(72 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(76 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(74 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(25 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Group Conlang: phonology
Group Conlang: phonology
(22 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: phonology
(44 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: phonology
(16 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: phonology
(34 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
GRUOPLANG: Phonetics
GRUOPLANG: Phonetics
(73 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hello all: I'm new...a quick question about v
Re: Hello all: I'm new...a quick question about v
(17 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hello all: I'm new...a quick question about vocabularies
Re: Hello all: I'm new...a quick question about vocabularies
(118 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hungarian
Hungarian
(14 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
IIs conlang a generator of conlanging
IIs conlang a generator of conlanging
(45 lines)
From:
The Keenan Establishment <
[log in to unmask]
>
inhapxualox, first composition
Re: inhapxualox, first composition
(60 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Input wanted.
Input wanted.
(48 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a su
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a su
(19 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a su
(48 lines)
From:
Sheets, Jeff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a su
(37 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a su
(55 lines)
From:
Sheets, Jeff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a su
(48 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a su
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a su
(64 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer?
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer?
(37 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: O...
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: O...
(17 lines)
From:
list James E. Hopkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(62 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(19 lines)
From:
Christopher Palmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(31 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(63 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(43 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(34 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(109 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(84 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(20 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(142 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(47 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(113 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(17 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(21 lines)
From:
list James E. Hopkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(51 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(48 lines)
From:
Pharamond Curtis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(18 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(35 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(29 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(29 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(32 lines)
From:
R. Skrintha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(97 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? or a sustainer? (was: Oops!)
(58 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Is conlang a generator of conlangers? Tolkien's Influence...
Re: Is conlang a generator of conlangers? Tolkien's Influence...
(16 lines)
From:
list James E. Hopkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language superiority, improvement, etc.
Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(99 lines)
From:
Leo J. Moser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(87 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(108 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(46 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(63 lines)
From:
Christopher Palmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(38 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(35 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(139 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(107 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(34 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(22 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(10 lines)
From:
$12 [locks up machine] <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(52 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(31 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(24 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(48 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(34 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(39 lines)
From:
Christopher Palmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(50 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(61 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(53 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(48 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(57 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(142 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(20 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(116 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(86 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(122 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(62 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(178 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(86 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(57 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Measurements revisited
Measurements revisited
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Modularity and Self-expression
Modularity and Self-expression
(44 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Myers-Briggs (was: Lunatic Survey)
Re: Myers-Briggs (was: Lunatic Survey)
(38 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Myers-Briggs (was: Lunatic Survey)
(14 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Myers-Briggs (was: Lunatic Survey)
(13 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Myers-Briggs (was: Lunatic Survey)
(26 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Ideas... group project?
Re: New Ideas... group project?
(34 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Ideas... group project?
(30 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Ideas... group project?
(114 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Ideas... group project?
(51 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Ideas... group project?
(75 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Ideas... group project?
(90 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
NGL: Request for vote on word order/number; proposed ballot
NGL: Request for vote on word order/number; proposed ballot
(117 lines)
From:
Jack Durst <
[log in to unmask]
>
numeral stuff
numeral stuff
(10 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Omnilingual
Omnilingual
(33 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Omnilingual
(45 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Omnilingual
(17 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Our lost first conlang
Re: Our lost first conlang
(72 lines)
From:
/Joe Mondello <
[log in to unmask]
>
Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen
Re: Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen
(24 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen...)
Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen...)
(25 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen...)
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen...)
(17 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen...)
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen...)
(28 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen...)
(39 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen...)
(18 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen...)
(37 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Our lost first conlang (was: Is conlang a gen...)
(32 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Perfect tenses (was Re Inhapxuom)
Perfect tenses (was Re Inhapxuom)
(102 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Programs for conlang?
Re: Programs for conlang?
(28 lines)
From:
Sheets, Jeff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Programs for conlang?
(82 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re Inhapxuom
Re Inhapxuom
(163 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reformed, Teutonic English
Reformed, Teutonic English
(44 lines)
From:
Gary L. Davenport <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reformed, Teutonic English
(14 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reformed, Teutonic English
(92 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sally et al Surveys
Sally et al Surveys
(66 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sally et al Surveys
(40 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Schwa vowel, which letter?
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(22 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(37 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(31 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(18 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(41 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(24 lines)
From:
Orjan Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(30 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(20 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(22 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Selenites (was Re: equinox)
Re: Selenites (was Re: equinox)
(48 lines)
From:
Steven R. Martindale <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Selenites (was Re: equinox)
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Speedtalk attempts)
Re: Speedtalk attempts)
(29 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tangential frivolity
Tangential frivolity
(44 lines)
From:
James Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
TEST:Delete this
TEST:Delete this
(17 lines)
From:
That Keenan crowd <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation
Re: Translation
(27 lines)
From:
J.A. Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation
(101 lines)
From:
Sheets, Jeff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation
(29 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unusual language
Unusual language
(40 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: French nasal vowels
USAGE: French nasal vowels
(45 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French nasal vowels
(54 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vector tense #10
Vector tense #10
(131 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
What're "agglutinating" and "isolating"? (was
Re: What're "agglutinating" and "isolating"? (was
(19 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
What're "agglutinating" and "isolating"? (was Re: Speedtalk attempts)
Re: What're "agglutinating" and "isolating"? (was Re: Speedtalk attempts)
(31 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What're "agglutinating" and "isolating"? (was Re: Speedtalk attempts)
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What're "agglutinating" and "isolating"? (was Re: Speedtalk attempts)
(40 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What're "agglutinating" and "isolating"? (was Re: Speedtalk attempts)
(55 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What're "agglutinating" and "isolating"? (was Re: Speedtalk attempts)
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
What? Yet another newbie?
Re: What? Yet another newbie?
(28 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? Yet another newbie?
(26 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? Yet another newbie?
(24 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What? Yet another newbie?
(34 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
your conlang
Re: your conlang
(67 lines)
From:
R. Skrintha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Zero-entropy (was Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs...)
Re: Zero-entropy (was Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs...)
(35 lines)
From:
Terrence Donnelly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Zero-entropy (was Re: FINAL QUESTION: your natlangs...)
(48 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Fwd: [occidental] Theory and Reality]
[Fwd: [occidental] Theory and Reality]
(88 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: [occidental] Theory and Reality]
(31 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: [occidental] Theory and Reality]
(35 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
[Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(73 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(87 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(202 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(47 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU