Conlang
Mailing List July 1999, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Back!
(14 messages)
Case
(48 messages)
Charles [WAS: THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences]
CHAT: "correctness" and syllabification
(3 messages)
CHAT: Ancient Planet Names
CHAT: Another NatLang i like
CHAT: Middle English
CHAT: Middle English (was: Ungrammaticalisation)
(3 messages)
CHAT: Stew
CHAT: the language code (longish)
CHAT: the language code (tepa)
CHAT: Un-American activities, was Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(4 messages)
CHAT: vocatives (was: Re: ...y'know)
(5 messages)
CHAT: Vowel harmony (was: CHAT: Another NatLang i like)
(2 messages)
Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(16 messages)
Contact Ulcers (WAS: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon)
(3 messages)
deseret conlangcon '99!
(9 messages)
double negation (was: Re: Sad translation)
(2 messages)
Egyptian writing more ancient than thought
Hangkerimce and Moscha
(2 messages)
Language classification: Re: Tepa & CHAT: Re: minimum phonemes, was Re: vrindo
Negation (was Re: Sad translation)
New Language
(3 messages)
new language; langmaker
new webpage
(6 messages)
Not, I repeat, this is Not a Translation Exercise...
(2 messages)
Ol vera lahef! don't forget me!
Phonology question
(10 messages)
Piat (was: Another NatLang i like)
(6 messages)
Piat an isolate?
(2 messages)
Re : new language; langmaker
(2 messages)
Re : new webpage
(2 messages)
Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(12 messages)
Re : TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
Re(2): Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
RV: Ungrammaticalization?
Sad translation
(6 messages)
signing off for a while
Star Names (was; Re; Back!)
(8 messages)
Strong/strange verbs and spoonerisms (was RE: Ungrammaticalization?)
Strong/strange verbs and spoonerisms (was RE:Ungrammaticalization?)
(2 messages)
Strong/strange verbs and spoonerisms (wasRE:Ungrammaticalization?)
Tautau!, was: Ol vera lahef! don't forget me!
(2 messages)
Temporarily withdrawing
Tepa & CHAT: Re: minimum phonemes, was Re: vrindo
(3 messages)
Testing, Please delete.
THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
(10 messages)
Ungrammaticalization?
(39 messages)
Updated webpages
USAGE/THEORY: Re: Case
(9 messages)
USAGE: boughten [was: Re: Ungrammaticalization?]
USAGE: Dutch/Flemish (was: Piat)
Web page up
yet another new conlang web page
(7 messages)
Back!
Back!
(20 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back!
(54 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back!
(70 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back!
(43 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Back!
(25 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back!
(31 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back!
(46 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back!
(47 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back!
(42 lines)
From:
J. Barefoot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back!
(31 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back!
(42 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back!
(50 lines)
From:
some Cook, Himes, or Concepcion <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back!
(67 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Back!
(44 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Case
Re: Case
(42 lines)
From:
A Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(49 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(137 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(38 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(59 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(34 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(80 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(19 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(18 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(38 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(44 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(63 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(34 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(23 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(50 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(41 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(66 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(39 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(86 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(19 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(32 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(40 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(29 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(37 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(67 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(56 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(36 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(43 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(28 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(27 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(29 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(37 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(27 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(23 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(27 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(67 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(23 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(38 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(43 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(48 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Case
(45 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Charles [WAS: THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences]
Charles [WAS: THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences]
(20 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: "correctness" and syllabification
CHAT: "correctness" and syllabification
(49 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "correctness" and syllabification
(31 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: "correctness" and syllabification
(38 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Ancient Planet Names
CHAT: Ancient Planet Names
(75 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Another NatLang i like
Re: CHAT: Another NatLang i like
(21 lines)
From:
A Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Middle English
Re: CHAT: Middle English
(62 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Middle English (was: Ungrammaticalisation)
CHAT: Middle English (was: Ungrammaticalisation)
(42 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Middle English (was: Ungrammaticalisation)
(37 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Middle English (was: Ungrammaticalisation)
(18 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Stew
Re: CHAT: Stew
(31 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: the language code (longish)
Re: CHAT: the language code (longish)
(41 lines)
From:
R. Nierse <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: the language code (tepa)
Re: CHAT: the language code (tepa)
(22 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Un-American activities, was Re: Ungrammaticalization?
CHAT: Un-American activities, was Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(38 lines)
From:
J. Barefoot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Un-American activities, was Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Un-American activities, was Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(34 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Un-American activities, was Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(25 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: vocatives (was: Re: ...y'know)
CHAT: vocatives (was: Re: ...y'know)
(52 lines)
From:
A Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: vocatives (was: Re: ...y'know)
(31 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: vocatives (was: Re: ...y'know)
(43 lines)
From:
A Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: vocatives (was: Re: ...y'know)
(48 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: vocatives (was: Re: ...y'know)
(27 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Vowel harmony (was: CHAT: Another NatLang i like)
Re: CHAT: Vowel harmony (was: CHAT: Another NatLang i like)
(60 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Vowel harmony (was: CHAT: Another NatLang i like)
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(37 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(35 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(45 lines)
From:
J. Barefoot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(61 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(37 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(46 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(57 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(38 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(45 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(40 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(54 lines)
From:
nicole <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(37 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(20 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(34 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(42 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(47 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Contact Ulcers (WAS: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon)
Contact Ulcers (WAS: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon)
(28 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contact Ulcers (WAS: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon)
(44 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contact Ulcers (WAS: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon)
(26 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
deseret conlangcon '99!
deseret conlangcon '99!
(19 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: deseret conlangcon '99!
(22 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: deseret conlangcon '99!
(33 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: deseret conlangcon '99!
(44 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: deseret conlangcon '99!
(36 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: deseret conlangcon '99!
(27 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: deseret conlangcon '99!
(43 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: deseret conlangcon '99!
(42 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: deseret conlangcon '99!
(25 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
double negation (was: Re: Sad translation)
double negation (was: Re: Sad translation)
(61 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: double negation (was: Re: Sad translation)
(105 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Egyptian writing more ancient than thought
Egyptian writing more ancient than thought
(382 lines)
From:
alypius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hangkerimce and Moscha
Hangkerimce and Moscha
(125 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hangkerimce and Moscha
(155 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Language classification: Re: Tepa & CHAT: Re: minimum phonemes, was Re: vrindo
Language classification: Re: Tepa & CHAT: Re: minimum phonemes, was Re: vrindo
(31 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Negation (was Re: Sad translation)
Negation (was Re: Sad translation)
(34 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Language
New Language
(185 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language
(74 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Language
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
new language; langmaker
new language; langmaker
(45 lines)
From:
J. Barefoot <
[log in to unmask]
>
new webpage
new webpage
(19 lines)
From:
J. Barefoot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new webpage
(48 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new webpage
(37 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new webpage
(27 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new webpage
(31 lines)
From:
J. Barefoot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: new webpage
(29 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Not, I repeat, this is Not a Translation Exercise...
Re: Not, I repeat, this is Not a Translation Exercise...
(50 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Not, I repeat, this is Not a Translation Exercise...
(56 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ol vera lahef! don't forget me!
Ol vera lahef! don't forget me!
(28 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonology question
Re: Phonology question
(33 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology question
(25 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology question
(31 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology question
(29 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology question
(39 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology question
(47 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology question
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology question
(20 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology question
(17 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology question
(18 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Piat (was: Another NatLang i like)
Piat (was: Another NatLang i like)
(113 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piat (was: Another NatLang i like)
(45 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piat (was: Another NatLang i like)
(29 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piat (was: Another NatLang i like)
(28 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piat (was: Another NatLang i like)
(30 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piat (was: Another NatLang i like)
(22 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Piat an isolate?
Piat an isolate?
(24 lines)
From:
A Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Piat an isolate?
(50 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : new language; langmaker
Re : new language; langmaker
(171 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : new language; langmaker
(188 lines)
From:
J. Barefoot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : new webpage
Re : new webpage
(149 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : new webpage
(56 lines)
From:
J. Barefoot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(31 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(42 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(22 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(28 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(36 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(33 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(21 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(40 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(20 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(31 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(37 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
Re: Re : TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
(26 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
Re: Re(2): Concosmic Conlocation (was; Re; Back!)
(16 lines)
From:
David T Shoda <
[log in to unmask]
>
RV: Ungrammaticalization?
RV: Ungrammaticalization?
(21 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sad translation
Sad translation
(36 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sad translation
(36 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sad translation
(123 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sad translation
(82 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sad translation
(33 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sad translation
(45 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
signing off for a while
signing off for a while
(17 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Star Names (was; Re; Back!)
Star Names (was; Re; Back!)
(44 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Names (was; Re; Back!)
(44 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Names (was; Re; Back!)
(21 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Names (was; Re; Back!)
(33 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Names (was; Re; Back!)
(75 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Names (was; Re; Back!)
(19 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Names (was; Re; Back!)
(42 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Names (was; Re; Back!)
(31 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Strong/strange verbs and spoonerisms (was RE: Ungrammaticalization?)
Strong/strange verbs and spoonerisms (was RE: Ungrammaticalization?)
(39 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Strong/strange verbs and spoonerisms (was RE:Ungrammaticalization?)
Re: Strong/strange verbs and spoonerisms (was RE:Ungrammaticalization?)
(51 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strong/strange verbs and spoonerisms (was RE:Ungrammaticalization?)
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Strong/strange verbs and spoonerisms (wasRE:Ungrammaticalization?)
Re: Strong/strange verbs and spoonerisms (wasRE:Ungrammaticalization?)
(25 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tautau!, was: Ol vera lahef! don't forget me!
Tautau!, was: Ol vera lahef! don't forget me!
(47 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tautau!, was: Ol vera lahef! don't forget me!
(17 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Temporarily withdrawing
Temporarily withdrawing
(22 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tepa & CHAT: Re: minimum phonemes, was Re: vrindo
Tepa & CHAT: Re: minimum phonemes, was Re: vrindo
(56 lines)
From:
A Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tepa & CHAT: Re: minimum phonemes, was Re: vrindo
(32 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tepa & CHAT: Re: minimum phonemes, was Re: vrindo
(45 lines)
From:
A Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Testing, Please delete.
Testing, Please delete.
(9 lines)
From:
Gustavo Eulalio <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
THEORY: Connolly: Interpreting ergative sentences
(275 lines)
From:
Lars Henrik Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
Re: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
(22 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
(210 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
(139 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
(21 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
(31 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
(142 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
(43 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
(46 lines)
From:
Kristian Jensen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
(32 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANSLATION: Grandfather and the dragon
(46 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ungrammaticalization?
Ungrammaticalization?
(39 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(26 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ungrammaticalization?
(71 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(70 lines)
From:
J. Barefoot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(109 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(36 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(30 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(81 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(29 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Ungrammaticalization?
(26 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(20 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(28 lines)
From:
Hawksinger <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(22 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(27 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(70 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(38 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(24 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(24 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(28 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(33 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(45 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(48 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(53 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(33 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(18 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(20 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(22 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(18 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(36 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(61 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(18 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(31 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(34 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(37 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(31 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(48 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(28 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ungrammaticalization?
(26 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Updated webpages
Updated webpages
(14 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE/THEORY: Re: Case
USAGE/THEORY: Re: Case
(57 lines)
From:
A Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE/THEORY: Re: Case
(40 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE/THEORY: Re: Case
(44 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE/THEORY: Re: Case
(41 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE/THEORY: Re: Case
(44 lines)
From:
Raymond A. Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE/THEORY: Re: Case
(48 lines)
From:
Nik Taylor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE/THEORY: Re: Case
(29 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE/THEORY: Re: Case
(24 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE/THEORY: Re: Case
(35 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: boughten [was: Re: Ungrammaticalization?]
USAGE: boughten [was: Re: Ungrammaticalization?]
(33 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Dutch/Flemish (was: Piat)
USAGE: Dutch/Flemish (was: Piat)
(32 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Web page up
Web page up
(17 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
yet another new conlang web page
yet another new conlang web page
(18 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: yet another new conlang web page
(44 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: yet another new conlang web page
(33 lines)
From:
J. Barefoot <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: yet another new conlang web page
(55 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: yet another new conlang web page
(24 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: yet another new conlang web page
(43 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: yet another new conlang web page
(48 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU