Conlang Mailing List – March 1999, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show contributor list | Hide contributor list

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

List of contributors:

• Adam Raizen <[log in to unmask]>
• Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]> (8 messages)
• And Rosta <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Andrew Smith <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• [log in to unmask] (2 messages)
• Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]> (10 messages)
• Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]> (17 messages)
• Bryan Maloney <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Carlos Eugenio Thompson Pinzon <[log in to unmask]>
• Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]> (14 messages)
• Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• charles <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Charles <[log in to unmask]>
• charles <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]> (10 messages)
• Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Daniel Andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
• Daniel Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
• Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]> (10 messages)
• David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Diana Slattery <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]> (20 messages)
• Edward Heil <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Edward Heil <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Fabian <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• FFlores <[log in to unmask]> (19 messages)
• From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]> (10 messages)
• Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Gerald Koenig <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Gustavo Eulalio <[log in to unmask]>
• Hawksinger <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]> (20 messages)
• Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Joe Mondello <[log in to unmask]>
• JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• John Cowan <[log in to unmask]> (10 messages)
• John Fisher <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Josh Brandt-Young <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Josh Roth <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Kenji Schwarz <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
• Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]> (14 messages)
• Laurie Gerholz <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Mathew Willoughby <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
• Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]> (51 messages)
• Orjan Johansen <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]> (12 messages)
• Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]> (16 messages)
• Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]> (22 messages)
• Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]> (16 messages)
• taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]> (22 messages)
• Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]> (12 messages)
• vardi <[log in to unmask]>

1. Adam Raizen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: adjectives -> adverbs (74 lines)
     Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 23:56:07 +0200

2. Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Bibliography (20 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 19:06:45 PST
   • Re: Copulas (32 lines)
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 22:05:38 PST
   • Graavgaaln colors (31 lines)
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 21:43:58 PST
   • Graavgaaln elements (49 lines)
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 20:49:24 PST
   • Re: Graavgaaln elements (73 lines)
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:23:52 PST
   • Re: Graavgaaln elements (20 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:55:20 PST
   • Re: Graavgaaln elements (99 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 21:25:39 PST
   • Re: winter quote (54 lines)
     Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 10:14:33 PST

3. And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Boreanesian phonology (was: Re: Allophones or Separate (260 lines)
     Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 17:43:31 GMT+0
   • Re: History of Conlang List (43 lines)
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 16:55:26 GMT+0
   • Re: History of Conlang List (20 lines)
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 12:24:19 GMT+0
   • Re: History of Conlang List (30 lines)
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 12:29:43 GMT+0

4. Andrew Smith <[log in to unmask]>
   • CHAT: .sig (32 lines)
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:37:14 +1200
   • Re: Lexicons and Langauge Borrowing (26 lines)
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 18:54:30 +1200

5. [log in to unmask]
   • Re: boys need accusations of lying. down Set le (425 lines)
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:33:46 -0600
   • Re: History of Conlang List (14 lines)
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 21:07:06 -0600

6. Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Book(s) recommendation? (44 lines)
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:45:12 +0100
   • Re: Book(s) recommendation? (30 lines)
     Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:58:35 +0100
   • Re: Book(s) recommendation? (50 lines)
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 08:47:43 +0100
   • relative tense (53 lines)
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:32:51 +0100
   • Re: relative tense (41 lines)
     Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:49:02 +0100
   • Re: relative tense (20 lines)
     Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 10:19:48 +0100
   • Re: relative tense (23 lines)
     Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 10:22:19 +0100
   • Re: relative tense (12 lines)
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 15:07:42 +0100
   • Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (55 lines)
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:11:16 +0100
   • Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (33 lines)
     Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:41:36 +0100

7. Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
   • Bibliography (36 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 21:56:29 +0100
   • Re: Bibliography (21 lines)
     Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 08:06:09 +0100
   • Re: derivation question (20 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 22:05:51 +0100
   • Kinship terminology (23 lines)
     Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 17:30:39 +0100
   • Sally Caves' word-list (247 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 23:55:55 +0100

8. Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
   • About linguistic (in)tolerance (304 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:25:52 -0500
   • Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (42 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:37:21 -0500
   • Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (36 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 12:04:41 -0500
   • About linguistic (in)tolerance (46 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 17:06:09 -0500
   • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (100 lines)
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:58:36 -0500
   • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (17 lines)
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:05:55 -0500
   • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (132 lines)
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:12:51 -0500
   • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (35 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:59:09 -0500
   • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (39 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:08:20 -0500
   • Re: derivation question (22 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:18:20 -0500
   • derivation question (33 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:43:10 -0500
   • Re: Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang (30 lines)
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:05:49 -0500
   • Re: hello? (26 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:23:33 -0500
   • Intolerance. (47 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:50:23 -0500
   • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (23 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:30:19 -0500
   • The letter R (25 lines)
     Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 16:35:41 -0500
   • Word of Day (12 lines)
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 10:01:00 -0500

9. Bryan Maloney <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a 12th century conlang (21 lines)
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 09:42:50 -0500
   • Re: a 12th century conlang (18 lines)
     Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 14:37:15 -0500
   • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (16 lines)
     Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:54:11 -0500

10. Carlos Eugenio Thompson Pinzon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Concultures on Internet (was Re: Boranesian Phonology) (25 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 18:28:00 -0500

11. Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: adjectives -> adverbs (34 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 11:20:36 -0500
    • Re: adjectives -> adverbs (66 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 22:50:38 -0500
    • Re: Bibliography (35 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 22:15:06 -0500
    • Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (303 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 09:36:19 -0500
    • Re: Con-prescriptivism (53 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 19:54:49 -0500
    • Re: Hangkerimce Grammar I (49 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 10:12:53 -0500
    • Re: Relative Genders-Comments-2 (24 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 11:03:32 -0500
    • Re: relative tense (30 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:43:12 -0500
    • Re: Subordination (65 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 00:11:48 -0500
    • Re: Subordination (36 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 07:20:27 -0500
    • Translations into Hangkerimce (75 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 12:20:05 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Cool Idioms (was Bibliography) (83 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 22:46:06 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (70 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:46:02 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (85 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 22:03:53 -0500

12. Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (121 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 12:40:06 -0500
    • Chleweyish pronouns (59 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 14:54:50 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (79 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:11:56 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (92 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:58:48 -0500
    • Re: Object Agreement in Verbs (was Re: relative tense) (60 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 13:59:49 -0500
    • Pronunciation of Hangkerimce (42 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 13:26:10 -0500

13. charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (23 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 11:49:58 -0800
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (20 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 10:15:52 -0800
    • Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (14 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 14:58:30 -0800
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (23 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 10:57:21 -0800
    • Re: CHAT: History of Conlang List (10 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 10:40:32 -0800

14. Charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (17 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 20:58:06 -0500

15. charles <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (17 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:53:55 -0800
    • URLs, was Book(s) recommendation? (31 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:27:21 -0800

16. Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (36 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 13:14:53 +0100
    • CHAT: Re: relative tense (22 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 08:22:20 +0100
    • Re: derivation question (69 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:04:13 +0100
    • Re: Heyas all! (74 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 13:30:06 +0100
    • Re: Marking case with articles (99 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 08:18:45 +0100
    • Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (171 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 12:36:05 +0100
    • Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (42 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:28:18 +0100
    • Re: relative tense (79 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:36:11 +0800
    • Re: relative tense (56 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 08:35:25 +0100
    • Re: relative tense (50 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 08:55:01 +0100

17. Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Book(s) recommendation? (85 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:56:22 +0200
    • Re: Book(s) recommendation? (56 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:22:16 +0200
    • Re: Lunatic Paper (38 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:03:58 +0200
    • Objections to Conlanging (69 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:06:19 +0200

18. Daniel Andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Adjectives -> Adverbs (29 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 14:48:08 +0100

19. Daniel Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: An experiment. (36 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 11:22:35 -0600

20. Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • hello? (28 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:37:16 PST
    • Re: hello? (21 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 14:09:47 PST
    • Re: hello? (a correction) (16 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:41:50 PST
    • Re: Sally's Word List. (55 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 21:36:30 PST
    • Tech gender and mutation (60 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 14:02:18 PST
    • Re: Tech gender and mutation (correction) (17 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 14:51:50 PST
    • Re: The letter R (20 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:06:24 PST
    • Re: Topic and non-topic pronouns (89 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 15:19:03 PST
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (RUDE) (57 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:44:31 PST
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (38 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 17:39:04 PST

21. David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
    • I'm off-list for the time being... (42 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:55:34 -0500
    • renewal notices (28 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:04:32 -0500

22. Diana Slattery <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (33 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 12:04:54 -0500
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (20 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 20:56:19 -0500
    • Re: Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang (53 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 22:09:52 -0500
    • Re: Lunatic Paper (30 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:36:34 -0500

23. Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: hello? (19 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 14:43:32 +0800
    • Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (247 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 18:59:00 +0800
    • Re: relative tense (31 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 16:30:38 +0800

24. dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (24 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:27:16 -0600
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (27 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 09:33:54 -0600
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (27 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:24:17 -0600
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (41 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:30:51 -0600
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (26 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:13:55 -0600
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (26 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:15:22 -0600
    • Re: Con-prescriptivism (18 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:00:25 -0600
    • derivation question (12 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 19:03:47 -0600
    • Re: derivation question (28 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 21:49:10 -0600
    • Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang (42 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 20:24:32 -0600
    • Re: Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang (35 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:25:42 -0600
    • Re: Lunatic Paper (38 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:23:20 -0600
    • Re: Marking case with articles (56 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:24:07 -0600
    • relative tense (18 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 16:16:23 -0600
    • Re: relative tense (20 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:32:00 -0600
    • Re: relative tense (27 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:56:22 -0600
    • Re: relative tense (24 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 18:38:48 -0600
    • Re: relative tense and beyond! (59 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:18:46 -0600
    • Subordination (28 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 22:03:24 -0600
    • Re: Subordination (52 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 23:17:23 -0600

25. Edward Heil <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (75 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 03:46:00 EST
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (42 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 23:40:55 EST

26. Edward Heil <[log in to unmask]>
    • languages with soul (79 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:31:44 MST
    • Re: [Re: languages with soul] (131 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 12:44:22 MST
    • Re: [Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws] (49 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:02:34 CST

27. Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Graavgaaln elements (59 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 18:20:56 -0000
    • Re: relative tense (45 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 23:37:51 -0000
    • Re: relative tense (22 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 19:21:33 -0000
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (51 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 11:15:58 -0000

28. FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: adjectives -> adverbs (44 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 21:19:44 -0300
    • Re: An experiment. (63 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 15:22:32 -0300
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (30 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:47:15 -0300
    • Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)) (175 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:44:06 -0300
    • Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12thcentury conlang)) (52 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 22:50:53 -0300
    • Re: derivation question (42 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 12:17:59 -0300
    • Re: Graavgaaln elements (100 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:48:02 -0300
    • Re: Graavgaaln elements (18 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 22:11:34 -0300
    • Re: Graavgaaln elements (62 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:35:17 -0300
    • Re: Heyas all! (72 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:56:29 -0300
    • Re: Heyas all! (45 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 14:47:24 -0300
    • Re: Heyas all! (56 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:36:50 -0300
    • Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (81 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:03:02 -0300
    • Re: relative tense (36 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:04:12 -0300
    • Re: relative tense (30 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 19:56:15 -0300
    • RV: Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)) (72 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:08:59 -0300
    • Re: Subordination (98 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:24:48 -0300
    • Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (27 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 18:01:18 -0300
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (35 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 13:43:51 -0300

29. From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Babel text: Vilani 1.0 (20 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 14:40:25 EST
    • Re: OFF : French Conlangers (25 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 05:31:07 EST
    • Re : Re: a 12th century conlang (18 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 16:59:26 EST
    • Re : Re: a 12th century conlang (21 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:00:10 EST
    • Re : Re: derivation question (27 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:21:59 EST
    • Re : tunafish (39 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 02:36:49 EST
    • Re: relative tense (15 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:46:45 EST
    • Re: relative tense (22 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 17:28:29 EST
    • Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (31 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:25:01 EST
    • Re: relative tense and beyond! (27 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 02:20:41 EST

30. Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (36 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 19:44:47 -0800
    • Re: Heyas all! (64 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 08:09:54 -0800
    • Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (30 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 17:35:49 -0800
    • Marking case with articles (46 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 20:12:00 -0800
    • Re: Onomastics and taxonomies (53 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:47:44 -0800
    • Re: relative tense and beyond! (35 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 19:17:49 -0800

31. Gerald Koenig <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hangkerimce Grammar I (63 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 11:27:23 -0800
    • Re: Marking case with articles (84 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 00:35:46 -0800
    • Re: relative tense (27 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 20:32:40 -0800
    • Re: relative tense and beyond! (31 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:47:48 -0800

32. Gustavo Eulalio <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (53 lines)
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 09:20:15 -0300

33. Hawksinger <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: hello? (34 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 16:51:05 -0500
    • Re: relative tense (31 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:52:55 -0500

34. Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (30 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 03:09:14 GMT
    • Re: Book(s) recommendation? (44 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 03:38:46 GMT
    • Re: derivation question (37 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 04:30:42 GMT
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (33 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 04:49:36 GMT
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (66 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 05:22:22 GMT
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (270 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 03:35:34 GMT

35. Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (30 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:09:25 +0100
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (25 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 10:25:03 +0100
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (22 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 10:34:36 +0100
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (32 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 10:29:01 +0100
    • Re: adjectives -> adverbs (38 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:05:40 +0100
    • Re: Book(s) recommendation? (44 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 19:38:19 +0100
    • Re: Book(s) recommendation? (28 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 19:47:12 +0100
    • Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (27 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 16:47:09 +0100
    • Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)) (28 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 16:51:30 +0100
    • Re: CHAT: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (38 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 10:43:28 +0100
    • Re: Con-prescriptivism (36 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 23:27:51 +0100
    • Re: derivation question (28 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 10:51:25 +0100
    • Hildegard's List (188 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 22:43:46 +0100
    • Re: Hildegard's List (73 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:00:17 +0100
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (42 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:01:02 +0100
    • Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (38 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 22:47:56 +0100
    • Re: relative tense (25 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:23:58 +0100
    • Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (66 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 19:44:42 +0100
    • Re: Subordination (83 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 15:22:12 +0100
    • Two Valdyan folk songs (was: Hildegard's List) (95 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 23:10:32 +0100

36. Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Relative Genders-Comments-2 (73 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 21:21:44 -0800
    • relative tense (13 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 12:54:36 -0800
    • relative tense and beyond! (38 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 17:18:02 -0800
    • relative tense-2 (41 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:23:22 -0800
    • Vowelized Consonants-2 (29 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:32:06 -0800
    • Why conlang? (48 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:03:54 -0800

37. Joe Mondello <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: adjectives -> adverbs (26 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 00:41:08 EST

38. JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: History of Conlang List (34 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 13:54:14 -0800
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (25 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 19:06:18 -0800
    • Re: Marking case with articles (54 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:09:39 -0800

39. John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (18 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 22:53:32 -0500
    • Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (28 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 22:57:59 -0500
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (17 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 23:01:24 -0500
    • Re: Con-prescriptivism (27 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 23:37:23 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (26 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 22:46:38 -0500
    • Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (22 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 21:04:09 -0500
    • Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (27 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 04:25:38 -0500
    • LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (44 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 21:48:01 -0500
    • Re: relative tense (18 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 01:39:38 -0500
    • Re: The letter R (17 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 23:41:28 -0500

40. John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bibliography (44 lines)
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 04:53:50 +0100
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (22 lines)
      Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 03:58:36 +0100
    • Re: Con-prescriptivism (50 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 22:05:57 +0000
    • Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties) (36 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 23:11:55 +0000
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (248 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 02:56:46 +0000
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (48 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 23:19:01 +0000

41. Josh Brandt-Young <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (52 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 13:03:37 -0800
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (73 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 13:29:33 -0800

42. Josh Roth <[log in to unmask]>
    • Object Agreement in Verbs (was Re: relative tense) (38 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:12:45 EST
    • Re: winter quote (59 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 00:31:01 EST

43. Kenji Schwarz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Babel text: Vilani 1.0 (137 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 21:41:37 -0500
    • Re: Babel text: Vilani 1.0 (68 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 22:24:29 -0500
    • Re: Lunatic Paper (26 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 16:30:43 -0500
    • New England Conlang Meeting (24 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 08:55:25 -0500

44. Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Marking case with articles (56 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 18:56:33 +0100

45. Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (23 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 16:46:48 +0100
    • Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (58 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:36:21 +0100
    • Re: CHAT: History of Conlang List (19 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:11:42 +0100
    • Re: derivation question (30 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 18:05:04 +0100
    • Re: derivation question (40 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:21:00 +0100
    • Re: derivation question (32 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:40:53 +0100
    • Re: derivation question (32 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:49:49 +0100
    • Re: derivation question (23 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:55:02 +0100
    • Re: derivation question (20 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:58:45 +0100
    • Re: derivation question (26 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 22:27:01 +0100
    • Re: derivation question (42 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:52:21 +0100
    • Re: History of Conlang List (118 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:43:29 +0100
    • Re: History of Conlang List (37 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:13:32 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: derivation question (19 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:49:54 +0100

46. Laurie Gerholz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (20 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 17:58:10 -0600
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (26 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:02:44 -0600

47. Mathew Willoughby <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Book(s) recommendation? (46 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:26:57 -0500
    • Re: Heyas all! (62 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:20:17 -0500
    • Re: Heyas all! (34 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 10:39:34 -0500
    • Re: Onomastics and taxonomies (36 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 23:13:46 -0500

48. Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Lunatic Paper (22 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 08:48:57 -0800

49. Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (29 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 19:30:53 -0500
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (30 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 19:44:05 -0500
    • Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (79 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:36:08 -0500
    • Re: adjectives -> adverbs (23 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 13:04:13 -0500
    • Re: Babel text: Vilani 1.0 (22 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 21:56:37 -0500
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (27 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 13:13:18 -0500
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (43 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:41:58 -0500
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (31 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:46:58 -0500
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (18 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 18:04:51 -0500
    • Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (28 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:45:13 -0500
    • Con-prescriptivism (59 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:34:28 -0500
    • Re: Con-prescriptivism (18 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:36:46 -0500
    • Re: Copulas (47 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 02:45:12 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (40 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 20:15:41 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (29 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 21:54:50 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (22 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 22:23:33 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (46 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 02:31:58 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (18 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 13:06:28 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (48 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:34:26 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (19 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:55:02 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (21 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:50:52 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (56 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 14:57:56 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (22 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:01:26 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (20 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:46:49 -0500
    • Re: Graavgaaln elements (26 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 18:12:35 -0500
    • Re: Graavgaaln elements (19 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:03:56 -0500
    • Re: hello? (26 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 01:03:53 -0500
    • Re: Heyas all! (26 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 14:40:14 -0500
    • Re: Heyas all! (57 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 14:54:32 -0500
    • Re: Heyas all! (26 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:44:42 -0500
    • Re: Hildegard's List (43 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:01:30 -0500
    • Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (20 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 20:00:52 -0500
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (20 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 22:18:50 -0500
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (99 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 18:28:11 -0500
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (23 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:39:07 -0500
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (23 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:39:44 -0500
    • Re: Nominative to ergative shift (22 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 01:18:10 -0500
    • Re: Nominative to ergative shift (31 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 01:23:23 -0500
    • Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (25 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:02:56 -0500
    • Re: relative tense (28 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 08:20:53 -0500
    • Re: relative tense (20 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:28:59 -0500
    • Re: relative tense (27 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 20:23:07 -0500
    • Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (26 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:20:46 -0500
    • Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (22 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 19:01:34 -0500
    • Re: relative tense and beyond! (21 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:24:44 -0500
    • Re: relative tense and beyond! (39 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:41:49 -0500
    • Re: relative tense and beyond! (24 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:32:05 -0500
    • Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (56 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 00:52:40 -0500
    • Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (21 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 18:14:41 -0500
    • Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (27 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 02:12:06 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (22 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:14:37 -0500

50. Orjan Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: adjectives -> adverbs (22 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:05:09 +0100
    • Re: relative tense (34 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 19:15:02 +0100
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (31 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:01:55 +0100

51. Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (58 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 13:29:43 -0500
    • Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (26 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 18:13:09 -0500
    • Re: derivation question (37 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:42:13 -0500
    • Re: Heyas all! (71 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 13:01:06 -0500
    • Re: Hildegard's List (21 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 17:22:39 -0500
    • Re: Hildegard's List (27 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:55:05 -0500
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (139 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 02:11:57 -0500
    • Re: Lunatic Paper (36 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 13:39:38 -0500
    • Re: Lunatic Paper (22 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:10:48 -0500
    • Sally's Word List. (289 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 18:21:44 -0500
    • Re: The letter R (29 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 16:54:10 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (36 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 22:52:08 -0500

52. Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (29 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 07:04:11 +0000
    • Re: adjectives -> adverbs (60 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 07:07:05 +0000
    • Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties) (52 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:33:54 +0000
    • Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties) (154 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 22:26:30 +0000
    • Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties) (105 lines)
      Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 07:35:26 +0000
    • Re: derivation question (66 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 06:59:41 +0000
    • Re: derivation question (57 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:22:11 +0000
    • Re: derivation question (54 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 07:04:11 +0000
    • Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (99 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 06:56:57 +0000
    • Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (34 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 06:59:41 +0000
    • Re: relative tense (36 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 07:38:30 +0000
    • Re: relative tense and beyond! (47 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 07:38:30 +0000
    • Swahili prefixes (was: relative tense) (67 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 06:56:57 +0000
    • Re: The letter R (20 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 22:01:47 +0000
    • Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (40 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 07:04:11 +0000
    • Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (48 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 19:45:19 +0000

53. Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (72 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 20:50:36 -0800
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (71 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:02:49 -0800
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (23 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:05:03 -0800
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (43 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:20:04 -0800
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (23 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:30:54 -0800
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:26:45 -0800
    • Re: a 12th century conlang (71 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 19:38:04 -0800
    • Re: adjectives -> adverbs (44 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:18:49 -0800
    • Re: Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang (33 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 22:12:45 -0800
    • Re: Hildegard's List (31 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:46:35 -0800
    • Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (29 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 19:50:02 -0800
    • Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (10 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 19:51:38 -0800
    • Re: languages with soul (72 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:46 -0800
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (94 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 22:09:42 -0800
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (37 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:02:15 -0800
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (30 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:50:08 -0800
    • Re: Lunatic Paper (26 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:54:31 -0800
    • Re: Marking case with articles (18 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:52:34 -0800
    • Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (57 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 08:49:21 -0800
    • Re: relative tense (20 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:55:10 -0800
    • To conlang or to flame, that's the question. (18 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 19:08:16 -0800
    • We don't need accusations of lying. (35 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:49:42 -0800

54. Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Bibliography (30 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 19:52:11 -0500
    • Re: Bibliography (44 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 22:30:44 -0500
    • Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (192 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 22:04:38 -0500
    • Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (92 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:16:03 -0500
    • Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (52 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 16:08:09 -0500
    • Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties) (164 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 12:36:43 -0500
    • Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties) (125 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 18:12:06 -0500
    • Re: Heyas all! (65 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:59:55 -0500
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (48 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 22:22:09 -0500
    • Re: Objections to Conlanging (39 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 14:44:18 -0500
    • Re: relative tense (34 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 18:37:29 -0500
    • Re: relative tense (48 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 18:49:27 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Cool Idioms (was Bibliography) (61 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:29:11 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Cool Idioms (was Bibliography) (36 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 23:26:27 -0500
    • Re: USAGE: Cool Idioms (was; Bibliography) (77 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 22:13:34 -0500
    • Vowelized Consonants? (37 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 18:46:50 -0500

55. taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Book(s) recommendation? (44 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 19:40:45 +0100
    • Lotsa small, small translations (94 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 17:03:11 +0100
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (30 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:47:31 +0100

56. Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: adjectives -> adverbs (46 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 17:10:42 -0500
    • Re: History of Conlang List (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 21:28:22 -0500
    • Re: History of Conlang List (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:41:51 -0500
    • Re: Nominative to ergative shift (88 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 17:10:47 -0500
    • Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (46 lines)
      Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 18:54:26 -0500
    • Topic and non-topic pronouns (41 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 17:49:02 -0500

57. Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
    • About linguistic (in)tolerance (202 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 15:57:46 -0600
    • Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (33 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 01:24:44 -0600
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (44 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 00:38:50 -0600
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (40 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:11:28 -0600
    • Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (46 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 21:21:31 -0600
    • CHAT: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (98 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 23:22:53 -0600
    • Re: derivation question (116 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 20:38:36 -0600
    • Re: derivation question (40 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 21:13:42 -0600
    • Re: derivation question (26 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:06:54 -0600
    • Re: derivation question (39 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 16:48:53 -0600
    • Re: derivation question (39 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 10:12:01 -0600
    • Re: derivation question (33 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:51:06 -0600
    • Re: Graavgaaln elements (29 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:26:05 -0600
    • Re: Marking case with articles (64 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 22:49:35 -0600
    • Re: New Englishisms (23 lines)
      Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 00:18:48 -0600
    • Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-centuryconlang (35 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:21:15 -0600
    • Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (26 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:55:05 -0600
    • Re: To conlang or to flame, that's the question. (35 lines)
      Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 17:54:41 -0600
    • USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (27 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 22:11:03 -0600
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (25 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 13:18:38 -0600
    • Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (34 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 19:59:04 -0600
    • USAGE: f/v alternations (was: Re: derivation question) (35 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 15:17:25 -0600

58. Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
    • An experiment. (93 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 01:25:45 -0800
    • Re: An experiment. (52 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 01:54:57 -0800
    • Re: An experiment. (64 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 14:23:02 -0800
    • Heyas all! (36 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 00:59:40 -0800
    • Re: Heyas all! (83 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 08:28:14 -0800
    • Re: Heyas all! (55 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:43:22 -0800
    • Re: Heyas all! (103 lines)
      Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:55:57 -0800
    • Re: Heyas all! (75 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 01:42:23 -0800
    • Re: Heyas all! (71 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 02:17:56 -0800
    • Re: Heyas all! (104 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 02:11:01 -0800
    • Re: Heyas all! (52 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 14:03:48 -0800
    • Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (30 lines)
      Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 02:25:05 -0800

59. vardi <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: hello? (61 lines)
      Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 08:45:36 +0200