Conlang Mailing List – April 1999, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A look at Navajo... (2 messages)
• A theatre play for translation (2 messages)
• allnoun revisted
• And how's about "periphony"? (was: Apophony?) (5 messages)
• Apophony?
• CHAT: Vlach (was: Roumania...)
• finis
• Font embedding
• Imperatives, not only negative (was: Noli-me-tangere)
• IPA texts, help
• My new conlang, Phaleran (was Re: A look at Navajo...) (3 messages)
• Noli-me-tangere (3 messages)
• Re : Noli-me-tangere
• Re : The Noli proverb.
• Taco Smell (3 messages)
• The Noli proverb. (2 messages)
• The skin of God (4 messages)
• THEORY: third-person imperatives (10 messages)
• THEORY: Verb voice (2 messages)
• Web page update

1. A look at Navajo...
   • Re: A look at Navajo... (23 lines)
     From: Hawksinger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 19:36:12 -0500
   • A look at Navajo... (35 lines)
     From: Ed Heil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 16:21:35 -0400

2. A theatre play for translation
   • Re: A theatre play for translation (365 lines)
     From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 19:58:59 +0100
   • Re: A theatre play for translation (410 lines)
     From: Boudewijn Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 00:44:50 +0100

3. allnoun revisted
   • Re: allnoun revisted (16 lines)
     From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 01:51:06 EDT

4. And how's about "periphony"? (was: Apophony?)
   • Re: And how's about "periphony"? (was: Apophony?) (53 lines)
     From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 07:04:47 +0100
   • Re: And how's about "periphony"? (was: Apophony?) (45 lines)
     From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 16:38:58 -0500
   • Re: And how's about "periphony"? (was: Apophony?) (28 lines)
     From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 22:27:41 +0100
   • Re: And how's about "periphony"? (was: Apophony?) (31 lines)
     From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 02:30:08 -0500
   • And how's about "periphony"? (was: Apophony?) (49 lines)
     From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 06:29:49 +0100

5. Apophony?
   • Re: Apophony? (19 lines)
     From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 18:49:43 -0700

6. CHAT: Vlach (was: Roumania...)
   • Re: CHAT: Vlach (was: Roumania...) (14 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 14:41:28 GMT+0

7. finis
   • finis (40 lines)
     From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 14:20:44 EDT

8. Font embedding
   • Font embedding (25 lines)
     From: James Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 09:19:04 +0100

9. Imperatives, not only negative (was: Noli-me-tangere)
   • Re: Imperatives, not only negative (was: Noli-me-tangere) (78 lines)
     From: P. M. ARKTAYG <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 01:18:29 +0200

10. IPA texts, help
    • IPA texts, help (14 lines)
      From: Gerald Koenig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 00:14:51 -0700

11. My new conlang, Phaleran (was Re: A look at Navajo...)
    • Re: My new conlang, Phaleran (was Re: A look at Navajo...) (19 lines)
      From: John Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 01:40:16 +0100
    • Re: My new conlang, Phaleran (was Re: A look at Navajo...) (33 lines)
      From: Ed Heil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 20:20:48 -0400
    • My new conlang, Phaleran (was Re: A look at Navajo...) (599 lines)
      From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 18:30:28 -0500

12. Noli-me-tangere
    • Re: Noli-me-tangere (50 lines)
      From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 17:24:29 -0500
    • Re: Noli-me-tangere (72 lines)
      From: Steg Belsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 15:48:10 -0400
    • Noli-me-tangere (87 lines)
      From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 19:50:28 +0100

13. Re : Noli-me-tangere
    • Re : Noli-me-tangere (36 lines)
      From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 15:22:38 EDT

14. Re : The Noli proverb.
    • Re : The Noli proverb. (16 lines)
      From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 14:15:19 EDT

15. Taco Smell
    • Re: Taco Smell (26 lines)
      From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 22:34:01 -0500
    • Taco Smell (19 lines)
      From: Brian Betty <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 15:42:06 -0400
    • Re: Taco Smell (20 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 14:46:48 -0400

16. The Noli proverb.
    • Re: The Noli proverb. (36 lines)
      From: Ed Heil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 14:37:23 -0400
    • The Noli proverb. (65 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 13:45:11 +0200

17. The skin of God
    • Re: The skin of God (51 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 22:01:56 +0100
    • Re: The skin of God (21 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 22:57:24 -0400
    • Re: The skin of God (30 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 23:21:45 +0100
    • Re: The skin of God (19 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 14:31:57 -0400

18. THEORY: third-person imperatives
    • Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives (84 lines)
      From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 07:10:03 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives (32 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 02:23:00 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives (59 lines)
      From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 07:04:06 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives (26 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 22:55:46 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives (44 lines)
      From: Raymond A. Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 22:27:41 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives (58 lines)
      From: Padraic Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 13:48:24 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives (39 lines)
      From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 12:04:48 -0500
    • Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives (62 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 12:39:35 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives (30 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 14:20:14 +0200
    • Re: THEORY: third-person imperatives (26 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 14:14:27 +0200

19. THEORY: Verb voice
    • Re: THEORY: Verb voice (30 lines)
      From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 23:34:54 -0400
    • THEORY: Verb voice (23 lines)
      From: Tom Wier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 22:32:25 -0500

20. Web page update
    • Web page update (24 lines)
      From: Irina Rempt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 23:27:38 +0100