Conlang Mailing List – November 1998, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• /N/ : suggestions please (8 messages)
• 10 new Almaqerin prepositions...
• a bit off-topic: ideographic english
• a new project of conlang (5 messages)
• Animal Sounds like... (10 messages)
• Another Orthography Question (9 messages)
• Answers to Tokana colour test (was: Re: Sounds like...)
• articles again (3 messages)
• Aspect revisited (14 messages)
• BAL (was: Re: TUNU) (11 messages)
• basic words counting
• Boston conlang get-together
• Changes to W, and a bit of con-culture
• CHAT: Aramaic whores in Hungary? (Was: Re: vulgarisms) (5 messages)
• CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (12 messages)
• Chinese adpositions (was: Re: inalienable pos (2 messages)
• Chinese adpositions (was: Re: inalienable possess
• Chinese adpositions (was: Re: inalienable possession) (3 messages)
• Con and Aux Lingos influences on natural languages.
• Con to Aux to Natlang. Influences on Natlangs (3 messages)
• Con-country Revisited (was: Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug
• Correction
• Cross-referencing tool for vocabularies (3 messages)
• Deriving words that aren't too long (11 messages)
• English-Eloshtan Dictionary Up
• Hardcopies and Softcopies (2 messages)
• inalienable possession (29 messages)
• Invented (getting less lunatic by the second) (4 messages)
• Invented (was and still is "lunatic") (4 messages)
• lang'n'mind
• List of natlangs (3 messages)
• List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (15 messages)
• LUNATIC again
• m'lang vowels
• Malat (Was: New Language) (7 messages)
• New Language (17 messages)
• Numerical language (was Chiming in (was Re: Evolving shades of meaning))
• Odp: Orthography Question
• OFF TOPIC: web servers (2 messages)
• OFF TOPIC: web servers (was Re: Tokana webification progress report) (4 messages)
• OFFTOPIC: Fermat numbers (was Re: Numerical language ...) (2 messages)
• OFFTOPIC: Re: Sounds like... (9 messages)
• OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"? (10 messages)
• onomatopeyics in conlangs (3 messages)
• Orthography Question
• Orthography Question) (3 messages)
• poetry (6 messages)
• private and public
• quantity triggered vs. quantity sensitive stress (7 messages)
• Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question) (10 messages)
• some origins...
• Sounds like... (41 messages)
• Split nominative and Nik's new project (3 messages)
• TAN: Scattered Tongues Java error (4 messages)
• The conlang webring
• The Human Body (2 messages)
• Tokana webification progress report
• Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (19 messages)
• vulgarisms (3 messages)
• Yay!!!! I have a web page!!!!
• [Fwd: OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"?]

1. /N/ : suggestions please
   • /N/ : suggestions please (8 lines)
     From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ : suggestions please (31 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ : suggestions please (51 lines)
     From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ : suggestions please (23 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ : suggestions please (15 lines)
     From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ : suggestions please (13 lines)
     From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ : suggestions please (41 lines)
     From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: /N/ : suggestions please (18 lines)
     From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>

2. 10 new Almaqerin prepositions...
   • 10 new Almaqerin prepositions... (42 lines)
     From: Didier Willis <[log in to unmask]>

3. a bit off-topic: ideographic english
   • Re: a bit off-topic: ideographic english (54 lines)
     From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>

4. a new project of conlang
   • a new project of conlang (338 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a new project of conlang (52 lines)
     From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a new project of conlang (27 lines)
     From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a new project of conlang (76 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a new project of conlang (122 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

5. Animal Sounds like...
   • Animal Sounds like... (59 lines)
     From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Animal Sounds like... (81 lines)
     From: Diana Slattery <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Animal Sounds like... (42 lines)
     From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Animal Sounds like... (65 lines)
     From: Bryan Maloney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Animal Sounds like... (24 lines)
     From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Animal Sounds like... (13 lines)
     From: vardi <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Animal Sounds like... (68 lines)
     From: Keenan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Animal Sounds like... (37 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Animal Sounds like... (42 lines)
     From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Animal Sounds like... (45 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

6. Another Orthography Question
   • Another Orthography Question (101 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Orthography Question (141 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Orthography Question (99 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Orthography Question (19 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Orthography Question (82 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Orthography Question (87 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Orthography Question (16 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Orthography Question (17 lines)
     From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Orthography Question (41 lines)
     From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>

7. Answers to Tokana colour test (was: Re: Sounds like...)
   • Answers to Tokana colour test (was: Re: Sounds like...) (36 lines)
     From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>

8. articles again
   • articles again (16 lines)
     From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: articles again (25 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: articles again (35 lines)
     From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>

9. Aspect revisited
   • Aspect revisited (17 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (17 lines)
     From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (30 lines)
     From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (27 lines)
     From: Hawksinger <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (19 lines)
     From: Christopher Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (46 lines)
     From: Gerald Koenig <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (48 lines)
     From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (25 lines)
     From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (12 lines)
     From: zev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (28 lines)
     From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (38 lines)
     From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (94 lines)
     From: Gerald Koenig <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (22 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspect revisited (21 lines)
     From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>

10. BAL (was: Re: TUNU)
    • BAL (was: Re: TUNU) (23 lines)
      From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: BAL (was: Re: TUNU) (45 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: BAL (was: Re: TUNU) (22 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: BAL (was: Re: TUNU) (35 lines)
      From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: BAL (was: Re: TUNU) (59 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: BAL (was: Re: TUNU) (15 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: BAL (was: Re: TUNU) (71 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: BAL (was: Re: TUNU) (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: BAL (was: Re: TUNU) (53 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: BAL (was: Re: TUNU) (87 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: BAL (was: Re: TUNU) (74 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>

11. basic words counting
    • basic words counting (18 lines)
      From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>

12. Boston conlang get-together
    • Boston conlang get-together (19 lines)
      From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>

13. Changes to W, and a bit of con-culture
    • Changes to W, and a bit of con-culture (54 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

14. CHAT: Aramaic whores in Hungary? (Was: Re: vulgarisms)
    • CHAT: Aramaic whores in Hungary? (Was: Re: vulgarisms) (32 lines)
      From: vardi <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Aramaic whores in Hungary? (Was: Re: vulgarisms) (12 lines)
      From: =cw4t7abs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Aramaic whores in Hungary? (Was: Re: vulgarisms) (58 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Aramaic whores in Hungary? (Was: Re: vulgarisms) (19 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Aramaic whores in Hungary? (Was: Re: vulgarisms) (43 lines)
      From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>

15. CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug
    • CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (34 lines)
      From: Keenan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (52 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (44 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (26 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (26 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (54 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (42 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (58 lines)
      From: Sheets, Jeff <[log in to unmask]>
    • CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (48 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (21 lines)
      From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (100 lines)
      From: Keenan <[log in to unmask]>

16. Chinese adpositions (was: Re: inalienable pos
    • Re: Chinese adpositions (was: Re: inalienable pos (38 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Chinese adpositions (was: Re: inalienable pos (43 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>

17. Chinese adpositions (was: Re: inalienable possess
    • Chinese adpositions (was: Re: inalienable possess (30 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>

18. Chinese adpositions (was: Re: inalienable possession)
    • Chinese adpositions (was: Re: inalienable possession) (88 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Chinese adpositions (was: Re: inalienable possession) (25 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Chinese adpositions (was: Re: inalienable possession) (33 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>

19. Con and Aux Lingos influences on natural languages.
    • Con and Aux Lingos influences on natural languages. (23 lines)
      From: Mike Adams <[log in to unmask]>

20. Con to Aux to Natlang. Influences on Natlangs
    • Con to Aux to Natlang. Influences on Natlangs (30 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Con to Aux to Natlang. Influences on Natlangs (10 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Con to Aux to Natlang. Influences on Natlangs (26 lines)
      From: Josh Brandt-Young <[log in to unmask]>

21. Con-country Revisited (was: Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug
    • Con-country Revisited (was: Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug (109 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

22. Correction
    • Correction (11 lines)
      From: Keenan <[log in to unmask]>

23. Cross-referencing tool for vocabularies
    • Cross-referencing tool for vocabularies (25 lines)
      From: Simon Kissane <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Cross-referencing tool for vocabularies (39 lines)
      From: Diana Slattery <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Cross-referencing tool for vocabularies (17 lines)
      From: Joshua Shinavier <[log in to unmask]>

24. Deriving words that aren't too long
    • Deriving words that aren't too long (17 lines)
      From: Simon Kissane <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving words that aren't too long (32 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving words that aren't too long (19 lines)
      From: list James E. Hopkins <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving words that aren't too long (35 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving words that aren't too long (29 lines)
      From: Peter Clark <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving words that aren't too long (37 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving words that aren't too long (22 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving words that aren't too long (33 lines)
      From: Clinton Moreland-Stringham <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving words that aren't too long (34 lines)
      From: Gerald Koenig <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving words that aren't too long (54 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Deriving words that aren't too long (29 lines)
      From: John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>

25. English-Eloshtan Dictionary Up
    • English-Eloshtan Dictionary Up (12 lines)
      From: Josh Roth <[log in to unmask]>

26. Hardcopies and Softcopies
    • Hardcopies and Softcopies (15 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hardcopies and Softcopies (29 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>

27. inalienable possession
    • inalienable possession (24 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (24 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (52 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (27 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (43 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (28 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (67 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (54 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (86 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (47 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (41 lines)
      From: Didier Willis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (18 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (79 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (62 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (29 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (38 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (17 lines)
      From: list James E. Hopkins <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (24 lines)
      From: Terrence Donnelly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (44 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (32 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (19 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (77 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (28 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (23 lines)
      From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (35 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (31 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (64 lines)
      From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (18 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: inalienable possession (34 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>

28. Invented (getting less lunatic by the second)
    • Invented (getting less lunatic by the second) (104 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Invented (getting less lunatic by the second) (26 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Invented (getting less lunatic by the second) (50 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Invented (getting less lunatic by the second) (18 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>

29. Invented (was and still is "lunatic")
    • Invented (was and still is "lunatic") (100 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Invented (was and still is "lunatic") (29 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Invented (was and still is "lunatic") (175 lines)
      From: Logical Language Group <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Invented (was and still is "lunatic") (79 lines)
      From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>

30. lang'n'mind
    • lang'n'mind (17 lines)
      From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>

31. List of natlangs
    • Re: List of natlangs (77 lines)
      From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (26 lines)
      From: Oliver Cromm <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (20 lines)
      From: Joshua Shinavier <[log in to unmask]>

32. List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question)
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (41 lines)
      From: Joshua Shinavier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (34 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (18 lines)
      From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (43 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (18 lines)
      From: Joshua Shinavier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (644 lines)
      From: Joshua Shinavier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (44 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (48 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (58 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (40 lines)
      From: Andrew Smith <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (76 lines)
      From: Joshua Shinavier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (37 lines)
      From: Joshua Shinavier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (115 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (61 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: List of natlangs (was Re: Orthography Question) (65 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>

33. LUNATIC again
    • Re: LUNATIC again (51 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

34. m'lang vowels
    • m'lang vowels (24 lines)
      From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>

35. Malat (Was: New Language)
    • Malat (Was: New Language) (27 lines)
      From: Garrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Malat (Was: New Language) (37 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Malat (Was: New Language) (46 lines)
      From: Garrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Malat (Was: New Language) (20 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Malat (Was: New Language) (56 lines)
      From: Laurie Gerholz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Malat (Was: New Language) (72 lines)
      From: Garrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Malat (Was: New Language) (111 lines)
      From: Laurie Gerholz <[log in to unmask]>

36. New Language
    • New Language (18 lines)
      From: Garrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (13 lines)
      From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (27 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (94 lines)
      From: Didier Willis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (37 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (40 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (44 lines)
      From: Gressett, David <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (28 lines)
      From: Sam Bryant <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (33 lines)
      From: John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (38 lines)
      From: Garrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (142 lines)
      From: Garrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (48 lines)
      From: Garrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (64 lines)
      From: Garrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (31 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (94 lines)
      From: Didier Willis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (28 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Language (128 lines)
      From: Garrett <[log in to unmask]>

37. Numerical language (was Chiming in (was Re: Evolving shades of meaning))
    • Numerical language (was Chiming in (was Re: Evolving shades of meaning)) (58 lines)
      From: Didier Willis <[log in to unmask]>

38. Odp: Orthography Question
    • Odp: Orthography Question (30 lines)
      From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>

39. OFF TOPIC: web servers
    • OFF TOPIC: web servers (37 lines)
      From: Craig Gilbert <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF TOPIC: web servers (32 lines)
      From: Hawksinger <[log in to unmask]>

40. OFF TOPIC: web servers (was Re: Tokana webification progress report)
    • OFF TOPIC: web servers (was Re: Tokana webification progress report) (19 lines)
      From: Joshua Shinavier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF TOPIC: web servers (was Re: Tokana webification progress report) (27 lines)
      From: Terrence Donnelly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF TOPIC: web servers (was Re: Tokana webification progress report) (21 lines)
      From: =cw4t7abs <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFF TOPIC: web servers (was Re: Tokana webification progress report) (31 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

41. OFFTOPIC: Fermat numbers (was Re: Numerical language ...)
    • OFFTOPIC: Fermat numbers (was Re: Numerical language ...) (31 lines)
      From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: Fermat numbers (was Re: Numerical language ...) (57 lines)
      From: Didier Willis <[log in to unmask]>

42. OFFTOPIC: Re: Sounds like...
    • OFFTOPIC: Re: Sounds like... (25 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • OFFTOPIC: Re: Sounds like... (21 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: Re: Sounds like... (27 lines)
      From: Joshua Shinavier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: Re: Sounds like... (20 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: Re: Sounds like... (43 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: Re: Sounds like... (18 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: Re: Sounds like... (43 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: Re: Sounds like... (60 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: Re: Sounds like... (19 lines)
      From: charles <[log in to unmask]>

43. OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"?
    • OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"? (18 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"? (22 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"? (18 lines)
      From: Christopher Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"? (15 lines)
      From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"? (34 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"? (22 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"? (31 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"? (24 lines)
      From: Arek Bellagio <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"? (31 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"? (54 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

44. onomatopeyics in conlangs
    • onomatopeyics in conlangs (32 lines)
      From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs (32 lines)
      From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs (17 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

45. Orthography Question
    • Re: Orthography Question (32 lines)
      From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>

46. Orthography Question)
    • Re: Orthography Question) (36 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography Question) (24 lines)
      From: Joshua Shinavier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Orthography Question) (39 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>

47. poetry
    • poetry (24 lines)
      From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: poetry (43 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: poetry (59 lines)
      From: Didier Willis <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: poetry (34 lines)
      From: Hawksinger <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: poetry (39 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: poetry (26 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

48. private and public
    • private and public (39 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>

49. quantity triggered vs. quantity sensitive stress
    • quantity triggered vs. quantity sensitive stress (72 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: quantity triggered vs. quantity sensitive stress (32 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: quantity triggered vs. quantity sensitive stress (43 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: quantity triggered vs. quantity sensitive stress (24 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: quantity triggered vs. quantity sensitive stress (49 lines)
      From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: quantity triggered vs. quantity sensitive stress (42 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: quantity triggered vs. quantity sensitive stress (42 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

50. Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question)
    • Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question) (36 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question) (19 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question) (41 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question) (32 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question) (52 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question) (21 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question) (57 lines)
      From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question) (43 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question) (74 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question) (21 lines)
      From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>

51. some origins...
    • Re: some origins... (43 lines)
      From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>

52. Sounds like...
    • Sounds like... (24 lines)
      From: John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (36 lines)
      From: Garrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (56 lines)
      From: Frank George Valoczy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (20 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (38 lines)
      From: Josh Roth <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (46 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (22 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (19 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (76 lines)
      From: Garrett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (30 lines)
      From: Oliver Cromm <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (33 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (30 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (47 lines)
      From: Joshua Shinavier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (84 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (29 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (29 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (25 lines)
      From: Mia Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (30 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (30 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (22 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (32 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (42 lines)
      From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (21 lines)
      From: Jason Hooper <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (29 lines)
      From: John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
    • Sounds like... (60 lines)
      From: John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (17 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (64 lines)
      From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (19 lines)
      From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (40 lines)
      From: Diana Slattery <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (45 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (49 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (18 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (41 lines)
      From: Simon Kissane <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (84 lines)
      From: Oliver Cromm <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (20 lines)
      From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (17 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (29 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (38 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (31 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (27 lines)
      From: Andrew Smith <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sounds like... (29 lines)
      From: Garrett <[log in to unmask]>

53. Split nominative and Nik's new project
    • Split nominative and Nik's new project (78 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Split nominative and Nik's new project (39 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Split nominative and Nik's new project (58 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>

54. TAN: Scattered Tongues Java error
    • TAN: Scattered Tongues Java error (51 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TAN: Scattered Tongues Java error (38 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TAN: Scattered Tongues Java error (42 lines)
      From: Laurie Gerholz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TAN: Scattered Tongues Java error (33 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>

55. The conlang webring
    • Re: The conlang webring (52 lines)
      From: Hawksinger <[log in to unmask]>

56. The Human Body
    • Re: The Human Body (25 lines)
      From: Andrew Smith <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Human Body (23 lines)
      From: charles <[log in to unmask]>

57. Tokana webification progress report
    • Re: Tokana webification progress report (36 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>

58. Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!!
    • Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (97 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (87 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (41 lines)
      From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (104 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (23 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (48 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (54 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (42 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (43 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (32 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (31 lines)
      From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (21 lines)
      From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (24 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (38 lines)
      From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (21 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (22 lines)
      From: Mathias M. Lassailly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (24 lines)
      From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (20 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!! (56 lines)
      From: Hawksinger <[log in to unmask]>

59. vulgarisms
    • Re: vulgarisms (122 lines)
      From: lucasso <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vulgarisms (39 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: vulgarisms (37 lines)
      From: Andrew Smith <[log in to unmask]>

60. Yay!!!! I have a web page!!!!
    • Re: Yay!!!! I have a web page!!!! (53 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>

61. [Fwd: OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"?]
    • [Fwd: OFFTOPIC: What is "francais hexagonal"?] (143 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>