Conlang
Mailing List August 1999, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
'per': was: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answers & proposal
(5 messages)
A question
(18 messages)
A tale of a programming conlanger
(8 messages)
And now... a new conlang!
(4 messages)
Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
(8 messages)
asian hoaxlang
(3 messages)
Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (was Artyom Kouzminykh; Answes&proposal)
Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (was ArtyomKouzminykh; Answ
Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (was ArtyomKouzminykh; Answes&proposal)
Basque Creole
(3 messages)
Celticonlang list is moving to Onelist.
(3 messages)
CHAT: apology and some whining
CHAT: Jesus quote (was Re: Celticonlang list is moving to Onelist.)
CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(11 messages)
CHAT: Re: The future of the English second person plural
chat: weird names, was Re: conlanging,the ultimate feminist subversion
chat: weird names,was Re: conlanging,the ultimate feminist s...
(2 messages)
conjunction disjunction (re: going without "without"
Conlang Software
(10 messages)
conlang.org
(23 messages)
conlang.org update
(8 messages)
directing email (was Re: conlang.org
(3 messages)
Elet Anta text
FAQ-builders (was: Re: conlang.org update)
(2 messages)
Fonts revisited
(3 messages)
Future Spanish
(6 messages)
Future Spanish: update
(2 messages)
Goblin phonology
(6 messages)
Goblin? errrr... Greek, Latin and Hebrew phonology
(3 messages)
going without "without"
(28 messages)
going without "without" - problem solved
hebrew, the movie Pi
(5 messages)
I've got a translation problem
Morphology of the noun in the New Language.
mutation?
Negation, www update, was: Re: going without "without"
New member
Not going to the store, was: going without "without"
(2 messages)
On holiday again ;-)
Proto-Wanic phonology 1
Pulse-Pounding Semantics Question
(2 messages)
question about the degrees of the adjective
(9 messages)
Question: help me!
(6 messages)
Re : Question: help me!
Re : Re: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
Re : Re: going without "without"
(3 messages)
Re : Re: Re : Re: Sawilan Constructions
Re : Re: Sawilan Constructions
(5 messages)
Re(2): CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(4 messages)
Re(2): Future Spanish
(2 messages)
Re(2): The future of the English second person plural (was Re: ...
Re(2): venge of the Mutant Ninja Consonants (Re: mutation?
revised orthography
(3 messages)
Sawilan Constructions
Silent letters in Irish (was: RE: Re(2): German Spelling Reform (fwd))
The future of the English second person plural (was Re: A question)
(6 messages)
The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
(11 messages)
The future of the English second person plural (was Re:Aquestion)
The future of the English second person plural (was Re; Aquestion)
(2 messages)
TRANS: a love poem
(7 messages)
TRANS: Eyes
Update to Phaleran webpages
Velocity and acceleration
venge of the Mutant Ninja Consonants (Re: mutation?
(3 messages)
venge of the Mutant Ninja Consonants (Re; mutation?
WH
yall, youse, youguys...
(3 messages)
'per': was: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answers & proposal
'per': was: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answers & proposal
(23 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'per': was: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answers & proposal
(27 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'per': was: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answers & proposal
(33 lines)
From:
alypius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'per': was: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answers & proposal
(28 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): 'per': was: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answers & proposal
(30 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
A question
Re: A question
(93 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(38 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(39 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(28 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(34 lines)
From:
alypius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(47 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(33 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(40 lines)
From:
alypius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(39 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(59 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): A question
(26 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(33 lines)
From:
Brad Coon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): A question
(24 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(36 lines)
From:
alypius <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): A question
(33 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(28 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(3): A question
(25 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A question
(38 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
A tale of a programming conlanger
A tale of a programming conlanger
(68 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A tale of a programming conlanger
(14 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A tale of a programming conlanger
(43 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A tale of a programming conlanger
(62 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A tale of a programming conlanger
(37 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A tale of a programming conlanger
(32 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A tale of a programming conlanger
(44 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A tale of a programming conlanger
(25 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
And now... a new conlang!
Re: And now... a new conlang!
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: And now... a new conlang!
(82 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): And now... a new conlang!
(21 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: And now... a new conlang!
(36 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
(180 lines)
From:
Artem Kouzminykh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
(290 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
(177 lines)
From:
Artem Kouzminykh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
(82 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
(38 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
(35 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
(36 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
(151 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
asian hoaxlang
asian hoaxlang
(18 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: asian hoaxlang
(25 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: asian hoaxlang
(23 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (was Artyom Kouzminykh; Answes&proposal)
Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (was Artyom Kouzminykh; Answes&proposal)
(32 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (was ArtyomKouzminykh; Answ
Re(2): Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (was ArtyomKouzminykh; Answ
(41 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (was ArtyomKouzminykh; Answes&proposal)
Re: Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (was ArtyomKouzminykh; Answes&proposal)
(55 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Basque Creole
Basque Creole
(13 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basque Creole
(24 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Basque Creole
(25 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Celticonlang list is moving to Onelist.
Celticonlang list is moving to Onelist.
(23 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Celticonlang list is moving to Onelist.
(39 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Celticonlang list is moving to Onelist.
(50 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: apology and some whining
CHAT: apology and some whining
(55 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Jesus quote (was Re: Celticonlang list is moving to Onelist.)
CHAT: Jesus quote (was Re: Celticonlang list is moving to Onelist.)
(26 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(28 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(38 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(26 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(31 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(29 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(42 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(18 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(41 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(31 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(26 lines)
From:
Joe Mondello <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(16 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: The future of the English second person plural
CHAT: Re: The future of the English second person plural
(20 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
chat: weird names, was Re: conlanging,the ultimate feminist subversion
Re: chat: weird names, was Re: conlanging,the ultimate feminist subversion
(32 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
chat: weird names,was Re: conlanging,the ultimate feminist s...
Re: chat: weird names,was Re: conlanging,the ultimate feminist s...
(38 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): chat: weird names,was Re: conlanging,the ultimate feminist s...
(20 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
conjunction disjunction (re: going without "without"
conjunction disjunction (re: going without "without"
(65 lines)
From:
Jay Bowks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Software
Conlang Software
(46 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Software
(50 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Software
(11 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Software
(24 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Software
(40 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Software
(39 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Software
(15 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Software
(35 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Software
(23 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Conlang Software
(28 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlang.org
conlang.org
(68 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(92 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(47 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(89 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(31 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(39 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(28 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(28 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(25 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(46 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(51 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(38 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(31 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(25 lines)
From:
Piermaria Maraziti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(28 lines)
From:
Piermaria Maraziti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(20 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(40 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(36 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(19 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(34 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(81 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(24 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org
(40 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlang.org update
conlang.org update
(56 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org update
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org update
(39 lines)
From:
Piermaria Maraziti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org update
(25 lines)
From:
Piermaria Maraziti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org update
(37 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org update
(43 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlang.org update
(26 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlang.org update
(43 lines)
From:
Piermaria Maraziti <
[log in to unmask]
>
directing email (was Re: conlang.org
Re: directing email (was Re: conlang.org
(47 lines)
From:
JJB <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: directing email (was Re: conlang.org
(27 lines)
From:
Piermaria Maraziti <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: directing email (was Re: conlang.org
(22 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Elet Anta text
Elet Anta text
(224 lines)
From:
John Fisher <
[log in to unmask]
>
FAQ-builders (was: Re: conlang.org update)
FAQ-builders (was: Re: conlang.org update)
(22 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: FAQ-builders (was: Re: conlang.org update)
(25 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fonts revisited
Re: Fonts revisited
(42 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fonts revisited
(30 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fonts revisited
(18 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Future Spanish
Future Spanish
(44 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future Spanish
(71 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future Spanish
(58 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future Spanish
(39 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future Spanish
(96 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Future Spanish
(17 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Future Spanish: update
Future Spanish: update
(67 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Future Spanish: update
(42 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Goblin phonology
Re: Goblin phonology
(45 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goblin phonology
(19 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goblin phonology
(25 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goblin phonology
(34 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goblin phonology
(51 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goblin phonology
(43 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Goblin? errrr... Greek, Latin and Hebrew phonology
Re: Goblin? errrr... Greek, Latin and Hebrew phonology
(30 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goblin? errrr... Greek, Latin and Hebrew phonology
(31 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Goblin? errrr... Greek, Latin and Hebrew phonology
(32 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
going without "without"
going without "without"
(107 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
going without "without"
(45 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(40 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(36 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(108 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(54 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(30 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(178 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(22 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(82 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(40 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(87 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(103 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(22 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(27 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(48 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(50 lines)
From:
JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(31 lines)
From:
Padraic Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
going without "without"
(20 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(28 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): going without "without"
(23 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(69 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(22 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(90 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(40 lines)
From:
Gerald Koenig <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(19 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(38 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: going without "without"
(42 lines)
From:
Adam Parrish <
[log in to unmask]
>
going without "without" - problem solved
going without "without" - problem solved
(37 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
hebrew, the movie Pi
Re: hebrew, the movie Pi
(43 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hebrew, the movie Pi
(92 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hebrew, the movie Pi
(52 lines)
From:
Jay Bowks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hebrew, the movie Pi
(36 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: hebrew, the movie Pi
(64 lines)
From:
Jay Bowks <
[log in to unmask]
>
I've got a translation problem
I've got a translation problem
(40 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Morphology of the noun in the New Language.
Morphology of the noun in the New Language.
(223 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
mutation?
mutation?
(29 lines)
From:
dirk elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Negation, www update, was: Re: going without "without"
Negation, www update, was: Re: going without "without"
(31 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
New member
New member
(19 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Not going to the store, was: going without "without"
Not going to the store, was: going without "without"
(83 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Not going to the store, was: going without "without"
(38 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
On holiday again ;-)
On holiday again ;-)
(18 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Proto-Wanic phonology 1
Proto-Wanic phonology 1
(122 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pulse-Pounding Semantics Question
Re: Pulse-Pounding Semantics Question
(46 lines)
From:
Daniel Andreasson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Pulse-Pounding Semantics Question
(59 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
question about the degrees of the adjective
question about the degrees of the adjective
(64 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about the degrees of the adjective
(45 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about the degrees of the adjective
(33 lines)
From:
Gustavo Eulalio <
[log in to unmask]
>
question about the degrees of the adjective
(111 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about the degrees of the adjective
(56 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about the degrees of the adjective
(150 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
question about the degrees of the adjective
(55 lines)
From:
Jim Grossmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about the degrees of the adjective
(80 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: question about the degrees of the adjective
(48 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Question: help me!
Question: help me!
(77 lines)
From:
Artem Kouzminykh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question: help me!
(36 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question: help me!
(22 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Question: help me!
(28 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question: help me!
(68 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Question: help me!
(37 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Question: help me!
Re : Question: help me!
(30 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
Re : Re: Artyom Kouzminykh: Answes&proposal
(40 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: going without "without"
Re : Re: going without "without"
(63 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: going without "without"
(41 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : Re: going without "without"
(49 lines)
From:
Joe Mondello <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: Re : Re: Sawilan Constructions
Re : Re: Re : Re: Sawilan Constructions
(148 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re : Re: Sawilan Constructions
Re : Re: Sawilan Constructions
(62 lines)
From:
From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : Re: Sawilan Constructions
(42 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : Re: Sawilan Constructions
(107 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : Re: Sawilan Constructions
(30 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re : Re: Sawilan Constructions
(18 lines)
From:
Charles <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
Re: Re(2): CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(34 lines)
From:
Irina Rempt-Drijfhout <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re(2): CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(12 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Re(2): CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(23 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Re(2): CHAT: Most boring part of constructing a new language?
(21 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Future Spanish
Re: Re(2): Future Spanish
(33 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): Re(2): Future Spanish
(22 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): The future of the English second person plural (was Re: ...
Re: Re(2): The future of the English second person plural (was Re: ...
(19 lines)
From:
Dale Morris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): venge of the Mutant Ninja Consonants (Re: mutation?
Re: Re(2): venge of the Mutant Ninja Consonants (Re: mutation?
(33 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
revised orthography
revised orthography
(44 lines)
From:
Fabian <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: revised orthography
(34 lines)
From:
Boudewijn Rempt <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: revised orthography
(26 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sawilan Constructions
Re: Sawilan Constructions
(82 lines)
From:
Ed Heil <
[log in to unmask]
>
Silent letters in Irish (was: RE: Re(2): German Spelling Reform (fwd))
Silent letters in Irish (was: RE: Re(2): German Spelling Reform (fwd))
(63 lines)
From:
Josh Brandt-Young <
[log in to unmask]
>
The future of the English second person plural (was Re: A question)
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: A question)
(26 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: A question)
(45 lines)
From:
R G Roberts <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: A question)
(25 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: A question)
(66 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: A question)
(29 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: A question)
(24 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
(32 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
(32 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
(34 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
(42 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
(31 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
(82 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
(29 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
(22 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
(45 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
(30 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re: Aquestion)
(36 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
The future of the English second person plural (was Re:Aquestion)
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re:Aquestion)
(42 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
The future of the English second person plural (was Re; Aquestion)
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re; Aquestion)
(37 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The future of the English second person plural (was Re; Aquestion)
(26 lines)
From:
Matt Pearson <
[log in to unmask]
>
TRANS: a love poem
Re: TRANS: a love poem
(111 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANS: a love poem
(22 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANS: a love poem
(59 lines)
From:
FFlores <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANS: a love poem
(36 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANS: a love poem
(102 lines)
From:
nicole perrin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANS: a love poem
(70 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TRANS: a love poem
(25 lines)
From:
Patrick Dunn <
[log in to unmask]
>
TRANS: Eyes
Re: TRANS: Eyes
(75 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Update to Phaleran webpages
Update to Phaleran webpages
(38 lines)
From:
Tom Wier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Velocity and acceleration
Velocity and acceleration
(40 lines)
From:
Joe Mondello <
[log in to unmask]
>
venge of the Mutant Ninja Consonants (Re: mutation?
Re: venge of the Mutant Ninja Consonants (Re: mutation?
(44 lines)
From:
Jay Bowks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: venge of the Mutant Ninja Consonants (Re: mutation?
(34 lines)
From:
John Cowan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re(2): venge of the Mutant Ninja Consonants (Re: mutation?
(28 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
venge of the Mutant Ninja Consonants (Re; mutation?
Re: venge of the Mutant Ninja Consonants (Re; mutation?
(36 lines)
From:
Steg Belsky <
[log in to unmask]
>
WH
Re: WH
(28 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
yall, youse, youguys...
yall, youse, youguys...
(32 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: yall, youse, youguys...
(26 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: yall, youse, youguys...
(29 lines)
From:
Carlos Thompson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU