I am reasonably confident this was fixed. Lemme check ... yup. The
The source to the development version of the definition of <div>
does not have this problem. Nor do the schemas I generated last week.
This makes me think that either
a) Roma is pointing to the released version of the schemas, and the
fix ws made after the release (I haven't checked); or
b) Roma has an old version of the schemas and should be fixed
 Currently at
but if I can get my act together, that path will change over the weekend.