Conlang Mailing List -- March 1999, week 4

Conlang Mailing List – March 1999, week 4

Sort by

Author | Date | Topic
Chronologically | Most recent first

Options

Show author | Hide author

Navigation

Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives

Re: winter quote (59 lines)
From: Josh Roth <[log in to unmask]>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs (26 lines)
From: Joe Mondello <[log in to unmask]>
Relative Genders-Comments-2 (73 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Nominative to ergative shift (22 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: New Englishisms (23 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Nominative to ergative shift (31 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (44 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs (60 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: OFF : French Conlangers (25 lines)
From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (30 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hangkerimce Grammar I (49 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties) (52 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Relative Genders-Comments-2 (24 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Lotsa small, small translations (94 lines)
From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs (34 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (33 lines)
From: Diana Slattery <[log in to unmask]>
Translations into Hangkerimce (75 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties) (164 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs (23 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: winter quote (54 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hangkerimce Grammar I (63 lines)
From: Gerald Koenig <[log in to unmask]>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs (46 lines)
From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Nominative to ergative shift (88 lines)
From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
relative tense (18 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties) (154 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties) (125 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties) (36 lines)
From: John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
Vowelized Consonants? (37 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs (44 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Marking case with articles (46 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (27 lines)
From: Gerald Koenig <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Marking case with articles (64 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties) (105 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Marking case with articles (84 lines)
From: Gerald Koenig <[log in to unmask]>
relative tense (53 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Why conlang? (48 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
relative tense-2 (41 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Vowelized Consonants-2 (29 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Book(s) recommendation? (44 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (79 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (28 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Lexicons and Langauge Borrowing (26 lines)
From: Andrew Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (55 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (26 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (33 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
I'm off-list for the time being... (42 lines)
From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Marking case with articles (56 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (20 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (45 lines)
From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (66 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Object Agreement in Verbs (was Re: relative tense) (38 lines)
From: Josh Roth <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (15 lines)
From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (17 lines)
From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Book(s) recommendation? (85 lines)
From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs (22 lines)
From: Orjan Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Marking case with articles (54 lines)
From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs (38 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (31 lines)
From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (20 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
URLs, was Book(s) recommendation? (31 lines)
From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (27 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (25 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (22 lines)
From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
relative tense (13 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (24 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
relative tense and beyond! (38 lines)
From: Jim Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (36 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense and beyond! (59 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense and beyond! (21 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (30 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense and beyond! (35 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs (66 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense and beyond! (39 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Marking case with articles (99 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense and beyond! (27 lines)
From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT: Re: relative tense (22 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (56 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re : tunafish (39 lines)
From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (36 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense and beyond! (47 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (50 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense and beyond! (31 lines)
From: Gerald Koenig <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (41 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Book(s) recommendation? (30 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (20 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (23 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Adjectives -> Adverbs (29 lines)
From: Daniel Andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense and beyond! (24 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (34 lines)
From: Orjan Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
Pronunciation of Hangkerimce (42 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Book(s) recommendation? (44 lines)
From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Boreanesian phonology (was: Re: Allophones or Separate (260 lines)
From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Object Agreement in Verbs (was Re: relative tense) (60 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Chleweyish pronouns (59 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs (74 lines)
From: Adam Raizen <[log in to unmask]>
Concultures on Internet (was Re: Boranesian Phonology) (25 lines)
From: Carlos Eugenio Thompson Pinzon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (46 lines)
From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement (22 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (34 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (48 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (29 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (10 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (20 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (30 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (27 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (72 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (30 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (71 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (23 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (20 lines)
From: Diana Slattery <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (17 lines)
From: Charles <[log in to unmask]>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs (44 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (43 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (23 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang (42 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Marking case with articles (18 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (20 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (31 lines)
From: Hawksinger <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang (33 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (22 lines)
From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang (53 lines)
From: Diana Slattery <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (30 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang (35 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (24 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (18 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Swahili prefixes (was: relative tense) (67 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (99 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Book(s) recommendation? (50 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (31 lines)
From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (75 lines)
From: Edward Heil <[log in to unmask]>
New England Conlang Meeting (24 lines)
From: Kenji Schwarz <[log in to unmask]>
Re: relative tense (12 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (21 lines)
From: Bryan Maloney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (27 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Lunatic Paper (22 lines)
From: Matt Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: History of Conlang List (43 lines)
From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (58 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Lunatic Paper (36 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (18 lines)
From: Bryan Maloney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (23 lines)
From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Lunatic Paper (26 lines)
From: Kenji Schwarz <[log in to unmask]>
Re: History of Conlang List (34 lines)
From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
Re : Re: a 12th century conlang (18 lines)
From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (45 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Lunatic Paper (22 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
We don't need accusations of lying. (35 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
To conlang or to flame, that's the question. (18 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: To conlang or to flame, that's the question. (35 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (20 lines)
From: Laurie Gerholz <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (26 lines)
From: Laurie Gerholz <[log in to unmask]>
Re: boys need accusations of lying. down Set le (425 lines)
From: [log in to unmask]
Re: a 12th century conlang (71 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Lunatic Paper (38 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (27 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (41 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (29 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (30 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (22 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
derivation question (12 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (40 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (44 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: History of Conlang List (43 lines)
From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Babel text: Vilani 1.0 (137 lines)
From: Kenji Schwarz <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (116 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: History of Conlang List (14 lines)
From: [log in to unmask]
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (94 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (29 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Babel text: Vilani 1.0 (22 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (25 lines)
From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (40 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (20 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Babel text: Vilani 1.0 (68 lines)
From: Kenji Schwarz <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (22 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (36 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (28 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Subordination (28 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Graavgaaln elements (49 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Subordination (65 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Subordination (52 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (98 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Graavgaaln colors (31 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (56 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Copulas (32 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (34 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (66 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (139 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (46 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Copulas (47 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars (27 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Heyas all! (36 lines)
From: Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
CHAT: .sig (32 lines)
From: Andrew Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (25 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (22 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (38 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (32 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (28 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (42 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (36 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Subordination (36 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: History of Conlang List (20 lines)
From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (74 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: History of Conlang List (30 lines)
From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (57 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (37 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Lunatic Paper (38 lines)
From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Lunatic Paper (30 lines)
From: Diana Slattery <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (100 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Word of Day (12 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (42 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Book(s) recommendation? (56 lines)
From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: derivation question (19 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (26 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang (30 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (64 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: History of Conlang List (19 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (62 lines)
From: Mathew Willoughby <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Book(s) recommendation? (46 lines)
From: Mathew Willoughby <[log in to unmask]>
Re: History of Conlang List (118 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (30 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (83 lines)
From: Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (55 lines)
From: Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (103 lines)
From: Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (71 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (18 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (27 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (20 lines)
From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Graavgaaln elements (59 lines)
From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
Re: CHAT: History of Conlang List (10 lines)
From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (23 lines)
From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
Re: History of Conlang List (37 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (26 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (57 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (17 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (40 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (48 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (32 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Book(s) recommendation? (44 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Book(s) recommendation? (28 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (32 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (23 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (19 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (20 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (26 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (26 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (57 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (26 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (52 lines)
From: Josh Brandt-Young <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (73 lines)
From: Josh Brandt-Young <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (43 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Hildegard's List (188 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (38 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (31 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
About linguistic (in)tolerance (202 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hildegard's List (43 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (26 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (132 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (40 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hildegard's List (21 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (79 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (37 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (39 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (21 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (16 lines)
From: Bryan Maloney <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Subordination (98 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Graavgaaln elements (100 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (18 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (72 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)) (175 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (27 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (14 lines)
From: charles <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Graavgaaln elements (26 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (21 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (99 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
renewal notices (28 lines)
From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
RV: Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)) (72 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (30 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Graavgaaln elements (73 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Lunatic Paper (26 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (30 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hildegard's List (31 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (23 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: History of Conlang List (51 lines)
From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (248 lines)
From: John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (65 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (192 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (48 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
languages with soul (79 lines)
From: Edward Heil <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Book(s) recommendation? (44 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (37 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: a 12th century conlang (42 lines)
From: Edward Heil <[log in to unmask]>
Re: languages with soul (72 lines)
From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (33 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (66 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
hello? (28 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: hello? (a correction) (16 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: hello? (26 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: hello? (19 lines)
From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: hello? (61 lines)
From: vardi <[log in to unmask]>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (29 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (54 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (40 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Objections to Conlanging (69 lines)
From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (27 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (33 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (69 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (247 lines)
From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (171 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (42 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hildegard's List (73 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Graavgaaln elements (18 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (79 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
About linguistic (in)tolerance (304 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (42 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (23 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Intolerance. (47 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)) (28 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (27 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (35 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (39 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (39 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (22 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: hello? (26 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (23 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (92 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (36 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (121 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Marking case with articles (56 lines)
From: Kristian Jensen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Hildegard's List (27 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (58 lines)
From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Babel text: Vilani 1.0 (20 lines)
From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
Re: [Re: languages with soul] (131 lines)
From: Edward Heil <[log in to unmask]>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws (48 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (56 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re : Re: a 12th century conlang (21 lines)
From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (22 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (25 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Graavgaaln elements (19 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re : Re: derivation question (27 lines)
From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
Con-prescriptivism (59 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Con-prescriptivism (18 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Objections to Conlanging (39 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (92 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
derivation question (33 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (28 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (20 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Con-prescriptivism (18 lines)
From: dunn patrick w <[log in to unmask]>
Re: [Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws] (49 lines)
From: Edward Heil <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (20 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (52 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
USAGE: f/v alternations (was: Re: derivation question) (35 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-centuryconlang (35 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Bibliography (36 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Graavgaaln elements (29 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
The letter R (25 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: hello? (34 lines)
From: Hawksinger <[log in to unmask]>
Re: The letter R (29 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Tech gender and mutation (60 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: The letter R (20 lines)
From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
About linguistic (in)tolerance (46 lines)
From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
Re: hello? (21 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Tech gender and mutation (correction) (17 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Two Valdyan folk songs (was: Hildegard's List) (95 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Con-prescriptivism (36 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Sally Caves' word-list (247 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: The letter R (20 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (26 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (48 lines)
From: John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
Sally's Word List. (289 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (81 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bibliography (20 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (270 lines)
From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (27 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (RUDE) (57 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Graavgaaln elements (20 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Graavgaaln elements (99 lines)
From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Sally's Word List. (55 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bibliography (21 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
An experiment. (93 lines)
From: Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (75 lines)
From: Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (30 lines)
From: Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An experiment. (52 lines)
From: Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (71 lines)
From: Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (104 lines)
From: Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (51 lines)
From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (53 lines)
From: Gustavo Eulalio <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (303 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Subordination (83 lines)
From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang (42 lines)
From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (34 lines)
From: Mathew Willoughby <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12thcentury conlang)) (52 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Kinship terminology (23 lines)
From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An experiment. (36 lines)
From: Daniel Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (30 lines)
From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (31 lines)
From: Orjan Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (25 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Con-prescriptivism (50 lines)
From: John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
Topic and non-topic pronouns (41 lines)
From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (52 lines)
From: Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An experiment. (64 lines)
From: Trace Erin Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Topic and non-topic pronouns (89 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (70 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Con-prescriptivism (53 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (35 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (45 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: An experiment. (63 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Graavgaaln elements (62 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (56 lines)
From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (22 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (38 lines)
From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang) (23 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Heyas all! (26 lines)
From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (34 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bibliography (30 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool Idioms (was Bibliography) (61 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (26 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (18 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance (28 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: derivation question (33 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (17 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (85 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (22 lines)
From: John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bibliography (35 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool Idioms (was; Bibliography) (77 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP* (46 lines)
From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Con-prescriptivism (27 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: The letter R (17 lines)
From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool Idioms (was Bibliography) (83 lines)
From: Carlos Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography) (36 lines)
From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bibliography (44 lines)
From: John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies (36 lines)
From: Mathew Willoughby <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Bibliography (44 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: USAGE: Cool Idioms (was Bibliography) (36 lines)
From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies (53 lines)
From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

Back to the main CONLANG page

LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU