David J. Peterson wrote:

> I was just looking over your page.  A couple questions:
>

Problem is, Pascal's German, so it's bound to be imperfect.  I think
there should be a few modifications.

> -How would AE differentiate between the [dZ] in a word like
> "language" and the "dg" in a made-up word like "midguard"?
>

Well, of course there's the possibility that it follows English rules
and 'softens' before an orthographic front vowel.

> -Same goes for something like "missionary" and "vishnu",
> the first with a reduced vowel between the [S] and [n], and
> the latter without?


I'd put a schwa-letter there (which I'd suggest to be e-umlaut, a la
Luxembourgish).

>
> -Curious: Why did you use "ae" for schwa, rather than "a",
> when you use "a" for carrot [V]?
>
Again, for Schwa I'd suggest e-umlaut.  For [V], I think we could have
o-tilde, which is Estonian for [7].  I'm a big fan of taking examples
from European languages.

> -According to your chart, you use "a" for [V] and [A]/[Q].
> Does this mean "cot" and "cut" would be spelled the same?
>

As I said, o-tilde would work.

> -Not familiar with British pronunciation.  Does the "i" in
> "technique" rhyme with the "i" in "bit" or the "ee" in "beet"?
>

The latter.  The other one would be understood as 'Technic'.