Conlang
Mailing List March 1999, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
a 12th century conlang
(33 messages)
About linguistic (in)tolerance
(14 messages)
adjectives -> adverbs
(9 messages)
Adjectives -> Adverbs
adjectives -> adverbs
(2 messages)
An experiment.
(5 messages)
Babel text: Vilani 1.0
(4 messages)
Bibliography
(7 messages)
Book(s) recommendation?
(10 messages)
Boreanesian phonology (was: Re: Allophones or Separate
Bostonites. *ZAP*
(19 messages)
boys need accusations of lying. down Set le
Categories in Lingua Ignota
(7 messages)
Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang))
(2 messages)
Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12thcentury conlang))
CHAT: .sig
CHAT: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
(2 messages)
CHAT: History of Conlang List
(2 messages)
CHAT: Re: relative tense
Chleweyish pronouns
Con-prescriptivism
(7 messages)
con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties)
(6 messages)
Concultures on Internet (was Re: Boranesian Phonology)
Copulas
(2 messages)
derivation question
(41 messages)
Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang
(5 messages)
Graavgaaln colors
Graavgaaln elements
(11 messages)
Hangkerimce Grammar I
(2 messages)
hello?
(7 messages)
hello? (a correction)
Heyas all!
(20 messages)
Hildegard's List
(6 messages)
History of Conlang List
(9 messages)
Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars
(9 messages)
I'm off-list for the time being...
Intolerance.
Kinship terminology
languages with soul
(2 messages)
LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(19 messages)
Lexicons and Langauge Borrowing
Lotsa small, small translations
Lunatic Paper
(8 messages)
Marking case with articles
(8 messages)
New England Conlang Meeting
New Englishisms
Nominative to ergative shift
(3 messages)
Object Agreement in Verbs (was Re: relative tense)
(2 messages)
Objections to Conlanging
(2 messages)
OFF : French Conlangers
Onomastics and taxonomies
(2 messages)
Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang
(4 messages)
Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang
(3 messages)
Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-centuryconlang
Pronunciation of Hangkerimce
Re : Re: a 12th century conlang
(2 messages)
Re : Re: derivation question
Re : tunafish
Relative Genders-Comments-2
(2 messages)
relative tense
(33 messages)
relative tense / universals / object agreement
(8 messages)
relative tense and beyond!
(9 messages)
relative tense-2
renewal notices
RV: Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang))
Sally Caves' word-list
Sally's Word List.
(2 messages)
Subordination
(6 messages)
Swahili prefixes (was: relative tense)
Tech gender and mutation
Tech gender and mutation (correction)
The letter R
(5 messages)
THEORY: derivation question
THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
(7 messages)
To conlang or to flame, that's the question.
(2 messages)
Topic and non-topic pronouns
(2 messages)
Translations into Hangkerimce
Two Valdyan folk songs (was: Hildegard's List)
URLs, was Book(s) recommendation?
USAGE: Cool idioms
USAGE: Cool idioms (RUDE)
USAGE: Cool Idioms (was Bibliography)
(3 messages)
USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(12 messages)
USAGE: Cool Idioms (was; Bibliography)
USAGE: f/v alternations (was: Re: derivation question)
Vowelized Consonants-2
Vowelized Consonants?
We don't need accusations of lying.
Why conlang?
winter quote
(2 messages)
Word of Day
[Re: languages with soul]
[Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws]
a 12th century conlang
Re: a 12th century conlang
(30 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(33 lines)
From:
Diana Slattery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(72 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(71 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(23 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(20 lines)
From:
Diana Slattery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(43 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(23 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(30 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(24 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(75 lines)
From:
Edward Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(21 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(27 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(58 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(18 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(23 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(45 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(20 lines)
From:
Laurie Gerholz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(26 lines)
From:
Laurie Gerholz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(71 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(27 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(41 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(25 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(22 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(32 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(36 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(20 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(26 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(26 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a 12th century conlang
(42 lines)
From:
Edward Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
About linguistic (in)tolerance
About linguistic (in)tolerance
(202 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance
(79 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance
(14 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance
(29 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance
(33 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
About linguistic (in)tolerance
(304 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance
(42 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance
(23 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance
(36 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance
(58 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
About linguistic (in)tolerance
(46 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance
(26 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance
(18 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: About linguistic (in)tolerance
(28 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
adjectives -> adverbs
Re: adjectives -> adverbs
(26 lines)
From:
Joe Mondello <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs
(60 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs
(34 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs
(46 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs
(44 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs
(22 lines)
From:
Orjan Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs
(38 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs
(66 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Adjectives -> Adverbs
Re: Adjectives -> Adverbs
(29 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
adjectives -> adverbs
Re: adjectives -> adverbs
(74 lines)
From:
Adam Raizen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: adjectives -> adverbs
(44 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
An experiment.
An experiment.
(93 lines)
From:
Trace Erin Kern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An experiment.
(52 lines)
From:
Trace Erin Kern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An experiment.
(36 lines)
From:
Daniel Seriff <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An experiment.
(64 lines)
From:
Trace Erin Kern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: An experiment.
(63 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Babel text: Vilani 1.0
Babel text: Vilani 1.0
(137 lines)
From:
Kenji Schwarz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Babel text: Vilani 1.0
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Babel text: Vilani 1.0
(68 lines)
From:
Kenji Schwarz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Babel text: Vilani 1.0
(20 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bibliography
Bibliography
(36 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bibliography
(20 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bibliography
(21 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bibliography
(30 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bibliography
(35 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bibliography
(44 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bibliography
(44 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Book(s) recommendation?
Book(s) recommendation?
(44 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Book(s) recommendation?
(85 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Book(s) recommendation?
(30 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Book(s) recommendation?
(44 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Book(s) recommendation?
(50 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Book(s) recommendation?
(56 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Book(s) recommendation?
(46 lines)
From:
Mathew Willoughby <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Book(s) recommendation?
(44 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Book(s) recommendation?
(28 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Book(s) recommendation?
(44 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Boreanesian phonology (was: Re: Allophones or Separate
Re: Boreanesian phonology (was: Re: Allophones or Separate
(260 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bostonites. *ZAP*
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(44 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(100 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(23 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(17 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(52 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(73 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(31 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(132 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(40 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(16 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(18 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(30 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(35 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(39 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(17 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(22 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bostonites. *ZAP*
(46 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
boys need accusations of lying. down Set le
Re: boys need accusations of lying. down Set le
(425 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Categories in Lingua Ignota
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota
(192 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota
(27 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota
(121 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota
(92 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota
(52 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota
(303 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang))
Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang))
(175 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang))
(28 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12thcentury conlang))
Re: Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12thcentury conlang))
(52 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: .sig
CHAT: .sig
(32 lines)
From:
Andrew Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
CHAT: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
(98 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
(38 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: History of Conlang List
Re: CHAT: History of Conlang List
(19 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of Conlang List
(10 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: relative tense
CHAT: Re: relative tense
(22 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chleweyish pronouns
Chleweyish pronouns
(59 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Con-prescriptivism
Con-prescriptivism
(59 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-prescriptivism
(18 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-prescriptivism
(18 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-prescriptivism
(36 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-prescriptivism
(50 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-prescriptivism
(53 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Con-prescriptivism
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties)
Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties)
(52 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties)
(164 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties)
(154 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties)
(125 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties)
(36 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: con-translation (was: Semitic/Celtic Ties)
(105 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Concultures on Internet (was Re: Boranesian Phonology)
Concultures on Internet (was Re: Boranesian Phonology)
(25 lines)
From:
Carlos Eugenio Thompson Pinzon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Copulas
Re: Copulas
(32 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Copulas
(47 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
derivation question
derivation question
(12 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(116 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(40 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(28 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(66 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(46 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(28 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(42 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(30 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(18 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(40 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(48 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(32 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(32 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(23 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(20 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(57 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(26 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(26 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(37 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(39 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(37 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(54 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(69 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(42 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(79 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(39 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(22 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(92 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(56 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
derivation question
(33 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(20 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: derivation question
(33 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang
Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang
(42 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang
(33 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang
(53 lines)
From:
Diana Slattery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang
(35 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Distaste and hostility was Re: a 12th century conlang
(30 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Graavgaaln colors
Graavgaaln colors
(31 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Graavgaaln elements
Graavgaaln elements
(49 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Graavgaaln elements
(59 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Graavgaaln elements
(100 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Graavgaaln elements
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Graavgaaln elements
(73 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Graavgaaln elements
(18 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Graavgaaln elements
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Graavgaaln elements
(29 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Graavgaaln elements
(20 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Graavgaaln elements
(99 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Graavgaaln elements
(62 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hangkerimce Grammar I
Re: Hangkerimce Grammar I
(49 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hangkerimce Grammar I
(63 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
hello?
hello?
(28 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hello?
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hello?
(19 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hello?
(61 lines)
From:
vardi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hello?
(26 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hello?
(34 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hello?
(21 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
hello? (a correction)
Re: hello? (a correction)
(16 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Heyas all!
Heyas all!
(36 lines)
From:
Trace Erin Kern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(74 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(64 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(62 lines)
From:
Mathew Willoughby <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(83 lines)
From:
Trace Erin Kern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(55 lines)
From:
Trace Erin Kern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(103 lines)
From:
Trace Erin Kern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(71 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(57 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(72 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(65 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(75 lines)
From:
Trace Erin Kern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(71 lines)
From:
Trace Erin Kern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(104 lines)
From:
Trace Erin Kern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(34 lines)
From:
Mathew Willoughby <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(52 lines)
From:
Trace Erin Kern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(45 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(56 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Heyas all!
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hildegard's List
Hildegard's List
(188 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hildegard's List
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hildegard's List
(21 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hildegard's List
(31 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hildegard's List
(73 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hildegard's List
(27 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
History of Conlang List
Re: History of Conlang List
(43 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: History of Conlang List
(34 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: History of Conlang List
(43 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: History of Conlang List
(14 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: History of Conlang List
(20 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: History of Conlang List
(30 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: History of Conlang List
(118 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: History of Conlang List
(37 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: History of Conlang List
(51 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars
(29 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars
(10 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars
(30 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars
(17 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars
(99 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars
(22 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars
(34 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hypersimple & Dreadfully Unnatural Grammars
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
I'm off-list for the time being...
I'm off-list for the time being...
(42 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Intolerance.
Intolerance.
(47 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kinship terminology
Kinship terminology
(23 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
languages with soul
languages with soul
(79 lines)
From:
Edward Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: languages with soul
(72 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(44 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(94 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(25 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(139 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(42 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(37 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(99 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(30 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(248 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(48 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(33 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(66 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(23 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(48 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(270 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(30 lines)
From:
Trace Erin Kern <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang)
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lexicons and Langauge Borrowing
Re: Lexicons and Langauge Borrowing
(26 lines)
From:
Andrew Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lotsa small, small translations
Lotsa small, small translations
(94 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lunatic Paper
Lunatic Paper
(22 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lunatic Paper
(36 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lunatic Paper
(26 lines)
From:
Kenji Schwarz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lunatic Paper
(22 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lunatic Paper
(38 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lunatic Paper
(38 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lunatic Paper
(30 lines)
From:
Diana Slattery <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lunatic Paper
(26 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Marking case with articles
Marking case with articles
(46 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Marking case with articles
(64 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Marking case with articles
(84 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Marking case with articles
(56 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Marking case with articles
(54 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Marking case with articles
(99 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Marking case with articles
(18 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Marking case with articles
(56 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
New England Conlang Meeting
New England Conlang Meeting
(24 lines)
From:
Kenji Schwarz <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Englishisms
Re: New Englishisms
(23 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nominative to ergative shift
Re: Nominative to ergative shift
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nominative to ergative shift
(31 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nominative to ergative shift
(88 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Object Agreement in Verbs (was Re: relative tense)
Object Agreement in Verbs (was Re: relative tense)
(38 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Object Agreement in Verbs (was Re: relative tense)
(60 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Objections to Conlanging
Objections to Conlanging
(69 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Objections to Conlanging
(39 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
OFF : French Conlangers
Re: OFF : French Conlangers
(25 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Onomastics and taxonomies
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies
(36 lines)
From:
Mathew Willoughby <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies
(53 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang
Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang
(57 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang
(38 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang
(247 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was, LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang
(171 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang
(25 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang
(81 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-century conlang
(42 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-centuryconlang
Re: Onomastics and taxonomies; Was,LeGuin; Was: 12th-centuryconlang
(35 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pronunciation of Hangkerimce
Pronunciation of Hangkerimce
(42 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: a 12th century conlang
Re : Re: a 12th century conlang
(18 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: a 12th century conlang
(21 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: derivation question
Re : Re: derivation question
(27 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : tunafish
Re : tunafish
(39 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relative Genders-Comments-2
Relative Genders-Comments-2
(73 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative Genders-Comments-2
(24 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
relative tense
relative tense
(18 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(27 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
relative tense
(53 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(79 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(20 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(45 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(15 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(27 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(25 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(22 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
relative tense
(13 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(24 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(36 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(30 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(36 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(50 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(41 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(20 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(23 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(34 lines)
From:
Orjan Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(34 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(48 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(30 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(20 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(31 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(22 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(18 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(31 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense
(12 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
relative tense / universals / object agreement
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement
(55 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement
(33 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement
(66 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement
(17 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement
(31 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement
(46 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense / universals / object agreement
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
relative tense and beyond!
relative tense and beyond!
(38 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense and beyond!
(59 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense and beyond!
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense and beyond!
(35 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense and beyond!
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense and beyond!
(27 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense and beyond!
(47 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense and beyond!
(31 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: relative tense and beyond!
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
relative tense-2
relative tense-2
(41 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
renewal notices
renewal notices
(28 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
RV: Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang))
RV: Categories in Lingua Ignota (was RE: LeGuin (was: a 12th century conlang))
(72 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sally Caves' word-list
Sally Caves' word-list
(247 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sally's Word List.
Sally's Word List.
(289 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sally's Word List.
(55 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Subordination
Subordination
(28 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subordination
(65 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subordination
(52 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subordination
(36 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subordination
(98 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subordination
(83 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Swahili prefixes (was: relative tense)
Swahili prefixes (was: relative tense)
(67 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tech gender and mutation
Tech gender and mutation
(60 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tech gender and mutation (correction)
Re: Tech gender and mutation (correction)
(17 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
The letter R
The letter R
(25 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The letter R
(29 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The letter R
(20 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The letter R
(20 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The letter R
(17 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: derivation question
Re: THEORY: derivation question
(19 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
(56 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
(26 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
(27 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
(40 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws
(48 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
To conlang or to flame, that's the question.
To conlang or to flame, that's the question.
(18 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: To conlang or to flame, that's the question.
(35 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Topic and non-topic pronouns
Topic and non-topic pronouns
(41 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Topic and non-topic pronouns
(89 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translations into Hangkerimce
Translations into Hangkerimce
(75 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Two Valdyan folk songs (was: Hildegard's List)
Two Valdyan folk songs (was: Hildegard's List)
(95 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
URLs, was Book(s) recommendation?
URLs, was Book(s) recommendation?
(31 lines)
From:
charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Cool idioms
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms
(51 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Cool idioms (RUDE)
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (RUDE)
(57 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Cool Idioms (was Bibliography)
Re: USAGE: Cool Idioms (was Bibliography)
(61 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool Idioms (was Bibliography)
(83 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool Idioms (was Bibliography)
(36 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(27 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(53 lines)
From:
Gustavo Eulalio <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(30 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(31 lines)
From:
Orjan Johansen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(25 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(70 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(35 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(38 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(34 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(85 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Cool idioms (was Re: Bibliography)
(36 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Cool Idioms (was; Bibliography)
Re: USAGE: Cool Idioms (was; Bibliography)
(77 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: f/v alternations (was: Re: derivation question)
USAGE: f/v alternations (was: Re: derivation question)
(35 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vowelized Consonants-2
Vowelized Consonants-2
(29 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vowelized Consonants?
Vowelized Consonants?
(37 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
We don't need accusations of lying.
We don't need accusations of lying.
(35 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why conlang?
Why conlang?
(48 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
winter quote
Re: winter quote
(59 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: winter quote
(54 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Word of Day
Word of Day
(12 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Re: languages with soul]
Re: [Re: languages with soul]
(131 lines)
From:
Edward Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws]
Re: [Re: THEORY: Historical linguistics, and soundlaws]
(49 lines)
From:
Edward Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU