Francois Lachance wrote:
>by asking if discussions have gone at the question of evolution from the
>perspective of minimal deprecation ... might go a ways to achieving
>not so much backwards compatability as validation under P5?
I confess now that under Michael Beddow's malign influence I went out
and bought a bottle of tonic water, then had and G&T. This may well explain
why I have to ask if you could possibly expand on the above for those
of us with deadened brains? what exactly are you suggesting?