Conlang
Mailing List October 1998, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"Dustmen" (was: GROUPLANG: optional features and case)
(2 messages)
'garbageman v dustman'
A Conlang, created by the group?
(2 messages)
A PUBLIC APOLOGY to Ray Brown.
(2 messages)
An update to my website
(2 messages)
Are some languages easier to learn?
(8 messages)
Are some languages easier to learn? (A twist
Are some languages easier to learn? (A twist on language superiority, improvement, etc.)
(3 messages)
CHAT Grandsire (was Re: Norman French?)
CHAT in-joke (was [Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
Code-switching and borrowing (was: Language superiority ...)
Conlang beginnings
(4 messages)
Conlang beginnings (was Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots))
Conlang beginnings/endings
ConLangCon
Eek! Can you help me out?
(3 messages)
Ergative
(5 messages)
Ergative (was: Re: Are some languages easier to learn?)
(2 messages)
Exotic lg catalog
Font layouts
Generic Plurals (was: Irish/Hebrew proverb)
GOUPLANG: prefix created
(4 messages)
Group Conlang
(2 messages)
Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(2 messages)
Group Conlang: affix morphology
Group Conlang: theme
(2 messages)
GROUPLANG : indirect object and passive
GROUPLANG : POLL2 (Re: cases, modifiers, pron
GROUPLANG : POLL2 (Re: cases, modifiers, pronouns)
(2 messages)
GROUPLANG: affix morphology
(10 messages)
GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(15 messages)
GROUPLANG: Genders
(2 messages)
GROUPLANG: noun and verb roots
(4 messages)
GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(23 messages)
GROUPLANG: Phonetics
(2 messages)
GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(18 messages)
GROUPLANG: Pronouns (politeness)
GROUPLANG: simple, original, natural case system
GROUPLANG: simple, original, natural case system (was: noun and verb roots)
GROUPLANG: simple, original,natural case sys
GROUPLANG: simple, original,natural case system (was: noun and verb roots)
(2 messages)
GROUPLANG: theme
(6 messages)
GROUPLANG: verbs and auxiliaries
(2 messages)
Halloween in the Netherlands?
Help! I've got 744 unread messages!
(3 messages)
Irish proverb
(2 messages)
LANGUAGE LAWS
(35 messages)
Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(79 messages)
Lunatic Survey
Measurements revisited
(5 messages)
more *SPECIFIC* Questions
(3 messages)
nasalisation of vowels
(2 messages)
Norman French?
(14 messages)
old clothing (was: Re: Language superiority...)
(6 messages)
old clothing: History, Upheaval,Idiosyncracy
OOPS!!!! (was: Language superiority, improvement, etc.)
(2 messages)
Optional features (was GROUPLANG: cases)
(2 messages)
Over the rivver and Throo the wuds
(8 messages)
Over the rivver and Throo the wuds in di far'einikte shtatn un in yisroel
Post-Albacon greeting
Rap Lin Rie/Occidental, was Re: A PUBLIC
Reformed, Teutonic English
Report on Albacon
(7 messages)
Schwa vowel, which letter?
(6 messages)
TAN: webpages that suck...
(4 messages)
TAN: Webpages that suck...
(5 messages)
The Tyzwya Recipe. Was: Senses
USAGE: French letter U WITH GRAVE
(3 messages)
USAGE: Unusual language
Webification of Tarni'f
Yive (was: Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case)
(2 messages)
[Fwd: Li Nov Cosmoglotta #10A A Contest.]
[Fwd: [occidental] Theory and Reality]
[Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(6 messages)
"Dustmen" (was: GROUPLANG: optional features and case)
Re: "Dustmen" (was: GROUPLANG: optional features and case)
(28 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Dustmen" (was: GROUPLANG: optional features and case)
(43 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
'garbageman v dustman'
Re: 'garbageman v dustman'
(19 lines)
From:
Alan Grieve <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Conlang, created by the group?
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(22 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Conlang, created by the group?
(31 lines)
From:
Steven R. Martindale <
[log in to unmask]
>
A PUBLIC APOLOGY to Ray Brown.
A PUBLIC APOLOGY to Ray Brown.
(76 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A PUBLIC APOLOGY to Ray Brown.
(53 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
An update to my website
An update to my website
(11 lines)
From:
The Keenan Establishment <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An update to my website
(15 lines)
From:
The Keenan Establishment <
[log in to unmask]
>
Are some languages easier to learn?
Re: Are some languages easier to learn?
(77 lines)
From:
Arek Bellagio <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are some languages easier to learn?
(33 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are some languages easier to learn?
(40 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are some languages easier to learn?
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are some languages easier to learn?
(37 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are some languages easier to learn?
(49 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are some languages easier to learn?
(67 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are some languages easier to learn?
(29 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Are some languages easier to learn? (A twist
Re: Are some languages easier to learn? (A twist
(30 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Are some languages easier to learn? (A twist on language superiority, improvement, etc.)
Are some languages easier to learn? (A twist on language superiority, improvement, etc.)
(28 lines)
From:
B.Philip.Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are some languages easier to learn? (A twist on language superiority, improvement, etc.)
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Are some languages easier to learn? (A twist on language superiority, improvement, etc.)
(23 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Grandsire (was Re: Norman French?)
CHAT Grandsire (was Re: Norman French?)
(25 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT in-joke (was [Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
CHAT in-joke (was [Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(27 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Code-switching and borrowing (was: Language superiority ...)
Code-switching and borrowing (was: Language superiority ...)
(92 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang beginnings
Re: Conlang beginnings
(37 lines)
From:
Christopher Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang beginnings
(125 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang beginnings
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang beginnings
(35 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang beginnings (was Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots))
Conlang beginnings (was Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots))
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang beginnings/endings
Re: Conlang beginnings/endings
(18 lines)
From:
list James E. Hopkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
ConLangCon
Re: ConLangCon
(29 lines)
From:
R. Skrintha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Eek! Can you help me out?
Eek! Can you help me out?
(20 lines)
From:
Hello Corey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eek! Can you help me out?
(46 lines)
From:
Jay Bowks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Eek! Can you help me out?
(62 lines)
From:
Hello Corey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ergative
Re: Ergative
(45 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative
(77 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative
(32 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative
(19 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ergative (was: Re: Are some languages easier to learn?)
Ergative (was: Re: Are some languages easier to learn?)
(48 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ergative (was: Re: Are some languages easier to learn?)
(52 lines)
From:
R. Skrintha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Exotic lg catalog
Exotic lg catalog
(36 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Font layouts
Re: Font layouts
(20 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Generic Plurals (was: Irish/Hebrew proverb)
Re: Generic Plurals (was: Irish/Hebrew proverb)
(50 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
GOUPLANG: prefix created
Re: GOUPLANG: prefix created
(20 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GOUPLANG: prefix created
(30 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GOUPLANG: prefix created
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GOUPLANG: prefix created
(21 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Group Conlang
Re: Group Conlang
(45 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang
(34 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(37 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang (was: Re: a Conlang, created by the group?)
(47 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Group Conlang: affix morphology
Re: Group Conlang: affix morphology
(51 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Group Conlang: theme
Group Conlang: theme
(34 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Group Conlang: theme
(16 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG : indirect object and passive
GROUPLANG : indirect object and passive
(35 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG : POLL2 (Re: cases, modifiers, pron
Re: GROUPLANG : POLL2 (Re: cases, modifiers, pron
(219 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG : POLL2 (Re: cases, modifiers, pronouns)
GROUPLANG : POLL2 (Re: cases, modifiers, pronouns)
(90 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG : POLL2 (Re: cases, modifiers, pronouns)
(161 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: affix morphology
GROUPLANG: affix morphology
(27 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: affix morphology
(29 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: affix morphology
(38 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: affix morphology
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: affix morphology
(36 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: affix morphology
(29 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: affix morphology
(76 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: affix morphology
(33 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: affix morphology
(90 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: affix morphology
(14 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(82 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(73 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(16 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(138 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(24 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(86 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(100 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(63 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(121 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(26 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(33 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(34 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: cases (was: noun and verb roots)
(39 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: Genders
GROUPLANG: Genders
(41 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Genders
(24 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: noun and verb roots
GROUPLANG: noun and verb roots
(54 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: noun and verb roots
(26 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: noun and verb roots
(28 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: noun and verb roots
(26 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: optional features and case
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(95 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(93 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(37 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(56 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(72 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(69 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(51 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(66 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(18 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(36 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(23 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(22 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(59 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(47 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(41 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case
(30 lines)
From:
R. Skrintha <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: Phonetics
Re: GROUPLANG: Phonetics
(68 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Phonetics
(172 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: Pronouns
GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(28 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(47 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(91 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(112 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(59 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(84 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(76 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(86 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(54 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(37 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(106 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(78 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(89 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(50 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(21 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(58 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(31 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns
(82 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: Pronouns (politeness)
Re: GROUPLANG: Pronouns (politeness)
(18 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: simple, original, natural case system
Re: GROUPLANG: simple, original, natural case system
(57 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: simple, original, natural case system (was: noun and verb roots)
GROUPLANG: simple, original, natural case system (was: noun and verb roots)
(40 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: simple, original,natural case sys
Re: GROUPLANG: simple, original,natural case sys
(39 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: simple, original,natural case system (was: noun and verb roots)
Re: GROUPLANG: simple, original,natural case system (was: noun and verb roots)
(82 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: simple, original,natural case system (was: noun and verb roots)
(18 lines)
From:
Clinton Moreland-Stringham <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: theme
GROUPLANG: theme
(18 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: theme
(17 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: theme
(30 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: theme
(30 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: theme
(38 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: theme
(28 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
GROUPLANG: verbs and auxiliaries
GROUPLANG: verbs and auxiliaries
(24 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: GROUPLANG: verbs and auxiliaries
(86 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Halloween in the Netherlands?
Halloween in the Netherlands?
(33 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Help! I've got 744 unread messages!
Help! I've got 744 unread messages!
(18 lines)
From:
Simon Kissane <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help! I've got 744 unread messages!
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help! I've got 744 unread messages!
(47 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Irish proverb
Re: Irish proverb
(19 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Irish proverb
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
LANGUAGE LAWS
LANGUAGE LAWS
(35 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(11 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(20 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(60 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(65 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(34 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(29 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(66 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(30 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(22 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(50 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(50 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(149 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(97 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(120 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(30 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(29 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(54 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(62 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(33 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(35 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(32 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(50 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(76 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(119 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(40 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(54 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LANGUAGE LAWS
(34 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language superiority, improvement, etc.
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(21 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(32 lines)
From:
Christopher Palmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(39 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(38 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(143 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(37 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(47 lines)
From:
Diana Slattery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(123 lines)
From:
Joshua Shinavier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(104 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(29 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(19 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(31 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(30 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(97 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(41 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(38 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(95 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(53 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(80 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(28 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(39 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(36 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(18 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(33 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(32 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(67 lines)
From:
Michael A. Rouse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(41 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(58 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(24 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(73 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(45 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(92 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(57 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(58 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(25 lines)
From:
Tommie Powell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(50 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(54 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(75 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(102 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(118 lines)
From:
Joshua Shinavier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(278 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(144 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(114 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(50 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(91 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(39 lines)
From:
Tundra Slosek <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(31 lines)
From:
R. Skrintha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(111 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(46 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(32 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(23 lines)
From:
Scott Jann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(47 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(79 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(44 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(25 lines)
From:
Christopher Palmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(31 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(98 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(61 lines)
From:
Michael A. Rouse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(112 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(35 lines)
From:
Christopher Palmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(31 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(82 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(40 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(51 lines)
From:
Laurie Gerholz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(33 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(67 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(30 lines)
From:
Joshua Shinavier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(58 lines)
From:
Christopher Palmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(73 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Language superiority, improvement, etc.
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lunatic Survey
Re: Lunatic Survey
(28 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Measurements revisited
Re: Measurements revisited
(31 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Measurements revisited
(92 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Measurements revisited
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Measurements revisited
(38 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Measurements revisited
(22 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
more *SPECIFIC* Questions
more *SPECIFIC* Questions
(32 lines)
From:
Hello Corey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: more *SPECIFIC* Questions
(29 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: more *SPECIFIC* Questions
(47 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
nasalisation of vowels
nasalisation of vowels
(36 lines)
From:
B.Philip.Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: nasalisation of vowels
(54 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Norman French?
Norman French?
(24 lines)
From:
Arek Bellagio <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(28 lines)
From:
Don Blaheta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(38 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(43 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(33 lines)
From:
R. Skrintha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(30 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(71 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(31 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(20 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(64 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(17 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Norman French?
(26 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
old clothing (was: Re: Language superiority...)
old clothing (was: Re: Language superiority...)
(35 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: old clothing (was: Re: Language superiority...)
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: old clothing (was: Re: Language superiority...)
(44 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: old clothing (was: Re: Language superiority...)
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: old clothing (was: Re: Language superiority...)
(35 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: old clothing (was: Re: Language superiority...)
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
old clothing: History, Upheaval,Idiosyncracy
Re: old clothing: History, Upheaval,Idiosyncracy
(14 lines)
From:
list James E. Hopkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
OOPS!!!! (was: Language superiority, improvement, etc.)
OOPS!!!! (was: Language superiority, improvement, etc.)
(28 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OOPS!!!! (was: Language superiority, improvement, etc.)
(20 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Optional features (was GROUPLANG: cases)
Optional features (was GROUPLANG: cases)
(39 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Optional features (was GROUPLANG: cases)
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Over the rivver and Throo the wuds
Over the rivver and Throo the wuds
(46 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Over the rivver and Throo the wuds
(395 lines)
From:
=cw4t7abs <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Over the rivver and Throo the wuds
(23 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Over the rivver and Throo the wuds
(38 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Over the rivver and Throo the wuds
(33 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Over the rivver and Throo the wuds
(50 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Over the rivver and Throo the wuds
(59 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Over the rivver and Throo the wuds
(13 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Over the rivver and Throo the wuds in di far'einikte shtatn un in yisroel
Re: Over the rivver and Throo the wuds in di far'einikte shtatn un in yisroel
(30 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Post-Albacon greeting
Post-Albacon greeting
(31 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rap Lin Rie/Occidental, was Re: A PUBLIC
Rap Lin Rie/Occidental, was Re: A PUBLIC
(102 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reformed, Teutonic English
Re: Reformed, Teutonic English
(30 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Report on Albacon
Report on Albacon
(25 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Report on Albacon
(37 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Report on Albacon
(91 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Report on Albacon
(27 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Report on Albacon
(52 lines)
From:
Pablo Flores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Report on Albacon
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Report on Albacon
(61 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Schwa vowel, which letter?
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(39 lines)
From:
B.Philip.Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(42 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(39 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(25 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa vowel, which letter?
(37 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
TAN: webpages that suck...
TAN: webpages that suck...
(47 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TAN: webpages that suck...
(25 lines)
From:
Christopher Palmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TAN: webpages that suck...
(66 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TAN: webpages that suck...
(56 lines)
From:
Christopher Palmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
TAN: Webpages that suck...
Re: TAN: Webpages that suck...
(29 lines)
From:
Terrence Donnelly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TAN: Webpages that suck...
(11 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TAN: Webpages that suck...
(19 lines)
From:
Christopher Palmer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TAN: Webpages that suck...
(30 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TAN: Webpages that suck...
(18 lines)
From:
Terrence Donnelly <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Tyzwya Recipe. Was: Senses
Re: The Tyzwya Recipe. Was: Senses
(9 lines)
From:
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: French letter U WITH GRAVE
USAGE: French letter U WITH GRAVE
(19 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French letter U WITH GRAVE
(27 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: French letter U WITH GRAVE
(31 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Unusual language
Re: USAGE: Unusual language
(38 lines)
From:
R. Skrintha <
[log in to unmask]
>
Webification of Tarni'f
Webification of Tarni'f
(15 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yive (was: Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case)
Yive (was: Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case)
(21 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yive (was: Re: GROUPLANG: optional features and case)
(18 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Fwd: Li Nov Cosmoglotta #10A A Contest.]
[Fwd: Li Nov Cosmoglotta #10A A Contest.]
(206 lines)
From:
Robert J. Petry <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Fwd: [occidental] Theory and Reality]
Re: [Fwd: [occidental] Theory and Reality]
(26 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
Re: [Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(19 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(14 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(27 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(23 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Fwd: [raplinrie] It's A Very Good Day]
(31 lines)
From:
Jay Bowks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU