Conlang
Mailing List – November 1998, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Addition to the Rokbeigalmki Webpage
adj/adv phrases, was inalienable possession
(3 messages)
Animal Sounds like...
(9 messages)
Animals and onomatopoeia
Another Orthography Question
Babel Text Archives?
(4 messages)
BAL (was: Re: TUNU)
(2 messages)
BAL - vowels
(7 messages)
Boston Conlang Dinner, was New Rikchik Postscript files
(2 messages)
CHAT: Chiba (was: Re: Sounds like...)
(5 messages)
CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug
Color terms and Animal names
(8 messages)
ConNumerology
(2 messages)
Elemental Forces (was: Re: water (was:re:sounds like...))
(2 messages)
Gender classes, which to use?
(10 messages)
inalienable possession
(5 messages)
inaudible (:)) vowels
(2 messages)
Kirshenbaum vs. SAMPA
Malat (Was: New Language)
(2 messages)
model lgs (was Re: LUNATIC again]
More about PL
(2 messages)
New Language
(4 messages)
New Rikchik Postscript files
(11 messages)
OFFTOPIC: PostScript readers (was: New Rikchik Postscript files)
onomatopeyics in conlangs
(18 messages)
Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question)
(2 messages)
Sally's paper was Re: Yaguello
sara + la(h)e
Sing Language 4
(2 messages)
Sounds like...
sounds like...)
Terminology
(10 messages)
Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!!
Water
(2 messages)
water (was:re:sounds like...)
(25 messages)
Yaguello [was: Re: LUNATIC again]
(7 messages)
_The_ OED was Re: Too Many Too Little Possibl
(3 messages)
_The_ OED was Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!!
(2 messages)
Addition to the Rokbeigalmki Webpage
Addition to the Rokbeigalmki Webpage
(21 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
adj/adv phrases, was inalienable possession
adj/adv phrases, was inalienable possession
(41 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: adj/adv phrases, was inalienable possession
(67 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: adj/adv phrases, was inalienable possession
(44 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Animal Sounds like...
Re: Animal Sounds like...
(27 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal Sounds like...
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal Sounds like...
(23 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal Sounds like...
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal Sounds like...
(57 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal Sounds like...
(21 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal Sounds like...
(46 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal Sounds like...
(15 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal Sounds like...
(38 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Animals and onomatopoeia
Animals and onomatopoeia
(100 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another Orthography Question
Re: Another Orthography Question
(98 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Babel Text Archives?
Babel Text Archives?
(12 lines)
From:
Adam Kasanof <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Babel Text Archives?
(28 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Babel Text Archives?
(14 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Babel Text Archives?
(10 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
BAL (was: Re: TUNU)
Re: BAL (was: Re: TUNU)
(73 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BAL (was: Re: TUNU)
(62 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
BAL - vowels
BAL - vowels
(35 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BAL - vowels
(73 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BAL - vowels
(29 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BAL - vowels
(72 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BAL - vowels
(39 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BAL - vowels
(44 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: BAL - vowels
(66 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Boston Conlang Dinner, was New Rikchik Postscript files
Boston Conlang Dinner, was New Rikchik Postscript files
(20 lines)
From:
Kenji Schwarz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Boston Conlang Dinner, was New Rikchik Postscript files
(41 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Chiba (was: Re: Sounds like...)
CHAT: Chiba (was: Re: Sounds like...)
(26 lines)
From:
Oliver Cromm <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Chiba (was: Re: Sounds like...)
(29 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Chiba (was: Re: Sounds like...)
(29 lines)
From:
Oliver Cromm <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Chiba (was: Re: Sounds like...)
(43 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Chiba (was: Re: Sounds like...)
(34 lines)
From:
Oliver Cromm <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug
Re: CHAT: Succumbing to the conlang bug
(35 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Color terms and Animal names
Color terms and Animal names
(233 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Color terms and Animal names
(69 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Color terms and Animal names
(36 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Color terms and Animal names
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Color terms and Animal names
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Color terms and Animal names
(29 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Color terms and Animal names
(20 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Color terms and Animal names
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
ConNumerology
Re: ConNumerology
(46 lines)
From:
Clinton Moreland-Stringham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ConNumerology
(30 lines)
From:
Diana Slattery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Elemental Forces (was: Re: water (was:re:sounds like...))
Elemental Forces (was: Re: water (was:re:sounds like...))
(70 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Elemental Forces (was: Re: water (was:re:sounds like...))
(60 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gender classes, which to use?
Gender classes, which to use?
(20 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gender classes, which to use?
(58 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gender classes, which to use?
(24 lines)
From:
Terrence Donnelly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gender classes, which to use?
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gender classes, which to use?
(25 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gender classes, which to use?
(17 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gender classes, which to use?
(27 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gender classes, which to use?
(35 lines)
From:
list James E. Hopkins <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gender classes, which to use?
(68 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gender classes, which to use?
(58 lines)
From:
Didier Willis <
[log in to unmask]
>
inalienable possession
Re: inalienable possession
(39 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inalienable possession
(38 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inalienable possession
(42 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inalienable possession
(57 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inalienable possession
(20 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
inaudible (:)) vowels
inaudible (:)) vowels
(22 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: inaudible (:)) vowels
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kirshenbaum vs. SAMPA
Kirshenbaum vs. SAMPA
(105 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Malat (Was: New Language)
Re: Malat (Was: New Language)
(23 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Malat (Was: New Language)
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
model lgs (was Re: LUNATIC again]
model lgs (was Re: LUNATIC again]
(59 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
More about PL
More about PL
(129 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: More about PL
(49 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Language
Re: New Language
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language
(21 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language
(29 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Rikchik Postscript files
New Rikchik Postscript files
(19 lines)
From:
Denis M. Moskowitz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Rikchik Postscript files
(22 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Rikchik Postscript files
(21 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Rikchik Postscript files
(17 lines)
From:
Clinton Moreland-Stringham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Rikchik Postscript files
(15 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Rikchik Postscript files
(30 lines)
From:
Kenji Schwarz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Rikchik Postscript files
(17 lines)
From:
Clinton Moreland-Stringham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Rikchik Postscript files
(41 lines)
From:
Didier Willis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Rikchik Postscript files
(41 lines)
From:
Diana Slattery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Rikchik Postscript files
(23 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Rikchik Postscript files
(27 lines)
From:
Diana Slattery <
[log in to unmask]
>
OFFTOPIC: PostScript readers (was: New Rikchik Postscript files)
Re: OFFTOPIC: PostScript readers (was: New Rikchik Postscript files)
(38 lines)
From:
Didier Willis <
[log in to unmask]
>
onomatopeyics in conlangs
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(40 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(15 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(24 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(68 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(17 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(85 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(21 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(30 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(36 lines)
From:
Gustavo Eulalio <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(25 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(54 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(59 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(44 lines)
From:
Joshua Shinavier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(23 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: onomatopeyics in conlangs
(58 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question)
Re: Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question)
(33 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Quryak (Was:Re: Another Orthography Question)
(54 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sally's paper was Re: Yaguello
Sally's paper was Re: Yaguello
(24 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
sara + la(h)e
sara + la(h)e
(24 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sing Language 4
Sing Language 4
(29 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sing Language 4
(40 lines)
From:
Mike <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sounds like...
Re: Sounds like...
(32 lines)
From:
Oliver Cromm <
[log in to unmask]
>
sounds like...)
Re: sounds like...)
(32 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Terminology
Terminology
(26 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology
(36 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology
(49 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology
(66 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology
(55 lines)
From:
Frank George Valoczy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology
(59 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology
(68 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terminology
(47 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!!
Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!!
(25 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Water
Re: Water
(28 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Water
(47 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
water (was:re:sounds like...)
water (was:re:sounds like...)
(20 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(24 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(26 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(18 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(46 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(25 lines)
From:
Mia/Rob Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(12 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(48 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(45 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(16 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(44 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(36 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(64 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(17 lines)
From:
Joshua Shinavier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(38 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(36 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(21 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(24 lines)
From:
Keenan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(31 lines)
From:
Clinton Moreland-Stringham <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(27 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: water (was:re:sounds like...)
(58 lines)
From:
lucasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yaguello [was: Re: LUNATIC again]
Yaguello [was: Re: LUNATIC again]
(29 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Yaguello [was: Re: LUNATIC again]
(30 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yaguello [was: Re: LUNATIC again]
(49 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yaguello [was: Re: LUNATIC again]
(16 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yaguello [was: Re: LUNATIC again]
(37 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yaguello [was: Re: LUNATIC again]
(34 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Yaguello [was: Re: LUNATIC again]
(33 lines)
From:
BP.Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
_The_ OED was Re: Too Many Too Little Possibl
Re: _The_ OED was Re: Too Many Too Little Possibl
(39 lines)
From:
Mathias M. Lassailly <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: _The_ OED was Re: Too Many Too Little Possibl
(17 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: _The_ OED was Re: Too Many Too Little Possibl
(26 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
_The_ OED was Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!!
_The_ OED was Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!!
(42 lines)
From:
Peter Clark <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: _The_ OED was Re: Too Many Too Little Possible Roots!!!
(60 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – November 1998, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – November 1998, week 4
