Conlang
Mailing List April 1999, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
a question of terminology
(3 messages)
A theatre play for translation
(2 messages)
allnoun
(4 messages)
allnoun relex babel
allnoun revisted
(6 messages)
allnoun, Linear P
(5 messages)
Apophony?
(7 messages)
Babel 64
Changes to W. phonology
(2 messages)
CHAT Linear P & the Psykhro inscription (was: allnoun, Linear P)
(3 messages)
CHAT: Re: Taco Smell
(2 messages)
Chernobyl Virus
(3 messages)
elements (was Re: The new Draseliq alphabet)
Elet Anta course
Further stanza's and a melody
(5 messages)
Further stanzas in Valdyan (LONG!)
Measuring language change
(6 messages)
natlang stuff: vowelless words
(5 messages)
New conlang: Callistic
Notya: a "neither-verb-nor-noun" conlang?
(6 messages)
oops
Pleremic? Kenemic? It's all Martian to me.
(5 messages)
pro-anything
(9 messages)
Re : Re: allnoun
(3 messages)
Re : Re: pro-anything
(2 messages)
Re : Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(3 messages)
Relations
Scripts (was pleremic etc.)
(4 messages)
Taco Smell
The skin of God
(3 messages)
THEORY: (terminology correction) RE: pro-anything
THEORY: dispensing with part-of-speech categories
THEORY: third-person imperatives
(35 messages)
third-person imperatives
Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang into a conlang)
(3 messages)
Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang into aconlang)
(3 messages)
Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang intoaconlang)
Translating Cortazar - into Valdyan
(3 messages)
Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(27 messages)
Translating from a conlang into a conlangm
(2 messages)
a question of terminology
a question of terminology
(46 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a question of terminology
(41 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a question of terminology
(82 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
A theatre play for translation
A theatre play for translation
(141 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A theatre play for translation
(13 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
allnoun
Re: allnoun
(119 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allnoun
(30 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allnoun
(26 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allnoun
(18 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
allnoun relex babel
allnoun relex babel
(50 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
allnoun revisted
allnoun revisted
(70 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allnoun revisted
(41 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allnoun revisted
(58 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allnoun revisted
(35 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allnoun revisted
(27 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allnoun revisted
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
allnoun, Linear P
Re: allnoun, Linear P
(177 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allnoun, Linear P
(46 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allnoun, Linear P
(94 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allnoun, Linear P
(129 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: allnoun, Linear P
(77 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Apophony?
Apophony?
(22 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Apophony?
(33 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Apophony?
(34 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Apophony?
(43 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Apophony?
(43 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Apophony?
(71 lines)
From:
P. M. ARKTAYG <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Apophony?
(48 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Babel 64
Babel 64
(87 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Changes to W. phonology
Changes to W. phonology
(73 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Changes to W. phonology
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT Linear P & the Psykhro inscription (was: allnoun, Linear P)
CHAT Linear P & the Psykhro inscription (was: allnoun, Linear P)
(115 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Linear P & the Psykhro inscription (was: allnoun, Linear P)
(37 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT Linear P & the Psykhro inscription (was: allnoun, Linear P)
(51 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: Taco Smell
CHAT: Re: Taco Smell
(31 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: Taco Smell
(33 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chernobyl Virus
Chernobyl Virus
(22 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chernobyl Virus
(38 lines)
From:
N N <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chernobyl Virus
(22 lines)
From:
Mathew Willoughby <
[log in to unmask]
>
elements (was Re: The new Draseliq alphabet)
elements (was Re: The new Draseliq alphabet)
(33 lines)
From:
Joshua Shinavier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Elet Anta course
Elet Anta course
(19 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Further stanza's and a melody
Further stanza's and a melody
(199 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Further stanza's and a melody
(26 lines)
From:
Bryan Maloney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Further stanza's and a melody
(263 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Further stanza's and a melody
(76 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Further stanza's and a melody
(58 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Further stanzas in Valdyan (LONG!)
Further stanzas in Valdyan (LONG!)
(276 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Measuring language change
Measuring language change
(24 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Measuring language change
(37 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Measuring language change
(33 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Measuring language change
(41 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Measuring language change
(57 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Measuring language change
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
natlang stuff: vowelless words
Re: natlang stuff: vowelless words
(29 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: natlang stuff: vowelless words
(63 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: natlang stuff: vowelless words
(27 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: natlang stuff: vowelless words
(23 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: natlang stuff: vowelless words
(37 lines)
From:
R. Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
New conlang: Callistic
New conlang: Callistic
(107 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Notya: a "neither-verb-nor-noun" conlang?
Notya: a "neither-verb-nor-noun" conlang?
(224 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Notya: a "neither-verb-nor-noun" conlang?
(27 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Notya: a "neither-verb-nor-noun" conlang?
(54 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Notya: a "neither-verb-nor-noun" conlang?
(69 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Notya: a "neither-verb-nor-noun" conlang?
(91 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Notya: a "neither-verb-nor-noun" conlang?
(63 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
oops
oops
(22 lines)
From:
Danny Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pleremic? Kenemic? It's all Martian to me.
Pleremic? Kenemic? It's all Martian to me.
(50 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pleremic? Kenemic? It's all Martian to me.
(18 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pleremic? Kenemic? It's all Martian to me.
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pleremic? Kenemic? It's all Martian to me.
(42 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Pleremic? Kenemic? It's all Martian to me.
(71 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
pro-anything
Re: pro-anything
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pro-anything
(26 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pro-anything
(58 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pro-anything
(49 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pro-anything
(38 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pro-anything
(22 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pro-anything
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pro-anything
(18 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: pro-anything
(61 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: allnoun
Re : Re: allnoun
(21 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: allnoun
(16 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : Re: allnoun
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: pro-anything
Re : Re: pro-anything
(18 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: pro-anything
(25 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
Re : Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(18 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(33 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relations
Re: Relations
(21 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Scripts (was pleremic etc.)
Scripts (was pleremic etc.)
(45 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts (was pleremic etc.)
(38 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts (was pleremic etc.)
(23 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Scripts (was pleremic etc.)
(21 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Taco Smell
Taco Smell
(24 lines)
From:
Brian Betty <
[log in to unmask]
>
The skin of God
The skin of God
(56 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
The skin of God
(81 lines)
From:
Joe Mondello <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The skin of God
(30 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: (terminology correction) RE: pro-anything
THEORY: (terminology correction) RE: pro-anything
(52 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: dispensing with part-of-speech categories
THEORY: dispensing with part-of-speech categories
(51 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: third-person imperatives
THEORY: third-person imperatives
(35 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(38 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(69 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(67 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(27 lines)
From:
Josh Roth <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(60 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(22 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(36 lines)
From:
dunn patrick w <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(31 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(38 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(48 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(41 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(20 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(19 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(57 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(18 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(22 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(40 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(42 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(36 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(25 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(64 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(34 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(39 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(20 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(41 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(35 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(115 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(42 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(58 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives
(36 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
third-person imperatives
third-person imperatives
(52 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang into a conlang)
Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang into a conlang)
(117 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang into a conlang)
(163 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang into a conlang)
(148 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang into aconlang)
Re: Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang into aconlang)
(105 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang into aconlang)
(97 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang into aconlang)
(111 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang intoaconlang)
Re: Translating Cortazar (WAS: Translating from a conlang intoaconlang)
(126 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translating Cortazar - into Valdyan
Translating Cortazar - into Valdyan
(212 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating Cortazar - into Valdyan
(131 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating Cortazar - into Valdyan
(106 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translating from a conlang into a conlang
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(69 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(139 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(111 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(60 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(108 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(100 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(23 lines)
From:
Andrew Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(28 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(32 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(29 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(49 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(63 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(29 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(113 lines)
From:
Joe Mondello <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(86 lines)
From:
Andrew Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(96 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(22 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(31 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(31 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(27 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(35 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(33 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(21 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlang
(27 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translating from a conlang into a conlangm
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlangm
(115 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translating from a conlang into a conlangm
(21 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU