Conlang Mailing List – August 1999, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (2 messages)
• barred-h (14 messages)
• Big Six (2000 model) phonology -- advice? (2 messages)
• demuan identifiers re-visited
• Encoding problems (was Re: Re: C, K, Q, J and wierd orthgraphy)
• Fw: [gothic-l] Re: More input ( POLL: Neologism: Computer
• length of the year
• More about the morphology of the noun in my NPL
• More notes on Tech
• New Script (2 messages)
• Phonology - request for comments (5 messages)
• possessors (was: Re: More about the morphology...) (2 messages)
• Proposed phonology for my new language (5 messages)
• Re : Re: Big Six (2000 model) phonology -- advice?
• Revised phonology
• The length of the year (was:RE: barred-h)
• The morphology of the verb in Chasma"o"cho
• Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers
• Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers re-visited) (7 messages)
• What is a year, but that by any other name 'twould be as long.
• Y2K Parable
• Year length in days (was: barred-h)

1. Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match!
   • Re: Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (70 lines)
     From: Thomas Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (21 lines)
     From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>

2. barred-h
   • Re: barred-h (36 lines)
     From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (37 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (35 lines)
     From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (46 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (15 lines)
     From: Hese Kiel <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (35 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (20 lines)
     From: CARLOS THOMPSON <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (36 lines)
     From: éò÷åáé ãåã <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (21 lines)
     From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (21 lines)
     From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (30 lines)
     From: Brad Coon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (47 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (60 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: barred-h (29 lines)
     From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

3. Big Six (2000 model) phonology -- advice?
   • Re: Big Six (2000 model) phonology -- advice? (21 lines)
     From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Big Six (2000 model) phonology -- advice? (50 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

4. demuan identifiers re-visited
   • Re: demuan identifiers re-visited (47 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

5. Encoding problems (was Re: Re: C, K, Q, J and wierd orthgraphy)
   • Re: Encoding problems (was Re: Re: C, K, Q, J and wierd orthgraphy) (46 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

6. Fw: [gothic-l] Re: More input ( POLL: Neologism: Computer
   • Fw: [gothic-l] Re: More input ( POLL: Neologism: Computer (36 lines)
     From: Jay Bowks <[log in to unmask]>

7. length of the year
   • length of the year (21 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

8. More about the morphology of the noun in my NPL
   • Re: More about the morphology of the noun in my NPL (109 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

9. More notes on Tech
   • More notes on Tech (68 lines)
     From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

10. New Script
    • Re: New Script (22 lines)
      From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re(3): New Script (21 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

11. Phonology - request for comments
    • Phonology - request for comments (100 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonology - request for comments (47 lines)
      From: Josh Roth <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonology - request for comments (29 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonology - request for comments (84 lines)
      From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonology - request for comments (52 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

12. possessors (was: Re: More about the morphology...)
    • possessors (was: Re: More about the morphology...) (56 lines)
      From: JOEL MATTHEW PEARSON <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: possessors (was: Re: More about the morphology...) (72 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

13. Proposed phonology for my new language
    • Proposed phonology for my new language (47 lines)
      From: Daniel Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proposed phonology for my new language (106 lines)
      From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proposed phonology for my new language (33 lines)
      From: Daniel Seriff <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proposed phonology for my new language (28 lines)
      From: BP Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Proposed phonology for my new language (49 lines)
      From: Danny Wier <[log in to unmask]>

14. Re : Re: Big Six (2000 model) phonology -- advice?
    • Re : Re: Big Six (2000 model) phonology -- advice? (28 lines)
      From: From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <[log in to unmask]>

15. Revised phonology
    • Revised phonology (17 lines)
      From: Daniel Seriff <[log in to unmask]>

16. The length of the year (was:RE: barred-h)
    • The length of the year (was:RE: barred-h) (32 lines)
      From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>

17. The morphology of the verb in Chasma"o"cho
    • The morphology of the verb in Chasma"o"cho (352 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire <[log in to unmask]>

18. Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers
    • Re: Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers (25 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>

19. Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers re-visited)
    • Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers re-visited) (24 lines)
      From: Daniel Andreasson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers re-visited) (45 lines)
      From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers re-visited) (40 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers re-visited) (33 lines)
      From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers re-visited) (39 lines)
      From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers re-visited) (52 lines)
      From: Fabian <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tolkien's elfish script (was: Re: demuan identifiers re-visited) (30 lines)
      From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>

20. What is a year, but that by any other name 'twould be as long.
    • What is a year, but that by any other name 'twould be as long. (65 lines)
      From: Lars Henrik Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>

21. Y2K Parable
    • Y2K Parable (16 lines)
      From: FFlores <[log in to unmask]>

22. Year length in days (was: barred-h)
    • Year length in days (was: barred-h) (19 lines)
      From: John Cowan <[log in to unmask]>